Aarts, B. (2001). Corpus Linguistics, Chomsky and Fuzzy Tree Fragments. In Mair, C. & Hundt, M. (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory (pp. 5–13). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Ackermann, K., & Chen, Y.-H. (2013). Developing the Academic Collocation List (ACL) – A Corpus-Driven and Expert-Judged Approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 235–247.Google Scholar

Ädel, A., & Ermann, B. (2012). Recurrent Word Combinations in Academic Writing by Native and Non-Native Speakers of English: A Lexical Bundles Approach. English for Specific Purposes, 31(2), 81–92.Google Scholar

Aitchison, J. (1987). Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the Models of Writing. London: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Alderson, J. C. (1991). Bands and Scores. In Alderson, J. C. & North, B. (Eds.), Language Testing in the 1990s (pp. 71–86). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Allard, L., & Ulatowska, H. K. (1991). Cohesion in Written Narrative and Procedural Discourse of Fifth-Grade Children. Linguistics and Education, 3, 63–79.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary Knowledge. In Guthrie, J. T. (Ed.), Comprehension and Teaching: Research Reviews (pp. 77–125). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar

Appel, R., & Wood, D. (2016). Recurrent Word Combinations in EAP Test-Taker Writing: Differences between High- and Low-Proficiency Levels. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(1), 55–71.Google Scholar

Applebee, A. N. (2000). Alternative Models of Writing Development. In Indrisano, R. & Squire, J. R. (Eds.), Perspectives on Writing: Research, Theory and Practice (pp. 90–110). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar

AQA (nd). GCSE English Language: Paper 2 Writers’ Viewpoints and Perspectives. Mark Schema. From https://filestore.aqa.org.uk/resources/english/AQA-87002-SMS.PDF (last accessed 2 August 2019).Google Scholar

Arthur, B. (1979). Short-Term Changes in EFL Composition Skills. In Yorio, C. A., Perkins, K., & Schachter, J. (Eds.), On TESOL ’79: The Learner in Focus (pp. 330–342). Washington DC: TESOL.Google Scholar

Aryadoust, V. (2016). Understanding the Growth of ESL Paragraph Writing Skills and Its Relationships with Linguistic Features. Educational Psychology, 36(10), 1742–1770.Google Scholar

Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Banerjee, J., Franceschina, F., & Smith, A. M. (2007). Documenting Features of Written Language Production Typical at Different IELTS Band Score Levels. IELTS Research Reports, 7, 1–69.Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2012). Formulas, Routines and Conventional Expressions in Pragmatics Research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 206–227.Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of Syntactic and Morphological Accuracy by Advanced Language Learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker, F., Salamoura, A., & Saville, N. (2015). Learner Corpora and Language Testing. In Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research (pp. 511–534). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Beard, R., Myhill, D., Riley, J., & Nystrand, M. (Eds.). (2009). The SAGE Handbook of Writing Development. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Becker, A. (2010). Distinguishing Linguistic and Discourse Features in ESL Students’ Written Performance. Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 406–424.Google Scholar

Beers, S. F., & Nagy, W. E. (2009). Syntactic Complexity as a Predictor of Adolescent Writing Quality: Which Measures? Which Genre? Reading and Writing, 22(2), 185–200.Google Scholar

Beers, S. F., & Nagy, W. E. (2011). Writing Development in Four Genres from Grades Three to Seven: Syntactic Complexity and Genre Differentiation. Reading and Writing, 24(2), 183–202.Google Scholar

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Berman, R., & Cheng, L. (2010). English Academic Language Skills: Perceived Difficulties by Undergraduate and Graduate Students, and Their Academic Achievement. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1–2), 25–40.Google Scholar

Berman, R. A. (2008). The Psycholinguistics of Developing Text Construction. Journal of Child Language, 35(4), 735–771.Google Scholar

Berman, R. A., & Nir, B. (2010). The Lexicon in Writing-Speech-Differentiation. Written Language and Literacy, 13(2), 183–205.Google Scholar

Berman, R. A., & Nir-Sagiv, B. (2007). Comparing Narrative and Expository Text Construction across Adolescence: A Developmental Paradox. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 79–120.Google Scholar

Berman, R. A., & Ravid, D. (2009). Becoming a Literate Language User: Oral and Written Text Construction across Adolescence. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy (pp. 92–111). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Berman, R. A., Slobin, D. I., Aksu-Koç, A. A., Bamberg, M., Dasinger, L., Marchman, V., et al. (1994). Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Berninger, V. W., Nagy, W. E., & Beers, S. (2011). Child Writers’ Construction and Reconstruction of Single Sentences and Construction of Multi-Sentence Texts: Contributions of Syntax and Transcription to Translation. Reading and Writing, 24, 151–182.Google Scholar

