Book contents
- Writing Biography in Greece and Rome
- Writing Biography in Greece and Rome
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on contributors
- Preface
- Part I Ancient biography revisited
- Part II Individual biographies
- Part III Collective biographies
- Part IV Biographical modes of discourse
- Bibliography
- General index
- Index locorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
Book contents
- Writing Biography in Greece and Rome
- Writing Biography in Greece and Rome
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on contributors
- Preface
- Part I Ancient biography revisited
- Part II Individual biographies
- Part III Collective biographies
- Part IV Biographical modes of discourse
- Bibliography
- General index
- Index locorum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Writing Biography in Greece and RomeNarrative Technique and Fictionalization, pp. 306 - 342Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Adrados, F. R. 1979, ‘The Life of Aesop and the Origins of Novel in Antiquity’, QUCC 1, 93–112.Google Scholar
Adrados, F. R. 1999, History of the Graeco-Latin Fable. Introduction and from the Origins to the Hellenistic Age, vol. 1. Mnemosyne Supplementum 201 (Leiden, Boston, Cologne).Google Scholar
Agapitos, P. and Boje Mortensen, L. 2012, ‘Introduction’, in Agapitos, and Mortensen, Boje (eds.), 1–24.Google Scholar
Agapitos, P. and Boje Mortensen, L. (eds.) 2012, Medieval Narratives between History and Fiction. From the Centre to the Periphery of Europe, c. 1100–1400 (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Almagor, E. 2009, ‘A “Barbarian”symposium and the Absence of philanthropia (Artaxerxes 15)’, in Ferreira, J. R. et al. (eds.), Symposion and Philanthropia in Plutarch. Humanitas Supplement (Coimbra), 131–146.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. 2012, ‘Ctesias and the Importance of His Writings Revisited’, Electrum 19, 9–40.Google Scholar
Almagor, E. 2013, ‘Aratus and Artaxerxes’, in M. Beck (ed.), A Companion to Plutarch (Malden, MA), 278–291.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 1986, Philostratus: Biography and Belles Lettres in the Third Century AD (London).Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 1996, ‘Popular and Sophisticated in the Ancient Novel’, in Schmeling (ed.), 107–114.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 2007, Folktale as a Source of Graeco-Roman Fiction: The Origin of Popular Narrative (Lewiston, NY).Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1963, ‘The Roman Socrates: Horace and His Satires’, in Sullivan, J. P. (ed.), Critical Essays on Roman Literature: Satire (London), 1–37. (= Anderson, W. S. 1982, 13–49.)Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1974, ‘Autobiography and Art in Horace’, in Galinsky, G. K. (ed.), Perspectives of Roman Poetry: A Classics Symposium (Austin, TX), 33–56. (= Anderson, W. S. 1982, 50–73.)Google Scholar
Appelbaum, A. 2007, ‘Another Look at the Assassination of Pertinax and the Accession of Julianus’, CP 102, 198–207.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1986, ‘Horatius eques et scriba: Satires 1.6 and 2.7’, TAPhA 116, 255–288.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 2010, ‘The Biographical and Social Foundations of Horace’s Poetic Voice’, in G. Davis (ed.), 7–33.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. 2013, ‘“Bands of Brothers”: Warfare and Fraternity in Early Rome’, JAH 1, 53–69.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. 1994, ‘Riflessione sulla letteratura e biografia presso i Greci’, in Montanari, F. (ed.), La philologie grecque à l’époque hellénistique et romaine: sept exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 40 (Geneva), 211–262.Google Scholar
Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. 2013, ‘Introduction’, in Augoustakis, A. and Traill, A. (eds.), A Companion to Terence (Malden, MA), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avlamis, P. 2011, ‘Isis and the People in the Life of Aesop’, in Townsend, P. and Vidas, M. (eds.), Revelation, Literature, and Community in Late Antiquity (Tübingen), 65–101.Google Scholar
Ayache, L. 1996, ‘Le cas de Démocrite: du diagnostic médical à l’évaluation philosophique’, in Wittern, R. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Hippokratische Medizin und antike Philosophie. Verhandlungen des VIII. Internationalen Hippokrates-Kolloquiums in Kloster Banz/Staffelstein vom 23. bis 28. September 1993 (Hildesheim), 63–75.Google Scholar
Babcock, C. L. 1981, ‘Carmina operosa: Critical Approaches to the “Odes” of Horace, 1945–1975’, ANRW 2.31.3, 1560–1611.Google Scholar
Bal, M. 2009, Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. 3rd edn (Toronto, Buffalo, London). (Originally published as De theorie van vertellen en verhalen. Inleiding in de narratologie. Muiderberg, 1978; 5th edn 1990.)Google Scholar
Baldick, C. 2008, ‘Biography’, in The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms (Oxford). Available online at www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t56.e1237 (accessed 20 January 2016).Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. 1989, ‘Ancient Lives of Virgil’, in Baldwin, B. (ed.), Roman and Byzantine Papers (Amsterdam), 467–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, B. 1997, ‘Hadrian’s Dismissal of Suetonius: A Reasoned Response’, Historia 46, 254–256.Google Scholar
Ballanti, A. 1954, ‘Documenti sull’opposizione degli intellettuali a Domiziano’, Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell’Università di Napoli 4, 75–95.Google Scholar
Bannon, C. J. 1997, The Brothers of Romulus: Fraternal Pietas in Roman Law, Literature, and Society (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. and Cucchiarelli, A. 2005, ‘Satire and the Poet: The Body as Self-referential Symbol’, in Freudenburg, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire (Cambridge), 207–223.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. T. (eds.) 1997, Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, vol. 1. (Oxford).Google Scholar
Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. T. (eds.) 1999, Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome (Oxford).Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1970, ‘Historical Discourse’, in Lane, M. (ed.), Introduction to Structuralism (New York), 145–155.Google Scholar
Barton, T. S. 1994, ‘The inventio of Nero: Suetonius’, in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds.), Reflections of Nero: Culture, History and Representation (Chapel Hill, NC), 48–63.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1989, Decoding the Ancient Novel: The Reader and the Role of Description in Heliodorus and Achilles Tatius (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1994, Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian (Cambridge, MA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassi, K. (2014), ‘Homer’s Achaean Wall and the Hypothetical Past’, in Wohl (ed.), 122–141.Google Scholar
Bastiaensen, A. A. R., Smit, J. W. (ed. and comm.), Mohrmann, C. (intro.), Canali, L. and Moreschini, C. (trans.) 1975, Vita di Martino; Vita di Ilarione (Milan).Google Scholar
Bauman, R. A. 1983, Lawyers in Roman Republican Politics: A Study of the Roman Jurists in their Political Setting, 316–82 BC. Münch. Beitr. Papyr. 75 (Munich).Google Scholar
Bayer, K. (ed.) 1995, ‘Vergil-Viten’, in Bayer, K, Götte, J. and Götte, M. (eds.), Vergil: Landleben, Catalepton, Bucolica, Georgica, 6th edn (Zurich), 212–229, 408–431.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2002, ‘Ciceronian Correspondences: Making a Book out of Letters’, in Wiseman, T. P. (ed.), Classics in Progress (London), 103–144.Google Scholar
Beecroft, A. 2011, ‘Blindness and Literacy in the Lives of Homer’, CQ 61, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneker, J. 2009, ‘Nepos’ Biographical Method in the Lives of Foreign Generals’, CJ 105.2, 109–121.Google Scholar
Beneker, J. 2012, The Passionate Statesman: Eros and Politics in Plutarch’s Lives (Oxford).Google Scholar
Béranger, J. 1980, ‘Mommsen et l’Histoire Auguste’, in Béranger, J., Birley, E. and Straub, J. (eds.), Bonner Historia Augusta Colloquium 1977/1978 (Bonn), 17–34.Google Scholar
Bernheim, E. 1889, Lehrbuch der historischen Methode und der Geschichtsphilosophie (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Bernstein, N. 1995, ‘Apuleian Rhetoric’. Available online at http://faculty.georgetown.edu/jod/apuleius/bernst.html (accessed 20 January 2016).Google Scholar
Berschin, W. 1986, Biographie und Epochenstil im lateinischen Mittelalter. 1. Von der Passio Perpetuae zu den Dialogi Gregors des Grossen (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Berthold, H. 2008, ‘Ihrem Originale nachzudenken’: Zu Lessings Übersetzungen (Tübingen).Google Scholar
Bertrand, P. H. E. 2006, Die Evagriusübersetzung der Vita Antonii: Rezeption – Überlieferung – Edition: Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Vitas Patrum- Tradition (Utrecht).Google Scholar
Bertrand-Dagenbach, C. and Molinier-Arbo, A. 2014. Histoire Auguste, vol. 3, part 2: Vie d’Alexandre Sévère. Collection des Universités de France Série Latine (Paris).Google Scholar
Beschorner, A. and Holzberg, N. 1992, ‘A Bibliography of the Aesop Romance’, in Holzberg, (ed.), 179–187.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. 1967, ‘The Augustan History’, in Dorey, T. A. (ed.), Latin Biography (London), 113–138.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. 2002, ‘Trebellius Pollio and Flavius Vopiscus Syracusius’, in Bonamente, G. and Paschoud, F. (eds.), Historiae Augustae Colloquium Perusinum. Atti dell’ 8° Convegno sulla Historia Augusta (Bari), 33–47.Google Scholar
Birley, E. 1978, ‘Tales of My Grandfather’, in Alföldy, G. et al., Bonner Historia Augusta Colloquium 1975/1976 (Bonn), 91–97.Google Scholar
Birley, E. 1983, ‘Some Names in the Historia Augusta’, in Alföldy, G. et al., Bonner Historia Augusta Colloquium 1979/1981 (Bonn), 67–98.Google Scholar
Blümner, H. 1891, Studien zur Geschichte der Metapher im Griechischen, Heft 1. Über Gleichnis und Metapher in der attischen Komödie (Leipzig; reprinted Aalen, 1974).Google Scholar
Bollansée, J. 1999a, Hermippos of Smyrna and His Biographical Writings: A Reappraisal. Studia Hellenistica 35 (Leuven).Google Scholar
Bollansée, J. 1999b, F. Jacoby, Die Fragmente der Griechischen Historiker, vol. 4: Biography and Antiquarian Literature (ed. Schepens, G.); vol. 4 A: Biography, fasc. 3: Hermippos of Smyrna (Leiden, Boston, Cologne).Google Scholar
