Abbi, A., 1980. Semantic Grammar of Hindi: A Study of Reduplication (New Delhi: Bahri Publications Private Ltd.).
Abbi, A., 1984. “The Conjunctive Participle in Hindi-Urdu,” International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics, 13.2, 252–263.
Abbi, A., 1990. “Experiential Constructions and the ‘Subjecthood’ of the Experiencer NPs in South Asian Languages,” in Verma and Mohanan (1990: 253–268).
Abbi, A., 1992. Reduplication in South Asian Languages: An Areal, Typological and Historical Study (New Delhi: Allied Publishers Ltd.).
Abbi, A., 1994. Semantic Universals in Indian Languages (Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study).
Abbi, A., 2001. A Manual of Linguistic Field Work and Indian Language Structures (Munich: Lincom Europa).
Abbi, A., 2006. Endangered Languages of the Andaman Islands (Munich: Lincom Europa).
Achumi, R., 2000. “Sentential Complementation in Sema,” M.Phil. dissertation, Delhi University, Delhi.
Achumi, R., and K. V. Subbarao, 2005. “Sentential Complementation in Sema,” paper presented at the International Conference on South Asian Languages and Literatures-6, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India.
Agnihotri, R., 1992. “India: Multilingual Perspectives,” in N. D. Crawhill (ed.), Democratically Speaking (Capetown: National Language Project), 46–55.
Agnihotri, R., 2001. Half the Battle and a Quarter, CIIL, Foundation Day Lectures (Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages).
Aissen, J., 2003. “Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 435–483.
Alexiadou, A., E. Anagnostopolou and F. Schafer, 2006. “The Properties of Anti-causatives Crosslinguistically,” in M. Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of Interpretation (Berlin: Mouton), 187–212.
Amritavalli, R., 2000. “Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Kannada,” in Lust et al. (2000: 49–112).
Amritavalli, R., 2004. “Experiencer Datives in Kannada,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: I, 1–24).
Anagnostopoulou, E., and M. Everaert, 1996. “How Exceptional are Nominative Anaphors? A Case Study of Greek,” in L. Nash, G. Tsoulas and A. Zribi-Hertz (eds.), Actes du deuxieme colloque langue et grammaire (Paris: Department of Language Sciences, Paris-8), 19–32.
Anderson, G. D. S. (ed.),
The Munda Verb: Typological Perspectives (
Berlin and New York:
Mouton de Gruyter,
2007).
Anderson, G. D. S. (ed.) 2008. The Munda Languages (London: Routledge).
Anderson, G. D. S., and K. D. Harrison, 2008. “Sora,” in Anderson (2008: 299–380).
Annamalai, E. 1997. Adjectival Clauses in Tamil (ILCAA, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Tokyo, Japan).
Annamalai, E. 2000. “Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Tamil,” in Lust et al. (2000: 169–216).
Arora, H.,
2004.
Syntactic Convergence: The Case of Dakkhini Hindi-Urdu(
Delhi:
Publication Division, Delhi University).
Arora, H., and K. V. Subbarao, 2004. “Syntactic Change and Convergence,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: II, 25–48).
Asher, R. E., 1985. Tamil. Lingua Descriptive Studies 7 (Amsterdam: North-Holland).
Asher, R. E., and T. C. Kumari, 1997. Malayalam (London and New York: Routledge).
Aze, F. R., 1973. “Clause Patterns in Parengi-Gorum,” in R. L. Trail (ed.), Patterns in Clause, Sentence, Discourse in Selected Languages of India and Nepal, vol. I (Norman, OK: Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of Oklahoma), 235–313.
Baker, M. C., 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Baker, M. C., 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Baker, M. C., 2001. Atoms of Language (New York: Basic Books).
Baker, M. C., 2010. “Formal Generative Typology,” in B. Heine and H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 285–312.
Baker, M. C., and J. McLoskey, 2007. “On the Relationship of Typology to Theoretical Syntax,” Linguistic Typology, 11.1, 285–296.
Bal, B. K.,
1990. “COMP
and Complementation in Oriya
and English,” Ph.D. thesis, Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages, Hyderabad.
Barbora, M., 2001. “COMPs in Assamese: Implications in Second Language Acquisition,” Ph.D. thesis, Tezpur University, Tezpur.
Bareh, C., 2007. “Descriptive Analysis of the Jowai and Rymbai Dialects of Khasi,” Ph.D. thesis, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong.
Barua, S., 2003. “Typological Characteristics of Kokborok,” Masters’ degree fieldwork dissertation, Delhi University.
Bashir, E., 1988. “Topics in Kalasha Syntax: An Areal and Typological Perspective,” doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Bashir, E., 2003. “Dardic,” in G. Cardona and D. Jain (eds.), Indo-Aryan (London: Routledge), 818–894.
Bayer, J., 1996. Directionality and Logical Form: On the Scope of Focusing Particles and wh-in-situ (Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer).
Bayer, J., 2001. “Two Grammars in One: Sentential Complements and Complementizers in Bangla and other South Asian Languages,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2001: 11–36).
Bayer, J., 2004. “Non-nominative Subjects in Comparison,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: I, 48–76).
Bayer, J., T. Bhattacharya and M. T. Hany Babu, 2007. Linguistic Theory and South Asian Languages: Essays in Honour of K. A. Jayaseelan (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
Beermann, D. A., and
L. Hellan,
2002. “
VP-Chaining in Oriya,” in
M. Butt and
T. Holloway King (eds.),
Proceedings of the LFG02 Conference, National Technical University of Athens, Athens (
Stanford, CA:
CSLI Publications, Stanford University),
41–56.
Begum, R., 2004. “The Conjunctive Participle in Bodo,” Masters’ fieldwork dissertation, Delhi University.
Benmamoun, A., 2006. “Licensing Configurations: The Puzzle of Head Negative Polarity Items,” Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 141–149.
Bhaskararao, P., 1972. “On the Syntax of Telugu Existential and Copulative Predications,” in J. W. Verhar (ed.), The verb “be” and its synonyms. Foundations of Language, supplementary series, 5 (Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company), 153–206.
Bhaskararao, P., and K. V. Subbarao (eds.), 2001. The Yearbook of South Asian Languages (New Delhi: Thousand Oaks; London: Sage Publications).
Bhaskararao, P., and K. V. Subbarao 2004. Non-nominative Subjects, vols. I and II (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
Bhaskararao, P., and K. V. Subbarao in preparation. A Grammar of Modern Telugu (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
Bhat, D. N. S., 1998. “A Typology of Himalayan Languages,” keynote address delivered at the 4th Himalayan Languages Conference, Pune, India.
Bhat, D. N. S., and
M. S. Ningomba,
1995.
Manipuri Grammar(
Mysore, India:
Central Institute of Indian Languages).
Bhatia, T. K., 1993. Punjabi: A Cognitive–Typological Study (London: Routlege).
Bhatia, T. K., 1995. Negation in South Asian Languages (New Delhi and Patiala: Indian Institute of Language Studies).
Bhatia, T. K., 2000. “Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Punjabi,” in Lust et al. (2000: 637–714).
Bhatt, R., 2003. “Locality in Correlatives,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21.3, 485–541.
Bhatt, R., 2005. “Long-distance Agreement in Hindi-Urdu,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, 758–807.
Bhatt, R., and V. Dayal, 2007. “Rightward Scrambling as Rightward Remnant Movement,” Linguistic Inquiry, 38.2, 287–301.
Bhatt, R. M., 1994. “The Case of Quirky Constructions,” in A. Davison, G. Silva and W. Yan (eds.), Papers from the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistic Society of Mid America, 23–34.
Bhatt, R. M., 1999. Verb Movement and the Syntax of Kashmiri (London: Kluwer Academic Publications).
