Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:53:57.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-ray Fractographic Approach to Fracture Toughness of AISI 4340 Steel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Yukio Hirose
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Kanazawa University 1-1 Marunouchi, Kanazawa 920, Japan
Zenjiro Yajima
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Kanazawa Institute of Technology 7-1 Oogigaoka, NonoichiKanazawa 921, Japan
Keisuke Tanaka
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto University Yoshida Honmachi, Sakyo-kuKyoto 606, Japan
Get access

Extract

X-ray diffraction observation of the material internal structure beneath fracture surfaces provide fracture analysists with useful information to investigate the conditions and mechanisms of fracture. X-ray fractography is a generic name given to this technique. In the present study, the residual stress on the fracture surface of the compact tension specimens for toughness tests was measured by X-ray diffraction. The effects of notch-tip radius and tempering temperature on the fracture toughness are discussed based on the results of X-ray fractography and fracture micromechanisms.

Type
VIII. X-Ray Strain and Stress Determination
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tairaj, S. and Tanaka, K., “Fracture Surface Analysis by X-Ray Diffraction Techniques,” J. Iron and Steel Ins. Jap., 65:450 (1979).Google Scholar
2.Committee on X-Ray Study on Mechanical Behavior of Materials, “X-Ray Fractography,” J. Soci. Mat. Sci. Jap., 31:244 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Standard, A.T., “Standard Test Method for PLANE-STRAIN FRACTURE TOUGHNESS OF METALLIC MATERIALS,” Part 10, E 399-81 (1981).Google Scholar
4. Standard, A.T., “Standard Test for JIC A MEASURE OF FRACTURE TOUGHNESS,” Part 10, E 813-81 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Yajima, Z., Hirose, Y., and Tanaka, K., “X-Ray Diffraction Observation of Fractured Surface of Fracture Toughness Specimen of High Strength Steel,” J. Jap. Soc. Strength and Fracture of Materials, 16:59 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Yajima, Z., Hirose, Y., and Tanaka, K., “X-Ray Observation of Fracture Surface in High Strength Steel,” Proc. 25th Jap. Cons-Mat. Res., 50 (1982).Google Scholar
7. Yajima, Z., Y.Hirose, and Tanaka, K., “X-Ray Diffraction Observation of Fracture Surfaces of Ductile Cast Iron,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, 26:291 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Hirose, Y., Yajima, Z., and Tanaka, K., “X-Ray Fractography on Stress Corrosion Cracking of High Strength Steel,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, 27 (1984). Accepted for publication.Google Scholar
9. Rice, J. R., “Fracture,” Liebowitz, H., ed., II, 191, Academic Press, New York (1968).Google Scholar
10. Tanaka, K., and Hirose, Y., “Fracture Criterion for Crack Initiation from Blunt Notch,” Proc. 18th X-Ray Symposium, The Society of Material Science, Japan, 140 (1981).Google Scholar
11. Levy, N., Marcal, P. V., Ostergren, W. J., and Rice, J.R., “Small Scal Yielding Near a Crack in Plane Strain: A Finite Element Analysis,” Int. J. Frac. Mech., 7:143 (1971).Google Scholar
12. Tsushima, N., “X-Ray Fractography on Fracture Surface of Rolling Bearing,” Proc. 15th X-Ray Symposium, The Society of Material Science, Japan, 59 (1978).Google Scholar