Allen, R. C. (1992), Enclosure and the Yeoman: The Agricultural Development of the South Midlands, 1450–1850 (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
American Bar Association Section of Taxation (2007), ‘Economic Substance Codification: ABA has “Substantial Reservations”’, Tax Notes 115: 389–96
Apps, P. and Rees, R. (2007), The Taxation of Couples, IZA Discussion Paper No. 2910 (Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor) at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1000899
Aprill, E. P. (2001), ‘Tax Shelters, Tax Law, and Morality: Codifying Judicial Doctrines’, SMU Law Review 54: 9–35
Arnold, B. J. (2004), ‘Tax Treaties and Tax Avoidance: The 2003 Revisions to the Commentary to the OECD Model Convention’, Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation 58(6): 488–511
Arnold, B. J. (2006a), ‘Confusion Worse Confounded: The Supreme Court's GAAR Decisions’, Canadian Tax Journal 54: 167–209
Arnold, B. J. (2006b), ‘The Supreme Court and the Interpretation of Tax Statutes – Again’, Canadian Tax Journal 54: 677–84
Arnold, B. J. and Wilson, J. R. (1988), ‘The General Anti-Avoidance Rule – Part II’, Canadian Tax Journal 36: 1123–85
Atiyah,, P. S. and Summers,, R. S. (1987), Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
Auerbach, A (2006), ‘The Future of Capital Income Taxation’, Fiscal Studies 27: 399–420
Jones, Avery J. F. (1983), ‘The Leedale Affair’, British Tax Review 1983: 70–2
Jones, Avery J. F. (2007), ‘The History of the United Kingdom's First Comprehensive Double Tax Agreement’, British Tax Review 2007: 211–54
Jones, Avery J. F.et al. (2006), ‘The Origins of Concepts and Expressions Used in the OECD Model and their Adoption by States’, Bulletin for International Taxation 60: 220–54
Bagchi, A. K. (1990), ‘Land Tax, Property Rights and Peasant Insecurity in Colonial India’, Journal of Peasant Studies 20: 1–49
Baker, J. H. (2002), An Introduction to English Legal History, 4th edition (London: Butterworths)
Baker, P. (2000), ‘Taxation and the European Convention on Human Rights’, British Tax Review 2000: 211–377
Ballance, J. (1887), A National Land Policy Based on the Principle of State Ownership (Wellington: Lyon and Blair)
Baltus, F. (2006), ‘Les “Pratiques Abusives” en Matière de TVA’, Journal de Droit Fiscal 80: 338–60
Bank, S. A. (2001), ‘Codifying Judicial Doctrines: No Cure for Rules but More Rules?’, SMU Law Review 54: 37–45
Banks, J. and Blundell, R. (2005), ‘Private Pension Arrangements and Retirement in Britain’, Fiscal Studies 26: 35–53
Bankman, J. (2004), ‘The Tax Shelter Problem’, National Tax Journal 57: 925–36
Bassett, J. (2004), ‘Atkinson, Sir Harry Albert (1831–1892)’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press), online edition: www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/844
Beale, L. M. (2006), ‘Tax Advice Before the Return: The Case for Raising Standards and Denying Evidentiary Privileges’, Virginia Tax Review 25: 583–669
Beatson,, J. (2006), ‘Unlawful Statutes and Mistakes of Law: Is there a Smile on the Face of Schrödinger's Cat?’, in Burrows, A. and Rodger, A. (eds.), Mapping the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 163–80
Beattie, C. N. and Tiley, J. (1970), Beattie's Elements of Estate Duty, 7th edition (London: Butterworths)
Beckett, J. V. (1985), ‘Land Tax or Excise: The Levying of Taxation in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century England’, English Historical Review 100: 285–308
Beckett, J. V. and Turner, M. E. (1990), ‘Taxation and Economic Growth in Eighteenth-Century England’, Economic History Review 43: 377–403
Belich, J. (2006), ‘Grey, Sir George (1812–1898)’,in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press), online edition: www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/11534
Birks, P. (2005), Unjust Enrichment, 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Bittker, B., McMahon, M. and Zelenak, L. (2002), Federal Income Taxation of Individuals (New York: Warren, Gorham & Lamont)
Bowler, T. (2007), Taxation of the Family, Tax Law Review Committee Discussion Paper No. 6 (London: Institute for Fiscal Studies)
Brenner, R. (1976), ‘Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-industrial Europe’, Past and Present70: 30–75
Bridgland, N. (2006), ‘The EU Code of Conduct to Eliminate Harmful or Potentially Harmful Business Tax Regimes: The Future’, Tax Planning International European Union Focus 8(1): 8–11
Brooking, T. (2004), ‘McKenzie, Sir John (1839–1901)’, inOxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press), online edition: www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/34752
