Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T21:57:22.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Gellner versus Marxism: a major concern or a fleeting affair?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Peter Skalník
Affiliation:
Charles University
Siniŝa Maleŝević
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland, Galway
Mark Haugaard
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland, Galway
Get access

Summary

Marx's faith, I believe, was fundamentally a faith in the open society.

(Popper 1966: 200)

When the Revolution comes, both sides will shoot him.

(David Glass, according to Gellner 1996: 673)

Gellner's choice is a variety of democratic socialism.

(Wettersten 1996: 503)

Gellner's social theory rests on two pillars: civil society and modernity. In both, Marxism has a stake. Lessnoff argues that Gellner saw Bolshevism as ‘an effective agent of economic and social modernization’ and that Marxism-Leninism as an ideology was for him ‘a kind of functional equivalent, a collectivist substitute, for the “Protestant ethic” of Calvinism’ (Lessnoff 2002: 55). This chapter is an attempt at a more subtle and diversified look at Gellner's relationship with Marxism. On the one hand there is the reality and practice of Bolshevism (Soviet Marxism or Marxism-Leninism) which Gellner viewed rather critically; on the other there is Marxism without adjectives as a general social and historical theory. I shall analyse both strands. Although Gellner did not submit the former to any deeper analysis (there are indications that after his one-year stay in Moscow in the late 1980s he envisaged a book on the Soviet communist system), I argue that he was attracted to the theory and practice of the Soviet experiment. In perhaps his last word on this theme, he wrote that he ‘always knew that those beliefs were rubbish’ but treated them with respect ‘as one generally does with regard to the religion of others’ (Gellner 1993: 141).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berelowitch, W. 1998. Entre marxisme et ethnicité: l'anthropologie russe selon Ernest Gellner. Genèses 33: 128–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelowitch, W. (ed.) 1990. Regards sur l'anthropologie soviétique. Special double issue of Cahiers du Monde Russe et Soviétique 31 (2–3).
Gellner, E. 1974. The Soviet and the Savage. Times Literary Supplement 3789: 1166–8, reprinted in Current Anthropology 16(4): 595–601 and Gellner 1988b : 1–17.
Gellner, E. (ed.) 1980. Soviet and Western Anthropology. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1984. Soviets against Wittfogel, or the Anthropological Preconditions of Marxism. In Galey, J. -C. (ed.), Différences, valeurs, hiérarchie: textes offerts à Louis Dumont. Paris: Editions de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, pp. 183–211.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1988a. Plough, Sword and Book: The Structure of Human History. London: Collins Harvill.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1988b. State and Society in Soviet Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1990. The Theory of History: East and West. In W. Berelowitch (ed.), Regards sur l'anthropologie soviétique. A special double issue of Cahiers du Monde Russe et Soviétique 31 (2–3): 141–50.
Gellner, E. 1992. A Year in the Soviet Union (An Interview with Nikki Keddie). Contention 1 (2): 107–20.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1993. Homeland of the Unrevolution. Daedalus 122 (3): 141–53.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1994a. Conditions of Liberty. Civil Society and Its Rivals. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1994b. Encounters with Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1996. Reply to Critics. In Hall, J. A. and Jarvie, I. (eds.), The Social Philosophy of Ernest Gellner. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, pp. 623–86.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1997. Nationalism. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Hall, J. A. and Jarvie, I. (eds.) 1996. The Social Philosophy of Ernest Gellner. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Hann, C. M. 2001. Ernest Gellner (1925–1995). In Smelser, N. J. and Bates, P. B. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 5899–5901.Google Scholar
Kabo, V. R. 1990. Etude de la structure sociale traditionnelle dans l'anthropologie soviétique, hier et aujour'hui. In W. Berelowitch (ed.), Regards sur l'anthropologie soviétique. A special double issue of Cahiers du Monde Russe et Soviétique 31 (2–3): 163–9.
Khazanov, A. 1990. The Ethnic Situation in the Soviet Union as Reflected in Soviet Anthropology. Cahiers du Monde Russe et Soviétique 31 (2–3): 213–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khazanov, A. 1996/7. Gellner and the Soviets. Cambridge Anthropology 19 (2): 50–8.Google Scholar
Kradin, N. N. 2003. Ernest Gellner and Debates on the Nomadic Feudalism. Social Evolution and History 2 (2): 162–76.Google Scholar
Lessnoff, M. 2002. Ernest Gellner and Modernity. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Musil, J. 2001. Gellner's Philosophy of History – Interpretations and Problems. Czech Sociological Review 9 (2): 153–72.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol. II. Rev. edn, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Skalník, P. 1981. Community: Struggle for a Key Concept in Soviet Ethnography. Dialectical Anthropology 6 (2): 183–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skalník, P. 1986. Towards an Understanding of Soviet Etnos Theory. South African Journal of Ethnology 9 (4): 157–66.Google Scholar
Skalník, P. 1988. Union soviétique-Afrique du Sud: les ‘théories’ de l'etnos. Cahiers d'Etudes Africaines 28 (2): 157–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skalník, P. 1990. Soviet Etnografiia and the National(ities) Question. In W. Berelowitch (ed.), Regards sur l'anthropologie soviétique. A special double issue of Cahiers du monde russe et soviétique 31 (2–3): 183–91.
Skalník, P. 1992. Soviet Etnografiia: Marxist Methodology or Evolutionist Ideology? In Gailey, C. W. (ed.), The Politics of Culture and Creativity: A Critique of Civilization. Gainesville: University of Florida Press, pp. 391–405.Google Scholar
Skalník, P. 2003a. Gellner's Encounter with Soviet Etnografiia. Social Evolution and History 2 (2): 177–93.Google Scholar
Skalník, P. 2003b. Gellner on Modernity. Social Evolution and History 2 (2): 203–24.Google Scholar
Wettersten, J. 1996. Ernest Gellner: A Wittgensteinian Rationalist. In Hall, J. A. and Jarvie, I. (eds.), The Social Philosophy of Ernest Gellner. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, pp. 497–520.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×