Bhatt, R. M., and J. Yoon, 1991. “The Composition of COMP and Parameters of V2,” WCCFL, 10, 41–52.
Bhattacharya, T., 2005. The Yearbook of South Asian Languages (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter).
Biberauer, T., A. Holmberg and I. Roberts, 2007. “Disharmonic Word-order Systems and the Final-over-Final Constraint (FOFC),” in A. Bisetto and F. Barbieri (eds.), Proceedings of XXXIII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, 86–105.
Biberauer, T., A. Holmberg and I. Roberts, 2008. “Structure and Linearization in Disharmonic Word Orders,” in C. B. Chang and H. J. Haynie (eds.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (Somerville, MA: Casadilla Proceedings Project), 96–104.
Biberauer, T.,
G. Newton and
M. Sheehan,
2009. “
The Final-over-Final Constraint and Predictions for Diachronic Change,”
Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics (TWPL),
31,
1–17.
Bickel, B., 1998. “Review Article: Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective,” Linguistic Typology, 2, 381–397.
Bickel, B., 1999. “Nominalization and Focus in Some Kiranti Languages,” in Y. Yadava and W. G. Glover (eds.), Topics in Nepalese Linguistics (Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy), 271–296.
Bickel, B., 2004. “The Syntax of Experiencers in the Himalayas,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: I, 77–111).
Bickel, B., W. Bisang and Y. P. Yadava, 1999. “Face vs. Empathy: The Social Foundation of Maithili Verb Agreement,” Linguistics, 37.3, 481–518.
Bloch, J., 1934. L’Indo-aryen du veda aux temps modern (Paris: Librairie Adrien Maisonnneuve).
Burling, R., 2004. The Language of the Modhupur Mandi (Garo) (New Delhi: Bibliophile South Asia / Promilla & Co.).
Burrows, L., [1915] 1980. The Grammar of the Ho Language: An Eastern Himalayan Dialect (New Delhi: Cosmos Publications).
Burzio, L., 1986. Italian Syntax (Dordrecht: Reidel).
Butt, M., 1993. “A Reanalysis of Long-distance Agreement in Urdu,” in Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (Berkeley, CA).
Butt, M., 1995. The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu (Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, Stanford University).
Butt, M., and W. Geuder, 1999. “On the Lexical Status of Light Verbs,” paper presented at the Workshop on Semi-lexical Heads, Tilburg.
Butt, M., T. Holloway King and G. Ramchand, 1994. Theoretical Perspectives on Word Order in South Asian Languages (Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, Stanford University).
Cardona, G., 1965. A Gujarati Reference Grammar (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).
Cardona, G., and D. Jain, 2003. The Indo-Aryan Languages (London and New York: Routledge).
Chandra, P., 2005. “Long-distance Agreement in Hindi,” paper presented at the South Asian Languages Analysis conference, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.
Chandra, P., 2007. “(Dis)Agree: Movement and Agreement Reconsidered,” doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
Chatterji, S. K., 1926. The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language, 3 vols. (Calcutta: Calcutta University Press; rpt. London: Allen and Unwin).
Chelliah, S., 1990. “Experiencer Subjects in Manipuri,” in Verma and Mohanan (1990: 195–212).
Chelliah, S., 1997. A Grammar of Manipuri (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
Chomsky, N., 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Chomsky, N., 1973. “Conditions on Transformations,” in S. R. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Chomsky, N., 1975. Reflections on Language (New York: Pantheon).
Chomsky, N., 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding (Holland: Foris Publications).
Chomsky, N.,
1986.
Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origins and Use (
New York:
Praeger).
Chomsky, N., 1995a. The Minimalist Program (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Chomsky, N., 1995b. “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory,” in Chomsky (1995a).
Chomsky, N., 1999. “Derivation by Phase,” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Chomsky, N.,
2000. “
Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework,” in
R. Martin,
D. Michaels and
J. Uriagereka (eds.),
Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honour of Howard Lasnik(
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press),
89–155.
Chomsky, N., 2001. “Derivation by Phase,” in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 1–52.
Chomsky, N., and H. Lasnik, 1995. “The Theory of Principles and Parameters,” in N. Chomsky, The Minimalist Program (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Cinque, G., 2007. “A Note on Linguistic Theory and Typology,” Language Typology, 11.1, 93–106.
Clark, T. W., [1977] 1989. Introduction to Nepali (New Delhi: Heritage Book House).
Cole, P., 1987. “The Structure of Internally Headed Relative Clauses,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 277–302.
Cole, P., and L. Sung, 1994. “Head Movement and Long-distance Reflexives,” Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 355–385.
Cole, P., G. Hermon and C.-T. James Huang (eds.), 2001. Long-distance Reflexives. Syntax and Semantics 33 (San Diego: Academic Press).
Comrie, B., 1978. “Ergativity,” in W. P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic Typology (Sussex: The Harvester Press), 329–394.
Comrie, B., 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Coopmans, P., 1983. “A Review of B. Comrie, Language Universals and Linguistic Typology,” Journal of Linguistics, 19.1–2, 455–473.
Coupe, A. L., 2003. “The Mongsen Dialect of Ao: A Language of Nagaland,” Ph.D. thesis, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria.
Croft, W., 1990. Typology and Universals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Cysouw, M., 2003. “Against Implicational Universals,” Language Typology, 7, 89–101.
Das, B., 2005. “PRO in Bangla,” term paper, M.Phil. course, Delhi University.
Das, P. K.,
2006.
Grammatical Agreement in Hindi-Urdu and its Major Varieties(
Munich:
Lincom Europa).
Dasgupta, P., 1977. “The Internal Grammar of Compound Verbs in Bangla,” Indian Linguistics, 38, 68–85.
Dasgupta, P., 1980. “Question and Relative and Complement Clauses in a Bangla Grammar,” Ph.D. thesis, New York University, New York.
Dasgupta, P., 2003. “Bangla,” in Cardona and Jain (2003: 391–443).
Dasgupta, P., 2004. “Some Non-nominative Subjects in Bangla,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: I, 128–140).
Dasgupta, P., 2007. “The Ubiquitous Complementizer,” in Bayer et al. (2007: 163–174).
Dasgupta, P., A. Ford and R. Singh, 2000. After Etymology: Towards a Substantive Linguistics (Munich: Lincom Europa).
Davison, A., 1981. “Syntactic and Semantic Indeterminacy Resolved,” in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics (New York: Academic Press), 101–128.
Davison, A., 1988. “Operator Binding, Gaps and Pronouns,” Linguistics, 26, 181–214.
Davison, A.,
1991. “Feature Percolation and Agreement in Hindi-Urdu,” paper presented at the Panel on Agreement in South Asian languages at the South Asian Languages Analysis Conference, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Davison, A., 1992a. “Lexical Projection, Case and Clause Adjunction: Another View of ‘Case Resistance,’” paper presented at University of Iowa.
Davison, A., 1992b. “Control Experiencer Subjects: Implications for Phrase Structure,” paper presented at Delhi University.
Davison, A., 1994. “Finite Clauses and the Structure of the Clausal Projection,” paper presented at CIEFL, Hyderabad and at Delhi University.
Davison, A., 1995. “Kashmiri V2, Hindi/Urdu V-final Order: The Role of C and its Features” (ms).
Davison, A., 2000. “Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Hindi,” in Lust et al. (2000: 397–470).
Davison, A.,
2001. “Long-distance Anaphors in Hindi/Urdu: Syntactic and Sema
ntic Issues,” in Cole et al. (2001:
47–82).
Davison, A., 2004a. “Non-nominative Subjects in Hindi-Urdu,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: 141–168).
Davison, A., 2004b. “Structural Case, Lexical Case and Verbal Projections,” in V. Dayal and A. Mahajan (eds.), Clause Structure in South Asian Languages. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 199–226.