Brooks, N. (1985), ‘Future Directions in Canadian Tax Law Scholarship’, Osgoode Hall Law Journal 23: 441–75
Bulkeley, W. M. (2007), ‘IBM's Under-the-wire Tax Break’, Wall Street Journal, 7June 2007, p. A3
Buxton, J. (1888), Finance and Politics: An Historical Study. 1783–1885, 2 vols. (London: John Murray)
Canada, (1988), Explanatory Notes to Legislation Relating to Income Tax, June (Ottawa: Department of Finance)
Canellos, P. C. (2001), ‘A Tax Practitioner's Perspective on Substance, Form and Business Purpose in Structuring Business Transactions and in Tax Shelters’, SMU Law Review 54: 47–72
Charlesworth, N. (1984), ‘The Problem of Government Finance in British India: Taxation, Borrowing and the Allocation of Resources in the Inter-war Period’, Modern Asian Studies 19: 521–48
Chirelstein, M. A. and Zelenak, L. A. (2005), ‘Tax Shelters and the Search for a Silver Bullet’, Columbia Law Review 105: 1939–62
Chowdry, M. (2004), ‘Unjust Enrichment and Section 80(3) of the Value Added Tax Act 1994’, British Tax Review 2004: 620–37
Chowdry, M. (2005), ‘The Revenue's Response: A Time Bar on Claims’, Law Quarterly Review 121: 546–50
Chrétien, M. (1954), ‘Le rôles des organisations internationals dans le règlement des questions d'impôts entre les divers états’ Recueil des Cours 86-II: 1–116
Cobbett, W. (1812–1820), The Parliamentary History of England, From the Earliest Period to the Year 1803, Vols. 13–36 (London: Longman & Co.)
Cooper, G. S. (2001), ‘International Experience with General Anti-avoidance Rules’, SMU Law Review 54: 83–130
Cooper, G. S. (2006), ‘The Emerging High Court Jurisprudence on Part IVA’, University of Sydney Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series, No. 06/09 at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=919480
Cornford, F. M. (1908), Microcosmographia Academica (Cambridge: Bowes & Bowes), available at www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/iau/cornford/cornford.html
Daunton, M. (1983), House and Home in the Victorian City: Working-Class Housing, 1850–1914 (London: Edward Arnold)
Daunton, M. (1995), Progress and Poverty: An Economic and Social History of Britain, 1700–1850 (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
Daunton, M. (2001), Trusting Leviathan: The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1799–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Dawson, W. H. (1890), The Unearned Increment: Or, Reaping without Sowing (London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.)
Degadt, C. and Hoorebeke, A. (2006), ‘New Belgian Anti-Abuse Measures: Belgian Legislator adopts Halifax Doctrine’, Tax Planning International European Union Focus 8(10): 14–15
Dodge, D. (1988),‘A New and More Coherent Approach to Tax Avoidance’, Canadian Tax Journal 36(1): 1–22
Douma, S. and Engelen, F. (2006), ‘Case Note: Halifax plc and Others v. Commissioners of Customs and Excise: The ECJ Applies the Abuse of Rights Doctrine in VAT Cases’, British Tax Review 2006: 429–40
Dowell, S. (1884), A History of Taxation and Taxes in England from the Earliest Times to the Present Day, 4 vols (London, Longmans & Co)
Dunbar, D. (2006), ‘Judicial Techniques for Controlling the New Zealand General Anti-Avoidance Rule: The Scheme and Purpose Approach, from Challenge Corporation to Peterson’, New Zealand Journal of Taxation Law and Policy 12: 324–96
Dyck, I. (1992), William Cobbett and Rural Popular Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Edelman, J. (2005), ‘Limitation Periods and the Theory of Unjust Enrichment’, Modern Law Review 68: 848–57
European Commission (1997), ‘Towards Tax-Coordination in the European Union – A Package to Tackle Harmful Tax Competition’, 1 October 1997, COM (97)495 final
Feria, R. (2006a), ‘The European Court of Justice's Solution to Aggressive VAT Planning – Further Towards Legal Uncertainty?’, EC Tax Review 15: 27–35
Feria, R. (2006b), ‘Giving Themselves Extra VAT? The ECJ Ruling in Halifax’, British Tax Review 2006: 119–23
Fforde, M. (1990), Conservatism and Collectivism, 1886–1914 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press)
Financial Reform Association (1859), Report on Taxation. Direct and Indirect. Adopted by the Financial Reform Association, Liverpool, and Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science Held at Bradford, Oct. 1859 (Liverpool)
Freedman, J. (2004a), ‘Defining Taxpayer Responsibility: In Support of a General Anti-Avoidance Principle’, British Tax Review 2004: 332–57
