Books and articles
Bassett, D.L., 2011: “The Future of International Class Actions”, Southwestern International Law Journal, 18: 21.
Bermann, G.A., 2012: “The ‘Gateway’ Problem in International Commercial Arbitration”, Yale Journal of International Law, 37: 1.
Blackaby, N., et al., 2009: Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (Leiden: Kluwer Law International).
Bolt, J.W. & Wheatley, J.K., 2006: “Private Rules for International Discovery in U.S. District Court: The U.S.-German Example”, UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, 11: 1.
Born, G.B., 2009: International Commercial Arbitration (Leiden: Kluwer Law International).
Born, G.B., 2010: International Arbitration and Forum Selection Agreements: Drafting and Enforcing (Leiden: Kluwer Law International).
Born, G.B & Rutledge, P.B., 2007: International Civil Litigation in United States Courts (New York: Aspen Publishers).
Borris, C., 2011: “Arbitrability of Corporate Law Disputes in Germany”, in Klaassen, C.J.M., et al. (Eds.), Onderneming en ADR (Leiden: Wolters Kluwer).
Brescia, R.H., 2009: “Tainted Loans: The Value of a Mass Torts Approach to Subprime Mortgage Lending”, University of Cincinnati Law Review, 78: 1.
Brower, C.H. II, 2011: “Arbitration and Antitrust: Navigating the Contours of Mandatory Law”, Buffalo Law Review, 59: 1127.
Brulard, Y. & Quintin, Y., 2001: “European Community Law and Arbitration – National Versus Community Public Policy”, Journal of International Arbitration, 18: 533.
Buckner, C.J., 2004: “Toward a Pure Arbitral Paradigm of Classwide Arbitration: Arbitral Power and Federal Preemption”, Denver University Law Review, 82: 301.
Buckner, C.J., 2006: “Due Process in Class Arbitration”, Florida Law Review, 58: 185.
Burch, E.C., 2008: “Litigating Groups”, Alabama Law Review, 61: 1.
Burch, E.C., 2009: “Securities Class Actions as Pragmatic Ex Post Regulation”, Georgia Law Review, 43: 63.
Bushkin, I.T., 2005: “The Viability of Class Action Lawsuits in a Globalized Economy – Permitting Foreign Claimants to be Members of Class Action Lawsuits in the U.S. Federal Courts”, Cornell Law Review, 90: 1563.
Buxbaum, H.L., 2006: “Transnational Regulatory Litigation”, Virginia Journal of International Law, 46: 251.
Cabraser, E.J., 2004: “Human Rights Violations as Mass Torts: Compensation as a Proxy for Justice in the United States Civil Litigation System”, Vanderbilt Law Review, 57: 2211.
Campos, S.J., 2011: “The Future of Mass Torts … And How to Stop It”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra, 159: 231.
Colangelo, A.J., 2011: “A Unified Approach to Extraterritoriality”, Virginia Law Review, 97: 1019.
Crook, J.R., 2006: “Lessons Learned Over Twenty-Five Years”, in Permanent Court of Arbitration, International Bureau (Ed.), Redressing Injustices Through Mass Claims Processes: Innovative Responses to Unique Challenges (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Crooks, E. & Mapstone, N., Jan. 4, 2012: “Chevron’s Ecuador Case Takes a New Twist”, Financial Times.
Cross, K.H., 2011: “Investment Arbitration Panel Upholds Jurisdiction to Hear Mass Bondholder Claims Against Argentina”, ASIL Insights, 15.
Dixon, J.C.L., 1997: “The Res Judicata Effect in England of a U.S. Class Action Settlement, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 46: 134.
Dubinsky, P.R., 2008: “Is Transnational Litigation a Distinct Field? The Persistence of Exceptionalism in American Procedural Law”, Stanford Journal of International Law, 44: 301.
Effron, R.J., 2008: “Disaster-Specific Mechanisms for Consolidation”, Tulane Law Review, 82: 2423.
Epstein, D., et al., 2008: International Litigation: A Guide to Jurisdiction, Practice, and Strategy (Leiden: Brill).
Fellas, J. & Warne, D., 2004: “Choice of Forum Under United States and English Law”, in Fellas, J. (Ed.), Transatlantic Commercial Litigation and Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Frick, J.G., 2001: Arbitration and Complex International Contracts (Leiden: Kluwer Law International).
Gaillard, E. & Savage, J., 1998: Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (Leiden, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International).
Glover, J.M., 2012: “The Structural Role of Private Enforcement Mechanisms in Public Law”, William and Mary Law Review, 53: 1137.