Davison, A., 2007a. “Word Order, Parameters and the Extended COMP Projection,” in Bayer et al. (2007a: 174–198).
Davison, A., 2007b. “Long-distance Agreement in Hindi/Urdu,” paper presented at University of Iowa Colloquium.
Dayal, V., 1994. “Binding Facts in Hindi and the Scrambling Phenomenon,” in Butt et al. (1994: 237–262).
Dayal, V., 1996. Locality in Wh Quantification (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
Deeney, J., 1979. Ho Grammar and Vocabulary (Chaibasa: Xavier Ho Publications).
Dilip, M., K. V. Subbarao and G. Uma Maheshwar Rao, 2011. “Quantification in Telugu,” paper presented at All India Conference of Linguists, Punjab University.
Dixon, R. M. W., 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 9 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Donegan, P., and D. Stampe, 2004. “Rhythm and the Synthetic Drift of Munda,” in R. Singh (ed.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 3–36.
Downing, B., 1978. “Some Universals of Relative Clause Structure,” in J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson and E. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language, vol. IV (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press), 375–418.
Dowty, D. R., 1989. “On the Semantic Content of the Notion ‘Thematic Role,’” in G. Chierchia and B. H. Partee (eds.), Properties, Types and Meaning, vol. II, Semantic Issues (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 69–129.
Dryer, M., 1992. “The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations,” Language, 69, 81–138.
Dryer, M., 2005. “Order of Subject, Object and Verb,” in M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gill and B. Comrie (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures (New York: Oxford University Press), 386–389.
Dube, K. C., 1983. Ādibhāratī Bhāg 2. Kuukh-Hindī (Bhopāl: Ādimjāti Anusandhān evam Vikās Sasthā).
Dwarikesh, P. P. S., 1971. “The Historical Study of the Conjunctive Participial Phrase in the New Indo-Aryan Dialects of the Madhyadesa (‘Midland’) of Northern India,” doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
Dwivedi, V.,
1994.
Syntactic Dependencies and Relative Phrases in Hindi (
Amherst, MA:
GLSA Publications).
Emeneau, M. B., 1956. “India as a Linguistic Area,” Language, 32.3, 3–16.
Emeneau, M. B., 1974. “India as a Linguistic Area Revisited,” in Southworth and Apte (1974).
Everaert, M., 1991. “Contextual Determination of the Anaphor/Pronominal Distinction,” in J. Koster and E. Reuland (eds.), Long-distance Anaphora (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 77–118.
Everaert, M., 1999. “The Morphosyntax of SE(-Reflexivization): Some Preliminaries,” paper presented at the seminar on Grammatical Models, Tilburg.
Everaert, M., 2001. “Paradigmatic Restrictions on Anaphors,” in K. Megerdoomian and L. A. Bar-el (eds.), WWCFL 20 Proceedings (Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press), 178–191.
Everaert, M., and E. Anagnostopoulou, 1997. “Thematic Hierarchies and Binding Theory: Evidences from Greek,” in F. Corblin, D. Godard and J.-M. Marandin (eds.), Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics (Bern: Peter Lang), 43–60.
Everaert, M., and K. V. Subbarao, 2011. “Verbal and Nominal Reciprocals in South Asian Languages (SALs) and Obligatory Order Reversal in the Nominal Anaphor in Dravidian,” paper presented at the South Asian Languages Analysis Conference, CIIL, Mysore.
Fox, B., 1987. “The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy Reinterpreted: Subject Primacy or the Absolutive Hypothesis?” Language, 63.4, 856–870.
Gair, J. W., 1998. Studies in South Asian Linguistics: Sinhala and Other South Asian Languages (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Gair, J. W., 2003. “Sinhala,” in Cardona and Jain (2003).
Gair, J., and W. S. Karunatillake, 2000. “Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Sinhala,” in Lust et al. (2000: 715–773).
Gair, J., and J. Paolillo, 1997. Sinhala (Munich: Lincom Europa).
Gair, J., and K. Wali, 1988. “On Distinguishing AGR from Agr: Evidence from South Asia,” in Papers from Parasession on Agreement in Linguistic Theory (Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society), 87–104.
Gambhir, V., 1981. “Syntactic Restrictions and Discourse Functions of Word Order in Standard Hindi,” doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Geeta Devi, T., 2000. “Relative Clauses in Manipuri,” M.Phil. dissertation, Delhi University.
Gill, D., 2000. Riau Indonesian: A VO Language with Internally Headed Relative Clauses (Leipzig: Max Plank Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology).
Giridhar, P. P., 1980. Angami (Mysore, India: Central Institute of Indian Languages).
Giridhar, P. P., 1994. Mao Grammar (Mysore, India: Central Institute of Indian Languages).
Greenberg, J. H., 1966. “Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements,” in J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language, vol. II (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 73–113.
Gumperz, J. J., and R. Wilson, 1971. “Convergence and Creolization: A Case from the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian Border,” in D. Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and Creolization of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Gurtu, M., 1992. Anaphoric Relations in Hindi and English (Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal).
Hany Babu, M. T., 1997. “Functional Categories,” Ph.D. thesis, Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages, Hyderabad.
Hasan, M.,
2005. “Backward Control in Subzapuri,” term paper, M.Phil. course, Delhi University.
Haspelmath, M., 1993. “More on the Typology of Inchoative/Causative Verb Alternations,” in B. Comrie and M. Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and Transitivity (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 87–120.
Haspelmath, M., and E. König (eds.) 1995. Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective: Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms – adverbial participles, Gerunds. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 13 (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter).
Herring, S. C., 1991. “Nominalization, Relativization, and Attribution in Lotha, Angami, and Burmese,” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 14.1, 55–72.
Hock, H. H., 1975. “Substratum Influence on (Rig Vedic) Sanskrit?” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 5.2, 76–125.
Hock, H. H., 1982a. “The Sanskrit Quotative: A Historical and Comparative Study,” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 12.2, 39–85.
Hock, H. H., 1982b. “Conjoined We Stand: Theoretical Implications of Sanskrit Relative Clauses,” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 19.1, 93–126.
Hock, H. H., 1991. Principles of Historical Linguistics (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter).
Hock, H. H., 2001. “Typology vs. Convergence: The Issue of Dravidian/Indo-Aryan Syntactic Similarities Revisited,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2001: 63–100).
Hock, H. H., 2005. “How Strict is Strict OV?” in T. Bhattacharya (ed.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 145–164.
Holmberg, A., 2000. “Deriving OV Order in Finnish,” in P. Svenonius (ed.), The Derivation of VO and OV (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 123–152.
Hook, P. E., 1973. Compound Verbs in Hindi (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan).
Hook, P. E., 1974. The Compound Verb in Hindi (Ann Arbor: Center for South and South-East Asia Studies, The University of Michigan).
Hook, P. E., 1976. “Is Kashmiri an SVO Language?” Indian Linguistics, 37, 133–142.
Hook, P. E., Hindi Structures: Intermediate Level. Michigan Papers on South and South-East Asia 16 (Ann Arbor, MI: Center for South and South-East Asia Studies, University of Michigan).
Hook, P. E., 1990. “A Note on Expressions of Involuntary Experience in the Shina of Skardu,” BSOAS, 67, 77–82.
Hook, P. E., 1991. “The Emergence of Perfective Aspect in Indo-Aryan Languages,” in E. Traugott and B. Hein (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. II (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 59–89.
Hook, P. E., 1996. “Kesar of Layul: A Central Asian Epic in the Shina of Gultari,” in W. Hanaway and W. Heston (eds.), Studies in the Popular Cultures of Pakistan (Lahore: Sang-e-Meel), 121–183.