Berse, P. (1974). Criteria for the Assessment of Pupils’ Compositions. Educational Research, 17(1), 54–61.Google Scholar

Bestgen, Y. (2017). Beyond Single-Word Measures: L2 Writing Assessment, Lexical Richness and Formulaic Competence. System, 69, 65–78.Google Scholar

Bestgen, Y., & Granger, S. (2014). Quantifying the Development of Phraseological Competence in L2 English Writing: An Automated Approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. (1988). Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (2009). Are There Linguistic Consequences of Literacy? Comparing the Potentials of Language Use in Speech and Writing. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy (pp. 75–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (2014). Multi-Dimensional Analysis: A Personal History. In Berber Sardinha, T. & Veirano Pinto, M. (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years On (pp. xxix–xxxviii). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If You Look at … : Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371.Google Scholar

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013). Discourse Characteristics of Writing and Speaking Task Types on the TOEFL iBT Test: A Lexico-Grammatical Analysis. TOEFL iBT Research Report, 19.Google Scholar

Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2016). Predicting Patterns of Grammatical Complexity across Language Exam Task Types and Proficiency Levels. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 639–668.Google Scholar

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Blount, N. S., Johnson, S. L., & Fredrick, W. C. (1969). A Comparison of the Writing of Eighth- and Twelfth-Grade Students. Madison, Wisconsin: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, The University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar

Bourke, L., & Adams, A.-M. (2003). The Relationship between Working Memory and Early Writing Assessed at the Word, Sentence and Text Level. Educational and Child Psychology, 20(3), 19–36.Google Scholar

Bourke, L., & Adams, A.-M. (2011). Is It Differences in Language Skills and Working Memory That Account for Girls Being Better at Writing than Boys? Journal of Writing Research, 3(3), 249–277.Google Scholar

Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bullokar, W. (1586/1980). Pamphlet for Grammar. In Turner, J. R. (Ed.), The Works of William Bullokar (Vol. 2). Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar

Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and Operationalising L2 Complexity. In Housen, A., Kuiken, K., & Vedder, I. (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA (pp. 21–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2014). Conceptualizing and Measuring Short-Term Changes in L2 Writing Complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 42–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005.Google Scholar

Byrd, P., & Coxhead, A. (2010). On the Other Hand: Lexical Bundles in Academic Writing and in the Teaching of EAP. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 5, 31–64.Google Scholar

Cambridge Assessment English. (2012). Cambridge English Qualifications: C1 Advanced Handbook for Teachers. From www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/167804-cambridge-english-advanced-handbook.pdf (last accessed 22 February 2020).Google Scholar

Cambridge Assessment International Education. (2018). Syllabus Cambridge IGCSE™ English as a Second Language. From www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/414306-2020-2021-syllabus.pdf (last accessed 22 February 2020).Google Scholar

Cameron, C. A., Lee, K., Webster, S., Munro, K., Hunt, A. K., & Linton, M. J. (1995). Text Cohesion in Children’s Narrative Writing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 257–269.Google Scholar

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second-Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1964). Language and Thought. NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Carter, R. (2012). Vocabulary: Applied Linguistic Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Casanave, C. P. (1994). Language Development in Students’ Journals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 179–201.Google Scholar

Castro, C. D. (2004). Cohesion and the Social Construction of Meaning in the Essays of Filipino College Students Writing in L2 English. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(2), 215–225.Google Scholar

Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrel, S. (1995). Communicative Competence: A Pedagogically Motivated Model with Content Specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 5–35.Google Scholar

Chapelle, C. (1994). Are C-Tests Valid Measures for L2 Vocabulary Research? Second Language Research, 10(2), 157–187.Google Scholar

Chapelle, C., Enright, M., & Jamieson, J. (Eds.). (2008). Building a Validity Argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chen, H., Xu, J., & He, B. (2014). Automated Essay Scoring by Capturing Relative Writing Quality. The Computer Journal, 57(9), 1318–1330.Google Scholar

Chen, W. (2017). Profiling Collocations in EFL Writing of Chinese Tertiary Learners. RELC Journal, 50(1), 53–70.Google Scholar

Chen, Y. H., & Baker, P. (2016). Investigating Criterial Discourse Features across Second Language Development: Lexical Bundles in Rated Learner Essays, CEFR B1, B2 and C1. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 849–880.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of a Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Christie, F. (2012). A Language Theory for Educational Practice. Language Learning, 62, 1–31.Google Scholar

Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School Discourse: Learning to Write across the Years of Schooling. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Church, K. W., & Hanks, P. (1990). Word Association Norms, Mutual Information, and Lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22–29.Google Scholar

