American Bar Association. 2014. Joint Comments of the American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law, Section of Intellectual Property Law, and Section of International Law on the SAIC Draft Rules on the Prohibition of Abuses of Intellectual Property Rights for the Purposes of Eliminating or Restricting Competition. July 9, 2014. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/consultations/2013_technology_transfer/aba_en.pdf.Google Scholar

Coco, Rita. 2008. Antitrust Liability for Refusal to License Intellectual Property: A Comparative Analysis and the International Setting. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 12, 3–47.Google Scholar

Cotter, Thomas F. 2014. Comparative Law and Economics of Standard-Essential Patents and FRAND Royalties. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 22, 311–61.Google Scholar

Emch, Adrian and Liyang, Hou. 2014. Antitrust Regulation of IPRs: China’s First Proposal. Competition Policy International Asian Column, August 14, 2014.Google Scholar

European Commission. 2014. Commission accepts legally binding commitments by Samsung Electronics on standard essential patent injunctions. IP-14–490. April 29, 2014.Google Scholar

Hao, Qian. 2013. The Multiple Hands: Institutional Dynamics of China’s Competition Regime. In Emch, Adrian and, Stallibrass, David (eds.), China’s Anti-monopoly Law: The First Five Years, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 15–34.Google Scholar

Hou, Liyang. 2012. The Essential Facilities Doctrine – What Was Wrong in Microsoft?. IIC- International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 43, 251–71.Google Scholar

International Bar Association. 2014. Submission to the Administration for Industry and Commerce on the Proposed Rules on the Prohibition of Abuses of Intellectual Property Rights for the Purposes of Eliminating or Restricting Competition. July 10, 2014. Available at www.ibanet.org/Document/Default.aspx?DocumentUid=088F2ACA-A837-47A2-A8AB-E4492EC96400.Google Scholar

Jones, Alison. 2014. Standard-Essential Patents: FRAND Commitments, Injunctions and the Smartphone Wars. European Competition Journal, 10, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

NDRC. 2014. NDRC Suspends the Investigation into IDC for Price-Monopoly Conduct, May 22, 2014. Available at www.ndrc.gov.cn/gzdt/201405/t20140522_612466.html.Google Scholar

US-China Business Council. 2014. US-China Business Council Comments on Draft Regulations on the Prohibition of Conduct that Eliminates or Restricts Competition through Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), July 10. Available at www.uschina.org/advocacy/testimony-speeches/us-china-business-council-comments-draft-regulations-prohibition-conduct.Google Scholar

USIT. 2015. NDRC Drafts Anti-Monopoly Guidelines against IPR Abuse. Available at http://usito.org/news/ndrc-drafts-anti-monopoly-guidelines-against-ipr-abuse.Google Scholar

Wang, Xianlin. 2000. Discussion on the Establishment and Responsibilities of China’s Anti-monopoly Agencies. Zhongguo Xingzheng Guanli (China Public Administration), 8, 60–64.Google Scholar

Wang, Xiaoye. 2007. Several Questions about Our Anti-Monopoly Agencies. Dong Luncong Dongyue Tribune 21, 30–41.Google Scholar

Zhang, Bingsheng. 2005. The Establishment of Our Anti-Monopoly Authorities – Questioning the Current Institutional Design. Fa Xue (Science of Law), 2, 113–21.Google Scholar