Freedman,, J. (2004b), ‘Taxation Research as Legal Research’, in Lamb, M., Lymer, A., Freedman, J. and James, S. (eds.), Taxation: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Research (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 13–34
Freedman, J. (2005), ‘Converging Tracks? Recent Developments in Canadian and UK Approaches to Tax Avoidance’, Canadian Tax Journal 53(4): 1038–46
Galle, B. (2006), ‘Interpretative Theory and Tax Shelter Regulation’, Virginia Tax Review 26: 357–403
Gammie,, M. (1997), ‘A Perspective from the United Kingdom’, in Cooper, G. S. (ed.), Tax Avoidance and the Rule of Law (Amsterdam: IBFD Publications), pp. 181–218
Gammie, M. (2005), ‘Barclays and Canada Trustco: Further Comment from a UK Perspective’, Canadian Tax Journal 53(4): 1047–52
Gammie, M. (2006), ‘Sham and Reality: The Taxation of Composite Transactions’, British Tax Review 2006: 294–317
Gergen, M. P. (2002), ‘The Logic of Deterrence: Corporate Tax Shelters’, Tax Law Review 55: 255–86
Ginsburg, M. (1985), ‘The National Office Mission’, Tax Notes 27: 99–102
Ginter, D. E. (1992), A Measure of Wealth: The English Land Tax in Historical Analysis (London: Hambledon Press)
Glenn, H. (2007), ‘IRS Official, Practitioners Pan Economic Substance Doctrine Codification’, Tax Notes 115: 888
Goldsmith, P. (2007), We Won; You Lost. Eat That! A Political History of Tax in New Zealand Since 1840, unpublished manuscript
Goschen, G. J. (1872), Reports and Speeches on Local Taxation (London: Macmillan and Co.)
Granwell, A. and McGonigle, S. (2006), ‘US Tax Shelters: A UK Reprise?’, British Tax Review 2006: 170–208
Graetz, M. J. and O'Hear, M. M. (1997), ‘The “Original Intent” of US International Taxation’, Duke Law Journal 46: 1021–109
Greg, W. R. (1860), ‘British Taxation’, Edinburgh Review 111: 254
George, H. (1880), Progress and Poverty: An Inquiry into the Cause of Industrial Depressions and of Increase of Want with Increase of Wealth. The Remedy (New York: D. Appleton & Co.)
Gunn, A. (2001), ‘The Use and Misuse of Antiabuse Rules: Lessons from the Partnership Antiabuse Regulations’, SMU Law Review 54: 159–76
Gustafson,, C. H. (1997), ‘The Politics and Practicalities of Checking Tax Avoidance in the United States’, in Cooper, G. S. (ed.), Tax Avoidance and the Rule of Law (Amsterdam: IBFD Publications), pp. 349–76
Halperin, D. (1995), ‘Are Anti-abuse Rules Appropriate?’, Tax Lawyer 48: 807–16
Hamer, D. (1988), The New Zealand Liberals: The Years of Power (Auckland: Auckland University Press)
Harris, P. (1996), Corporate/Shareholder Income Taxation and Allocating Taxing Rights Between Countries: A Comparison of Imputation Systems (Amsterdam: IBFD)
Harris, P. (1999), ‘An Historic View of the Principle and Options for Double Tax Relief’, British Tax Review, 1999: 469–89
Harris, P. (2000), ‘Origins of the 1963 OECD Model Series: Working Party 12 and Article 10’, Australian Tax Forum 15: 3–223
Harris, P. (2006), Income Tax in Common Law Jurisdictions: From the Origins to 1820 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Harris, P. (2007a), ‘Fair in Love but not Taxation: The English Origin of the Australasian General Anti-Avoidance Rule – Part I’, Bulletin for International Taxation 61(2): 65–83
Harris, P. (2007b), ‘Fair in Love but not Taxation: The English Origin of the Australasian General Anti-Avoidance Rule – Part II’, Bulletin for International Taxation 61(3): 109–25
Harvard Law Review Association (2004) ‘Developments in the Law – Corporations and Society: V. Governmental Attempts to Stem the Rising Tide of Corporate Tax Shelters’, Harvard Law Review 117: 2249–71
Herman, T. (1999), ‘Tax Report’, Wall Street Journal, 10 February 1999, p. A1
HM Revenue & Customs, National Statistics at www.hmrc.gov.uk/stats/
Hoffmann, L. (2005), ‘Tax Avoidance’, British Tax Review 2005: 197–206
International Fiscal Association (2002), Form and Substance in Tax Law, Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International, Vol. 87a (The Hague: Kluwer)
Kay, J. (1979), ‘The Economics of Tax Avoidance’, British Tax Review, 1979: 354–65
Kerridge, R. (2001), ‘Revenue Law by John Tiley’, British Tax Review, 2001: 283–7
Korb, D. (2007), ‘What a Difference Two Years Make! Remarks at the 2007 University of Southern California Tax Institute’, Tax Notes Today, 2007 TNT: 16–65
Lang, M. (2006), ‘Rechtsmissbrauch und Gemeinschaftsrecht’, Steuer und Wirtschaft International 16: 273–85
Lang, M. (2007), ‘Non-Discrimination: What Does History Teach Us?’, in Fiscalité et enterprise: politiques et pratiques: Mélanges en l'honneur de Jean Pierre Le Gall (Paris: Dalloz), pp. 103–8.