Gonzalez, A., Jan. 5, 2012: “Chevron Case Could Last for Years”, Wall Street Journal.
Hensler, D.R., 1995: “A Glass Half Full, a Glass Half Empty: The Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Mass Personal Injury Litigation”, Texas Law Review, 73: 1587.
Hensler, D.R., 2000: Class Action Dilemmas: Pursuing Public Goals for Private Gain (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation).
Hensler, D.R., 2009: “The Globalization of Class Actions: An Overview”, in Hensler, D.R., et al. (Eds.), The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 622: 1.
Hensler, D.R., et al. (Eds.), 2009: The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 622 [hereinafter The Annals].
Hodges, C., 2009: “England and Wales”, in Hensler, D.R., et al. (Eds.), The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 622: 105 [hereinafter Hodges, C., England].
Hodges, C., 2009: “European Union Legislation”, in Hensler, D.R., et al. (Eds.), The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 622: 78 [hereinafter Hodges, C., Europe].
Hodges, C., 2009: “What Are People Trying to Do in Resolving Mass Issues, How Is It Going, and Where Are We Headed?”, in Hensler, D.R., et al. (Eds.), The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 622: 330 [hereinafter Hodges, C., Resolving].
Hogg, P.W., 2011: Constitutional Law of Canada (Toronto: Carswell).
Hogg, P.W. & McKee, S.G., 2010: “Are National Class Actions Constitutional?”, National Journal of Constitutional Law, 26: 279.
Kalajdzic, J., et al., 2009: “Canada”, in Hensler, D.R., et al. (Eds.), The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 622: 41.
Kerr, M., 1997: “Concord and Conflict in International Arbitration”, Arbitration International, 13: 121.
Kingsbury, B., et al., 2005: “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law”, Law & Contemporary Problems, 68: 15.
Knox, J.H., 2011: “The Unpredictable Presumption Against Extraterritoriality”, Southwestern Law Review, 40: 635.
Koenig, T.H., 2008: “Crimtorts: A Cure for the Hardening of the Categories”, Widener Law Journal, 17: 733.
Kristjánsdóttir, E. & Simerova, B., 2006: “Processing Claims for ‘Other Personal Injury’ Under the German Forced Labour Compensation Programme”, in Permanent Court of Arbitration, International Bureau (Ed.), Redressing Injustices Through Mass Claims Processes: Innovative Responses to Unique Challenges (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Kröll, S.M., 2009: “The ‘Arbitrability’ of Disputes Arising From Commercial Representation”, in Mistelis, L.A. & Brekoulakis, S.L. (Eds.), Arbitrability: International and Comparative Perspectives (Leiden: Kluwer Law International).
Lamm, C.B. & Aqua, J.A., 2002–03: “Defining the Party – Who Is a Proper Party in an International Arbitration Before the American Arbitration Association and Other International Institutions”, George Washington International Law Review, 34: 711.
Landau, T., 2003: “The Requirement of A Written Form for An Arbitration Agreement: When ‘Written’ Means ‘Oral’”, in van den Berg, A.J. (Ed.), International Commercial Arbitration: Important Contemporary Questions (Leiden: Kluwer Law International).
Lew, J.D.M., et al., 2003: Comparative International Commercial Arbitration (Leiden: Kluwer Law International).
Main, T.O., 2010: “The Procedural Foundation of Substantive Law”, Washington University Law Review, 87: 801.
Mayer, T.V.H. & Sigler, P., 2004: “Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants in the United States and England”, in Fellas, J. (Ed.), Transatlantic Commercial Litigation and Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Michaels, R., 2006: “Two Paradigms of Jurisdiction”, Michigan Journal of International Law, 27: 1003.
Miles, J.C., et al., 1910: Digest of English Civil Law, Book II (London: Butterworth).
Monestier, T.J., 2010: “Personal Jurisdiction Over Non-Resident Class Members: Have We Gone Down the Wrong Road?”, Texas International Law Journal, 45: 537.
Monestier, T.J., 2011: “Transnational Class Actions and the Illusory Search for Res Judicata”, Tulane Law Review, 86: 1.
Monestier, T.J., 2012: “Is Canada the New “Shangri-La” of Global Securities Class Actions?”, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 32: *1.
Mulheron, R., 2004: The Class Action in Common Law Legal Systems: A Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Hart).
Mulheron, R., 2009: “The Case for an Opt-Out Class Action for European Member States: A Legal and Empirical Analysis”, Columbia Journal of European Law, 13: 409.
