Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T12:53:20.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Philosophy of Law

The Normativity of Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2024

Michael Giudice
Michael Giudice
Affiliation:
York University

Summary

In the philosophy of law there has been a proliferation of advanced work in the last thirty years on the normativity of law. Recent theories explore law's character as a special kind of convention, shared cooperative activity, and social artifact, among other perspectives, to explain the precise way in which law provides subjects with reasons for action. Yet, for all their sophistication, such accounts fail to deliver on their promise, which is to establish how law creates more than just legal reasons for action. This Element aims to survey these views and others, situate them in a broader context of theories about the nature of law, and subsequently suggest a path forward based on the methodological continuity between analytical, evaluative, and empirical approaches to law's normativity.
Get access

Keywords

lawphilosophynormativitylegal positivismnatural law
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Philosophy of Law
Online ISBN: 9781009209854
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 19 December 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, St. T. (2017). “Treatise on Law” from Summa Theologica. In Culver, K. and Giudice, M., eds., Readings in the Philosophy of Law, 3rd ed. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, pp. 27–40.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (2009). The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by W. D. Ross, edited by Brown., L. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. (2000). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1987). Anarchical Fallacies. In Waldron, J., ed., “Nonsense upon Stilts”: Bentham, Burke, and Marx on the Rights of Man. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bix, B. (2005). Legal Positivism. In Golding, M. P., ed., The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. (1992). Shared Cooperative Activity. Philosophical Review, 101(2), 327–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. (2001). The Practice of Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, R. (2017). Sociological Jurisprudence. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culver, K., and Giudice, M. (2017). The Unsteady State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, J. (2001). Evaluation and Legal Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Dickson, J. (2022). Elucidating Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1978). Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2022). The Long Arc of Legality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, K. (2016). The Functions of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emon, A. (2010). Islamic Natural Law Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, D. (2011). Reason-Giving and the Law. In Green, L. and Leiter, B., eds., Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law: Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. (1980). Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. (1998). Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, L. (1969). The Morality of Law, rev. ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, J. (2012). Law as a Leap of Faith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Giudice, M. (2015). Understanding the Nature of Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giudice, M. (2016). Imperialism and Importance in Dworkin’s Jurisprudence. In Waluchow, W. and Sciaraffa, S., eds., The Legacy of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 225–43.Google Scholar
Giudice, M. (2019). Review of Kenneth Ehrenberg, The Functions of Law (Oxford University Press, 2016). Philosophical Quarterly, 69(277), 864–67.Google Scholar
Giudice, M. (2020). Social Construction of Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giudice, M., and Schaeffer, M. (2012). Universal Jurisdiction and the Duty to Govern. In Tanguay-Renaud, F. and Stribopoulos, J., eds., Rethinking Criminal Law Theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 233–48.Google Scholar
Gkouvas, T. (2023). The Place of Coercion in Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, L. (2007). The Duty to Govern. Legal Theory, 13(3–4), 165–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, L. (2008). Positivism and the Inseparability of Laws and Morals. New York University Law Review, 83(4), 1035–58.Google Scholar
Green, L. (2023). The Normativity of Law: What is the Problem? www.uvic.ca/victoria-colloquium/assets/docs/Green_Normativity.pdf.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M (2014). The Moral Impact Theory of Law. Yale Law Journal, 123(5), 1288–343.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1958). Legal and Moral Obligation. In Melden, A. I., ed., Essays in Moral Philosophy. Seattle: Washington University Press, pp. 82–107.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1982). Essays on Bentham. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1983). Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (2012). The Concept of Law, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himma, K. (2020). Coercion and the Nature of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1985). Leviathan. Edited by Macpherson, C. B.. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1970). Pure Theory of Law, 2nd ed. Translated by M. Knight. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. (2004). Where Law and Morality Meet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1977). The Third Theory of Law. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
Postema, G. (1987). The Normativity of Law. In Gavison, R., ed., Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 81–104.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. (1995). Ethics in the Public Domain, rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1999). Practical Reason and Norms, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. (2009a). The Authority of Law, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (2009b). Between Authority and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, A. (2013). The Normative Fallacy Regarding Law’s Authority. In Sciaraffa, S. and Waluchow, W., eds., Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roughan, N. (2013). Authorities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1990). The Problems of Philosophy. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. (2015). The Force of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. (2011). Legality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. J. (1979). Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M. B. E. (1973). Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law? Yale Law Journal, 82(5), 950–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, B. (2001). A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twining, W. (2009). General Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waluchow, W. (1994). Inclusive Legal Positivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, K. P. (2018). Kayanerenkó:wa. Winnipeg, MB: University of Manitoba Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodbury-Smith, K. (2020). The Nature of Law and Potential Coercion. Ratio Juris, 33(2), 223–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yankah, E. (2008). The Force of Law: The Role of Coercion in Legal Norms. University of Richmond Law Review, 42(5), 1195–256.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Normativity of Law
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Normativity of Law
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Normativity of Law
Available formats
×