Hook, P. E., 1997. “Relative Clauses in Eastern Shina,” in P. Michalove, I. Hegedüs and A. Manaster-Ramer (eds.), Indo-European, Nostratic, and Beyond: Festschrift for Vitalij V. Shevoroshkin (Washington: Institute for the Study of Man), 140–154.
Hook, P. E., 2001. “Where Do Compound Verbs Come From? (And Where Are They Going?)” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2001: 101–130).
Hook, P., and O. N. Koul, 1996. “Kashmiri as a V-2 Language,” in V. S. Lakshmi and A. Mukerjee (eds.), Word Order in Indian Languages (Hyderabad: Center of Advanced Study in Linguistics, Osmania University), 95–105.
Hook, P., and O. N. Koul, 2004. “Case as Agreement,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: I, 213–226).
Hopper, P.,
and
S. Thompson,
1980. “
Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse,”
Language,
56,
251–299.
Hornstein, N., 1999. “Movement and Control,” Linguistic Inquiry, 30.1, 69–96.
Huang, Y., 2000. Anaphora: A Cross-linguistic Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Ichihashi-Nakayama, K., 1994. “On Dative Subject Construction in Nepali,” in C. Genetti (ed.), Papers in Linguistics 6 (Santa Barbara: Department of Linguistics, UC Santa Barbara), 41–76.
Jaeggli, O., and K. J. Safir, 1989. The Null Subject Parameter. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer).
Jayaseelan, K. A., 1990. “The Dative Subject Construction and the Pro-Drop Parameter,” in Verma and Mohanan (1990: 269–283).
Jayaseelan, K. A., 1998. “Blocking Effects and the Syntax of Malayalam Taan,” in R. Singh (ed.), Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics (New Delhi: Sage), 11–27.
Jayaseelan, K. A., 1999. Parametric Studies in Malayalam Syntax (New Delhi: Allied Publishers).
Jayaseelan, K. A., 2000. “Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Malayalam,” in Lust et al. (2000: 113–168).
Jayaseelan, K. A., 2004. “The Possessor–experiencer Dative in Malayalam,” in. Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: I, 227–244).
Jayaseelan, K. A., 2007. “The Argument Structure of the Dative Construction,” in E. Reuland, T. Bhattacharya and G. Spathas (eds.), Argument Structure (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins), 37–48.
Kachru, B.,
1973.
An Introduction to Spoken Kashmiri, part 1(
Urbana, IL:
Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois).
Kachru, Y.,
1970. “
The Syntax of ko-sentences in Hindi-Urdu,”
Papers in Linguistics,
2.2,
299–316.
Kachru, Y., 1979. “The Quotative in South Asian Languages,” South Asian Languages Analysis, 1, 63–77.
Kachru, Y., 1980. Aspects of Hindi Grammar (New Delhi: Manohar Publications).
Kachru, Y., 1981. “On the Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of the Conjunctive Participle in Hindi-Urdu,” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 11.2, 35–49.
Kachru, Y., 1990. “Experiencer and Other Oblique Subjects in Hindi,” in Verma and Mohanan (1990: 59–75).
Kachru, Y., 1993. “Verb Serialization in Syntax, Typology and Historical Change,” in M. K. Verma (ed.), Complex Predicates in South Asian Languages (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass), 115–133.
Kachru, Y., 2006. Hindi (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
Kachru, Y., and T. K. Bhatia, 1977. “On Reflexivization in Hindi-Urdu and its Theoretical Implications,” Indian Linguistics, 38.1, 21–38.
Kak, A., ms. “Complementation in Kashmiri,” University of Kashmir, Sri Nagar, India.
Kayne, R., 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Kazenin, K. I., 2001. “Verbal Reflexives and the Middle Voice,” in M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher and W. Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 916–927.
Keenan, E. L.,
1985. “
Relative Clause,” in
T. Shopen (ed.),
Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. II (
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press),
141–170.
Keenan, E. L., and B. Comrie, 1977. “Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar,” Linguistic Inquiry, 8.1, 63–99.
Kellogg, S. H., 1938. A Grammar of the Hindi Language (Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corporation).
Kemmer, S., 1993. The Middle Voice. Typological Studies in Language 23 (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins).
Kevichüsa, M., 1996. “Relative Clause Formation in Angami (Tenyidie),” M.Phil. dissertation, Delhi University.
Kevichüsa, M., 2007. “Apects of Angami (Tenyidie) Syntax,” Ph.D. thesis, Delhi University.
Kevichüsa, M., and K. V. Subbarao, 1998. “The Relative Clause in Tenyidie (Angami Naga),” South Asian Language Review, 8.2, 40–64.
Kidwai, A., 2000. XP-Adjunction in Universal Grammar: Scrambling and Binding in Hindi-Urdu. Oxford Studies in Comperative Syntax (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Klaiman, M. H., 1977. “Bengali Syntax: Possible Dravidian Influence,” International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics, 4.2.
Klaiman, M. H., 1979. “On the Status of Subjecthood Hierarchy in Hindi,” International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics, 8, 17–31.
Klaiman, M. H., 1980. “Bengali Dative Subjects,” Lingua, 51, 275–295.
Klaiman, M. H., 1983. “Bengali Conjunctive Participle Constructions,” in Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 19, 138–147.
Koh, T. J., 2003. “Agreement in Ho,” Masters’ field methods course dissertation, Delhi University.
Koh, T. J., and K. V. Subbarao, ms. “A Grammar of Ho.”
Koul, O. N., and K. Wali, 2006. Modern Kashmiri Grammar (Springfield, VA: Dunwoody Press).
Koshal, S., 1979. Ladakhi Grammar (Delhi: Motilal Banarasi Dass).
Krishnamurti, Bh., 1975. “Verbs of Cognition in Telugu,” Osmania Papers in Linguistics, 1.1, 1–15.
Krishnamurti, Bh., 2003. The Dravidian Languages. Cambridge Language Survey (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Krishnamurti, Bh., and J. P. L. Gwynn, 1985. A Grammar of Modern Telugu (Delhi: Oxford University Press).
Kuolie, D., 2006. A Structural Description of Tenyidie: A Tibeto-Burman Language of Nagaland (Kohima: Ura Academy).
Kuiper, F. B. J., 1974. “The Genesis of a Linguistic Area,” in F. C. Southworth and M. L. Apte (eds.), “Contact and Convergence in South Asian Languages,” International Journal of Dravidian Languages, 3.1, 135–153.
Kumar, R.,
1998. “Internal Relative Clauses in Hmar and Mizo
,” M.Phil. dissertation, Delhi University.
Kumar, R., 2006. Syntax of Negation and Licensing of Negative Polarity Items in Hindi (London and New York: Routledge).
Kumar, R., and
K. V. Subbarao,
2005. “
Postposition Incorporation and Internally Headed Relative Clauses in Hmar,” in
Y. Yadava,
G. Bhattariai,
R. R. Lohani,
B. Prasainand
K. Parajuli (eds.),
Contemporary Issues in Nepalese Linguistics (
Kathmandu:
Nepalese Linguistic Society),
129–138.
Kuroda, S. Y., 1965. “Generative Studies in the Japanese Language,” doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Lahaussois, A., 2003. “Nominalization in Thulung Rai,” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 26.1, 37–62.
Lakshmi Bai, B.,
1985. “
Some Notes on Correlative Constructions in Dravidian,” in
V. Z. Acson and
R. L. Leed (eds.),
For Gordon H. Fairbanks (
Honolulu:
University of Hawaii Press),
181–190.
Lalitha Murthy, B., 1994. “Participial Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Study,” Ph.D. thesis, Delhi University.
Lalitha Murthy, B., and K. V. Subbarao, 2000. “Pronouns and Lexical Anaphors in Mizo,” in Lust et al. (2000: 777–840).
Lambert, H. M.,
1971.
Gujarati Language Course(
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press).