Mulheron, R., 2012: “The Recognition, and Res Judicata Effect, of a United States Class Actions Judgment in England: A Rebuttal of Vivendi”, Modern Law Review, 75: 180.
Mullenix, L.S., 2011: “Promethus Unbound: The Gulf Coast Claims Facility as a Means of Resolving Mass Tort Claims – A Fund Too Far”, Louisiana Law Review, 71: 819.
Nagareda, R.A., 2007: Mass Torts in a World of Settlement (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Nagareda, R.A., 2009: “Aggregate Litigation Across the Atlantic and the Future of American Exceptionalism”, Vanderbilt Law Review, 62: 1.
Nolan-Haley, J.M., 2012: “Is Europe Headed Down the Primrose Path With Mandatory Mediation?”, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 37: 981.
Ostrager, B.R., et al., 1999: “Andersen v. Andersen: The Claimants’ Perspective”, American Review of International Arbitration, 10: 443.
Permanent Court of Arbitration, International Bureau (Ed.), 2006: Redressing Injustices Through Mass Claims Processes: Innovative Responses to Unique Challenges (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Permanent Court of Arbitration, International Bureau (Ed.), 2009: Multiple Party Actions in International Arbitration (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Platte, M., 2002: “When Should an Arbitrator Join Cases?”, Arbitration International, 18: 67.
Platte, M., 2003: “An Arbitrator’s Duty to Render Enforceable Awards”, Journal of International Arbitration, 20: 307.
Rau, A.S. 2008: “Arbitral Jurisdiction and the Dimensions of ‘Consent’”, Arbitration International, 24: 199.
Ringe, W. & Hellgardt, A., 2011: “The International Dimension of Issuer Liability – Liability and Choice of Law From a Transatlantic Perspective”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 31: 23.
Russell, T.L., 2010: “Exporting Class Actions to the European Union”, Boston University International Law Journal, 28: 141.
Rutherglen, G., 2012: “Wal-Mart, AT&T Mobility and the Decline of the Deterrent Class Action”, Virginia Law Review in Brief, 98: 24.
Saumier, G., 2005: “USA-Canada Class Actions: Trading in Procedural Fairness”, Global Jurist Advances, 5: 1.
Simard, L.S. & Tidmarsh, J., 2011: “Foreign Citizens in Transnational Class Actions”, Cornell Law Review, 97: 87.
Smit, H., 2004: “Class Actions and Their Waiver in Arbitration”, American Review of International Law, 15: 199.
Smith, D.G., 2009: “An Administrative Approach to the Resolution of Mass Torts?”, University of Illinois Law Review, 2009: 895.
Spacone, A.J., 2000: “Strict Liability in the European Union – Not a United States Analog”, Roger Williams University Law Review, 5: 341.
Steenson, M. & Sayler, J.M., 2009: “The Legacy of the 9/11 Fund and the Minnesota I-35 W Bridge Collapse Fund: Creating a Template for Compensating Victims of Future Mass-Tort Catastrophes”, William Mitchell Law Review, 35: 524.
Stigglebout, M., 2011: “The Recognition in England and Wales of United States Judgments in Class Actions”, Harvard International Law Journal, 52: 433.
Strong, S.I., May 23, 2005: “Backyard Advantage: New Rules Mean That U.S. Companies May Be Forced to Litigate Across the Pond”, Legal Times 28: 43.
Strong, S.I., 2008: “Enforcing Class Arbitration in the International Sphere: Due Process and Public Policy Concerns”, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 30: 1.
Strong, S.I., 2009: “The Sounds of Silence: Are U.S. Arbitrators Creating Internationally Enforceable Awards When Ordering Class Arbitration in Cases of Contractual Silence or Ambiguity?”, Michigan Journal of International Law, 30: 1017.
Strong, S.I., 2010: “Class Arbitration Outside the United States: Reading the Tea Leaves”, in Hanotiau, B. & Schwartz, E.A. (Eds.), Dossier VII: Arbitration and Multiparty Contracts 183 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Tea Leaves].
Strong, S.I., 2010: “From Class to Collective: The De-Americanization of Class Arbitration”, Arbitration International, 26: 493 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., De-Americanization].
Strong, S.I., 2010: “Jurisdictional Discovery in United States Federal Courts”, Washington and Lee Law Review, 67: 489 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Jurisdictional Discovery].
Strong, S.I., 2010: “Opening More Doors Than It Closes: Stolt-Nielsen SA v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.”, Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, 2010(4): 565 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Doors].
Strong, S.I., 2011: “Class and Collective Relief in the Cross-Border Context: A Possible Role for the Permanent Court of Arbitration”, The Hague Yearbook of International Law 2010, 23: 113 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., PCA].
