Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:32:11.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Whole Farm Analysis of the Implications of Variable Maturity Groups on Harvest Logistics and Net Returns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2017

B. Martin ,
C. Dillon ,
T. Mark  and
T. Davis
B. Martin*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
C. Dillon
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
T. Mark
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
T. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
*
†E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A whole farm economic analysis was performed to maximize net returns utilizing variable maturity groups of corn and soybeans over different soil types. Demand for drying and storage equipment throughout harvest was generated based on profit-maximizing combinations of grain types, their respective maturity groups, and yield potential over different topsoil depths. Two marketing strategies were considered: cash and futures contract sales. It was found that drying equipment became a limiting factor in the proposed system. This prevented storage facilities from reaching full capacity and additional grain from capturing value in the futures market.

Keywords

farm managementmaturity groupharvest logisticsspecialty grains
Type
Economics
Information
Advances in Animal Biosciences , Volume 8 , Special Issue 2: Papers presented at the 11th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (ECPA 2017), John McIntyre Centre, Edinburgh, UK, July 16–20 2017 , July 2017 , pp. 668 - 671
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dantzig, GB, 1963. Linear programming and extensions . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, USA.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture NRCS 2008. Internet site: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov.Google Scholar
Edwards, William, 2015. Monthly Cost of Storing Grain. Iowa State University, n.d. Web. 19 Oct. 2016. https://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/crops/html/a2-33.html.Google Scholar
Halich, G. Western Kentucky Corn and Soybean Budgets. University of Kentucky, Apr. 2016. Web. 19 October 2016. http://www.uky.edu/Ag/AgriculturalEconomics/ halich_greg_rowcropbudgets.php.Google Scholar
Smith, A, 2013. Grain Hauling Cost Calculator. University of Tennessee, n.d. Web. 19 Oct. 2016. https://extension.tennessee.edu/WebPacket/Pages/WP-2013-12-GrainCalculator.aspx.Google Scholar
Pierce, JS. Kentucky Farm Business Management Program: Annual Summary Data 2008. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service, USA.Google Scholar
Kenimer, Richard C, Ron W, Kurd and Chad, Lee 2015. Kentucky Hybrid Corn Performance Test. Rep. no. PR-692. College of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service. N.p.: n.p., n.d. 6-7. Print.Google Scholar
Shockley, Jordan, Carl R., Dillon and Tim, Stombaugh 2011. Whole Farm Analysis of Automatic Section Control for Agricultural Machinery. Precision Agriculture 13.4, 411–420 (web).Google Scholar