Abrajano, Marisa A. and R. Michael Alvarez, New Faces, New Voices: The Hispanic Electorate in America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012).
Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, Phil Paolino, and David Rohde, “Sophisticated Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries,” American Political Science Review 86–1 (1992), 55–69.
Adams, James and Samuel Merrill, “Candidate and Party Strategies in Two-Stage Elections Beginning with a Primary,” American Journal of Political Science 52–2 (2008), 344–359.
Ahler, Doug, Jack Citrin, and Gabriel S. Lenz, “Do Open Primaries Help Moderate Candidates? An Experimental Test on the 2012 California Primary,” Working Paper (2014).
Aldrich, John H., Before the Convention: Strategies and Choices in Presidential Nomination Campaigns (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980a).
Aldrich, John H., “A Dynamic Model of Presidential Nomination Campaigns,” American Political Science Review 74–3 (1980b), 651–669.
Aldrich, John H., Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).
Aldrich, John H. and Richard D. McKelvey, “A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential Elections,” American Political Science Review 71–1 (1977), 111–130.
Alvarez, R. Michael, Information & Elections, revised from 1997 edition, (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999).
Alvarez, R. Michael, Melanie Goodrich, Thad E. Hall, D. Roderick Kiewiet, and Sarah M. Sled, “The Complexity of the California Recall Election,” Political Science and Politics 37–1 (2004), 23–26.
Alvarez, R. Michael and Thad E. Hall, Electronic Elections: The Perils and Promises of Digital Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008).
Alvarez, R. Michael, Thad E. Hall, and Morgan H. Llewellyn, “How Hard Can It Be: Do Citizens Think It Is Difficult to Register to Vote?,” Stanford Law & Policy Review 18–349 (2007), 382–409.
Alvarez, R. Michael, Thad E. Hall, and Morgan H. Llewellyn, “Who Should Run Elections in the United States?” Policy Studies Journal 36–3 (2008), 325–346.
Alvarez, R. Michael and Gabriel Katz, “Structural Cleavages, Electoral Competition and Partisan Divide: A Bayesian Multinomial Probit Analysis of Chile’s 2005 Election,” Electoral Studies 28–2 (2009), 177–189.
Alvarez, R. Michael and D. Roderick Kiewiet, “Rationality and Rationalistic Choice in the California Recall,” British Journal of Political Science 39–2 (2009), 267–290.
Alvarez, R. Michael and Jonathan Nagler, “Issues and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election,” American Journal of Political Science 39–3 (1995), 714–744.
Alvarez, R. Michael and Jonathan Nagler, “Economics, Entitlements, and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election,” American Journal of Political Science 42–4 (1998a), 1349–1363.
Alvarez, R. Michael and Jonathan Nagler, “When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections,” American Journal of Political Science 42–1 (1998b), 55–96.
Alvarez, R. Michael and Jonathan Nagler, “A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections,” British Journal of Political Science 30–1 (2000), 57–75.
Alvarez, R. Michael and Jonathan Nagler, “Should I Stay or Should I Go? Sincere and Strategic Crossover Voting in California Assembly Races,” in Cain and Gerber, eds. (2002), 77–106.
Alvarez, R. Michael, Jonathan Nagler, and Shaun Bowler, “Issues, Economics, and the Dynamics of Multiparty Elections: The British 1987 General Election,” American Political Science Review 94–1 (2000), 131–149.
Alvarez, R. Michael and Betsy Sinclair, “Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: The Effects of Primary Processes,” Political Research Quarterly 65–3 (2012), 544–557.
Alvarez, R. Michael and J. Andrew Sinclair, “Who Are California’s Decline to State Voters?” California Journal of Politics and Policy 5–1 (2013), 47–66.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Nathaniel Persily, and Charles Stewart III, “Regional Differences in Racial Polarization in the 2012 Presidential Election: Implications for the Constitutionality of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act,” Harvard Law Review 126 (2013), 205–214.
Arrow, Kenneth J., Social Choice and Individual Values (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1951).
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, “Divisive Primaries and General Election Outcomes: Another Look at Presidential Campaigns,” American Journal of Political Science 42–1 (1998), 256–271.
Baldassare, Mark, California at the New Millennium: The Changing Social and Political Landscape (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000).
Baldassare, Mark, A California State of Mind: The Conflicted Voter in a Changing World (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002).
Baldassare, Mark, Dean Bonner, Sonja Petek, and Nicole Wilcoxon, “PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians & Their Government,” Public Policy Institute of California (March 2010a).
Baldassare, Mark, Dean Bonner, Sonja Petek, and Nicole Wilcoxon, “PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians & Their Government,” Public Policy Institute of California (May 2010b).