Bordwell, D. 1989, Making Meaning: Inference and Rhetoric in the Interpretation of Cinema (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Borghart, P. and De Temmerman, K. (eds.) 2010, Biography and Fictionality in the Greek Literary Tradition (Ghent).Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. 1992, ‘History and Artifice in Plutarch’s Eumenes’, in Stadter, P. A. (ed.), Plutarch and the Historical Tradition (London), 56–89.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. Nice, Richard (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1994b, ‘The Aithiopica of Heliodorus and the Historia Augusta’, in Bonamente, G. and Paschoud, F. (eds.), Historiae Augustae Colloquium Genevense. Atti dei Convegni sulla Historia Augusta (Bari), 43–52.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1998, ‘Vita Caesarum: Remembering and Forgetting the Past’, in Maul, S. M., Bresciani, E., Berschin, W. et al. (eds.), La biographie antique. Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 44 (Geneva), 193–215.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. 1994, ‘The Readership of Greek Novels in the Ancient World’, in Tatum (ed.), 435–459.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. 1995, ‘Names and a Gem: Aspects of Allusion in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica’, in Innes, D., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday (Oxford), 269–280.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. 1996, ‘The Ancient Readers of the Greek Novels’, in Schmeling (ed.), 87–113.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. 2006, ‘Portrait of the Sophist as a Young Man’, in McGing and Mossman (eds.), 141–153.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. 2008, ‘Plutarch’s Habits of Citation: Aspects of Difference’, in Nikolaidis (ed.), 143–158.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. 2009, ‘Quotation of Earlier Texts in Τὰ ἐς τòν Τυανέα ᾿Απολλώνιον’, in Demoen, and Praet, (eds.), 57–73.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. R. 1991, ‘The Imperial Ideal in Suetonius’ “Caesares”’, ANRW 2.33.5, 3701–3732.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, A. 2002, ‘Horace’s Birthday and Deathday’, in Woodman, T. and Feeney, D. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace (Cambridge), 1–16.Google Scholar
Brandão, J. L. 2006, ‘Vida suetoniana de Terêncio: estrutura e estratégias de defesa do poeta’, in Pociña, A., Rabaza, B. and de F. Silva, M. (eds.), Estudios sobre Terencio (Granada), 111–123.Google Scholar
Branham, R. B. 1989, Unruly Eloquence: Lucian and the Comedy of Traditions (Cambridge, MA, London).Google Scholar
Bréchet, C., Videau, A. and Webb, R. 2013, ‘Introduction’, in Bréchet, C., Videau, A. and Webb, R. (eds.), Théories et pratiques de la fiction à l’époque impériale (Paris), 7–17.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 1998, ‘The Novel and the Apocryphal Acts: Place, Time and Readership’, Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 9, 157–180.Google Scholar
Briant, P. 2002, From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire (Winona Lake, IN).Google Scholar
Brind’Amour, P. 1981, ‘Problèmes astrologiques et astronomiques soulevés par le récit de la mort de Domitien chez Suétone’, Phoenix 35, 338–344.Google Scholar
Buchan, D. 1990, ‘Folk Literature’, in Coyle, M., Garside, P. et al. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Literature and Criticism (London), 976–980.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1960, Untersuchungen zur Theorie des Genos Epideiktikon von Gorgias bis Aristoteles (Munich).Google Scholar
Bultmann, R. 1994, The History of the Synoptic Tradition, trans. John Marsh. Reprint of 2nd edn (Peabody, MA).Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, D. 2007, ‘Nepos in der Historia Augusta’, in Bonamente, G and Brandt, H (eds.), Historiae Augustae Colloquium Bambergense (Bari), 95–107.Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, D. 2010, Style and Structure of the Historia Augusta. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Available online at http://www.dare.uva.nl.Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, D. 2013, ‘Pliny’s Panegyricus and the Historia Augusta’, Arethusa 46, 289–312.Google Scholar
Burgersdijk, D. 2014, ‘La présence de Salluste dans l’Histoire Auguste’, in Bertrand-Dagenbach, C. and Chausson, F. (eds.), Historiae Augustae Colloquium Nanceiense. Munera 39 (Bari), 111–127.Google Scholar
Burian, J. 1977, ‘Fides Historica als methodologischer Grundsatz der Historia Augusta’, Klio 59, 285–298.Google Scholar
Burridge, R. A. 2004, What Are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography. 2nd edn (Grand Rapids, MI).Google Scholar
Burridge, R. A. 2006, ‘Reading the Gospels as Biography’, in McGing, and Mossman, (eds.), 31–49.Google Scholar
Burrus, V. 2004, The Sex Lives of Saints: An Erotics of Ancient Hagiography (Philadelphia).Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1986, Le récit en Grèce ancienne: énonciations et représentations de poètes (Paris).Google Scholar
Calder, W. M. 1988, ‘F. G. Welcker’s Sapphobild and Its Reception in Wilamowitz’, in Calder, W. M., Köhnken, A., Kullmann, W. and Pflug, G. (eds.), Friedrich Gottlieb Welcker: Werk und Wirkung (Stuttgart), 131–156.Google Scholar
Callu, J.-P. (ed.) 1992, Histoire Auguste, vol. 1, part 1: Vies d’Hadrien, Aelius, Antonin (Paris).Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 2000, ‘Form and Meaning: The Vita Constantini and the Vita Antonii’, in Hägg and Rousseau, (eds.), 72–88.Google Scholar
Carney, T. F. (ed.) 1963, ‘Suetonii: Vita Terentii’, in Carney, T. F. (ed.), P. Terenti Afri Hecyra (Pretoria), 5–17.Google Scholar
Cels-Saint-Hilaire, J. 1999, ‘Horace, libertino patre natus’, in Petitfrère, C. (ed.), Construction, reproduction et représentation des patriciats urbains de l’Antiquité au XXe siècle (Tours), 23–46.Google Scholar
Ceresa-Gastaldo, A. 1988, Gerolamo, Gli uomini illustri: De viris illustribus (Florence).Google Scholar
Chamberlain, G. 1986, ‘Afterward: Allohistory in Science Fiction’, in Waugh, C. G. and Greenberg, M. H. (eds.), Alternative Histories: Eleven Stories of the World as It Might Have Been (New York), 281–300.Google Scholar
Charles, M. B. and Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. 2010, ‘The Sexual Hypocrisy of Domitian: Suet., Dom. 8, 3’, AC 79, 173–187.Google Scholar
Charles, M. B. and Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. 2012, ‘Galba in the Bedroom: Sexual Allusions in Suetonius’ Galba’, Latomus 71, 1077–1087.Google Scholar
Charles, M. B. and Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. 2013–2014, ‘Unmanning the Emperor: Otho in the Literary Tradition’, CJ 109, 199–222.Google Scholar
Chassang, A. 1862, Apollonius de Tyane, sa vie, ses voyages, ses prodiges par Philostrate et ses Lettres (Paris).Google Scholar
Chastagnol, A. (ed.) 1994, Histoire Auguste. Les empereurs romains des IIe et IIIe siècles (Paris).Google Scholar
Chew, K. 2007, ‘Divine Epistemology: The Relationship between Speech and Writing in the Aithiopika’, in Rimell, V. (ed.), Seeing Tongues, Hearing Scripts: Orality and Representation in the Ancient Novel. Ancient Narrative Supplementum 7 (Groningen), 279–298.Google Scholar
Chitwood, A. 2004, Death by Philosophy: The Biographical Tradition in the Life and Death of the Archaic Philosophers Empedocles, Heraclitus and Democritus (Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
Christy, J. 2010, Writing to Power: Tyrant and Sage in Greek Epistolography. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia).Google Scholar
Clay, D. 1992, ‘Lucian of Samosata: Four Philosophical Lives (Nigrinus, Demonax, Peregrinus, Alexander Pseudomantis)’, ANRW 2.36.5, 3406–3450.Google Scholar
Cohn, D. 1989, ‘Fictional versus Historical Lives: Borderlines and Borderline Cases’, Journal of Narrative Technique 19.1, 3–24.Google Scholar
Cohn, D. 1990, ‘Signposts of Fictionality: A Narratological Perspective’, Poetics Today 11.4, 775–804.Google Scholar
Collins, A. Y. 1990, Is Mark’s Gospel a Life of Jesus? The Question of Genre (Milwaukee, WI).Google Scholar
Collins, A. Y. 1992, Beginning of the Gospel: Probings of Mark in Context (Minneapolis, MI).Google Scholar
Conybeare, F. C. 1912, Philostratus: The Life of Apollonius of Tyana, The Epistles of Apollonius and The Treatise of Eusebius. Loeb Classical Library. 2 vols. (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Cook, B. L. 2001, ‘Plutarch’s Use of λέγεται: Narrative Design and Source in Alexander’, GRBS 42, 329–360.Google Scholar
Costa, C. D. N. 2001, Greek Fictional Letters: A Selection with Introduction, Translation and Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar
Cowan, R. 2009, ‘Starring Nero as Nero: Poetry, Role-Playing and Identity in Juvenal 8.215–21’, Mnemosyne 62, 76–89.Google Scholar
Cowley, R. (ed.) 2001, What If?: Eminent Historians Imagine What Might Have Been (New York).Google Scholar
Cowley, R. (ed.) 2003, What Ifs? of American History: Eminent Historians Imagine What Might Have Been (New York).Google Scholar
Cowley, R. W. and Ambrose, S. E. (eds.) 1999, What If? The World’s Foremost Military Historians Imagine What Might Have Been (New York).Google Scholar
Cox, P. 1983, Biography in Late Antiquity: A Quest for the Holy Man (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London).Google Scholar
Cross, F. L. and Livingstone, E. A. (eds.) 1997, The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. 3rd edn (Oxford).Google Scholar
Curry, S. A. 2014, ‘Nero quadripes: Animalizing the Emperor in Suetonius’s Nero’, Arethusa 47, 197–230.Google Scholar
Damon, C. 2008, ‘The Mind of an Ass and the Impudence of a Dog: A Scholar Gone Bad’, in Sluiter, and Rosen, (eds.), 335–364.Google Scholar
Danzig, G. 2003, ‘Apologizing for Socrates: Plato and Xenophon on Socrates’ Behavior in Court’, TAPA 133. 2, 281–321.Google Scholar
Davis, J. E. 2014, ‘Terence Interrupted: Literary Biography and the Reception of the Terentian Canon’, AJPh 135, 387–409.Google Scholar
de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T. and Schenkeveld, D. M. (eds.) 2005, The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society. Nijmegen/Castle Hernen, May 1–5, 2002, vol. 2: The Statesman in Plutarch’s Greek and Roman Lives (Leiden, Boston).Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 1987, Narrators and Focalizers. The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad (Amsterdam; 2nd edn Bristol, 2004).Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 1999, Vertellers met een lijf. Een sondering van de geschiedenis van het Klassiek Griekse verhaal (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 2004, ‘General Introduction’, in de Jong, Nünlist and Bowie (eds.), xi–xiii.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. (ed.) 2012, Space in Ancient Greek Literature. Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, vol. 3 (Leiden, Cologne, Boston).Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. and Nünlist, R. (eds.) 2007a, Time in Ancient Greek Literature. Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, vol. 2 (Leiden, Boston).Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. and Nünlist, R. 2007b, ‘Epilogue: Time in Ancient Greek Literature’, in De Jong and Nünlist (eds.), 505–522.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R. and Bowie, A. (eds.) 2004, Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature. Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, vol. 1 (Leiden, Boston).Google Scholar
De Temmerman, K. 2010, ‘Ancient Rhetoric as a Hermeneutical Tool for the Analysis of Characterization in Narrative Literature’, Rhetorica 28. 1, 23–51.Google Scholar
De Temmerman, K. 2014, Crafting Characters: Heroes and Heroines in the Ancient Greek Novel (Oxford).Google Scholar
de Vogüé, A. 1993, Histoire littéraire du mouvement monastique dans l’Antiquité. 1: Le monachisme latin. 2: De l'Itinéraire d'Égérie à l'éloge funèbre de Népotien (384-396) (Paris).Google Scholar
de Vogüé, A. 1997, Histoire littéraire du mouvement monastique dans l’Antiquité. 1: Le monachisme latin. 4: Sulpice Sévère et Paulin de Nole (393–409); Jérôme, homéliste et traducteur des “Pachomiana” (Paris).Google Scholar
Del Corno, D. 1978, Filostrato, Vita di Apollonios di Tiana. Bibliotheca Adelphi 82 (Milan).Google Scholar