Lavoie, R. (2001), ‘Deputizing the Gunslingers: Co-Opting the Tax Bar into Dissuading Corporate Tax Shelters’, Virginia Tax Review 21: 43–99.
Leclercq, L. (2007), ‘Interacting Principles: The French Abuse of Law Concept and the EU Notion of Abusive Practices’, Bulletin for International Taxation 61(16): 235–44
Levy, H. (1911), Large and Small Holdings: A Study in English Agricultural Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Livingston, M. (1998), ‘Reinventing Tax Scholarship: Lawyers, Economists, and the Role of the Legal Academy’, Cornell Law Review 83: 365–436
Locher, P. (2007), ‘Rechtsmissbrauchsüberlegungen im Recht der direkten Steuern in der Schweiz’, Archiv für Schweizerisches Abgabenrecht 75: 675–700
McAlpin, M. B. (1983), Subject to Famine: Food Crises and Economic Change in Western India, 1860–1920 (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
McCarthy, H. L. (2007), ‘Abuse of Rights: The Effect of the Doctrine on VAT Planning’, British Tax Review 2007: 160–74
McCrudden, C. (2006), ‘Legal Research and the Social Sciences’, Law Quarterly Review 122: 632–50
McDaniel, P., McMahon, M.Simmons, D. and Abreu, A. (2004), Federal Income Taxation, Cases and Materials, 5th edition (New York: Foundation Press)
McInnes, M. (2003), ‘Interceptive Subtraction, Unjust Enrichment and Wrongs – A Reply to Professor Birks’, Cambridge Law Journal 62: 697–716
McIvor, T. (1989), The Rainmaker: A Biography of John Ballance (Auckland: Heinemann Reed)
McIvor, T. (2004), ‘Ballance, John (1839–1893)’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press), online edition: www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/1225
McMichael, P. (1984), Settlers and the Agrarian Question: Capitalism in Colonial Australia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Makkus, E. and Preter, J. (2006), ‘Abuse of Rights: The End of VAT Planning?’, Tax Planning International European Union Focus 8(3): 15–17
Mandler, P. (2001), ‘Art, Death and Taxes: The Taxation of Works of Art in Britain, 1796–1914’, Historical Research 74: 271–97
Mann, M. (1995), ‘A Permanent Settlement for the Ceded and Conquered Provinces: Revenue Administration in North India, 1801–33’, India Economic and Social History Review 32: 245–69
Murray, A. and Carter, R. N. (1895), A Guide to Income-Tax Practice (London: Gee & Co.)