Baldassare, Mark,
Dean Bonner,
Sonja Petek, and
Jui Shrestha, “Californians & Their Government: PPIC Statewide Survey, May 2012,” Public Policy Institute of California (
2012). Available online at:
http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/survey/S_512MBS.pdf (last accessed September 22, 2012).
Bartels, Larry M., “Expectations and Preferences in Presidential Nominating Campaigns,” The American Political Science Review 79–3 (1985), 805–815.
Bartels, Larry M., Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).
Bernstein, Robert A., “Divisive Primaries Do Hurt: U.S. Senate Races, 1956–1972,” The American Political Science Review 71–2 (1977), 540–545.
Black, Duncan, “On the Rationale of Group Decision-Making,” Journal of Political Economy 56–1 (1948), 23–34.
Born, Richard, “The Influence of House Primary Election Divisiveness on General Election Margins, 1962–1976,” Journal of Politics 43–3 (1981), 640–661.
Bowler, Shaun and Todd Donovan, “Political Reform via the Initiative Process: What Voters Think about When They Change the Rules,” in Cain and Gerber, eds. (2002), 36–58.
Brady, David W., Hahrie Han, and Jeremy C. Pope, “Primary Elections and Candidate Ideology: Out of Step with the Primary Electorate?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32–1 (2007), 79–105.
Bullock III, Charles S. and Loch K. Johnson, “Runoff Elections in Georgia,” The Journal of Politics 47–3 (1985), 937–946.
Bullock III, Charles S. and Loch K. Johnson, Runoff Elections in the United States (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992).
Bullock III, Charles S. and A. Brock Smith, “Black Success in Local Runoff Elections,” The Journal of Politics 52–4 (1990), 1205–1220.
Cain, Bruce E., “Strategic Voting in Britain,” American Journal of Political Science 22–3 (1978), 639–655.
Cain, Bruce E. and Elisabeth R. Gerber (eds.), Voting at the Political Fault Line: California’s Experiment with the Blanket Primary (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002).
Callander, Steven, “Duverger’s Hypothesis, the Run-Off Rule, and Electoral Competition,” Political Analysis 13 (2005), 209–232.
Callander, Steven, “Bandwagons and Momentum in Sequential Voting,” Review of Economic Studies 74 (2007), 653–684.
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes, The American Voter (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960).
Chen, Kong-Pin and Sheng-Zhang Yang, “Strategic Voting in Open Primaries,” Public Choice 112–1/2 (2002), 1–30.
Cohen, Marty, David Karol, Hans Noel, and John Zaller, The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008).
Cooper, Alexandra L., “Nominating Presidential Candidates: The Primary Season Compared to Two Alternatives,” Political Research Quarterly 54–4 (2001), 771–793.
Cox, Gary, Making Votes Count (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
Dahl, Robert A., A Preface to Democratic Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956).
Donovan, Todd, “The Top Two Primary: What Can California Learn from Washington?” The California Journal of Politics & Policy 4–1 (2012), 1–22.
Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1957).
Duverger, Maurice, Political Parties (New York: Wiley, 1954).
Fiorina, Morris P., “An Outline for a Model of Party Choice,” American Journal of Political Science 21–3 (1977), 601–625.
Fiorina, Morris P., Retrospective Voting in American National Elections (New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press, 1981).
Fowler, Linda L., Constantine J. Spiliotes, and Lynn Vavreck, “Sheep in Wolves’ Clothing: Undeclared Voters in New Hampshire’s Open Primary,” PS: Political Science and Politics 36–2 (2003), 159–163.
Gaines, Brian J. and Wendy K. Tam Cho, “Crossover Voting Before the Blanket,” in Cain and Gerber, eds. (2002), 12–35.
Geer, John G., “Assessing the Representativeness of Electorates in Presidential Primaries,” American Journal of Political Science 32–4 (1988), 929–945.
Gerber, Elisabeth R. and Rebecca B. Morton, “Primary Election Systems and Representation,” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 14–2 (1998), 304–324.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay, The Federalist Papers (New York: Signet, 2003 [1788]).
Hedlund, Ronald D., “Cross-Over Voting in a 1976 Open Presidential Primary,” The Public Opinion Quarterly 41–4 (1977–1978), 498–514.
Hedlund, Ronald D. and Meredith W. Watts, “The Wisconsin Open Primary, 1968 to 1984,” American Politics Quarterly 14 (1986), 55–73.
Hedlund, Ronald D., Meredith W. Watts, and David M. Hedge, “Voting in an Open Primary,” American Politics Quarterly 10 (1982), 197–218.