Lasnik, H., 1999. Minimalist Analysis (London: Blackwell).
Lasnik, H., and J. Uriagereka with C. Boeckx, 2005. Minimalist Syntax (Malden: Blackwell).
Lee, H., 2003. “Prominence Mismatch and Markedness Reduction in Word Order,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 617–680.
Lehmann, T., 1989. A Grammar of Modern Tamil (Pondicherry: Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture).
Lehmann, W. P., 1973. “A Structural Principle of Language and its Implications,” Language, 49, 47–66.
Lichtenberk, F. 1985. “Multiple Uses of Reciprocal Constructions,” Australian Journal of Linguistics, 5, 19–41.
Lidz, J., 2001a. “Anti-locality,” in Cole et al. (2001: 227–254).
Lidz, J., 2001b. “Condition R,” Linguistic Inquiry, 32.1, 123–140.
Lidz, J., 2001c. “Argument Structure of Verbal Reflexives,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19.2, 311–353.
Lidz, J., 2006. “The Grammar of Accusative Case in Kannada,” Language, 82.1, 10–32.
Lohse, B., J. A. Hawkins and T. Wasow, 2004. “Domain Minimization in English Verb-particle Constructions,” Language, 80.2, 238–261.
Lord, C., 1976. “Evidence for Syntactic Reanalysis from Verb to Complementizer,” in Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax (Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society), 179–191.
Lorrain, J. H. (a.k.a. Pu Buanga), [1940] 1982. Dictionary of the Lushai Language (Culcutta: The Asiatic Society).
Lust, B., 1986. Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora, vol. I, Defining the Constraints (Dordrecht: Reidel).
Lust, B., K. Wali, J. W. Gair and K. V. Subbarao, 2000. Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Selected South Asian Languages: A Principled Typology (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
Lyngdoh, A., 2000. “Complementation in Khasi,” M.Phil. dissertation, Delhi University.
Macphail, R. M., 1983. An Introduction to Santali (Calcutta: Firma KLM Private Ltd.).
Magier, D., 1987. “The Transitivity Prototype: Evidence from Hindi,” Word, 38.3, 187–199.
Magier, D.,
1990. “Dative/Accusative Subjects in Marwari,” in Verma and Mohanan (1990:
213–220).
Mahajan, A., 1982. “Causatives in Indian languages,” M.Phil. dissertation, Delhi University.
Mahajan, A., 1987. “Notes on wh Questions in Hindi,” paper presented at “South Asian Languages Analysis,” Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Mahajan, A., 1989. “Agreement and Agreement Phrases,” in I. Laka and A. Mahajan (eds.), Functional Heads and Clause Structure. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 217–252.
Mahajan, A., 1990. “The A/A-bar Distinction and Movement Theory,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Mahajan, A., 1994. “Active Passives,” Proceedings of WCCFL, 13, 286–301.
Mahajan, A., 1997a. “Rightward Scrambling,” in D. Beerman, D. LeBlanc and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Rightward Movement (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins), 185–213.
Mahajan, A., 1997b. “Universal Grammar and the Typology of Ergative Languages,” in A. Alexiadou and T. A. Hall (eds.), Studies in Universal Grammar and Typological Variation (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins), 1335–1357.
Mahajan, A., 2000. “Relative Asymmetries and Hindi Correlatives,” in A. Alexiadou, P. Law and C. Wilder (eds.), The Syntax of Relative Clauses (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins), 201–229.
Mahajan, A., 2004. “The Origin of Non-nominative Subjects,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: I, 283–299).
Mahapatra, B. P., 1979. Malto: An Ethnosemantic Study (Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages).
Mahto, P., 1989. “On the Nature of Empty Pronominals,” Ph.D. thesis, Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages, Hyderabad.
Malhotra, S., 2002. “Sentential Word Order in Kokborok,” paper presented at the Linguistic Society of India meeting, Shillong, North-Eastern Hill University.
Malhotra, V., 1982. “The structure of Kharia: A Study of Linguistic Typology and Language Change,” Ph.D. thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
Manzini, R. M., and A. Roussou, 1998. “A Minimalistic Theory of A-movement and Control,” University College of London Working Papers, 11. Also in: Lingua, 10, 409–447 (2000).
Martin, R., 2001. “Null Case and the Distribution of PRO,” Linguistic Inquiry, 32.1, 141–166.
Martin, S. E., 1975. A Reference Grammar of Japanese (New Haven: Yale University Press).
Masica, C. P., 1976. Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Masica, C. P., 1991. The Indo-Aryan Languages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Masica, C. P., 1999. “Alternative Embedding Strategy in Gujarati,” in P. J. Mistry and B. Modi (eds.), Vidyopasaanaa: Studies in Honour of Harivallabh C. Bhayani (Mumbai and Ahmedabad: Image Publications Pvt. Ltd.), 135–156.
Matisoff, J., 1972. “Lahu Nominalization, Relativization and Genitivization,” in J. Kimbal (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. I (New York: Academic Press), 237–257.
McAlpin, D.,
1976. “Dative Subjects in Malayalam,” in Verma (1976:
183–194).
Minegishi, M., and G. Murmu, 2001. Santali Basic Lexicon with Grammatical Notes (Tokyo: ILCAA, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies).
Mistry, P. J., 1998: “Objecthood and Specificity in Gujarati,” in J. H. Hill, P. J. Mistry and L. Campbell (eds.), The Life of Language: Papers in Honour of William Bright (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 425–442.
Mistry, P. J., 2000. “Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Gujarati,” in Lust et al. (2000: 333–395).
Mistry, P. J., 2004. “Subjecthood of Non-nominatives in Gujarati,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: II, 1–32).
Mohanan, K. P., 1981. “Pronouns in Malayalam,” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 11, 67–75.
Mohanan, K. P., 1984. “Operator Binding and the Path Containment Condition,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, 357–396.
Mohanan, K. P., and T. Mohanan, 1990. “Dative Subjects in Malayalam: Semantic Information in Syntax,” in Verma and Mohanan (1990: 43–58).
Mohanan, K. P., and T. Mohanan, 1994. “Issues in Word Order in South Asian Languages: Enriched Phrase Structure or Multidimensionality?” in Butt et al. (1994: 153–184).
Mohanan, T., 1994. Argument Structure in Hindi (Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, Stanford University).
Mohanty, R., 2002. “ECM Constructions in Oriya and English and Tree Adjoining Grammar,” Ph.D. thesis, Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages, Hyderabad.
Monahan, P., 2003. “Backward Object Control in Korean,” in G. Garding and M. Tsujimura (eds.), WCCFL 22 Proceedings (Somerville, MA: Casadilla Press), 356–369.
Montaut, A., 2004. A Grammar of Hindi (Munich: Lincom Europa).
Mukherjee, A., 1989. Language Change and Language Variation (Hyderabad: Centre for Advanced Study in Linguistics, Osmania University).
Mukherjee, S. N., K. V. Subbarao and D. Walia, 2004. “Lexical Anaphors and Blocking Effects in Hmar,” in T. R. Kansakar and M. Turin (eds.), Themes in Himalayan Languages and Linguistics (Kathmandu, Nepal: Tribhuvan University; Heidelberg: Heidelberg University), 103–114.
Nadkarni, M. V., 1970. “Noun Phrase Embedded Structures in Kannada and Konkani,” doctoral disseration, UCLA.
Nadkarni, M. V., 1975. “Bilingualism and Syntactic Change in Konkani,” Language, 51, 672–683.
Nagaraja, K. S., 1984. “Relativization in Konyak,” Indian Linguistics, 45, 41–48.
Nagaraja, K. S., 1985. Khasi: A Descriptive Analysis (Pune: Deccan College).
Nagaraja, K. S., 1999. Korku Language (Tokyo: ILCAA, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies).