Clendon, S. A., & Erikson, K. A. (2008). The Vocabulary of Beginning Writers: Implications for Children with Complex Communication Needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(4), 281–293.Google Scholar

Clendon, S. A., Sturm, J. M., & Cali, K. S. (2013). Vocabulary Use across Genres: Implications for Students with Complex Communication Needs. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 44, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Constantinou, F. (2019). The Construct of Language Competence over Time: Using High-Stakes Tests to Gain Insight into the History of L2 Education in England. Language and Education, 33(6), 491–505.Google Scholar

Cooksey, R. W., Freebody, P., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2007). Assessment as Judgment-in-Context: Analysing How Teachers Evaluate Students’ Writing. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(5), 401–434.Google Scholar

Corson, D. (1985). The Lexical Bar. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical Bundles in Published and Student Disciplinary Writing: Examples from History and Biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 397–423.Google Scholar

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of References for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Council of Europe. (2018). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Cox, B. E., Shanahan, T., & Sulzby, E. (1990). Good and Poor Elementary Readers’ Use of Cohesion in Writing. Research Quarterly, 25(1), 47–65.Google Scholar

Coxhead, A. (2000). A New Academic Wordlist. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.Google Scholar

Crossley, S. A., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. (2014). A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Essay Writing: What Linguistic Features Tell Us about Situational Parameters and the Effects of Language Functions on Judgments of Quality? In Sardinha, T. B. & Pinto, M. V. (Eds.), Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years On: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 197–233). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. (2016). The Development and Use of Cohesive Devices in L2 Writing and Their Relations to Judgments of Essay Quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1–16.Google Scholar

Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. (2012). Predicting Second Language Writing Proficiency: The Roles of Cohesion and Linguistic Sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(2), 115–135.Google Scholar

Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. (2014). Does Writing Development Equal Writing Quality? A Computational Investigation of Syntactic Complexity in L2 Learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 66–79.Google Scholar

Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). What Is Successful Writing? An Investigation into the Multiple Ways Writers Can Write Successful Essays. Written Communication, 31(2), 184–214.Google Scholar

Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. (2011). Predicting the Proficiency Level of Language Learners Using Lexical Indices. Language Testing, 29(2), 243–263.Google Scholar

Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D., & Jarvis, S. (2010). Predicting Lexical Proficiency in Language Learner Texts Using Computational Indices. Language Testing, 28(4), 561–580.Google Scholar

Crossley, S. A., Weston, J. L., Sullivan, S. T. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). The Development of Writing Proficiency as a Function of Grade Level: A Linguistic Analysis. Written Communication, 28(3), 282–311.Google Scholar

Crowhurst, M. (1980a). Syntactic Complexity and Teachers’ Quality Ratings of Narrations and Arguments. Research in the Teaching of English, 14(3), 223–231.Google Scholar

Crowhurst, M. (1980b). Syntactic Complexity in Narration and Argument at Three Grade Levels. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 5(1), 6–13.Google Scholar

Crowhurst, M. (1987). Cohesion in Argument and Narration at Three Grade Levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(2), 185–201.Google Scholar

Crowhurst, M., & Piché, G. L. (1979). Audience and Mode of Discourse Effects on Syntactic Complexity in Writing at Two Grade Levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 13(2), 101–109.Google Scholar

Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui, K., & James, M. (2005). Differences in Written Discourse in Independent and Integrated Prototype Tasks for Next Generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing, 10(1), 5–43.Google Scholar

Dale, E. (1965). Vocabulary Measurement: Techniques and Major Findings. Elementary English, 42(8), 895–901, 948.Google Scholar

Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2007). Editors’ Introduction: Conventions, Terminology and an Overview of the Book. In Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (Eds.), Modelling and Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge (pp. 1–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Daller, H., & Phelan, D. (2013). Predicting International Student Study Success. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(1), 173–193.Google Scholar

Daller, H., Turlik, J., & Weir, I. (2013). Vocabulary Acquisition and the Learning Curve. In Jarvis, S. & Daller, H. (Eds.), Vocabulary Knowledge: Human Ratings and Automated Measures (pp. 185–215). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dastjerdi, H. V., & Samian, S. H. (2011). Quality of Iranian EFL Learners’ Argumentative Essays: Cohesive Devices in Focus. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 65–76.Google Scholar

Davies, M. (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American: 450 Million Words, 1990–Present. From http://corpus.byu.edu/coca (last accessed 1 May 2018).Google Scholar

Davies, M. (2018). Word Frequency Data. From www.wordfrequency.info (last accessed November 2012).Google Scholar