Delehaye, H. 1903, ‘La passion de S. Théodote d’Ancyre’, Analecta Bollandiana 22, 320–328.Google Scholar
Demand, N. 1987, ‘Herodotus’ Encomium of Athens: Science or Rhetoric?’ AJPh 108, 746–758.Google Scholar
Demoen, K. 1997, ‘A Paradigm for the Analysis of Paradigms: The Rhetorical Exemplum in Ancient and Imperial Greek Theory’, Rhetorica 15 .2, 125–158.Google Scholar
Demoen, K. and Praet, D. (eds.) 2009, Theios Sophistes: Essays on Flavius Philostratus’ Vita Apollonii. Mnemosyne Suppl. 305 (Leiden).Google Scholar
den Hengst, D. 2010, Emperors and Historiography: Collected Essays on the Literature of the Roman Empire, ed. Burgersdijk, D. W. P. and van Waarden, J. A. (Leiden).Google Scholar
Deremetz, A. 2004, ‘Narration et argumentation dans l’Apologie d’Apulée’, REL 82, 209–226.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1997, ‘La pharmacie de Platon’, in Brisson, L. (ed.), Platon: Phèdre (Paris).Google Scholar
Dessau, H. 1889, ‘Über Zeit und Persönlichkeit der Scriptores Historiae Augustae’, Hermes 24, 337–392.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. E. 1922, ‘A Prophecy of Caesar’s Murder (Suetonius Iulius 81.1)’, CP 17, 119–127.Google Scholar
Devos, P. 1975, ‘Le manteau partagé: un thème hagiographique en trois de ses variantes’, Analecta Bollandiana 93, 157–165.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. 1999, ‘Chronology’, in Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy (Cambridge), 31–54.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 1989, Death and the Maiden: Girls’ Initiation Rites in Greek Mythology. (London, New York).Google Scholar
Dubel, S. 1990, ‘La description d’objets d’art dans les Ethiopiques’, Pallas 36, 101–115.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. 1952, The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Ducrot, O. and Todorov, T. (eds.) 1972, Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage (Paris).Google Scholar
Duff, T. E. 2003, ‘Plutarch on the Childhood of Alkibiades (Alk. 2–3)’, PCPhS 49, 89–117.Google Scholar
Duff, T. E. 2011, ‘Plutarch’s Lives and the Critical Reader’, in Roskam, G. and Van der Stockt, L. (eds.), Virtues for the People: Aspects of Plutarchan Ethics (Leuven), 59–82.Google Scholar
du Toit, D. S. 1999, ‘Die Vorstellung eines Begleitdämons in Philostrats Vita Apollonii’, W&D 25, 149–166.Google Scholar
Düring, I. (ed. with intro. and comm.) 1951, Chion of Heraclea: A Novel in Letters. Acta Universitatis Gotoburgensis 57.5 (Göteborg).Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. 2000, ‘Birth, Death, and Divinity in Porphyry’s Life of Plotinus’, in Hägg, and Rousseau, (eds.), 52-71.Google Scholar
Efthymiadis, S. 2011, ‘Introduction’, in Efthymiadis, S. (ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Byzantine Hagiography, vol. 1: Periods and Places (Farnham), 1–16.Google Scholar
Elliott, A. G. 1987, Roads to Paradise: Reading the Lives of the Early Saints (Hanover, London).Google Scholar
Elliott, D. 1993, Spiritual Marriage: Sexual Abstinence in Medieval Wedlock (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Erbse, H. 1956, ‘Die Bedeutung der Synkrisis in den Parallelbiographien Plutarchs’, Hermes 89, 257–287.Google Scholar
Erler, M. and Schorn, S. (eds.) 2007, Die griechische Biographie in hellenistischer Zeit: Akten des internationalen Kongresses vom 26.–29. Juli 2006 in Würzburg. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 245 (Berlin).Google Scholar
Fairweather, J. 1974, ‘Fiction in the Biographies of Ancient Writers’, Ancient Society 5, 231–275.Google Scholar
Fairweather, J. 1983, ‘Traditional Narrative, Inference and Truth in the Lives of Greek Poets’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar, 315–369.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 2013b, Roman Literary Culture: From Plautus to Macrobius. 2nd edn (Baltimore).Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2002, ‘Greek Lives and Roman Careers in the Classical Vita Tradition’, in Cheney, P. and de Armas, F. A. (eds.), European Poetic Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance (Toronto), 24–46.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (intro. and ed.) 1997, Romanzo di Esopo, trans. and notes Guido Bonelli and Giorgio Sandrolini (Milan).Google Scholar
Festy, M. 2007, ‘L’Histoire Auguste et les Nicomaques’, in Bonamente, G. and Brandt, H. (eds.), Historiae Augustae Colloquium Bambergense (Bari), 183–195.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. 2009, ‘The Best of Intentions ? Intertexuality and the Philosopher’s vita’, in van Mal-Maeder, Burnier and Nuñez (eds.), 257–283.Google Scholar
Flinterman, J. J. 1995, Power, Paideia and Pythagoreanism: Greek Identity, Conceptions of the Relationship between Philosophers and Monarchs and Political Ideas in Philostratus’ Life of Apollonius. Dutch Monographs on Ancient History and Archaeology 13 (Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Flinterman, J. J. 2009, ‘The Ancestor of My Wisdom: Pythagoras and Pythagoreanism in Life of Apollonius’, in Bowie, and Elsner, (eds.), 155–175.Google Scholar
Flory, S. 1988, ‘Thucydides’ Hypotheses about the Peloponnesian War’, TAPA, 118, 43–56.Google Scholar
Foley, H. P. 1985, Ritual Irony: Poetry and Sacrifice in Euripides (London, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. 1963, ‘Sulpice Sévère a-t-il travesti saint Martin de Tours en martyr militaire?’, Analecta Bollandiana 81, 31–58.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. (intro., ed. and trans.) 1967–1969, Vie de Saint Martin. Sources Chrétiennes 133–135. 3 vols (Paris).Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. 1997, ‘Le partage du manteau dans la Vita Martini de Sulpice Sévère’, in XVIème centenaire de la mort de saint Martin. Colloque universitaire 22–25 octobre 1997. Mémoires de la Société Archéologique de Touraine (MSAT) 63 (Tours), 27–38.Google Scholar
Fontaine, J. (intro., ed., trans. and notes) 2006, Severus, Sulpicius. Gallus: dialogues sur les ‘vertus’ de saint Martin. Sources Chrétiennes 510 (Paris).Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1933, ‘Lucili quam sis mendosus’, Hermes 68, 392–399. (= Fraenkel 1964, 199–208.)Google Scholar
Francis, J. A. 1998, ‘Truthful Fiction: New Questions to Old Answers on Philostratus’ Life of Apollonius’, AJPh 119, 419–441.Google Scholar
Frazier, F. 1988, ‘A propos de la “Philotimia” dans les Vies. Quelques jalons dans l’histoire d’une notion’, RPh 62, 109–127.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 1992, The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2010, ‘Horatius anceps: Persona and Self-Revelation in Satire and Song’, in Davis (ed.), 271–290.Google Scholar
Fry, C. 2010, ‘Suetonianus quidam: l’auteur de l’Histoire Auguste en utilisateur de style Suétonien’, in Galli Milić, L. and Hecquet-Noti, N. (eds.), Historiae Augustae colloquia. Nova series 11 (Bari), 135–152.Google Scholar
Frye, N. 1976, The Secular Scripture: A Study of the Structure of Romance (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, M. 1976, ‘Die Mönchsgeschichten des heiligen Hieronymus. Formexperimente in erzählender Literatur’, in Fuhrmann, M. (ed.), Christianisme et formes littéraires de l’antiquité tardive en occident (Geneva), 41–99.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, L. 2006, ‘Staging a Mutiny: Competitive Role-Playing on the Rhine (Annals 1.31–51)’, Ramus 35, 169–192.Google Scholar
Fündling, J. 2006, Kommentar zur Vita Hadriani der Historia Augusta. Antiquitas. Reihe 4, Beiträge zur Historia-Augusta-Forschung. Series 3, vol. 4 (Bonn).Google Scholar
Funk, K. 1907, ‘Untersuchungen über die lucianische Vita Demonactis’, Philologus Suppl. 10, 561–672.Google Scholar
Fusillo, M. 1988, ‘Textual Patterns and Narrative Situations in the Greek Novel’, Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 1, 17–31.Google Scholar
Fusillo, M. 1994, ‘Letteratura di consumo e romanzesca’, in Cambiano, G., Canfora, L. and Lanza, D. (eds.), Lo spazio letterario della Grecia antica, vol. 1: La produzione e la circolazione del testo; part 3: I Greci e Roma (Rome, Salerno), 233–273.Google Scholar
Fusillo, M. 1996, ‘Modern Critical Theories and the Ancient Novel’, in Schmeling (ed.), 277–305.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. 1996, ‘Biografie di consumo in Grecia: Il Romanzo di Alessandro e la Vita del Filosofo Secondo’, in Pecere and Stramaglia (eds.), 235–249.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. and Scardigli, B. (eds.) 1995, Teoria e prassi politica nelle opere di Plutarco. Atti del V Convegno plutarcheo (Certosa di Pontignano, 7–9 giugno 1993) (Naples).Google Scholar
Garbrah, K. A. 1981, ‘Terence and Scipio: An Echo of Terence in the Oratorical Fragments of Scipio Aemilianus?’ Athenaeum 59, 188–191.Google Scholar
Gascou, J. 1984, Suétone historien. Bibliothèque des Écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 255 (Rome).Google Scholar
Geiger, J. 2008, The First Hall of Fame: A Study of the Statues in the Forum Augustum. Mnemosyne Suppl. 295 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1990, ‘Fictional Narrative, Factual Narrative’, Poetics Today 11. 4, 755–774.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1997b, Paratexts. Thresholds of Interpretation. Literature, Culture, Theory 20 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. 2014, ‘Suetonius and the uiri illustres of Pliny the Younger’, in Power and Gibson (eds.), 199–230.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R. 2012, Reading the Letters of Pliny the Younger: An Introduction (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1983, ‘The Question of Character Development in Plutarch and Tacitus’, CQ 33.2, 469–487.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1986, ‘The Question of Character and Personality in Greek Tragedy’, Poetics Today 7. 2, 251–273.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2006, The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought (Oxford, New York).Google Scholar
Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.) 1993, Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World (Exeter).Google Scholar
Goins, S. E. 1989/1990, ‘The Influence of Old Comedy on the Vita Aesopi’, CW 83, 28–30.Google Scholar
Goodrich, R. 2007, ‘Vir maxime catholicus: Sulpicius Severus’ Use and Abuse of Jerome in the Dialogi’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 58. 2, 189–210.Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. D. R. (ed.) 1972, The Annals of Tacitus, Books 1–6, vol. 1: Annals 1.1–54 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. 2010, ‘What Did Jesus Do? Reading and Unreading the Gospels’, The New Yorker (24 May), 72–77.Google Scholar
Goward, B. 1999, Telling Tragedy. Narrative Technique in Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides (London).Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 2004, ‘The Plot Thickens: Hidden Outlines in Terence’s Prologues’, Ramus 33, 150–166.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 2009a, ‘A Cat May Look at a King: Difference and Indifference in Horace, Satire 6’, in Urso, G. (ed.), Ordine e sovversione nel mondo greco e romano (Pisa), 301–316.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 2009b, ‘Eupolitics: Horace, Sermones I, 4’, in Felgentreu, F., Mundt, F. and Rücker, N. (eds.), Per attentam Caesaris aurem: Satire – die unpolitische Gattung? (Berlin), 85–98.Google Scholar
Granberry, J. 2005, The Americas that Might Have Been: Native American Social Systems through Time (Tuscaloosa, AL).Google Scholar