Meade, J. S. (1978), The Structure and Reform of Direct Taxation: report of a committee chaired by J. E. Meade (London: George Allen & Unwin)
Mehrotra, A. J. (2005), ‘Teaching Tax Stories’, Journal of Legal Education 55: 116–25
Morse, S. C. (2006), ‘The How and Why of the New Public Corporation Tax Shelter Compliance Norm’, Fordham Law Review 75: 961–1018
Moss, M. and Gillham, G. (2006), ‘Controlled Foreign Companies Legislation and the Abuse of Law’, Tax Planning International Review 33(12): 3–7
NevilleBrown, L. Brown, L. (1994), ‘Is there a General Principle of Abuse of Rights in European Community Law?’, in Curtin, D. and Heukels, T. (eds.), Institutional Dynamics of European Integration, Essays in Honour of Henry G. Schermers, vol. II (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff), pp. 511–26
New Zealand (1858–), Statistics of New Zealand for 1853, 1854, 1855, and 1856 (1857, etc.) … Compiled from official records (Auckland)
New Zealand (1893), ‘Statistical Summary of the Colony of New Zealand for the Years 1840–1852 (inclusive)’, in The New Zealand Official Year Book (Wellington: Government Printer)
Nutt, A. (2007), ‘O'Connor Cites Justice Gains in Combating Tax Shelters’, Tax Notes 115: 697
O'Brien, P. K. (1988), ‘The Political Economy of British Taxation, 1660–1815’, Economic History Review 41: 1–32
O'Brien, P. K. and Hunt, P. A. (1993), ‘The Rise of the Fiscal State in England, 1485–1815’, Historical Research 66: 129–76
OECD (1963), Draft Model Double Taxation Convention on Income and Capital (Paris: OECD)
OECD (1985), Trends in International Taxation (Paris: OECD)
OECD (1992–), Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital, Committee on Fiscal Affairs (Paris: OECD)
OECD (1998), Harmful Tax Competition – An Emerging Global Issue (Paris: OECD)
OECD (1999), The Application of the OECD Model Tax Convention to Partnerships (Paris: OECD)
OECD (2000), Issues related to Article 14 of the OECD Model Tax Convention (Paris: OECD)
OEEC (1958), The Elimination of Double Taxation: Report of the Fiscal Committee of the OEEC (Paris: OEEC)
OEEC (1959), The Elimination of Double Taxation: 2nd Report by the Fiscal Committee of the OEEC (Paris: OEEC)
OEEC (1961), The Elimination of Double Taxation: Fourth Report of the Fiscal Committee of the OEEC (Paris: OEEC)
Offer, A. (1981), Property and Politics, 1870–1914: Landownership, Law, Ideology and Urban Development in England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Offer, A. (1989), The First World War: An Agrarian Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon)
Oliver, J. D. B. (1998), ‘Ship-money’, British Tax Review 1998: 1–3
Park,, A. (1997), ‘Tax Law in and after the Wheatcroft Era’, in Rawlings, R. (ed.), Law, Society, and Economy (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 131–45
Pearlman, R. A. (2002), ‘Demystifying Disclosure: First Steps’, Tax Law Review 55: 289–324
Pedroli, A. (2007), ‘L'elusione fiscale nel diritto italiano’, Archiv für Schweizerisches Abgabenrecht 75: 701–26
Posner, R. A. (1987), ‘The Decline of Law as an Autonomous Discipline 1962–1987’, Harvard Law Review 100(4): 761–80
Raad, K. (1987), 1963 and 1977 OECD Model Income Tax Treaties and Commentaries (Deventer: Kluwer)
Raskolnikov, A. (2006), ‘Crime and Punishment in Taxation: Deceit, Deterrence, and the Self-Adjusting Penalty’, Columbia Law Review 106: 569–642
Reeder, D. A. (1961), ‘The Politics of Urban Leaseholds in Late Victorian England’, International Review of Social History 6: 413–30
Ricardo,, D. (1951), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, in Sraffa, P. and Dobb, M. H. (eds.), The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), vol. 1
Richardson, J. W. (1967), ‘Correspondence’, British Tax Review 1967: 153
Ridsdale, M. (2006), ‘Halifax and others v. Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Case C-255/02)’, Tax Planning International Review 33(3): 10–11
Rostain, T. (2006),'Sheltering Lawyers: The Organized Bar and the Tax Shelter Industry', Yale Journal on Regulation 23: 77–120
Rousselle, O. and Liebman, H. M. (2006), ‘The Doctrine of Abuse of Community Law: The Sword of Damocles Hanging over the Head of EC Corporate Tax Law?’, European Taxation 46: 559–64
Rush, M. (2006), The Defence of Passing On (Oxford: Hart Publishing)
Rutherford, J. (1961), Sir George Grey, 1812–1898: A Study in Colonial Government (London: Cassell)
Schizer, D. M. (2006), ‘Enlisting the Tax Bar’, Tax Law Review 59: 331–72
Schler, M. L. (2002), ‘Ten More Truths About Tax Shelters: The Problem, Possible Solutions, and a Reply to Professor Weisbach’, Tax Law Review 55: 325–95
Schön, W. (1996), ‘Gestaltungsmissbrauch im Europäischen Steuerrecht’, Internationales Steuerrecht 5(2): Appendix
Schön, W. (2000), ‘Tax Competition in Europe – the Legal Perspective’, EC Tax Review 9: 90–105
Schön,, W. (2002), ‘Der “Rechtsmissbrauch” im Europäischen Gesellschaftsrecht’, in Wank, R.et al. (ed.), Festschrift für Herbert Wiedemann zum 70. Geburtstag (Munich: C. H. Beck) p. 1271 et seq.
