Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T10:13:49.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

Chapter 4 - Gender, Sexuality, Race, and Colonialism

By
Sandra G. Harding
Edited by
Jude Browne
Jude Browne
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Today, new histories of science are producing skeptical questions about the supposedly international philosophies of science that prevail in the North.1 The conceptual resources of conventional Northern philosophies seem inadequate to enable them to interact effectively with how sciences and their philosophies do, could, and should function in today’s economic, political, social and cultural, local and global contexts. Gender, sexuality, and race issues often are central to these queries, though not consistently recognized. In this chapter, I consider each and ask how international, or universal, are these philosophies of science in reality?

Type
Chapter
Information
Why Gender? , pp. 78 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Warwick. 2002. Postcolonial Technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 32 (Special issue), 643–58.Google Scholar
Anderson, Warwick and Adams, Vinceanne. 2008. Pramoedya’s Chickens: Postcolonial Studies of Technoscience. In Hackett, Edward J. et al., ed., The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 181–207.Google Scholar
Anzaldua, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco, CA: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.Google Scholar
Brotherston, Gordon, 2008. America and the Colonizer Question: Two Formative Statements from Early Mexico. In Morana, Mabel, Dussel, Enrique, and Jauregui, Carlos A., eds., Coloniality at Large: Latin America and the Postcolonial Debate. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 23–42.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Connell, Raewyn. 2015. Meeting at the Edge of Fear: Theory on a World Scale. Feminist Theory, 16(1), 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coronil, Fernando. 2008. Elephants in the Americas? Latin American Postcolonial Studies and Global Decolonization. In Morana, Mabel, Dussel, Enrique, and Jauregui, Carlos A., eds., Coloniality at Large. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 396–416.Google Scholar
de la Cadena, Marisol. 2010. Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections beyond “Politics.” Cultural Anthropology, 25(2), 334–70.Google Scholar
Denevan, William M. 1992. The Pristine Myth: The Landscape of the Americas in 1492. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 82(3), 369–85.Google Scholar
Dussel, Enrique. 1995. The Invention of the Americas: Eclipse of “the Other” and the Myth of Modernity. Michael D. Barber, trans. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo, 1995, Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo 2004. Beyond the Third World: Imperial Globality, Global Coloniality and Anti-Globalisation Social Movements. Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 207–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, Arturo 2010. Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise: The Latin American Modernity/Coloniality Research Program. In Mignolo, Walter D. and Escobar, Arturo, eds., Globalization and the Decolonial Option. New York: Routledge, pp. 33–64.Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. 1995. The Gender of Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grosfoguel, Ramon, Maldonado-Torres, Nelson, and Saldivar, Jose David, eds., 2005. Latino/as in the World System: Decolonization Struggles in the 21st Century U.S. Empire. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Wendy and Escobar, Arturo. 2002. Women and the Politics of Place. Development, 45, 7–14. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.development.1110308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra G., ed. 2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra G. 2009. Postcolonial and Feminist Philosophies of Science and Technology: Convergences and Dissonances. Postcolonial Studies, 12(4), 401–22.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra G. ed. 2011. The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra G. 2016. Latin American Decolonial Social Studies of Scientific Knowledge: Alliances and Tensions. Science, Technology and Human Development, 41(6), 1063–87.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra G. 2017. Latin American Decolonial Studies: Feminist Issues. Feminist Studies, 43(3), 624–36.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra G. 2018. State of the Field: Latin American Decolonial Philosophies of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 78, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.10.001.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra and Mendoza, Breny. 2020. Latin American Decolonial Feminist Philosophy of Knowledge Production. In Crasnow, Sharon and Intemann, Kristen, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Philosophy of Science, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, Steven J. 1998. Long-Distance Corporations and the Geography of Natural Knowledge. Configurations, 6(2).Google Scholar
Harris, Steven J. 2005. Jesuit Scientific Activity in the Overseas Missions, 1540–1773. Isis, 96, 71–79.Google Scholar
Hecht, Susanna. 2004. Indigenous Soil Management and the Creation of Amazonian Dark Earths: Implications of Kayapo Practices. In Lehman, Johannes, ed., Amazonian Dark Earths: Origins, Properties and Management of Fertile Soils in the Humid Tropics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 355–73.Google Scholar
Lange-Churion, Pedro and Mendieta, Eduardo, eds. 2001. Latin American Postmodernity. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Lugones, Maria. 2008. The Coloniality of Gender. Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise, Spring, 1–17.Google Scholar
Lugones, Maria. 2010. Toward a Decolonial Feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742–59.Google Scholar