Gray, C. 2015, Jerome, Vita Malchi: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar
Gray, V. 1998, The Framing of Socrates: The Literary Interpretation of Xenophon’s Memorabilia. Hermes Einzelschriften 79 (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2006, ‘Il rapporto tra autore ed opera nella tradizione biografica greca’, in Roscalla, F. (ed.), L’autore e l’opera: attribuzioni, appropriazioni, apocrifi nella Grecia antica (Pisa), 155–174.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2009, ‘Horace, Suetonius, and the Lives of the Greek Poets’, in Houghton and Wyke (eds.), 140–160.Google Scholar
Green, D. H. 2002, The Beginnings of Medieval Romance: Fact and Fiction, 1150–1220 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Greimas, A. J. and Courtes, J. 1979, Sémiotique: dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage (Paris).Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1984, ‘Augustus and the Poets: “Caesar qui cogere posset”’, in Millar, F. and Segal, E. (eds.), Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects (Oxford), 189–218.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 1986a, ‘Philosophy, Cato and Roman Suicide I’, Greece and Rome 33. 1, 64–77.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 1986b, ‘Philosophy, Cato and Roman Suicide II’, Greece and Rome 33. 2, 192–202.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1996, ‘The Expansion of the Empire under Augustus’, in Bowman, A. K., Champlin, E. and Lintott, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 10. 2nd edn (Cambridge), 147–197.Google Scholar
Grützmacher, G. 1901–1908, Hieronymus, eine biographische Studie, 3 vols. (Leipzig, Berlin).Google Scholar
Gugel, H. 1971‚ ‘Die Aufstellung von Kyros’ Heer in der Schlacht von Kunaxa’, Gymnasium 78, 241–243.Google Scholar
Guijarro, S. G. 2009, La imatge del filòsof i de l’activitat filosòfica a la Grècia antiga: anàlisi dels tòpics biogràfics presents a les Vides i doctirnes del filòsofs més il·lustres de Diògenes Laerci (Barcelona).Google Scholar
Günther, H.-C. 2013b, ‘The First Collection of Odes: Carmina I–III’, in Günther (ed.), 211–406.Google Scholar
Gyselinck, W. and Demoen, K. 2009, ‘Author and Narrator: Fiction and metafiction in Philostratus’ Vita Apollonii’, in Demoen and Praet (eds.), 95–127.Google Scholar
Hadas, M. and Smith, M. 1965, Heroes and Gods: Spiritual Biographies in Antiquity (London).Google Scholar
Hägg, T. 1971, Narrative Technique in Ancient Greek Romances: Studies of Chariton, Xenophon Ephesius, and Achilles Tatius (Stockholm).Google Scholar
Hägg, T. 1994, ‘Orality, Literacy, and the “Readership” of the Early Greek Novel’, in Eriksen, R. (ed.), Contexts of Pre-Novel Narrative: The European Tradition. Approaches to Semiotics 114 (Berlin, New York), 47–81.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. 1997, ‘A Professor and His Slave: Conventions and Values in the Life of Aesop’, in Bilde, P., Engberg-Pedersen, T. et al. (eds.), Conventional Values of the Hellenistic Greeks. Studies in Hellenistic Civilization 8 (Aarhus), 177–203.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. 2004, ‘Callirhoë and Parthenope: The Beginnings of the Historical Novel’, in Boje Mortensen, L. and Eide, T. (eds.), Parthenope (Copenhagen), 73–98 (= ClAnt 6 (1987) 184–204).Google Scholar
Hägg, T. 2012b, ‘Historical Fiction in the Graeco-Roman World: Cyrus, Alexander, Apollonius’, in Agapitos, and Boje Mortensen, (eds.), 25–47.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. and Rousseau, P. (eds. with the assistance of Høgel, Christian) 2000, Greek Biography and Panegyrics in Late Antiquity (Berkeley, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
Hahn, J. 1989, Der Philosoph und die Gesellschaft: Selbstverständnis, öffentliches Auftreten und populäre Erwartungen in der hohen Kaiserzeit. Habes 7 (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Hammer, D. 2010, ‘Roman Spectacle Entertainments and the Technology of Reality’, Arethusa 43, 63–86.Google Scholar
Hanink, J. 2010, ‘The Life of the Author in the Letters of “Euripides”’, GRBS 50, 537–564.Google Scholar
Harker, A. 2008, Loyalty and Dissidence in Roman Egypt: The Case of the Acta Alexandrinorum (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Harmon, A. M. (ed. and trans.) 1913, Lucian, vol. 1. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Harrison, S. 2014, Horace. Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics 42 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Haug, M. 1854, Die Quellen Plutarchs in den Lebensbeschreibungen der Griechen (Tübingen).Google Scholar
Heeren, A. H. L. 1826, De la politique et du commerce des peuples de l’antiquité, vol. 6 (Paris).Google Scholar
Henderson, I. H. 2003, ‘Speech Representation and Religious Rhetorics in Philostratus’ Vita Apollonii’, SR 32.1–2, 19–37.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1991, The Maculate Muse: Obscene Language in Attic Comedy, 2nd edn (New York, Oxford).Google Scholar
Hendrickson, T. 2013, ‘Poetry and Biography in the Athēnaiōn Politeia: The Case of Solon’, CJ 109, 1–19.Google Scholar
Henige, D. 2008, ‘The Alchemy of Turning Fiction into Truth’, Journal of Scholarly Publishing 39, 354–372.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 2000, ‘Drama and Dromena: Bloodshed, Violence, and Sacrificial Metaphor in Euripides’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 100, 173–188.Google Scholar
Hernadi, P. 1976, ‘Clio’s Cousins: Historiography as Translation, Fiction and Criticism’, New Literary History 7. 2, 247–257.Google Scholar
Hershbell, J. P. 1997, ‘Plutarch’s Concept of History: Philosophy from Examples’, AncSoc 28, 225–243.Google Scholar
Higgins, W. E. 1977, Xenophon the Athenian:The Problems of the Individual and the Society of the Polis (Albany, NY).Google Scholar
Hills, P. D. 2001, ‘Ennius, Suetonius and the Genesis of Horace, Odes 4’, CQ 51, 613–616.Google Scholar
Hock, R. F., Chance, J. B. and Perkins, J. (eds.) 1998, Ancient Fiction and Early Christian Narrative. Society of Biblical Literature Symposium Series 6 (Atlanta, GA).Google Scholar
Hodkinson, O. 2007, ‘Better than Speech: Some Advantages of the Letter in the Second Sophistic’, in Morello and Morrison (eds.), 283–300.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, O. 2010, ‘Some Distinguishing Features of Deliberate Fictionality in Greek Biographical Narratives’, in Borghart and De Temmerman (eds.), 11–35.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (ed.) 1992, Der Äsop-Roman. Motivgeschichte und Erzählstruktur (Tübingen).Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 1992, ‘Der Äsop-Roman. Eine strukturanalytische Interpretation’, in Holzberg, (ed.), 33–75.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 1993, ‘A Lesser Known “Picaresque” Novel of Greek Origin: The Aesop Romance and Its Influence’, Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 5, 1–16.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 1994, ‘Der griechische Briefroman: Versuch einer Gattungstypologie’, in Holzberg, N. (ed.), Der griechische Briefroman: Gattungstypologie und Textanalyse. Classica Monacensia 8 (Tübingen), 1–52.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 1996a, ‘The Genre: Novels Proper and the Fringe’, in Schmeling (ed.), 11–28.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 1996b, ‘Novel-like Works of Extended Prose Fiction II’, in Schmeling (ed.), 619–653.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. and Spawforth, A. (eds.) 2003, The Oxford Classical Dictionary 3rd edn (Oxford, New York).Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1994, ‘Problemi della biografia letteraria: Terenzio, Orazio, Virgilio’, AAPel 68, 41–53.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1995, ‘Virgil: His Life and Times’, in Horsfall, N. (ed.), A Companion to the Study of Virgil. Mnemosyne Suppl. 151 (Leiden), 1–25.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1998, ‘The First Person Singular in Horace’s Carmina’, in Knox, P. E. and Foss, C. (eds.), Style and Tradition: Studies in Honour of Wendell Clausen (Stuttgart), 40–54.Google Scholar
Hostetter, H. 1955, A Linguistic Study of the Vulgar Greek Life of Aesop. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Houghton, L. B. T. and Wyke, M. (eds.) 2009, Perceptions of Horace: A Roman Poet and His Readers (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Huber-Rebenich, G. 1999, ‘Hagiographic Fiction as Entertainment’ in Hofmann, H. (ed.), Latin Fiction: The Latin Novel in Context (London, New York), 187–212.Google Scholar
Huber-Rebenich, G. (trans., commentary and epilogue) 2010, Sulpicius Severus, Vita Sancti Martini, Das Leben des heiligen Martin (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Hulls, J.-M. 2014, ‘The Mirror in the Text: Privacy, Performance, and the Power of Suetonius’ Domitian’, in Power and Gibson (eds.), 178–196.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 1998, ‘The Aithiopika of Heliodorus: Beyond Interpretation?’, in Hunter, (ed.), 40–59.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2012, Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hurley, D. W. 1993, An Historical and Historiographical Commentary on Suetonius’ Life of C. Caligula. American Classical Studies 32 (Atlanta).Google Scholar
Hurley, D. W. 2003, ‘The Politics of Agrippina the Younger’s Birthplace’, AJAH 2. 1, 95–117.Google Scholar
Hurley, D. 2014, ‘Rhetorics of Assassination: Ironic Reversal and the Emperor Gaius’, in Power and Gibson (eds.), 146–158.Google Scholar
Hurschmann, R. 2012, ‘Chlamys’, in Cancik, H. and Schneider, H (eds.), Brill’s New Pauly. Antiquity volumes. Available online at http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-pauly/chlamys-e232850 (accessed 20 January 2016).Google Scholar
Iddeng, J. W. 2000, ‘Juvenal, Satire and the Persona Theory: Some Critical Remarks’, SO 75, 107–129.Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. 2009, ‘Writing to the Emperor: Horace’s Presence in Ovid’s Tristia 2’, in Houghton and Wyke (eds.), 123–139.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. 2005, Solon and Early Greek Poetry: The Politics of Exhortation (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Irwin, E. 2006, ‘The Biographies of Poets: The Case of Solon’, in McGing and Mossman (eds.), 13–30.Google Scholar
Iser, W. 1993, The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology (Baltimore).Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1971, ‘The Metaphoric and Metonymic Poles’, in Adams, H. (ed.), Critical Theory since Plato (San Diego, CA), 1113–1116.Google Scholar
Jameson, H. C. 1938, ‘The Greek Version of Jerome’s Life of Malchus’, TAPA 69, 411–422.Google Scholar
Jenkins, T. E. 2006, Intercepted Letters: Epistolarity and Narrative in Greek and Roman Literature (Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
Jenkyns, R. 1998, Virgil’s Experience: Nature and History; Times, Names, and Places (Oxford).Google Scholar
Johnson, T. 2004, A Symposion of Praise: Horace Returns to Lyric in Odes IV (Madison, WI).Google Scholar
Jones, B. W. 2002, ‘Domitian, Nerva and the Bias of Suetonius’, in Defosse, P. (ed.), Hommages à Carl Deroux, vol. 2. Collection Latomus 267 (Brussels), 236–239.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 2005, Philostratus: The Life of Apollonius of Tyana. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Jouanno, C. 2009, ‘Novelistic Lives and Historical Biographies: The Life of Aesop and the Alexander Romance as Fringe Novels’, in Karla, (ed.), 33–48.Google Scholar
