Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2012
Political liberals such as Charles Larmore, Martha Nussbaum, and the later John Rawls argue that societies should be well ordered by public conceptions of justice that are specifically political. To say that a view “well orders” a society is to say, among other things, that that view provides the public basis for justifying its fundamental political arrangements. Political conceptions of justice stand in contrast to moral views, which are more comprehensive, such as the perfectionism of Aristotle and Aquinas, the ethical liberalisms of Kant and Mill, and conceptions of justice derived from religious traditions and texts. They are said to promise more appropriate and effective public bases for political justification than comprehensive views do because the foundations on which they are built, the values that they promote, and – important for present purposes – the forms of freedom that they encourage can be endorsed by citizens who hold a wide range of comprehensive views, including religious views. Some skeptics of political liberalism have argued that it cannot fulfill its promise because it requires government – and specifically public education – to promote a kind of freedom that is associated with ethical liberalism, and that is incompatible with certain religious conceptions of freedom. I shall defend political liberalism against this challenge, arguing that it rests on a misunderstanding of political liberalism and of the kind of freedom that an education guided by political liberalism is to promote.
My conclusion will, I hope, go some way toward answering a long-standing question in religious ethics, the question of whether Christians can or should be accepting one of the versions of philosophical liberalism currently on offer. An affirmative answer to this question is important, because those liberalisms defend attractive conceptions of justice that furnish the essentials of just, liberal, and democratic constitutions. A persistent strain in recent Christian ethics is that justice is a “bad idea” for Christians and that Christians are forced to live as “resident aliens” in contemporary liberal democracies like the United States. Showing that political liberalism promotes a conception of freedom that is compatible with the forms of freedom prized by citizens of faith can address one source of Christian alienation.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.