Maldonado-Torres, Nelson. 2012. Epistemology, Ethics, and the Time/Space of Decolonization: Perspectives from the Caribbean and the Latina/o Americas. In Isasi-Diaz, Ada Maria and Mendieta, Eduardo, eds., Decolonizing Epistemologies. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 193–206.Google Scholar
Mann, Charles C. 2002. 1491. AtlanticMonthly, March, 41–53.Google Scholar
Mann, Charles C. 2005. 1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Colombus. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Marques, Ivan da Costa. 2014. Ontological Politics and Latin American Local Knowledges. In Medina, Eden, Marques, Ivan da Costa, and Holmes, Christina, eds., Beyond Imported Magic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeil, Maureen. 2005. Introduction: Postcolonial Technoscience. Science as Culture, 14(2), 105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, Breny. 2015. Coloniality of Gender and Power: From Postcoloniality to Decoloniality. In Disch, Lisa and Hawkesworth, Mary, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter. 2000. Introduction: From Cross-Genealogies and Subaltern Knowledges to Nepantla. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(1), 1–8. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/23878/summary?casa_token=xm8mnRFTMtcAAAAA:9-zOOZnuGqH4-vTZuaL0UYlioRhxN6Q1pjEzANyNX0zNjh-kAvNj6u3SyXxNCc3-GLuLTrc5kQ.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter 2011. The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter D. and Escobar, Arturo, eds. 2010. Globalization and the Decolonial Option. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter D. and Walsh, Catherine E. 2018. On Decoloniality Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. www.dukeupress.edu/on-decoloniality.Google Scholar
Morana, Mabel, Dussel, Enrique, and Jauregui, Carlos A., eds. 2008. Coloniality at Large: Latin America and the Postcolonial Debate. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Nieto Olarte, Mauricio. 2016. The European Comprehension of the World: Early Modern Science and Eurocentrism. In Vessuri, Hebe and Kuhn, Michael, ed.,The Global Social Science World: Under and Beyond European Universalism. Stuttgart: Ibiden Verlag, pp. 97–136.Google Scholar
Park, Peter 1993. What is Participatory Research? A Theoretical and Methodological Perspective. In Park, Peter et al., Voices of Change: Participatory Research in the United States and Canada. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Perez-Butros, Tania, Olarte Sierra, Maria Fernanda, and Castillo, Adriana Diaz del. 2014. In Medina, Eden, Marques, Ivan da Costa, Holmes, Christina, eds., Working with Care: Narratives of Invisible Women Scientists Practicing Forensic Genetics in Colombia. Beyond Imported Magic. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise. 2008. Imperial Eyes, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quijano, Anibal. 1992/2007. Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 22–32.Google Scholar
Quijano, Anibal 2010. La crisis del horizonte de sentido colonial/moderno/eurocentrado. Revista Casa de las Américas, 259–60 (abril–septiembre), 32–42.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Ileana, ed. 2001. The Latin American Subaltern Studies Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, Julia. 2011. A Complex Fabric: Intersecting Histories of Race, Gender, and Science in Latin America. Hispanic American Historical Review, 91(3), 409–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, 2006. The Rise of the Global Left: The World Social Forum and Beyond. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa ed. 2007. Another Knowledge is Possible: Beyond Northern Epistemologies. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Schiwy, Freya. 2010. Decolonization and the Question of Subjectivity: Gender, Race, and Binary Thinking. In Mignolo, Walter D. and Escobar, Arturo, eds., Globalization and the Decolonial Option. New York: Routledge, pp. 271–94.Google Scholar
Scott, Catherine V. 1995. Gender and Development: Rethinking Modernization and Dependency Theory. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar
Seth, Suman, ed. 2009. Special Issue: Science, Colonialism, Postcolonialism. Postcolonial Studies, 12(4).Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L., eds., Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 271–313.Google Scholar
Stepan, Nancy Leys. 1986. Race and Gender: The Role of Analogy in Science. Isis, 77(2), 261–77.Google Scholar
Stepan, Nancy Leys 1991. The Hour of Eugenics: Race, Gender, and Nation in Latin America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Subramaniam, Banu et al. 2016. Feminism, Postcolonialism, Technoscience. In Felt, Ulrike et al., eds., Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 407–35.Google Scholar
Tambe, Ashwini, ed. 2017. Decolonial and Postcolonial Approaches: A Dialogue. Feminist Studies, 43(3), 503–691.Google Scholar
Terraciano, Kevin and Sousa, Lisa. 2011. Historiography of New Spain. In Moya, Jose C., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Latin American History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–64.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan, 1984. The Conquest of America. Richard Howard, trans. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Visvanathan, et al., eds. 2011. The Women, Gender and Development Reader. New York: Zed.Google Scholar
Walsh, Catherine. 2010. Development as Buen Vivir: Institutional Arrangements and (De)Colonial Entanglements. Development, 53(1), 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Catherine 2016. On Gender and its Otherwise. In Harcourt, Wendy, ed., The Palgrave Handbook on Gender and Development: Critical Engagements in Feminist Theory and Practice. London: Palgrave, pp. 34–47.Google Scholar
Weatherford, Jack MacIver. 1988. Indian Givers: What the Native Americans Gave to the World. New York: Crown.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×