Hoffenblum, Allan,
Al Pross,
Victor Griego,
Deborah Howard,
Tony Quinn, and
Darry Sragow,
California Target Book (
2012). Available online at:
www.californiatargetbook.com (last accessed February 25, 2014).
Hotelling, Harold, “Stability in Competition,” The Economic Journal 39–153 (1929), 41–57.
Hurley, Patricia A. and Kim Quaile Hill, “In Search of Representation Theory,” in The Oxford Handbook of American Elections and Political Behavior, Jan E. Leighley, ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).
Illinois Bar Association, (ed.), Illinois Revised Statues (1945).
Imai, Kosuke and David A. van Dyk, “MNP: R Package for Fitting the Multinomial Probit Model,” Journal of Statistical Software 14–3 (2005), 1–32.
Iversen, Torben, “Political Leadership and Representation in West European Democracies: A Test of Three Models of Voting,” American Journal of Political Science 38–1 (1994), 45–74.
Jewell, Malcolm, “Voting Turnout in State Gubernatorial Primaries,” The Western Political Quarterly 30–2 (1977), 236–254.
Kanthak, Kristin and Rebecca Morton, “Congressional Primaries,” in Congressional Primaries and the Politics of Representation, Peter F. Galderisi, Mami Ezra, and Michael Lyons, eds. (New York: Rowan & Littlefield, 2001).
Kaufmann, Karen M., James G. Gimpel, and Adam H. Hoffman, “A Promise Fulfilled? Open Primaries and Representation,” The Journal of Politics 65–2 (2003), 457–476.
Keith, Bruce E., David Magleby, Candice J. Nelson, Elizabeth Orr, Mark C. Westlye, and Raymond E. Wolfinger, The Myth of the Independent Voter (Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press, 1992).
Kenney, Patrick J. “Explaining Turnout in Gubernatorial Primaries,” American Politics Research, 11–3 (1983), 315–326.
Kenney, Patrick J. “Explaining Primary Turnout: The Senatorial Case,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 11–1 (1986), 65–73.
Key, V. O. Southern Politics in State and Nation, 1984 reprint (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1949).
Keyssar, Alexander, The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States (New York: Basic Books, 2000).
King, Gary, A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997).
King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg, “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation,” American Journal of Political Science 44–2 (2000), 347–361.
Korey, John L. and Theodore L. Lascher, Jr., “Political Independents and Civic Engagement in California,” Paper presented at the 2010 annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Francisco, April 1–3 (2010).
Kousser, J. Morgan. “The Historical Origins of the Run-Off Primary,” Focus, June (1984), 8–9.
Lascher, Edward L. Jr. and John L. Korey, “The Myth of the Independent Voter, California Style,” The California Journal of Politics & Policy 3 (2011), 1–19.
Leighley, Jan E. and Jonathan Nagler, Who Votes Now? Demographics, Issues, Inequality, and Turnout in the United States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013).
Levin, Ines, J. Andrew Sinclair, and R. Michael Alvarez. “Political Participation with Heterogeneous Citizens: Economic Adversity, Blame Attribution, and Civic Engagement,” Working Paper (2013).
Lubecky, David, “Setting Voter Qualifications for State Primary Elections: Reassertion of the Right of State Political Parties to Self-Determination,” University of Cincinnati Law Review 55 (1987), 799–830.
Lupia, Arthur, “Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections,” American Political Science Review 88–1 (1994), 63–76.
Masket, Seth E., No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2011).
Mayhew, David R., “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals,” Polity 6–3 (1974), 295–317.
McGhee, Eric, Seth Masket, Boris Shor, Steven Rogers, and Nolan McCarty, “A Primary Cause of Partisanship? Nomination Systems and Legislator Ideology,” American Journal of Political Science (2013). Advanced online copy, DOI:10.1111/ajps.12070.
McKelvey, Richard D., “Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control,” Journal of Economic Theory 12–3 (1976), 472–482.
McKelvey, Richard D., “General Conditions for Global Intransitivities in Formal Voting Models,” Econometrica 47–5 (1979), 1085–1111.
McNitt, Andrew D., “The Effect of Preprimary Endorsement on Competition for Nominations: An Examination of Different Nominating Systems,” The Journal of Politics 42–1 (1980), 257–266.
Meinke, Scott R., Jeffrey K. Staton, and Steven T. Wuhs, “State Delegate Selection Rules for Presidential Nominations, 1972–2000,” The Journal of Politics 68–1 (2006), 180–193.
Merriam, Charles Edward and Louise Overacker, Primary Elections (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1928).
Miller, Warren E. and Donald E. Stokes, “Constituency Influence in Congress,” The American Political Science Review, 57–1 (1963), 45–56.
