Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:46:34.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Choice of Lattice Planes in X-Ray Strain Measurements of Single Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Balder Ortner*
Affiliation:
Erich-Schmid-Institut f. Festkörperphysik d. Österreichischen Akademie d. Wissenschaften Leoben, Austria
Get access

Extract

It is well known that all of the six independent components of the strain tensor can be calculated if the linear strains in six appropriate directions are known (e.g.). That calculation is to solve a system of linear equations, whose coefficients are defined by the orientations of the measured planes. The strains are determined by lattice plane distance measurements using X-rays.

The linear equation system can only be solved if the matrix of coefficients has rank. Whether this condition is met or not can be decided without calculating a determinant just from geometric relationships among the planes to be measured. A demand beyond that necessary condition is to make the matrix of coefficients so that the accuracy of the calculated strain tensor is best. From error calculation we know that there exist distinct ratios between the inevitable measurement errors and the errors of the calculated strain components. These ratios depend strongly on the geometric relationship among the lattice planes. It is the purpose of this paper to show how lattice planes should be chosen in order to get these ratios as small as possible i.e. to get a maximum of accuracy at a given number of measurements, or a minimum of experimental effort if a distinct limit of error is to be reached.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Imura, T., Weissmann, S. and Slade, J.J., A Study of Age Hardening of Al-3.85% Cu by the Divergent X-ray Beam Method, Acta Cryst. 15: 786 (1962)Google Scholar
2. Bollenrath, F.,, Hauk, V., Müller, E.H., Röntgenographische Verformungsmessung an Einzelkristalliten verschiedener KorngröBe, Metall 22: 442 (1968)Google Scholar
3. Taira, S., “X-ray Studies on Mechanical Behaviour of Materials”, The Society of Mat.Sci., Japan, Kyoto, (1974) (cited after4)Google Scholar
4. Gocijk, J., Nannenberg, S., and Willemse, P.F., A Goniometer for the Measurement of Stresses in Single Crystal and CoarseGrained Specimens, J.Appl.Cryst. 13: 128 (1980)Google Scholar
5. Ortner, B., Röntgenographische Spannungsmessung an einkristallir. en Proben, in: “Eigenspannungen, Mac’nerauch, E., Hauk, V., Edts., Deutsche Ges.Metallkunde, Oberursel (1983)Google Scholar
6. Ortner, B., to be publishedGoogle Scholar
7. Hardtwig, E., “Fehler. und Ausgleichsrechnung”, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim (1968)Google Scholar
8. Nye, J.F., “Physical Properties of Crystals”, Clarendon Press,Oxford (1969)Google Scholar