Nath, D. K., 2009. “Nominalization in Tiwa,” paper presented at the seminar on Nominalization at Tezpur University, Tezpur.
Neukom, L., 2001. Santali. Languages of the World / Materials 323 (Munich: Lincom Europa). (*insert unfigure* L. Neukom, ms “Santali Grammar”)
Neukom, L., and M. Patnaik, 2003. A Grammar of Oriya. Seminar für Allgemeine. Sprachwissenschaft der Univerität Zürich.
Newmeyer, F. J., 2007. “Linguistic Typology Requires Cross-linguistic Formal Categories,” Linguistic Typology, 11.1, 133–158.
Noonan, M., 1985. “Complementation,” in T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 42–140.
Osada, T., 1992. A Reference Grammar of Mundari (Tokyo: ILCAA, University of Foreign Studies, Tokyo).
Pandharipande, R., 1981. “Syntax and Semantics of the Passive Construction in Selected South Asian Languages,” doctoral dissertatiion, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana.
Pandharipande, R., 1990. “Experiencer (Dative) NPs in Marathi,” in Verma and Mohanan (1990: 161–180).
Pandharipande, R., 1997. Marathi (London and New York: Routledge).
Pandharipande, R., and Y. Kachru, 1976. “Relational Grammar, Ergativity and Hindi-Urdu,” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 6.1, 82–99.
Pandit, P. B., 1972. “India as a Sociolinguistic Area,” Gune Memorial Lectures, Pune University, Poona.
Pangersenla, 2005. “Issues in the Interpretation of Anaphors in Ao (Mongsen),” M.Phil. dissertation, Delhi University.
Paramasivam, K.,
1979.
Effectivity and Causativity in Tamil(
Trivandrum:
Dravidian Linguistics Association).
Patnaik, M., 1998. “Quotatives Revisited,” South Asian Language Review, 8.2, 79–96.
Patnaik, M., 1999. “Aspects of Juang Syntax,” Ph.D. thesis, Delhi University.
Patnaik, M., and K. V. Subbarao, 2000. “An Initial Note on Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Juang,” in Lust et al. (2000: 841–859).
Peterson, J., 2006. “Kharia: A South Munda Language, vol. I, Grammatical Analysis,” unpublished Habilitationsschrift, Universität Osnabrück. Also A Grammar of Kharia (Leiden: Brill, 2010).
Peterson, J., 2008. “Kharia,” in G. D. S. Anderson (ed.), The Munda Languages (New York: Routledge), 434–507.
Picallo, C., 1985. “Opaque Domains,” Ph.D. thesis, CUNY (City University of New York), New York.
Pinker, S., and R. Jackendoff, 2005. “The Faculty of Language: What's Special about It?” Cognition, 95, 201–236.
Pinnow, H. J., 1960. Beiträge zur Kenntnis Juang-Sprache.
Piñón, C., 2001. “A Finer Look at the Causative–inchoative Alternation,” in R. Hastings, B. Jackson and Z. Zvolensky (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 11 (Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications).
Polinsky, M., and E. Potsdam., 2002. “Backward Control in Tsez,” Linguistic Inquiry, 33.2, 245–285.
Polinsky, M., and E. Potsdam., 2003. Backward Control: Evidence from Malagasy. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 44 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy).
Porizka, V., 1963. Hindi Language Course (Prague: Statni pedagogicke nakladatelstvi).
Poudel, T.,
2007.
Tense, Aspect and Modality in Nepali and Manipuri(
Munich:
Lincom Europa).
Prakash, O., 2006. “Subordination in Mizo,” Ph.D. thesis, Delhi University.
Prakash, O., and K. V. Subbarao, 2003. “Internally Headed Relative Clauses in Mizo,” paper presented at the Himalayan Languages Conference, CIIL, Mysore.
Prasad, B. R., 1991. Mising Grammar (Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages).
Premchand, 1966. Godān (Allahabad: Sarasvati Press).
Raina, A. M.,
2002. “
The Verb Second Phenomenon in Kashmiri,” in
O. N. Koul and
K. Wali (eds.),
Topics in Kashmiri Linguistics (
New Delhi:
Creative Books),
113–128.
Ramakrishna Reddy, B., 1980. “Non-Dravidian Element in Manda Syntax: A Study in Linguistic Convergence,” Osmania Papers in Linguistics, 6, 71–88.
Ramakrishna Reddy, B., 1992a. “Syntactic Convergence in Central Indian Languages,” in M. K. Sastri (ed.), Sri Korada Ramakrishnaiah Centenary Festschrift (Visakhapatnam: Sita Trust), 571–577.
Ramakrishna Reddy, B., 1992b. “Predicate Agreement in Dravidian,” PILC Journal of Dravidic Studies, 1.1, 33–44.
Ramamurti, G. V., 1931. A Manual of the Sora (or Savara) Language (Madras: Govt. Press).
Ramanujan, A. K., and C. Masica, 1969. “Toward a Phonological Typology of the Indian Linguistic Area,” in T. E. Sebeok (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics, 5: Linguistics in South Asia (The Hague: Mouton), 543–577.
Ramarao, C., 1975. Telugu vākyam [“The Telugu Sentence” – in Telugu] (Hyderabad: A. P. Sahitya Academy).
Ramarao, C., 2003. Telugu velugulu [“Telugu Brightness” – in Telugu] (Hyderabad: Navodaya Book House).
Ramasamy, K. 1981. “Correlative Relative Clauses in Tamil,” in S. Agesthialingom and N. R. Nair (eds.), Dravidian Syntax. Annamalai University Publications in Linguistics 73 (Annamalainagar: Annamalai University Department of Linguistics), 363–380.
Ray, T., 2000. “Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Oriya,” in Lust et al. (2000: 575–636).
Regmi, C. U., 2002. “Relativization in Nepali,” Ph.D. thesis, Tribhuvan University.
Reinhart, T., 2002. “The Theta System: An Overview,” Theoretical Linguistics, 28.3, 229–290.
Reinhart, T., and T. Siloni, 2005. “The Lexicon–Syntax Parameter: Reflexivization and Other Arity Operations,” Linguistic Inquiry, 36.3, 389–436.
Riemsdijk, V. H., 2006. “Free Relatives,” in M. Everaert and V. H. Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. II (Oxford: Blackwell), 338–382.
Rizzi, L., 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery,” in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 281–283.
Rosenbaum, P. S., 1967. The Grammar of Predicate Complement Constructions (Boston, MA: MIT Press).
Ross, J. R., 1973. “Slifting,” in M. Gross and M. Schützenberger (eds.), The Formal Analysis of Natural Languages (‘s Gravenhage, Holland: Mouton and Company), 133–172.
Sarju Devi, T., 2006. “Embedded Clauses in Manipuri,” doctoral thesis, Delhi University.
Sarju Devi, T., and K. V. Subbarao, 2002. “Reduplication and Case Copying: The Case of Lexical Anaphors in Manipuri and Telugu,” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 25.2 (Fall), 47–72; also in R. Laury, G. McMenamin, S. Okamoto, V. Samiian and K. V. Subbarao (eds.), Papers in Honor of P. J. Mistry (New Delhi: Indian Institute of Language Studies, 2003).
Savio, D., 1991. “WH-questions in Tamil,” CIEFL Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 3, 55–67.
Saxena, A., 1985. “Reflexivization in Hindi: A Reconsideration,” International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics, 14, 224–237.
Schiffman, H.,
2000.
A Reference Grammar of Spoken Tamil(
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press).
Schiffman, H., and M. Shapiro, 1981. Language and Society in South Asia (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass).
Sengupta, G., 2000. “Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Bangla” in B. Lust et al. (2000: 277–332).