Kaesser, C. 2004, ‘Tweaking the Real: Art Theory and the Borderline between History and Morality in Plutarch’s Lives’, GRBS 44, 361–374.Google Scholar
Karla, G. A. 2001, Vita Aesopi: Sprache und Edition einer frühbyzantinischen Fassung des Aesopromans (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Karla, G. A. 2003, ‘Die Redactio Accursiana der Vita Aesopi: ein Werk des Maximos Planudes?’ Byzantinische Zeitschrift 96, 661–669.Google Scholar
Karla, G. A. 2009a, ‘Fictional Biography vis-à-vis Romance: Affinity and Differentiation’, in Karla, (ed.), 13–32.Google Scholar
Karla, G. A. 2009b, ‘Die älteste Version des Äsopromans’, in Karamalengou, E. and Makrygianni, E. (eds.), Ἀντιφίλησις. Studies on Classical, Byzantine and Modern Greek Literature and Culture. In Honour of John-Theophanes A. Papademetriou (Stuttgart), 442–452.Google Scholar
Karla, G. A. (ed.) 2009, Fiction on the Fringe: Novelistic Writing in the Post-Classical Age. Mnemosyne Suppl. 310 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. 1992, Studies on the Text of Suetonius De grammaticis et rhetoribus. American Classical Studies 28 (Atlanta, GA).Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (ed. with trans., intro. and comm.) 1995, C. Suetonius Tranquillus: De grammaticis et rhetoribus (Oxford).Google Scholar
Kavanagh, B. 2010, ‘The Identity and Fate of Caligula’s Assassin, Aquila’, Latomus 69, 1007–1017.Google Scholar
Kayser, C. L. 1870, Flavii Philostrati opera, vol. 1 (Leipzig; reprinted Hildesheim, 1964).Google Scholar
Kech, H. 1977, Hagiographie als christliche Unterhaltungsliteratur: Studien zum Phänomen des Erbaulichen anhand der Mönchsviten des hl. Hieronymus (Göppingen).Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (ed.) 1982, The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. 2 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Kilburn, K. (ed. and trans.) 1959, Lucian, vol. 6. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, R. S. 1990, The Poetry of Criticism: Horace, Epistles II and Ars Poetica (Edmonton).Google Scholar
Kim, L. 2010, Homer between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J. F. (ed.) 1976, Bion of Borysthenes: A Collection of the Fragments with Introduction and Commentary. Studia Graeca Upsaliensia 11 (Uppsala).Google Scholar
Kivilo, M. 2010, Early Greek Poets’ Lives: The Shaping of the Tradition. Mnemosyne Suppl. 322 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Knöbl, R. 2010, ‘Talking about Euripides: Paramimesis and Satyrus’ Bios Euripidou’, in Borghart, and De Temmerman, (eds.), 37–58.Google Scholar
Koester, H. 2004, Ancient Christian Gospels: Their History and Development . 2nd edn (Harrisburg, PA).Google Scholar
Kolb, F. 1972, Literarische Beziehungen zwischen Cassius Dio, Herodian und der Historia Augusta. Antiquitas Series 4 vol. 9 (Bonn).Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1998, ‘The Alexander Romance: The Cunning of the Open Text’, Lexis 16, 123–138.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2002, ‘Narrative Spaces’, in Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Space in the Ancient Novel. Ancient Narrative Suppl. 1 (Groningen), 1–11.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. and Mitsis, P. 1990, ‘Chion of Heraclea: A Philosophical Novel in Letters’, Apeiron 23, 257–279.Google Scholar
Konstantakos, I. M. 2003, ‘Riddles, Philosophers and Fishes: Aesop and the θαλάσσιον πρόβατον (Vita Aesopi W 24, G 47)’, Eranos 10, 94–113.Google Scholar
Konstantakos, I. M. 2006, ‘Aesop Adulterer and Trickster: A Study of Vita Aesopi Ch. 75–76’, Athenaeum 94, 563–600.Google Scholar
Konstantakos, I. M. 2008–2013, Ακίχαρος. Η Διήγηση του Αχικάρ στην αρχαία Ελλάδα. 3 vols (Athens).Google Scholar
Konstantakos, I. M. 2009, ‘Nektanebo in the Vita Aesopi and in Other Narratives’, Classica et Mediaevalia 60, 99–144.Google Scholar
Konstantakos, I. M. 2011, ‘A Passage to Egypt: Aesop, the Priests of Heliopolis and the Riddle of the Year (Vita Aesopi, 119–120)’, Trends in Classics 3, 83–112.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 2003, ‘Aesop and the Contestation of Delphic Authority’, in Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L. (eds.), The Cultures within Ancient Greek Culture: Contact, Conflict, Collaboration (Cambridge), 77–100.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 2011, Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Labarre, S. 1998, Le manteau partagé: deux métamorphoses poétiques de la Vie de saint Martin chez Paulin de Périgueux (Ve S.) et Venance Fortunat (VIe S.) (Paris, Turnhout).Google Scholar
Larmour, D. H. J. 1992, ‘Making Parallels: Synkrisis and Plutarch’s “Themistocles and Camillus”’, ANRW 2.33.6, 4154–4200.Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. 1998, Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. Foreword by Kennedy, G. A., trans. Bliss, M. T., Jansen, A. and Orton, D. A., ed. Orton, D. A. and Anderson, R. D. (Leiden, Boston, Cologne).Google Scholar
Leclerc, P., Morales, E. M. and de Vogüé, A. 2007, Jérôme: Trois vies de moines (Paul, Malchus, Hilarion) (Paris).Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. B. 2008, ‘Ugliness and Value in the Life of Aesop’, in Sluiter, and Rosen, (eds.), 59–81.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. 1976, ‘Fictions in Literary Biography: The New Poem and the Archilochus Legend’, Arethusa 9, 181–189.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. 1978, ‘The Poet as Hero: Fifth-Century Autobiography and Subsequent Biographical Fiction’, CQ 28, 459–469.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. 1984, ‘Satyrus the Historian’, in Atti del XVII congresso internazionale di papirologia (Napoli, 19–26 maggio 1983). 3 vols. (Naples), vol. 2, 339–343.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. 2007, ‘Visits to Egypt in the Biographical Tradition’, in Erler and Schorn (eds.), 101–113.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. 2009, ‘Biographical Mythology’, in Dill, U. and Walde, C. (eds.), Antike Mythen: Medien, Transformationen und Konstruktionen (Berlin), 516–531.Google Scholar
Leitão, D. D. 1998, ‘Senecan Catoptrics and the Passion of Hostius Quadra (Sen. Nat. 1)’, MD 41, 127–160.Google Scholar
Lenz, F. W. 1964, ‘Die Selbstverteidigung eines politischen Angeklagten, Untersuchungen zu der Rede des Apollonios von Tyana bei Philostratos’, Altertum 10, 95–110.Google Scholar
Leo, F. 1901, Die griechisch-römische Biographie nach ihrer literarischen Form (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Lessing, G. E. 1754, ‘Rettungen des Horaz’, in Lessing, G. E., Schrifften. vol. 3 (Berlin), 3–100. (Reprinted in Lessing, G. E., Sämtliche Schriften, V, ed. Lachmann, K.. 3rd edn (Stuttgart, 1890), 272–309.)Google Scholar
Levine, A.-J. 2006, ‘Introduction’, in Levine, A.-J., Allison, D. C. and Crossan, J. D. (eds.), The Historical Jesus in Context (Princeton, NJ), 1–39.Google Scholar
Lindsay, H. 1994, ‘Suetonius as Ab Epistulis to Hadrian and the Early History of the Imperial Correspondence’, Historia 43, 454–468.Google Scholar
Lindsay, H. 2009, ‘Suetonius De Poetis: The Project and the Life of Vergil’, Classicum 35, 2–7.Google Scholar
Llewellyn-Jones, L. and Robson, J. 2010, Ctesias’ History of Persia: Tales of the Orient (London, New York).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. 1979, Magic, Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origins and Development of Greek Science (Cambridge).Google Scholar
López-Salvá, M. 1996, ‘Hippokratische Medizin und aristotelische Handlungsphilosophie: Analogien und Parallelismen’, in Wittern, R. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Hippokratische Medizin und antike Philosophie. Verhandlungen des VIII. Internationalen Hippokrates-Kolloquiums in Kloster Banz/Staffelstein vom 23. bis 28. September 1993 (Hildesheim), 203–215.Google Scholar
Louis, N. 2010, Commentaire historique et traduction du Diuus Augustus de Suétone. Collection Latomus 324 (Brussels).Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2010a, ‘Horace’, in Gagarin, M. and Fantham, E. (eds.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece and Rome, vol. 4 (Oxford), 29–36.Google Scholar
Lucarini, C. M. 2005, ‘Filostrato e Apollonio di Tiana’, Studi Ellenistici 16, 289–344.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. 1954, ‘The Language of Fiction’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Suppl. 28: 165–184.Google Scholar
Magie, D. (ed. and trans.) 1921, 1924, 1931, Historia Augusta, 3 vols. Loeb Classical Library vols. 139, 140, 263 (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Malherbe, A. 1988, Ancient Epistolary Theorists. Sources for Biblical Study 19 (Atlanta, GA).Google Scholar
Manfredini, M. and Orsi, D. P. 1987, Plutarco, Le Vite di Arato et di Artaserse (Milan).Google Scholar
Margolin, U. 1991, ‘Reference, Coreference, Referring, and the Dual Structure of Literary Narrative’, Poetics Today 12.3, 517–542.Google Scholar
Margolin, U. 1996, ‘Characters and Their Versions’, in Mihailescu, C. A. and Hamarneh, W. (eds.), Fiction Updated: Theories of Fictionality, Narratology, and Poetics (Toronto), 113–132.Google Scholar
Margolin, U. 2007, ‘Character’, in Herman, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Narrative (Cambridge), 66–79.Google Scholar
Martin, S. 2004, ‘Studio Script Notes on ‘The Passion”’, The New Yorker (8 March 2004), 94.Google Scholar
Martina, M. 1984, ‘Le vite antiche di Lucano e Persio’, CCC 5, 155–189. (= Martina 2004).Google Scholar
Martina, M. 2004, ‘Le vite antiche di Lucano e Persio’, in Bandelli, G., Fernandelli, M., Galasso, L. and Toneatto, L. (eds.), Scritti di filologia classica e storia antica (Trieste), 206–230.Google Scholar
Merkle, S. 1996, ‘Fable, “Anecdote” and “Novella” in the Vita Aesopi. The Ingredients of a “Popular Novel”’, in Pecere and Stramaglia (eds.), 209–234.Google Scholar
Miles, G. 2010, ‘Narrative Form and Philosophical Implications in the Life of Plotinus’, in Borghart, and De Temmerman, (eds.), 59–81.Google Scholar
Mitchell, E. 2010, ‘Time for an Emperor: Old Age and the Future of the Empire in Horace Odes 4’, MD 64, 43–76.Google Scholar
Moles, J. 1997, ‘Plutarch, Brutus and Brutus’ Greek and Latin Letters’, in Mossman, J. (ed.), Plutarch and His Intellectual World (London), 141–168.Google Scholar
Moles, J. 2006, ‘Cynic Influence upon First-Century Judaism and Early Christianity’, in McGing and Mossman (eds.), 89–116.Google Scholar
Molinier-Arbo, A. 2012, La vie de Commode dans l’Histoire Auguste. Études Anciennes 49 (Nancy).Google Scholar
Möllendorff, P. von 2001, ‘Frigid Enthusiasts: Lucian on Writing History’. PCPhS 47, 116–140.Google Scholar
Momigliano, A. 1993, The Development of Greek Biography. 2nd edn (Cambridge MA, London).Google Scholar
Montgomery, H. 1965, Gedanke und Tat: Zur Erzählungstechnik bei Herodot, Thukydides, Xenophon und Arrian (Lund).Google Scholar
Morales, H. 2009, ‘Challenging Some Orthodoxies: The Politics of Genre and the Ancient Greek Novel’, in Karla, (ed.), 1–12.Google Scholar
Morello, R. 2002, ‘Livy’s Alexander Digression (9.17–19): Counterfactuals and Apologetics’, JRS 92, 62–85.Google Scholar
Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D. (eds.) 2007, Ancient Letters: Essays in Classical and Late Antique Epistolography (Oxford).Google Scholar