Schön, W. (2006a), ‘The Mobility of Companies and the Organizational Freedom of Company Founders’, European Company and Financial Law Review 3: 122–46
Schön,, W. (2006b), ‘State Aid in the Area of Taxation’, in Hancher, L.Ottervanger, T. and Slot, P. J. (eds.), EC State Aids, 3rd edition (London: Thomson/Sweet & Maxwell, London), pp. 241–76.
Sheppard, L. (2007), ‘Bad LILO Facts Make Good Law?’, Tax Notes 114: 733–41
Silsby, W. and Smith, I. (2007), ‘BATR (Badger and Toad Relief)’, Taxation 160(4115): 39–42
Silverman, M., Lerner, M. and Kidder, G. (2006), ‘The Economic Substance Doctrine: Sorting Through the Federal Circuit's “We Know It When We See It” Ruling in Coltec’, The Tax Executive 58: 423–41
Simmonds, S. (2007), ‘Government Continues Winning Streak in Shelter Litigation’, Tax Notes 115: 913
Simpson, P. (2006), ‘Case Note: Cadbury Schweppes plc v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue: the ECJ Sets Strict Test for CFC Legislation’, British Tax Review 2006: 677–83
Sinclair, K. (1957), Origins of the Maori Wars (Wellington: New Zealand University Press)
Stratton, S. (2007), ‘Black & Decker to Settle; Bigger Case on Horizon’, Tax Notes 114: 980
Stevens, R. (2005), ‘Justified Enrichment’, Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 5: 141–50
Stokes, E. (1959), The English Utilitarians and India (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
Stopforth, D. (1987), ‘The Background to the Anti-Avoidance Provisions Concerning Settlements by Parents on their Minor Children’, British Tax Review 1987: 417–33
Stopforth, D. (1992), ‘1922–36: Halcyon Days for the Tax Avoider’, British Tax Review 1992: 88–105
Surrey, S. S. (1969), ‘Complexity and the Internal Revenue Code: The Problem of the Management of Tax Detail’, Law & Contemporary Problems 34: 673–710
Tailby, C. (2006), ‘Halifax – A Basis for Optimism?’, The Tax Journal833(17 April): 4–6.
Tax Analysts (2007), ‘Senate Finance Tax Counsel Says Codification of Economic Substance Likely’, Tax Notes Today 2007 TNT: 97–3
Tax Analysts (electronic), Worldwide Tax Treaties (Falls Church: Tax Analysts), available at www.taxanalysts.com
Tempel, A. J. (1967), Relief from Double Taxation (Amsterdam: IBFD)
Tennant, C. (1856), The People's Blue Book: Taxation As It Is and As It Ought to Be, 2nd edition (1857), 3rd edition (1862), 4th edition (1872) (London: Longmans, Green & Co)
Thomas, P. J. (1939), The Growth of Federal Finance in India (Madras: Oxford University Press)
Thompson,, F. M. L. (2002), ‘Changing Perceptions of Land Tenures in Britain, 1750–1914’, in Winch, D. and O'Brien, P. K. (eds.), The Political Economy of British Historical Experience, 1688–1914 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 119–38
Tiley, J. (1980), ‘Widowhood Anomalies’, British Tax Review 1980: 216–18
Tiley,, J. (1985a), ‘An Academic Perspective on the Ramsay/Dawson Doctrine’, in Dyson, J. (ed.), Recent Tax Problems (London: Stevens & Sons), pp. 19–27
Tiley, J (1985b), ‘Section 52 and Maintenance Payments’, British Tax Review 1985: 329–33
Tiley, J, (1987a), ‘Judicial Anti-avoidance Doctrines: The U.S. Alternatives – Part I’, British Tax Review 1987: 180–97
Tiley, J. (1987b), ‘Judicial Anti-avoidance Doctrines: The U.S. Alternatives – Part II’, British Tax Review 1987: 220–44
Tiley, J. (1988a), ‘Judicial Anti-Avoidance Doctrines: Some Problem Areas’, British Tax Review 1988: 63–103
Tiley, J. (1988b), ‘Judicial Anti-Avoidance Doctrines: Corporations and Conclusions’, British Tax Review 1988: 108–45.