Shibatani, M., and T. Bynon, 1995. Approaches to Language Typology (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Shibatani, M., and P. Pardeshi, 2001. “Dative Subject Constructions in South Asian Languages,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2001: 311–348).
Sigurdsson, H. A., 1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic: A Comparative GB Approach (Lund: Department of Scandinavian Linguistics, University of Lund).
Sigurdsson, H. A., 1991. “Icelandic Case-marked PRO and the Licensing of Lexical Arguments,” NLLT, 9, 327–363.
Sigurdsson, H. A., 2004a. “The Syntax of Person, Tense, and Speech Features,” Italian Journal of Linguistics / Rivista di Linguistica, 16.1, 219–251.
Sigurdsson, H. A., 2004b. “Icelandic Non-nominative Subjects,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: 137–160).
Simpson, A., and T. Bhattacharya, 2003. “Obligatory Overt wh-movement in a wh-in-situ Language,” Linguistic Inquiry, 34.1, 127–142.
Singh, J., 1993. “Case and Agreement in Hindi: A GB Approach,” Ph.D. thesis, York University, UK.
Singh, U. N., 1979. “Some Aspects of Maithili Syntax: A Transformational-Generative Approach,” Ph.D. thesis, Delhi University.
Singh, U. N., 1980. “Bole: An Unresolved Problem in Bengali Syntax,” Indian Linguistics, 41, 188–195.
Southworth, F. C., and M. L. Apte (eds.), 1974. Contact and Convergence in South Asian languages. Special issue of International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics, 3.1.
Speijer, J. S., 1886. Sanskrit Syntax (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass; repr: 1980).
Sridhar, S. N., 1979. “Dative Subjects and the Notion of Subject,” Lingua, 49, 99–125.
Sridhar, S. N., 1981. “Linguistic Convergence: Indo-Aryanization of Dravidian,” Lingua, 53, 199–220.
Sridhar, S. N., 1990. Kannada (London: Routledge).
Srivastav, V., 1989. “Hindi wh and Pleonastic Operators,” NELS, 20.
Srivastav, V., 1991a. “Subjacency Effects at LF: The Case of Hindi WH,” Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 762–769.
Srivastav, V.,
1991b. “
The Syntax and Semantics of Correlatives,”
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,
9,
637–686.
Steever, S. B., 1987. “Remarks on Dravidian Complementation,” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 17.1, 103–119.
Steever, S. B., 1988. The Serial Verb Formation in the Dravidian Languages (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass).
Stowell, T., 1981. “Origins of Phrase Structure,” Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Subbarao, K. V., 1971. “Notes on Reflexivization in Hindi Syntax,” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 2.1, 180–214.
Subbarao, K. V., 1974. “Noun Phrase Complementation in Hindi,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois.
Subbarao, K. V.,
1979. “
Secondary Verbs in Telugu,”
International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics,
8.2,
268–272.
Subbarao, K. V., 1984a. Complementation in Hindi Syntax (Delhi: Academic Publications).
Subbarao, K. V., 1984b. Syntactic Typology, Language Universals and Convergence in South Asian Languages, UGC Project Report (Delhi: Delhi University).
Subbarao, K. V., 1996. “The Conjunctive Participle in South Asian Languages,” paper presented at the Indo-French Workshop on Computational Linguistics, Hyderabad: University of Hyderabad.
Subbarao, K. V., 1998a. “Linguistic Theory and Syntactic Typology: A Proposal for A Symbiotic Relationship,” in Vāgbhārati: Proceedings of the International Conference on South Asian Languages and Literatures (Moscow: Moscow State University, 5–23. Rpt. in Indian Linguistics, 60 (1999), 95–110).
Subbarao, K. V., 1998b. “In Support of Agr as a Functional Category,” paper presented at the GLOW Workshop, Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages, Hyderabad.
Subbarao, K. V., 1999. “Agreement and Relative Clauses in Tibeto-Burman Languages,” Tokyo: ILCAA, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies (ms).
Subbarao, K. V., 2000. “Syntactic Typology and South Asian Languages,” in R. Singh (ed.), The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics (New Delhi: Thousand Oaks; London: Sage Publications), 93–108.
Subbarao, K. V., 2001. “Agreement in South Asian Languages: Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2001: 457–492).
Subbarao, K. V., 2003. “Language Types and Agreement in South Asian Languages,” in B. Ramakrishna Reddy (ed.), Special Issue on Agreement, International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics (Chennai: International Institute of Tamil Studies), 1–27.
Subbarao, K. V., 2004. “Tense and Agreement in Backward Control,” paper presented at the Universities of Osnabrück and Lund and also at the conference on Control Verbs, ZAS, Berlin.
Subbarao, K. V., 2005a. “Backward Control,” plenary lecture delivered at the 25th South Asian Languages Analysis Conference, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, Illinois.
Subbarao, K. V., 2005b. “Case Alternations and Control Theory,” keynote address delivered at the International Conference on South Asian Languages and Literatures, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India.
Subbarao, K. V., 2007a. “The Role of Particles and Clitics in Disambiguation in South Asian Languages,” in C. Masica (ed.), Old and New Perspectives on South Asian Languages: Grammar and Semantics (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass), 153–174.
Subbarao, K. V., 2007b. “Typological Characteristics of South Asian Languages,” in B. B. Kachru and S. N. Sridhar (eds.), Language in South Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 49–78.
Subbarao, K. V., 2010. “Dravidian Languages: A Syntactic Typology,” special lecture presented at the seminar on The Linguistic and Genetic Architecture of Dravidian at Dravidian University, Kuppam, India, 22–24 February 2010.
Subbarao, K. V., and
H. Arora,
1989. “
Extreme Convergence: The Case of Dakhini Hindi-Urdu,” in
A. Mukherjee (ed.),
Language Change and Language Variation (
Hyderabad:
Centre of Advanced Study, Osmania University),
105–122.
Subbarao, K. V., and H. Arora, 2009. “The Conjunctive Participle in Dakkhini Hindi-Urdu: Making the Best of Both Worlds,” Indian Linguistics, 70, 359–386.
Subbarao, K. V., and
P. Bhaskararao,
2004. “Non-nominative Subjects in Telugu
,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: II,
161–196).
Subbarao, K.V., and M. Everaert, 2011. “Verbal and Nominal Anaphors in South Asian Languages (SALs): Some Observations on Case Copying, Antecedent Restrictions and Long-distance Binding,” paper presented at the workshop on “The World of Reflexives” at University of Utrecht.
Subbarao, K. V., and P. Haokip, 2009. “Gap Relatives in Thadou with Special Reference to the Comitative PP as Head,” paper presented at the seminar on Nominalization at Tezpur University, Tezpur; also at South Asian Languages Analysis (SALA) 2011, Central Institute of Languages, Mysore.
Subbarao, K. V., and P. Haokip, 2011. “EHRCs and IHRCs in Thadou (Tibeto-Burman),” paper presented at South Asian Languages Analysis 29 (SALA 29) conference at the Central Institute of Indian Languages, Mysore, India.
Subbarao, K. V., and M. Kevichüsa, 1999. “Internal Relative Clauses in Tenyidie (Angami): A Case of Hierarchical Precedence vs. Linear Precedence,” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 22.1, 149–181.
Subbarao, K. V., and M. Kevichüsa, 2005. “Relative Clauses in Sema,” in Bhattacharya (2005: 255–272).
Subbarao, K. V., and B. Lalitha Murthy, 1994. “Ergativity in Mizo,” Gaveshana (Agra: Central Hindi Institute), 257–266.
Subbarao, K. V., and B. Lalitha Murthy, 1997. “The Passive in Mizo,” in A. Abbi (ed.), Languages of Tribal and Indigenous Peoples of India: The Ethnic Space (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass), 401–414.