Morgan, G. 1993, ‘Nullam, Vare ... Chance or Choice in Odes 1.18?’, Philologus 137, 142–145.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1982, ‘History, Romance and Realism in the Aithiopika of Heliodoros’, ClAnt 1, 221–265.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1989, ‘An Ethiopian Story’, in Reardon, B. P. (ed.), Collected Ancient Greek Novels (Berkeley, CA), 349–588.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1993, ‘Make-believe and Make Believe: The Fictionality of the Greek Novels’, in Gill, and Wiseman, (eds.), 175–229.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 2015, ‘The Monk’s Story: The Narrationes of pseudo-Nilus of Ankyra’, in Panayotakis, S., Schmeling, G. and Paschalis, M (eds.), Holy Μen and Charlatans in the Ancient Novel. Ancient Narrative Supplementum 19 (Groningen), 167–193.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. and Stoneman, R. (eds.) 1994, Greek Fiction: The Novel in Context (New York).Google Scholar
Mossman, J. 2010, ‘A Life Unparalleled: Artaxerxes’, in Humble, N. (ed.), Plutarch’s Lives: Parallelism and Purpose (Swansea), 145–168.Google Scholar
Mueller-Goldingen, C. 2004, ‘Biographie, Historiographie und Philosophie’, in Mueller-Goldingen, C. (ed.), Das Kleine und das Grosse: Essays zur antiken Kultur und Geistesgeschichte (Munich), 5–10.Google Scholar
Mumprecht, V. 1983, Philostratos. Das Leben von Apollonios von Tyana (Zürich, Munich).Google Scholar
Münscher, K. 1920, Xenophon in der Griechisch-Römischen Literatur. Philologus Suppl. 13.2 (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Nagy, B. 2003, ‘Imbellis ac firmus parum: The Poet as Military Tribune’, NECJ 30, 117–127.Google Scholar
Naumann, H. 1979, ‘Lücken und Einfügungen in den Dichter-Viten Suetons’, WS 13, 151–165.Google Scholar
Neuburg, V. E. 1977, Popular Literature: A History and Guide. From the Beginning of Printing to the Year 1897 (London).Google Scholar
Ní Mheallaigh, K. 2008, ‘Pseudo-Documentarism and the Limits of Ancient Fiction’, AJPh 129.3, 403–431.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. G. 1986, ‘Ἑλληνικός – βαρβαρικός: Plutarch on Greek and Barbarian Characteristics’, WS 20, 229–244.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. G. 1995, ‘Plutarch’s Heroes in Action: Does the End Justify the Means?’, in Gallo and Scardigli (eds.), 301–312.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. G. 1997, ‘Plutarch’s Criteria for Judging His Historical Sources’, in Schrader, C., Ramón, V. and Vela, J. (eds.), Plutarco y la historia. Actas del V Simposio Español sobre Plutarco. Zaragoza, 20–22 de junio de 1996 (Zaragoza), 329–341.Google Scholar
Nikolaidis, A. G. (ed.) 2008, The Unity of Plutarch’s Work: Moralia Themes in the Lives, Features of the Lives in the Moralia (Berlin).Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 1998, Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung (Stuttgart, Leipzig).Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2009, The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Nünning, A. 1995, Von historischer Fiktion zu historiographischer Metafiktion, vol. 1: Theorie, Typologie und Poetik des historischen Romans. Literatur – Imagination – Realität vol. 11 (Trier).Google Scholar
Oldfather, W. A., Cherf, J. F., Corey, K. S. T., McNeil, M. D., Strout, R. C. F., Jameson, H. C. and Steiner, G. 1943, Studies in the Text Tradition of St. Jerome’s Vitae Patrum (Urbana, IL).Google Scholar
Osgood, J. 2006, Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Osgood, J. (ed.) 2011, A Suetonius Reader: Selections from the Lives of the Caesars and the Life of Horace (Mundelein, IL).Google Scholar
Pagán, V. 2006, ‘Shadows and Assassinations: Forms of Time in Tacitus and Appian’, Arethusa 39, 193–218.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, S. 2009, ‘A Fisherman’s Cloak and the Literary Texture of the Story of Apollonius, King of Tyre’, in Gasti, F. (ed.), Il romanzo latino: modelli e tradizione letteraria. Atti della VII Giornata ghisleriana di Filologia classica, Pavia 11–12/10/2007 (Pavia), 125–138.Google Scholar
Panayotakis, S. 2011, ‘The Divided Cloak in the Historia Apollonii regis Tyri: Further Thoughts’, in Doulamis, K. (ed.), Echoing Narratives: Studies of Intertextuality in Greek and Roman Prose Fiction. Ancient Narrative Supplements 13 (Groningen), 185–199.Google Scholar
Papaconstantinou, A., Debié, M. and Kennedy, H. (eds.) 2010, Writing ‘True Stories’: Historians and Hagiographers in the Late Antique and Medieval Near East. Cultural Encounters in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages 9 (Turnhout).Google Scholar
Papademetriou, J. T. A. 1997, Aesop as an Archetypal Hero. Hellenic Society for Humanistic Studies. Studies and Researches 39 (Athens).Google Scholar
Paschoud, F. 1995, ‘Noms camouflés d’historiens du 4e siècle dans l’Histoire Auguste’, Historia 44, 502–504.Google Scholar
Paschoud, F. (ed.) 1996, Histoire Auguste, vol. 5, part 1: Vies d’Aurélien, Tacite (Paris).Google Scholar
Paschoud, F. (ed.) 2001, Histoire Auguste, vol. 5, part 2: Vies de Probus, Firmus, Saturnin, Proculus et Bonose, Carus, Numérien et Carin (Paris).Google Scholar
Paschoud, F. 2005, ‘Biographie und Panegyrik: wie spricht man vom lebenden Kaiser?’, in Voessing, K. (ed.), Biographie und Prosopographie. Internationales Kolloquium zum 65. Geburtstag von Anthony R. Birley. Historia Einzelschriften 178 (Stuttgart), 103–118.Google Scholar
Pausch, D. 2009, ‘Libellus non tam diserte quam fideliter scriptus? Unreliable Narration in the Historia Augusta’, Ancient Narrative 8, 115–135.Google Scholar
Pauw, D. A. 1980, ‘Impersonal Expressions and Unidentified Spokesmen in Greek and Roman Historiography and Biography’, AClass 22, 115–130.Google Scholar
Pecere, O. and Stramaglia, A. (eds.) 1996, La letteratura di consumo nel mondo greco-latino. Atti del convegno internazionale. Cassino, 14–17 settembre 1994 (Cassino).Google Scholar
Pekary, T. 1990, ‘Unkonventionelle Gedanken zur römischen Geschichtsschreibung’, in Leidinger, P. and Metzler, D. (eds.), Festschrift Karl-Ernst Jeisman zum 65. Geburtstag (Münster), 61–74.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1979, ‘Plutarch’s Method of Work in the Roman Lives’, JHS 99, 74–96.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1989, ‘Plutarch: Roman Heroes and Greek Culture’, in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society (Oxford), 199–232.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1990a, ‘Childhood and Personality in Greek Biography’, in Pelling (ed.), 213–244.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1990b, ‘Truth and Fiction in Plutarch’s Lives’, in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature (Oxford), 19–54.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.) 1990c, Characterization and Individuality in Greek Literature (Oxford).Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1995, ‘Plutarch’s Adaptation of His Source-Material’, in Scardigli, B. (ed.), Essays on Plutarch’s Lives (Oxford), 125–154. (Orig. JHS 100 (1980), 127–141.)Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1997a, ‘Biographical History? Cassius Dio on the Early Principate’, in Edwards, M. J. and Swain, S. (eds.), Portraits: Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire (Oxford), 117–144.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 1997b, ‘Is Death the End? Closure in Plutarch’s Lives’, in Roberts, D. H., Dunnand, F. M. and Fowler, D. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin literature (Princeton, NJ), 228–250.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2002b, ‘“You for me and me for you”: Narrator and Narratee in Plutarch’s Lives’, in Pelling 2002a, 267–282.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2002c, ‘Truth and Fiction in Plutarch’s Lives’, in Pelling, 2002a, 143–170 (revised version of Pelling 1990b).Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2002d, ‘Aspects of Plutarch’s Characterisation’, in Pelling 2002a: 283–300 (revised version of Pelling 1988a).Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2002e, ‘Childhood and Personality in Greek Biography’, in Pelling 2002a: 301–338 (revised version of Pelling 1990a).Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2003, ‘Biography, Greek’, in Hornblower and Spawforth (eds.), 241–242.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2005, ‘Synkrisis Revisited’, in Pérez Jiménez, A. and Titchener, F. (eds.), Historical and Biographical Values of Plutarch’s Works: Studies Devoted to Professor Philip A. Stadter by the International Plutarch Society, (Malaga, Logan, UT), 325–340.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2010a, ‘The Spur of Fame: Annals 4.37–8’, in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J. and Pelling, C (eds.), Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman (Oxford), 364–384.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2010b, Rome in Crisis. Nine Lives by Plutarch: Tiberius Gracchus – Gaius Gracchus – Sertorius – Lucullus – Younger Cato – Brutus – Antony – Galba – Otho (London) [translation by Scott-Kilbert, I. and Pelling, C.; introduction and Notes by Pelling, C.].Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2011, Plutarch Caesar: Translated with an Introduction and Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. 2013, ‘Explanation and What Didn’t Happen: The Virtues of Virtual History’, in Powell, A. and Brodersen, K. (eds.), Hindsight in Greek and Roman History (Swansea), 1–24.Google Scholar
Penwill, J. L. 2010, ‘Evolution of An Assassin: The Letters of Chion of Heraclea’, Ramus 39.1, 24–52.Google Scholar
Perrin, B. (ed. and trans.) 1914–1926, Plutarch’s Lives. 11 vols. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Perry, B. E. 1933, ‘The Text Tradition of the Greek Life of Aesop’, TAPhA 64, 198–244.Google Scholar
Perry, B. E. 1936, Studies in the Text History of the Life and Fables of Aesop (Haverford, PA).Google Scholar
Perry, B. E. 1952, Aesopica: A Series of Texts Relating to Aesop or ascribed to him or closely connected with the literary tradition that bears his name. Collected and critically edited, in part translated from oriental languages, with a commentary and historical essay, vol. 1: Greek and Latin Texts (Urbana, IL).Google Scholar
Pervo, R. I. 1996, ‘The Ancient Novel Becomes Christian’, in Schmeling (ed.), 685–711.Google Scholar
Pervo, R. I. 1998, ‘A Nihilist Fabula: Introducing the Life of Aesop’, in Hock, Chance and Perkins (eds.), 77–120.Google Scholar
Philippson, R. 1928, ‘Verfasser und Abfassungszeit der sogenannten Hippokratesbriefe’, RhM 77, 293–328.Google Scholar
Pigeaud, J. 1981, ‘Les lettres d’Hippocrate’, in Pigeaud, J. (ed.), La maladie de l’âme: Étude sur la relation de l’âme et du corps dans la tradition médico-philosophique antique (Paris), 452–477.Google Scholar
Pirenne, H. 1952, Medieval Cities: Their Origins and the Revival of Trade, trans. Frank D. Halsey. 2nd edn (Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Pitcher, L. 2009, Writing Ancient History: An Introduction to Classical Historiography (London).Google Scholar
Power, T. 2009b, ‘The Servants’ Taunt: Homer and Suetonius’ Galba’, Historia 58, 242–245.Google Scholar
Power, T. 2010, ‘Pliny, Letters 5.10 and the Literary Career of Suetonius’, JRS 100, 140–162.Google Scholar
Power, T. 2011b, ‘Two Acrostics by Late Republican Poets in Suetonius’, Athenaeum 99, 509–514.Google Scholar
Power, T. 2014a, ‘The Endings of Suetonius’ Caesars’, in Power and Gibson (eds.), 58–77.Google Scholar
Power, T. 2014b, ‘Introduction: The Originality of Suetonius’, in Power and Gibson (eds.), 1–18.Google Scholar