Tiley, J. (1989), ‘Case Comment, Craven (Inspector of Taxes) v. White (Stephen)’, British Tax Review, 1989: 20–8
Tiley, J. (1990), ‘Double Taxation – Visiting Academics’, Cambridge Law Journal 49: 225–8
Tiley, J. (1992), ‘Trading Tax Matters in the House of Lords’, Cambridge Law Journal 51: 443–6
Tiley, J. (1995), ‘Taxation – Exploring the New Approach’, Cambridge Law Journal 54: 258–61
Tiley, J. (1998a), ‘Away from a Virtuous Tax System’, British Tax Review 1998: 317–47
Tiley, J (1998b), ‘Human Rights and Taxpayers’ Cambridge Law Journal 57: 269–73
Tiley,, J. (1999), ‘United Kingdom’, in Roch, M. T. Soler (ed.), Family Taxation in Europe (London: Kluwer Law International), pp. 129–50
Tiley, J. (2001), ‘First Thoughts on Westmoreland’, British Tax Review 2001: 153–8
Tiley, J. (2004a), ‘Tax Avoidance Jurisprudence as Normal Law’, British Tax Review, 2004: 304–31
Tiley,, J. (2004b), ‘United Kingdom’, in Ault, H. and Arnold, B. (eds.), Comparative Income Taxation: A Structural Analysis, 2nd edition (Amsterdam: Kluwer Law International), pp. 115–36
Tiley,, J. (2004c), ‘Aspects of Schedule A’, in Tiley, J. (ed.), Studies in the History of Tax Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing), pp. 81–97
Tiley, J. (2005a), ‘Barclays and Scottish Provident: Avoidance and Highest Courts; Less Chaos but More Uncertainty’, British Tax Review 2005: pp. 273–80
Tiley, J. (2005b), Revenue Law, 5th edition (London: Hart Publishing)
Tiley, J. (2006a), ‘50 years: Tax, Law and Academia’, British Tax Review 2006: 229–48
Tiley, J. (2006b), ‘Tax, Marriage and the Family’, Cambridge Law Journal 65: 289–300
Tiley, J. (2007), ‘Death and Taxes’, British Tax Review 2007: 300–19
Tiley, J. and Jensen, E. (1998), ‘The Control of Avoidance: The United States Experience’, British Tax Review 1998: 161–85.
Travers, T. N. (2004), ‘“The real value of the lands”: the Nawabs, the British and the Land Tax in Eighteenth-century Bengal’, Modern Asian Studies 38: 517–38
Trombitas, E. (2004), ‘The Abracadabra Effect and Tax Avoidance – Comments on Inland Revenue's Exposure Draft INA0009: Interpretation of Sections B61 and 6B1 of the Income Tax Act 2004 – Part 1’, New Zealand Journal of Taxation Law and Policy 10(4): 353–89
Trombitas, E. (2005), ‘The Abracadabra Effect and Tax Avoidance – Comments on Inland Revenue's Exposure Draft INA0009: Interpretation of Sections B61 and 6B1 of the Income Tax Act 2004 – Part 2’, New Zealand Journal of Taxation Law and Policy 11(1): 37–68
United Kingdom (1801–), Parliamentary Papers (Blue Books) (London: HMSO)
United Kingdom (1829–91), Hansard's Parliamentary Debates, 3rd Series (London: Baldwin and Cradock)
United Kingdom (1870a), Report of the Commissioners of Inland Revenue: 13th Report, in United Kingdom (1801–), 1870 [C.82-I] XX. 377
United Kingdom (1870b), Report of G J Goschen … on the Progressive Increase of Local Taxation, in United Kingdom (1801–), 1870 (470) LV.177
United Kingdom (1886–90), Report and Proceedings, Select Committee on Town Holdings, in United Kingdom (1801–), 1886 (213) Ⅻ.367, 1887 (260) XIII.41, 1888 (313) XXII.1, 1889 (251) XV.1, 1890 (341) XVIII.1, 1890–91 (325) XVIII.15, 1892 (214) XVIII.613
United Kingdom (1920), Report of the Royal Commission on the Income Tax, in United Kingdom (1801–), 1920 Cmd. 615 XVIII.97
United Kingdom (1951), Report of the Committee on the Taxation of Trading Profits, in United Kingdom (1801–), 1950–51 Cmd. 8189 XX.1
United Kingdom (1972), Reform of Corporation Tax, in United Kingdom (1801–), 1971–72 Cmnd. 4955 XXXIX.1
United Kingdom (1974), Wealth Tax, in United Kingdom (1801–), 1974 Cmnd. 5704 XVII.525
United Kingdom (1975), Minutes of Evidence of Select Committee on a Wealth Tax, in United Kingdom (1801-), 1974–75 (696-II) XVIII.785