Subbarao, K. V., and B. Lalitha Murthy, 2000. “Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Telugu,” in Lust et al. (2000: 217–276).
Subbarao, K. V., and B. Lalitha Murthy, ms. “Aspects of Mizo Grammar.”
Subbarao, K. V., and
S. Munshi,
2000. “Agreement in Kashmiri
: Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework” (ms).
Subbarao, K. V., and T. Sarju Devi, ms. “A Grammar of Manipuri.”
Subbarao, K. V., and
A. Saxena,
1987. “
Language Universals: Inductive or Deductive?” in
E. Bashir,
M. Deshpande and
P. E. Hook (eds.),
Select Papers from SALA 7 (
Indiana:
Indiana University Linguistic Club, Indiana University),
337–342.
Subbarao, K. V., and A. Saxena, 1989. “Reflexives and Reciprocals in Dravidian,” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences (University of Illinois), 17.1, 121–136.
Subbarao, K. V., and
G. Temsen, in press. “
Comitative PP as Head in Externally Headed Relative Clauses in Khasi,”
Mon-Khmer Studies: A Journal of Southeast Asian Languages (
Bangkok, Thailand:
Mahidol University),
187–205.
Subbarao, K. V., R. K. Agnihotri and A. Mukherjee, 1991. “Syntactic Strategies and Politeness Phenomena,” International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 35–53.
Subbarao, K.V., Th. Geeta Devi and Th. Sarju Devi, 2003. “Embedded Clauses in Manipuri,” in T. R. Kansakar and M. Turin (eds.), Themes in Himalayan Linguistics (Heidelberg: South Asian Institute; Kathmandu: Tribhuvan University), 173–196.
Subbarao, K. V., U. R. Hakacham and M. Gogoi-Dutta, ms. “A Typological Grammar of Rabha.”
Subbarao, K. V.,
U. R. Hakacham and
T. Sarju Devi,
2007. “
Case-marked PRO: Evidence from Rabha, Manipuri, Hindi-Urdu and Telugu,” in
R. Bielmeier and
F. Haller(eds.),
Linguistics of the Himalayas and Beyond (
Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter),
291–322.
Subbarao, K. V., S. Malhotra and S. Barua, 2010. “Aspects of Kokborok Syntax,” Interdiciplinary Journal of Linguistics, 3, 1–43.
Subbarao, K. V., C. Viswanath Rao and A. Saxena, “Agreement in Telugu,” in B. Lakshmi Bai and B. Ramakrishna Reddy (eds.), Studies in Dravidian and General Linguistics: A Festschrift for Bh. Krishnamurti (Hyderabad: Center for Advanced Studies in Linguistics, Osmania University, 1991), 215–232.
Subbarao, K. V., C. Viswanath Rao, N. Rao and A. Saxena, 1989. “Verb Say in South Asian Languages,” in A. Mukherjee (ed.), Language Change and Language Variation (Hyderabad: Centre of Advanced Study, Osmania University), 89–104.
Tang, C. C. J., 1989. “Chinese Reflexives,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7, 93–121.
Temsen, G., 2006. “Embedded Clauses in Khasi,” Ph.D. thesis, Delhi University.
Temsen, G., 2007. “What is the Order?” paper presented at the National Seminar on the Emerging Linguistic Scene in North-East India.
Temsen, G., and K. V. Subbarao, 2004. “Control Structures in Khasi,” paper presented at the Fourth Himalayan Languages Conference, Central Institute of Indian Languages, Mysore, India.
Temsen, G., and K. V. Subbarao, in preparation. “A Grammar of Khasi.”
Tikkanen, B., 1987. The Sanskrit Gerund: A Syntactic Diachronic and Typological Analysis. Studia. Orientalia 62.
Tikkanen, B., 1995. “Burushaski Converbs in their South and Central Asian Areal Context,” in Haspelmath and König: 487–528.
Tikkanen, B., 2001. “Converbs,” in M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher and W. Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals (Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter), 1112–1123.
Ura, H., 2000. Checking Theory and Grammatical Functions in Universal Grammar (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Ura, H., 2003. “Case,” in M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds.), The Handbook of Syntactic Contemporary Theory (Malden, MA: Blackwell), 334–373.
van der Wurff, W., 1989. “The Syntax of Participial Adjuncts in Eastern Bengali,” Journal of Linguistics, 25, 373–416.
van Driem, G., 1993. A Grammar of Dumi (Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter).
Varija, N., 2005. “Syntactic Convergence in Bhalavali Marathi,” paper presented at the Prof. M. B. Emeneau Centenary International Conference on South Asian Linguistics, Central Institute of Indian Languages, Mysore, India.
Verma, M. K., 1971. The Structure of Noun Phrase in English and Hindi (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass).
Verma, M. K., 1976. The Notion of Subject in Indian Languages (Madison: University of Wisconsin).
Verma, M. K., 1991. “Exploring the Parameters of Agreement: The Case of Magahi,” Language Sciences, 13.2, 125–143.
Verma, M. K., and K. P. Mohanan, 1990. Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages (Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, Stanford University).
Wali, K., 2000. “Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Marathi,” in B. Lust et al. (2000: 513–574).
Wali, K., 2004. “Non-nominative Subjects in Marathi,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: II, 223–252).
Wali, K., 2006. Marathi (Delhi: Indian Institute of Language Studies).
Wali, K., and O. N. Koul, 1997. Kashmiri: A Cognitive Descriptive Grammar (London and New York: Routledge).
Wali, K., and K. V. Subbarao, 1991. “On Pronominal Classification: Evidence from Marathi and Telugu,” Linguistics, 29, 1093–1110.
Wali, K., O. N. Koul, P. E. Hook and A. K. Koul, 2000. “Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Kashmiri,” in B. Lust et al. (2000: 471–512).
Wasow, T., 1986. “Reflections on Anaphora,” in B. Lust (ed.), Studies in the Acquisition of Anaphora, vol. I, Defining the Constraints (Dordrecht: Reidel), 107–122.
Wasow, T., A. Perfors and D. Beaver, 2005. “The Puzzle of Ambiguity,” in Morphology and the Web Grammar: Essays in Memory of Steven H. Lapointe (Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, Stanford University).
Watters, D. E., 2002. A Grammar of Kham, Cambridge Grammatical Descriptions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Weinreich, U., 1958. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems, Linguistic Circle of New York 1 (The Hague: Mouton).
Woolford, E., 1999. “More on the Anaphor Agreement Effects,” Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 257–287.
Woolford, E., 2003. “Burzio's Generalization, Markedness, and Locality Constraints on Nominative Objects,” in E. Brandner and H. Zinsmeister (eds.), New Perspectives on Case Theory (Stanford: CSLI Publications), 301–329.
Wurmbrandt, S., 2003. Infinitives and Clause Structures (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).
Yadava, Y. P., 1997. “Maithili Agreement” (ms).
Yadava, Y. P., 1999. “The Complexity of Maithili Verb Agreement,” in R. Singh (ed.), The Yearbook of South Asian Language and Linguistics (Delhi: Sage), 139–152.
Yadava, Y. P., 2004. “Non-nominative Subjects in Maithili,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: II, 253–264).
Yadava, Y. P., 2007. “Raising from a Tensed Clause and Linguistic Theory: Evidence from Maithili,” in Bayer et al. (2007: 143–162).
Yamabe, J., 1990. “Dative Subject Constructions in Indic Languages,” unpublished Masters’ thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Tokyo.
Yoon, J., 2004. “Non-nominative (Major) Subjects and Case Stacking in Korean,” in Bhaskararao and Subbarao (2004: II, 265–314).
Zaenen, A., J. Maling and H. Thrá insson, 1985. “Case and Grammatical Functions: The Icelandic Passive,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 3, 441–483.