Power, T. 2014e, ‘Suetonius’ Famous Courtesans’, in Power, and Gibson, (eds.), 231–255.Google Scholar
Power, T. and Gibson, R. K. (eds.) 2014, Suetonius the Biographer: Studies in Roman Lives (Oxford).Google Scholar
Praet, D. 1999, ‘Hagiography and Biography as Prescriptive Sources for Late Antique Sexual Morals’, Litterae Hagiologicae 5, 2–13.Google Scholar
Praet, D. 2011, ‘Susanna, the Fathers and the Passio Sereni (BHL 7595–6): Sexual Morals, Intertextuality and Early Christian Self-definition’, Journal of Ancient Christianity – Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum 14.3, 556–580.Google Scholar
Quack, J. F. 2005, ‘Gibt es eine ägyptische Homer-Rezeption?’, in Luther, A. (ed.), Odysseerezeptionen (Frankfurt am Main), 55–72.Google Scholar
Rahe, P. A. 1980, ‘The Military Situation in Western Asia on the Eve of Cunaxa’, AJPh 101, 79–96.Google Scholar
Rebenich, S. 1992, Hieronymus und sein Kreis. Historia Einzelschriften 72 (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Rebenich, S. 2009, ‘Inventing an Ascetic Hero: Jerome’s Life of Paul the First Hermit’, in Cain, A. and Lössl, J. (eds.), Jerome of Stridon: His Life, Writings and Legacy (Farnham), 13–28.Google Scholar
Rees, R. 2012, ‘The Modern History of Latin Panegyric’, in Rees, R. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Latin Panegyric (Oxford), 3–48.Google Scholar
Reifferscheid, A. (ed.) 1860, C. Suetoni Tranquilli praeter Caesarum libros reliquiae (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Reimer, A. M. 2002, Miracle and Magic: A Study in the Acts of the Apostles and the Life of Apollonius of Tyana. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 235 (London).Google Scholar
Richardson, B. 2000, ‘Narrative Poetics and Postmodern Transgression: Theorizing the Collapse of Time, Voice, and Frame’, Narrative 8, 23–42.Google Scholar
Robbins, V. K. 1992, Jesus the Teacher: A Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation of Mark, 2nd edn (Minneapolis).Google Scholar
Roberts, A. (ed.) 2004, What Might Have Been: Leading Historians on Twelve What Ifs of History (London).Google Scholar
Roemer, A. 1901, ‘Ueber den litterarisch-aestetischen Bildungsstand des attischen Theaterpublikums’, Abhandlungen der philosophisch-philologischen Klasse der koeniglich bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 22, 1–96.Google Scholar
Ron, M. 1981, ‘Free Indirect Discourse, Mimetic Language Games and the Subject of Fiction’, Poetics Today 2.2, 17–39.Google Scholar
Roselli, D. K. 2005, ‘Vegetable-Hawking Mom and Fortunate Son: Euripides, Tragic Style, and Reception’, Phoenix 59, 1–49.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, G. D. 2002, ‘Why Do We Ask “What If?” Reflections on the Function of Alternate History’, History and Theory 41, 90–103.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. 2001, Ancient Epistolary Fictions: The Letter in Greek Literature (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Roskam, G. 2005a, On the Path to Virtue: The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and Its Reception in (Middle-)Platonism (Leuven).Google Scholar
Roskam, G. 2005b, ‘Plutarch’s Life of Agis, or the Honourable Course of a Beginning Politician’, in de Blois, Bons, Kessels and Schenkeveld (eds.), 227–241.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. 2011, ‘Ambition and Love of Fame in Plutarch’s Lives of Agis, Cleomenes, and the Gracchi’, CP 106, 208–225.Google Scholar
Roskam, G., De Pourcq, M. and Van der Stockt, L. (eds.) 2012, The Lash of Ambition: Plutarch, Imperial Greek Literature and the Dynamics of Philotimia. Collection d’Études Classiques 25 (Leuven).Google Scholar
Rubincam, C. 2003, ‘Numbers in Greek Poetry and Historiography: Quantifying Fehling’, CQ 53, 448–463.Google Scholar
Ruch, W. 1998, The Sense of Humor: Explorations of a Personality Characteristic. Humor Research 3 (Berlin, New York).Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (ed.) 1989, Horace: Epistles Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (‘Ars Poetica’) (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Ruggiero, F. (intro., ed., trans. and comm.) 2003, Sulpicio Severo. Vita di Martino. Biblioteca Patristica 40 (Bologna).Google Scholar
Ruiz Montero, C. 2010, ‘‘La Vida de Esopo’ (rec. G): niveles de lengua y aspectos de estilo’, in Cortés Gabaudan, F. and Méndez Dosuna, J. V. (eds.), Dic mihi, Musa, uirum: Homenaje al profesor A. López Eire (Salamanca), 605–612.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1995, ‘On Reading Plutarch’s Lives’, in Scardigli, B. (ed.), Essays on Plutarch’s Lives (Oxford), 75–94.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 1998, Canons of Style in the Antonine Age: Idea Theory in its Literary Context (Oxford).Google Scholar
Rütten, T. 1992, Demokrit – Lachender Philosoph und Sanguinischer Melancholiker. Eine pseudohippokratische Geschichte (Leiden).Google Scholar
Ryan, M. 1992, Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory (Bloomington, IN).Google Scholar
Said, S. 2005, ‘Plutarch and the People in the Parallel Lives’, in de Blois, Bons, Kessels and Schenkeveld (eds.), 7–25.Google Scholar
Sakalis, D. 1983, ‘Beiträge zu den pseudo-hippokratischen Briefen’, in Lasserre, F. and Mudry, P. (eds.), Formes de pensée dans la collection hippocratique. Actes du IVe colloque international hippocratique (Lausanne 21–28 September 1981) (Geneva), 499–514.Google Scholar
Saller, R. 1980, ‘Anecdotes as Historical Evidence for the Principate’,Greece and Rome 27, 69–83.Google Scholar
Sandy, G. H. 1982, ‘Characterisation and Philosophical Décor in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica’, TAPhA 112, 141–167.Google Scholar
Santoro L’hoir, F. 2006, Tragedy, Rhetoric and the Historiography of Tacitus’ Annales (Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
Sargeaunt, J. 1918, Terence, The Lady from Andros etc. Loeb Classical Library, (Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Saunders, M. 2010, Self-Impression: Life-Writing, Autobiografiction, and the Forms of Modern Literature (Oxford).Google Scholar
Schindel, U. 1989, ‘Philosophisches Tugendschema und menschliche Individualität am Beispiel von Xenophons Agesilaos’, Mitteilungen des deutschen Altphilologen-Verbandes 39.2, 2–16.Google Scholar
Schirren, T. 2005, Philosophos Bios. Die antike Philosophenbiographie als symbolische Form: Studien zur Vita Apollonii des Philostratos. Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumwissenschatfen, 2nd series 15 (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Schlumberger, J. 1976a, ‘Non scribo, sed dicto (HA T 33.8): hat der Autor der Historia Augusta mit Stenographen gearbeitet?’, in Alföldy, G et al., Bonner Historia Augusta Colloquium 1972/4 (Bonn), 221–238.Google Scholar
Schlumberger, J. 1976b, Die Epitome de Caesaribus. Untersuchungen zur heidnischen Geschichtsschreibung des 4. Jahrhunderts n. Chr. (Munich).Google Scholar
Schmid, W. 1897, Der Atticismus in seinen Hauptvertretern; von Dionysius von Halicarnass bis auf den zweiten Philostratus, vol. 4 (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Schneemelcher, W. 1991–1992, New Testament Apocrypha. Revised edn, English translation ed. Wilson, R. McL. (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Scholes, R. 1980, ‘Language, Narrative and Anti-narrative’, Critical Inquiry 7, 204–212.Google Scholar
Scholtemeijer, J. 1984, Historia Augusta. Knolskrywer(s) ... òfknollesers ... òfknollevirlesers (Pretoria).Google Scholar
Schorn, S. (ed.) 2004, Satyros aus Kallatis: Sammlung der Fragmente mit Kommentar (Basel).Google Scholar
Scott, R. T. 2010, ‘There’s Nothing Wrong with Horace, Odes 4’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, vol. 15. Collection Latomus 323 (Brussels), 258–270.Google Scholar
Searby, D. M. 2008, ‘Non-Lucian Sources for Demonax with a New Collection of “Fragments”’, SO 83.1, 120–147.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1979, Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Shimron, B. 1964a, ‘The Spartan Polity after the Defeat of Cleomenes III’, CQ 14, 232–239.Google Scholar
Shiner, W. 1998, ‘Creating Plot in Episodic Narratives: The Life of Aesop and the Gospel of Mark’, in Hock, Chance and Perkins (eds.), 155–176.Google Scholar
Shumate, N. 1997, ‘Compulsory Pretence and the “Theatricalization of Experience” in Tacitus’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, vol. 8. Collection Latomus 239 (Brussels), 364–403.Google Scholar
Silvestre Landrobe, H. 2008, ‘Suetoni ‘Vita Horati’: retrato metatextual frustrante’, in Cascón Dorado, A. et al. (eds.), Donum amicitiae: estudios en homenaje al profesor Vicente Picón García (Madrid), 431–436.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A. and Weiner, E. S. C. 2004, The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd edn, vol. 12 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds.), Kakos. Badness and Anti-Value in Classical Antiquity. Mnemosyne Suppl. 307 (Leiden, Boston).Google Scholar
Smith, M. 1975, ‘De superstitione (Moralia 164E–171F)’, in Betz, H. D. (ed.), Plutarch’s Theological Writings and Early Christian Literature (Leiden), 1–35.Google Scholar
Smith, W. D. 1990, Hippocrates. Pseudoepigraphic Writings. Letters – Embassy – Speech From the Altar – Decree (Leiden).Google Scholar
Staab, G. 2002, Pythagoras in der Spätantike, Studien zu De Vita Pythagorica des Iamblichos von Chalkis. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 165 (Munich, Leipzig).Google Scholar
Stadter, P. A. 1975, ‘Plutarch’s Comparison of Pericles and Fabius Maximus’, GRBS 16, 77–85.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. A. 1996, ‘Anecdotes and the Thematic Structure of Plutarchean Biography’, in Fernández Delgado, J. A., Antonio, J. and Pordomingo Pardo, F. (eds.), Estudios sobre Plutarco: Aspectos Formales (Madrid), 291–303.Google Scholar
Stamoulakis, I. P. 2006, Το λεξιλόγιο της Μυθιστορίας του Αισώπου. Dissertation, Athens University.Google Scholar
Stancliffe, C. 1983, Saint Martin and His Hagiographer: History and Miracle in Sulpicius Severus (Oxford, New York).Google Scholar
Steen, G. 2005, ‘Metaphor/Metonymy’, in Herman, D., Jahn, M. and Ryan, M. L. (eds.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory (London), 305–308.Google Scholar
Steffen, W. 1960, ‘Kritische Bemerkungen zu Suetons Vita Horati’, in Irmscher, J. and Kumaniecki, K. F. (eds.), Römische Literatur der augusteischen Zeit: eine Aufsatzsammlung (Berlin), 18–25.Google Scholar
Stem, R. 2009, ‘Shared Virtues and the Limits of Relativism in Nepos’ Epaminondas and Atticus’, CJ 105.2, 123–136.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. B. 1987, ‘Lies and Invention in Deinon’s Persica’, Achaemenid History 2, 27–35.Google Scholar
Stoneman, R. 1994, ‘The Alexander Romance: From History to Fiction’, in Morgan, and Stoneman, (eds.), 117–145.Google Scholar
Stronk, J. P. 2010, Ctesias’ Persian History. Part I: Introduction, Text, and Translation (Düsseldorf).Google Scholar
Suárez de la Torre, E. 1992, ‘Las cartas pseudo-hipocráticas’, in López Férez, J. A. (ed.), Tratados hipocráticos: estudios a cerca de su contenido, forma e influencia. Actas del VIIe Colloque International Hippocratique (Madrid, 24–29 de septiembre de 1990)(Madrid), 453–466.Google Scholar