Morton, Rebecca and Kenneth Williams, “Information Asymmetries and Simultaneous versus Sequential Voting,” American Political Science Review 93–1 (1999), 51–67.
Morton, Rebecca B. and Kenneth C. Williams, Learning by Voting: Sequential Choices in Presidential Primaries and Other Elections (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001).
Nagler, Jonathan, “Voting in California’s Top 2 Primary and General Election,” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 1 (2013).
Norrander, Barbara, “Explaining Cross-State Variation in Independent Identification,” American Journal of Political Science 33–2 (1989), 516–536.
Norrander, Barbara, “Nomination Choices: Caucus and Primary Outcomes, 1976–88,” American Journal of Political Science 37–2 (1993), 343–364.
Oak, Mandar P., “On the Role of the Primary System in Candidate Selection,” Economics & Politics 18–2 (2006), 169–190.
Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action: Public goods and the theory of groups, second edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).
Overton, Spencer, Stealing Democracy: The New Politics of Voter Suppression (New York: W.W. Norton, 2006).
Owen, Guillermo and Bernard Grofman, “Two-Stage Electoral Competition in Two-Party Contests: Persistent Divergence of Party Positions,” Social Choice and Welfare 26–3 (2006), 547–569.
Palfrey, Thomas R., “Spatial Equilibrium with Entry,” The Review of Economic Studies 51–1 (1984), 139–156.
Persily, Nathaniel, “The Blanket Primary in the Courts: The Precedent and Implications of California Democratic Party v. Jones,” in Cain and Gerber, eds. (2002), 303–324.
Plott, Charles, “A Nation of Equilibrium and Its Possibility under Majority Rule,” American Economic Review 57–4 (1967), 787–806.
Poole, Keith,
Jeffrey Lewis,
Howard Rosenthal,
James Lo, and
Royce Carroll “Recovering a Basic Space from Issue Scales in R” (
2012). Available online at:
http://voteview.com/basicspace.pdf (last accessed November 14, 2012).
Rabinowitz, George and Elaine S. Macdonald “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting,” The American Political Science Review 83–1 (1989), 93–121.
Ranney, Austin, “The Representativeness of Primary Electorates,” Midwest Journal of Political Science 12–2 (1968), 224–238.
Ranney, Austin, “Turnout and Representation in Presidential Primary Elections,” American Political Science Review 66–1 (1972), 21–37.
Riker, William H. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between The Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice (New York: W.H. Freeman, 1982).
Riker, William H., and Peter C. Ordeshook, “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting,” The American Political Science Review 62–1 (1968), 25–42.
Rosenstone, Steven. J. and Raymond E. Wolfinger, “The Effect of Registration Laws on Voter Turnout,” The American Political Science Review 72–1 (1978), 22–45.
Rothenberg, Lawrence S. and Richard A. Brody, “Participation in Presidential Primaries,” The Western Political Quarterly 41–2 (1988), 253–271.
Salvanto, Anthony. M. and Martin P. Wattenberg, “Peeking under the Blanket: A Direct Look at Crossover Voting in the 1998 Primary,” in Cain and Gerber, eds. (2002), 124–142.
Sides, John, Jonathan Cohen, and Jack Citrin, “The Causes and Consequences of Crossover Voting in the 1998 California Elections,” in Cain and Gerber, eds. (2002), 77–106.
Sinclair, J. Andrew, “Pragmatic Sincerity: Crossover Voting in the Top-Two Primary,” California Institute of Technology, Social Sciences Working Paper (2013).
Southwell, Priscilla L., “Open versus Closed Primaries and Candidate Fortunes, 1972–1984,” American Politics Research 16–3 (1988), 280–295.
Starr, Kevin, Inventing the Dream: California through the Progressive Era (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).
Tolstoy, Leo, War and Peace. Trans. Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky (New York: Vintage Classics, 2008).
Ware, Alan, The American Direct Primary: Party Institutionalization and Transformation in the North (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
Weicker, Lowell P., Maverick: A Life in Politics (New York: Little Brown & Co., 1995).
Wekkin, Gary D., “The Conceptualization and Measurement of Crossover Voting,” Western Political Quarterly 41–1 (1988), 105–114.
Wekkin, Gary D., “Why Crossover Voters Are Not ‘Mischievous Voters’: The Segmented Partisanship Hypothesis,” American Politics Research 19–2 (1991), 229–247.
White, Theodore H., The Making of the President: 1960, reprint 2009 (New York: Harper Collins, 1961).
Wolfinger, Raymond E. and Steven J. Rosenstone, Who Votes? (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980).
Zaller, John R., The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
Zaller, John R., “Monica Lewinsky’s Contribution to Political Science,” PS: Political Science and Politics 31–2 (1998), 182–189.