Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Glossary
- Introduction
- 1 A Century of Contestation around Cashews
- 2 Tarana: History from the Factory Floor
- 3 Migration: Pathways from Poverty to Tarana
- 4 Lives around Livelihoods: ‘Children Are Not Like Chickens’
- 5 African Urban Families in the Late Colonial Era: Agency
- Conclusions
- Epilogue: Mozambique’s Cashew Economy, 1975 to 2014
- Sources and Bibliography
- Index
5 - African Urban Families in the Late Colonial Era: Agency
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2021
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Glossary
- Introduction
- 1 A Century of Contestation around Cashews
- 2 Tarana: History from the Factory Floor
- 3 Migration: Pathways from Poverty to Tarana
- 4 Lives around Livelihoods: ‘Children Are Not Like Chickens’
- 5 African Urban Families in the Late Colonial Era: Agency
- Conclusions
- Epilogue: Mozambique’s Cashew Economy, 1975 to 2014
- Sources and Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Africans [in Lourenço Marques] live in total promiscuity… numerous families together with no thought of hygiene. These poor people not only live miserably in shacks built of all kinds of junk but also pay rents for the space they occupy on lands, that in other times perhaps belonged to their grandparents, but are now held in legitimate title by Europeans.
Adelino José Macedo, Municipal Administrator, 1947Why do you prefer to have your wife and children live in the rural areas?
António Rita-Ferreira – 1967 Survey ‘Africans of Lourenço Marques’The social history of everyday life in late colonial Lourenço Marques supports John Lonsdale's assertion that Africans navigated in quite tight corners. Lourenço Marques municipal authorities created, perpetuated and exacerbated those tight corners, and the city's willful neglect cost African urban businesses and families a great deal. This chapter reveals that families formed by cashew shellers were broadly similar to those of the overall urban African population. The daily lives of people living in the bairros de caniço revolved around work, wages, housing, rents, strategies to leverage wages and struggles to keep families intact, fed and healthy.
Many urban women, not just cashew shellers, formed amancebado families, not because it was their last option, but because such arrangements allowed them a measure of autonomy that they valued and pursued. Poor women in particular had limited expectations of service and support in relation to employment, child bearing, formal marriage, common-law marriage and polygamy. Although the status as head of household was unusually common among women of Tarana, their family forms and lives were otherwise broadly similar to those of their neighbours. Women throughout the suburbs of Lourenço Marques experienced the essential economic and social connectivity of productive and reproductive labour in the working lives of their families.
Lourenço Marques was a settler city, and increasingly through this period a sophisticated cosmopolitan destination for white tourists. The white city was completely supported by black workers whose neighbourhoods and urban social history is as diverse and interesting as the settler city, but much more difficult to extricate. To retrieve the daily challenges the great majority of African families faced living in what everyone called caniço, the diverse and sprawling bairros de caniço, we have to extricate caniço from the projection of a white city.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Women, Migration & the Cashew Economy in Southern Mozambique1945-1975, pp. 180 - 209Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2015