Swain, S. 1996, Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World AD 50–250 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Swain, S. 1997, ‘Biography and Biographic in the Literature of the Roman Empire’, in Edwards, M. J. and Swain, S. (eds.), Portraits: Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire (Oxford), 1–37.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1984, ‘Fictional History Old and New: Hadrian’, A James Bryce Memorial Lecture delivered in the Wolfson Hall, Somerville College, on 10 May 1984 (Oxford).Google Scholar
Szlezák, T. 1985, Platon und die Schriftlichkeit der Philosophie. Interpretationen zu den frühen und mittleren Dialogen (Berlin, New York).Google Scholar
Tally, S. 2000, Almost America: From the Colonists to Clinton: A ‘What If?’ History of the US (New York).Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., Lebow, R. N. and Parker, G. (eds.) 2006, Unmaking the West: ‘What-If’ Scenarios that Rewrite World History (Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
Thomas, C. M. 1998, ‘Stories without Texts and without Authors: The Problem of Fluidity in Ancient Novelistic Texts and Early Christian Literature’, in Hock, Chance and Perkins (eds.), 273–291.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, S. J. and Winterbottom, M. 1983, ‘Suetonius’, in Reynolds, L. D. (ed.), Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics (Oxford), 399–405.Google Scholar
Tomashevsky, B. 1978, ‘Literary Genres’, in O’Toole, L. M and Shukman, A (eds.), Russian Poetics in Translation 5 (Oxford), 52–93.Google Scholar
Tornau, C. 2001, ‘Intertextuality in Early Latin Hagiography: Sulpicius Severus and the Vita Antonii’, Studia Patristica 35, 158–166.Google Scholar
Trapp, M. 2006, ‘Biography in Letters; Biography and Letters’, in McGing and Mossman (eds.), 335–350.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, H. 1982, ‘History and Imagination’, in Pearl, V., Worden, B. and Lloyd-Jones, H. (eds.), History and Imagination: Essays in Honour of H. R. Trevor-Roper (London), 356–369.Google Scholar
Trzaskoma, S. M. 2005, ‘A Novelist Writing “History”: Longus’ Thucydides Again’, GRBS 45, 75–90.Google Scholar
Trzaskoma, S. M. 2011, ‘Echoes of Thucydides’ Sicilian Expedition in Three Greek Novels’, CP 106, 61–65.Google Scholar
Tschiedel, H. J. 1986, ‘Hic Abdera. Gedanken zur Narrheit eines Gemeinwesens im laterum – oder: Wie dumm waren die Abderiten?’, in Kraft, P. and J. Tschiedel, H. (eds.), Concentus hexachordus. Beiträge zum 10. Symposion der bayerischen Hochschullehrer für Klassische Philologie in Eichstätt (24.–25. Februar 1984). Eichstätter Beiträge. Abteilung Sprache und Literatur, vol. 13 (Regensburg), 169–195.Google Scholar
Tucker, A. 2009, ‘Causation in Historiography’, in Tucker, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography (Oxford), 98–108.Google Scholar
Turner, P. 2012, Truthfulness, Realism, Historicity: A Study in Late Antique Spiritual Literature (Farnham).Google Scholar
Vaihinger, H. 1911 , Die Philosophie des Als Ob. System der theoretischen, praktischen und religiosen Fiktionen der Menschheit auf Grund eines idealistischen Positivismus (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Van Dam, R. 1988, ‘Images of Saint Martin in Late Roman and Early Merovingian Gaul’. Viator 19, 1–17.Google Scholar
Van Dam, R. 1999, ‘Saint Martin of Tours’, in Bowersock, G. W., Brown, P. and Grabar, O. (eds.), Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World (Cambridge, MA), 566–567.Google Scholar
Van den Bosch, J. 1959, Capa, basilica, monasterium et le culte de saint Martin de Tours: Étude lexicologique et sémasiologique (Nijmegen).Google Scholar
Van den Ven, P. 1900–1, ‘S. Jérôme et la Vie du moine Malchus le Captif’, Le Muséon 1–2, 411–455; 208–326.Google Scholar
Van Hooff, A. J. L. 1990, From Autothanasia to Suicide: Self-killing in Classical Antiquity (London, New York).Google Scholar
van Mal-Maeder, D., Burnier, A. and Nuñez, L., (eds.) 2009, Jeux de voix: énonciation, intertextualité et intentionnalité dans la littérature antique (Bern).Google Scholar
Van Uytfanghe, M. 1985, ‘L’empreinte biblique sur la plus ancienne hagiographie occidentale’, in Fontaine, J. and Pietri, C. (eds.), Le monde latin antique et la Bible. Bible de tous les temps, vol. 2 (Paris), 565–611.Google Scholar
Van Uytfanghe, M. 1987a, Stylisation biblique et condition humaine dans l’hagiographie mérovingienne (600–750) (Brussels).Google Scholar
Van Uytfanghe, M. 1987b, ‘Heiligenverehrung II (Hagiographie)’, Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum vol. 14 (Stuttgart), 150–183.Google Scholar
Van Uytfanghe, M. 1993, ‘L’hagiographie: un “genre” chrétien ou antique tardif?’, Analecta Bollandiana 111, 135–188.Google Scholar
Van Uytfanghe, M. 2001, ‘Biographie 2 (spirituelle)’, in Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum, Supplement vol. 1 (Stuttgart), 1088–1364.Google Scholar
Van Uytfanghe, M. 2005, ‘La biographie classique et l’hagiographie chrétienne antique tardive’, Hagiographica 12, 223–248.Google Scholar
Van Uytfanghe, M. 2007, ‘L’hagiographie en Occident de la Vita Antonii aux dialogues de Grégoire le Grand: genèse et occupation du terrain’, in degl’Innocenti, A. et al. (eds.), Gregorio Magno e l’agiografia fra 4 e 7 secolo (Florence), 3–51.Google Scholar
Van Uytfanghe, M. 2011, ‘Review of Barnes 2010’, Römische Quartalschrift für christliche Altertumskunde und Kirchengeschichte 106, 120–126.Google Scholar
Vielberg, M. 2006, Der Mönchsbischof von Tours im ‘Martinellus’: Zur Form des hagiographischen Dossiers und seines spätantiken Leitbilds. Untersuchungen zur Antiken Literatur und Geschichte 79 (Berlin, New York).Google Scholar
Vorster, W. S. and Botha, J. E. (eds.) 1999, Speaking of Jesus: Essays on Biblical Language, Gospel Narrative, and the Historical Jesus (Leiden, Boston).Google Scholar
Walsh, R. 2005, ‘The Pragmatics of Narrative Fictionality’, in Phelan, J. and Rabinowitz, P. J. (eds.), A Companion to Narrative Theory (Oxford), 150–166.Google Scholar
Walsh, R. 2007, The Rhetoric of Fictionality: Narrative Theory and the Idea of Fiction (Columbus, OH).Google Scholar
Wardle, D. 2002, ‘Suetonius as Ab Epistulis: An African Connection’, Historia 51, 462–480.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. 2007, ‘A Perfect Send-Off: Suetonius and the Dying Art of Augustus (Suetonius Augustus 99)’, Mnemosyne 60, 443–464.Google Scholar
Watts, E. 2010, ‘Three Generations of Christian Philosophical Biography’, in McGill, S., Sogno, C. and Watts, E. (eds.), The Roman Empire from the Tetrarchs to the Theodosians (Cambridge), 117–133.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1949, ‘Objective Possibility and Adequate Causation in Historical Explanation’, in Shils, E. A. and Finch, H. A. (eds. and trans.), Max Weber on The Methodology of the Social Sciences (Glencoe, IL), 164–188 (Originally published in Archiv fiir Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 1905.).Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. (ed.) 1974, Die Schule des Aristoteles: Texte und Kommentar, Suppl. II: Sotion (Basel).Google Scholar
Weingarten, S. 2005, The Saint’s Saints: Hagiography and Geography in Jerome (Leiden).Google Scholar
White, C. (trans., ed. and intro.) 1998, Early Christian Lives. Life of Antony by Athanasius; Life of Paul of Thebes by Jerome; Life of Hilarion by Jerome; Life of Malchus by Jerome; Life of Martin of Tours by Sulpicius Severus; Life of Benedict by Gregory the Great (London, New York).Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 1998, ‘The Birth of a Prodigy: Heliodorus and the Genealogy of Hellenism’, in Hunter, (ed.), 93–124.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2001, Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation (Oxford).Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2002a, ‘Alexander’s Hellenism and Plutarch’s Textualism’, CQ 52, 174–192.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2002b, ‘Written on the Body: Ekphrasis, Perception and Deception in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica’, Ramus 31, 111–125.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2003, ‘Reading for Pleasure: Narrative, Irony, and Eroticism in Achilles Tatius’, in Panayotakis, S., Zimmerman, M. and Keulen, W. (eds.), The Ancient Novel and Beyond (Leiden, Boston, Cologne), 191–205.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (ed.) 2008, The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Wieland, C. M. 1861, The Republic of Fools: Being the History of Abdera in Thrace. 2 vols (London).Google Scholar
Williams, G. 1995, ‘Libertino patre natus: True or False?’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration (Oxford), 296–313. (Reprinted in Freudenburg, K (ed.), Oxford Readings in Horace: Satires and Epistles (Oxford, 2009), 138–155.)Google Scholar
Williams, M. S. 2008, Authorised Lives in Early Christian Biography: Between Eusebius and Augustine (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Wills, L. M. 1997, The Quest of the Historical Gospel: Mark, John, and the Origins of the Gospel Genre (London, New York).Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. 1985, Auctor and Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius’s Golden Ass (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London).Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. 1999, ‘The Mendacity of Kalasiris and the Narrative Strategy of Heliodoros’ Aithiopika’, in Swain, S. (ed.), Oxford Readings in the Greek Novel (Oxford), 286–350. (= YCS 27 (1982), 93–158.)Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1993, ‘Lying Historians: Seven Types of Mendacity’, in Gill, and Wiseman, (eds.), 122–146.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2009, ‘Augustus, Sulla and the Supernatural’, in Smith, C. and Powell, A. (eds.), The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography (Swansea), 111–123.Google Scholar
Wohl, V. 1998, ‘Plato avant la lettre: Authenticity in Plato’s Epistles’, Ramus 27, 60–93.Google Scholar
Wohl, V. (ed.) 2014, Probabilities, Hypotheticals, and Counterfactuals in Ancient Greek Thought (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 1979, ‘Self-Imitation and the Substance of History’, in West, D. and Woodman, T. (eds.), Creative Imitation and Latin Literature (Cambridge), 143–155.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 2006, ‘Tiberius and the Taste of Power: The Year 33 in Tacitus’, CQ 56, 175–189.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 2009, ‘Horace and Historians’, CJ 55, 157–167. (= Woodman 2012: 112–120.)Google Scholar
Woods, D. 2012, ‘Seven Notes on the Reign of Caligula’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, vol. 16. Collection Latomus 338 (Brussels), 437–471.Google Scholar
Woolf, V. 1942, ‘The Art of Biography’, in The Death of the Moth and Other Essays (London), 119–126.Google Scholar
Yacobi, T. 2000, ‘Interart Narrative: (Un)Reliability and Ekphrasis’, Poetics Today 21.4, 711–749.Google Scholar
Yona, S. 2015, ‘Some Epicurean Aspects of Horace’s Upbringing in Satires 1.4’, CP 110, 227–251.Google Scholar
Zafiropoulos, C. A. 2001, Ethics in Aesop’s Fables: the Augustana Collection. Mnemosyne Supplement 216 (Leiden, Boston, Cologne).Google Scholar
Zeelander, S. 2012, Closure in Biblical Narrative. Biblical Interpretation Series 111 (Leiden).Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. 2008, Imagining Alternate Possibilities: Counterfactual Reasoning and Writing in Graeco-Roman Historiography. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Zweimüller, S. 2008, Lukian Rhetorum Praeceptor: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar (Göttingen).Google Scholar