United Kingdom (1994), Restitution: Mistakes of Law and Ultra Vires Public Authority Receipts and Payments, Law Commission Report No. 227 (London: The Stationery Office)
United Kingdom (2007), ‘Treasury: Small Businesses and Settlements Legislation’, Written Ministerial Statement of 26 July by Angela Eagle, available at www.theyworkforyou.com/wms/?id=2007-07-26a.89WS.5
United States (1962), ‘Model Tax Conventions’, in Joint Committee of Internal Revenue Taxation, Legislative History of United States Tax Conventions (Washington: US Government Printing Office), vol. 4, available at http://setis.library.usyd.edu.au/oztexts/parsons.html, items 3 and 4
United States (1982), Legislation Relating to Tax-Motivated Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures of the House Committee on Ways and Means, 97th Cong., 2d Sess. 90
United States (2004), ‘American Jobs Creation Act of 2004: Conference Report, Statement of Conference Managers’, H. R. Rep. No. 108–755 at http://waysandmeans.house.gov/Links.asp?section=1639
United States (2005), ‘Summary of Joint Committee Staff “Options to Improve Tax Compliance and Reform Tax Expenditures”’ JCX-19-05R, 12 April 2005 at www.house.gov/jct/x-19-05r.pdf
Vanistendael, F. (2006), ‘Halifax and Cadbury Schweppes: One Single Theory of Abuse in Tax Law?’, EC Tax Review 15: 192–5
Vinther, N. and Werlauff, E. (2006), ‘Tax Motives are Legal Motives – The Borderline between the Use and the Abuse of the Freedom of Establishment with Reference to the Cadbury Schweppes Case’, European Taxation 46: 383–6
Virgo, G. (1993), ‘The Law of Taxation is Not An Island – Overpaid Taxes and the Law of Restitution’, British Tax Review 1993: 442–67
Virgo, G, (2004), ‘Deutsche Morgan Grenfell: Restitution of Tax Paid by Mistake’, British Tax Review 2004: 8–14
Virgo, G. (2005), ‘Deutsche Morgan Grenfell: the Right to Restitution of Tax Paid by Mistake Rejected’, British Tax Review 2005: 281–6
Virgo, G. (2006), The Principles of the Law of Restitution, 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Waincymer,, J. (1997), ‘The Australian Tax Avoidance Experience and Responses: A Critical Review’, in Cooper, G. S. (ed.), Tax Avoidance and the Rule of Law (Amsterdam: IBFD), pp. 247–306.
Ward, W. R. (1953), The English Land Tax in the Eighteenth Century (London: Oxford University Press)
Ward, D. A., Jones, Avery J. F.et al. (1985), ‘The Business Purpose Test and Abuse of Rights’, British Tax Review 1985: 68–123
Ward, D. A. and Cullity, M. C. (1981), ‘Abuse of Rights and the Business Purpose Test as Applied to Taxing Statutes’, Canadian Tax Journal 29(4): 451–75
Weisbach, D. A. (1999), ‘Formalism in the Tax Law’, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 66, pp. 860–86
Weisbach, D. A. (2001), ‘The Failure of Disclosure as an Approach to Tax Shelters’, SMU Law Review 54: 71–82
Weisbach, D. A. (2002), ‘Ten Truths about Tax Shelters’, Tax Law Review 55: 215–53
Wheatcroft, G. S. A. and Bramwell, R. M. (eds.), (1963–), British Tax Encyclopedia (London: Sweet & Maxwell)
Wolfman, B. (1981), ‘The Supreme Court in the Lyons Den: A Failure of Judicial Process’, Cornell Law Review 66: 1075–102
Wolfman, B. (2004), ‘Why Economic Substance is Better Left Uncodified’, Tax Notes 104: 445
Wolfman, B., Holden, J. P. and Harris, K. L. (2006), Standards of Tax Practice 2006 Supplement (Falls Church: Tax Analysts)
Lord Wright of Durley (1939), Legal Essays and Addresses (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
Yin, G. K. (2001), ‘Getting Serious about Corporate Tax Shelters: Taking a Lesson from History’, SMU Law Review 54: 209–37
Zelenak, L. (2001), ‘Codifying Anti-avoidance Doctrines and Controlling Corporate Tax Shelters’, SMU Law Review 54: 177–93
Zimmer, F. (2002), ‘General Report’, in International Fiscal Association (2002), pp. 19–67