Strong, S.I., 2011: “Collective Arbitration Under the DIS Supplementary Rules for Corporate Law Disputes: A European Form of Class Arbitration?”, ASA Bulletin, 29: 45 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., DIS].
Strong, S.I., 2011: “Jurisdictional Discovery in Transnational Litigation: Extraterritorial Effects of United States Federal Practice”, Journal of Private International Law, 7: 1 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Transnational Litigation].
Strong, S.I., 2012: “Arbitration of Trust Disputes: Two Bodies of Law Collide”, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 45: 1157 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Trust].
Strong, S.I., 2012: “Does Class Arbitration ‘Change the Nature’ of Arbitration? Stolt-Nielsen, AT&T and a Return to First Principles”, Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 17: 201 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., First Principles].
Strong, S.I., 2012: International Commercial Arbitration: A Guide for U.S. Judges [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Guide].
Strong, S.I., 2012: “Mandatory Arbitration of Internal Trust Disputes: Improving Arbitrability and Enforceability Through Proper Procedural Choices”, Arbitration International 26: 591 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Trust Procedures].
Strong, S.I., 2012: “Regulatory Litigation in the European Union: Does the U.S. Class Action Have a New Analogue?”, Notre Dame Law Review 88: 899 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Regulatory Litigation].
Strong, S.I., 2012: “Resolving Mass Legal Disputes Through Class Arbitration: The United States and Canada Compared”, North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation 37: 921 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Canada].
Strong, S.I., 2013: Class, Mass, and Collective Arbitration (New York: Oxford University Press) [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Class, Mass]
Strong, S.I., 2013: “Collective Consumer Arbitration in Spain: A Civil Law Response to U.S.-Style Class Arbitration”, Journal of International Arbitration 30: 495 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Spain].
Strong, S.I., 2013: “Cross-Border Collective Redress in the European Union: Constitutional Rights in the Face of the Brussels I Regulation”, Arizona State Law Journal 44: 233 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Brussels I].
Strong, S.I., 2013: “Cross-Border Collective Redress and Individual Participatory Rights: Quo Vadis?”, Civil Justice Quarterly 32: 508 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Quo Vadis].
Strong, S.I., 2013: “Mass Procedures as a Form of ‘Regulatory Arbitration’ – Abaclat v. Argentine Republic and the International Investment Regime”, The Journal of Corporation Law 38: 259 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Regulatory Arbitration].
Strong, S.I., 2014: “Ambiente Ufficio S.p.A. v. Argentine Republic: Heir of Abaclat? Mass and Multiparty Proceedings”, ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal 29: 149 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Ambiente Ufficio].
Strong, S.I., 2014: “Beyond International Commercial Arbitration? The Promise of International Commercial Mediation”, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 45: 11 [hereinafter Strong, S.I., Mediation].
Strong, S.I. & Dries, J.J., 2005: “Witness Statements Under the IBA Rules of Evidence: What to do About Hearsay?”, Arbitration International, 21: 301.
Strong, S.I. & Williams, L., 2011: Tort Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Susskind, L.E. & Crump, L. (Eds.), 2008: Multiparty Negotiation, vol. 3, Complex Litigation and Legal Transactions (London: SAGE Publications, Ltd.).
Szalai, I.S., 2008: “Aggregate Dispute Resolution: Class and Labor Arbitration”, Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 13: 399.
Tushnet, M., 1986: “The Constitution of Religion”, Connecticut Law Review, 18: 710.
Tzankova, I. & Scheurleer, D.L., 2009: “The Netherlands”, in Hensler, D.R., et al. (Eds.), The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 622: 149.
Walker, J., 2010: “Are National Classes Constitutional? A Reply to Hogg and McKee”, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 48: 95.
Wasserman, R., 2011: “Transnational Class Actions and Interjurisdictional Preclusion”, Notre Dame Law Review, 86: 313.
Weidemaier, W.M.C., 2007: “Arbitration and the Individuation Critique”, Arizona Law Review, 49: 69.
Weston, M., 2006: “Universes Colliding: The Constitutional Implications of Arbitral Class Actions”, William & Mary Law Review, 47: 1711.
Willging, T.E., et al., 1996: “An Empirical Analysis of Rule 23 to Address the Rulemaking Challenges”, New York University Law Review, 71: 74.
Willging, T.E. & Lee, E.G. III, 2010: “From Class Actions to Multidistrict Consolidations: Aggregate Mass-Tort Litigation After Ortiz”, University of Kansas Law Review, 58: 775.