De Haan, P., & Van Esch, K. (2008). Measuring and Assessing the Development of Foreign Language Writing Competence. Porta Linguarum, 9, 7–21.Google Scholar

de Marneffe, M.-C., Dozat, T., Silveira, N., Haverinen, K., Ginter, F., Nivre, J., & Manning, C. D. (2014). Universal Stanford Dependencies: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 4584–4592.Google Scholar

Deane, P., & Quinlan, T. (2010). What Automated Analyses of Corpora Can Tell Us about Students’ Writing Skills. Journal of Writing Research, 2(2), 151–177.Google Scholar

Department for Education. (2014). The National Curriculum in England: Framework Document. From www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-framework-for-key-stages-1-to-4 (last accessed 22 April 2018).Google Scholar

Department for Education. (2015). Final Report of the Commission on Assessment without Levels. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar

Díaz-Negrillo, A., Meurers, D., Valera, S., & Wunsch, H. (2010). Towards Interlanguage POS Annotation for Effective Learner Corpora in SLA and FLT. Language Forum, 36(1–2), 140–153.Google Scholar

Diederich, P. B., French, J. W., & Carlton, S. T. (1961). Factors in Judgements of Writing Ability. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 2, i–93.Google Scholar

Douglas, S. R. (2010). Non-Native English Speaking Students at University: Lexical Richness and Academic Success. (PhD). University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar

Douglas, S. R. (2015). The Relationship between Lexical Frequency Profiling Measures and Rater Judgements of Spoken and Written General English Language Proficiency on the CELPIP-General Test. TESL Canada Journal (Special Issue 9), 43–64.Google Scholar

Dunlea, J., Spilby, R., Wu, S., Zhang, J., & Cheng, M. (2019). China’s Standards of English Language Ability (CSE): Linking UK Exams to the CSE. London: British Council.Google Scholar

Durrant, P. (2008). High-Frequency Collocations and Second Language Learning. (PhD). University of Nottingham, Nottingham.Google Scholar

Durrant, P. (2013). Formulaicity in an Agglutinating Language: The Case of Turkish. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 9(1), 1–38.Google Scholar

Durrant, P. (2017). Corpus Research on the Development of Children’s Writing in L1 English. Paper presented at the Learner Corpus Research Conference, Bozen/Bolzano, Italy.Google Scholar

Durrant, P. (2019). Formulaic Language in English for Academic Purposes. In Siyanova-Chanturia, A. & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (Eds.), Understanding Formulaic Language: A Second Language Acquisition Perspective (pp. 211–227). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Durrant, P., & Brenchley, M. (2019). Development of Vocabulary Sophistication across Genres in English Children’s Writing. Reading and Writing, 32(8), 1927–1953.Google Scholar

Durrant, P., & Brenchley, M. (in press). The Development of Academic Collocations in Children’s Writing. In Szudarski, P. & Barclay, S. (Eds.), Vocabulary Theory, Patterning and Teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Durrant, P., Brenchley, M., & Clarkson, R. (2020). Syntactic development across genres in children’s writing: the case of adverbial clauses. Journal of Writing Research. 12(2), 419–452.Google Scholar

Durrant, P., Moxley, J., & McCallum, L. (2019). Vocabulary Sophistication in First-Year Composition Assignments. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24(1), 33–66.Google Scholar

Durrant, P., & Schmitt, N. (2009). To What Extent Do Native and Non-Native Writers Make Use of Collocations? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47(2), 157–177.Google Scholar

Durrant, P., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2015). Learner Corpora and Psycholinguistics. In Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research (pp. 57–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eckert, J., & Rickford, J. R. (Eds.). (2008). Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eckes, T., Müller-Karabil, A. , & Zimmerman, S. (2017). Assessing Writing. In Tsgari, D. & Banerjee, J. (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Assessment (pp. 147–164). Berlin: Walter de Gruyer.Google Scholar

Egbert, J. (2017). Corpus Linguistics and Language Testing: Navigating Unchartered Waters. Language Testing, 34(4), 555–564.Google Scholar

Elliott, G., Green, S., Constantinou, F., Vitellow, S., Chambers, L., Rushton, N., Ireland, J., Bowyer, J., & Beauchamp, D. (2016). Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment Publication, Special Issue 4.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency Effects in Language Processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(02), 143–188.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, Chunking, and Connectionism: The Emergence of Second Language Structure. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 63–103). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. (2008). Usage-Based and Form-Focused Language Acquisition. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 372–405). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Constructions and Their Acquisition: Islands and the Distinctiveness of Their Occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 187–220.Google Scholar

Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Engber, C. A. (1995). The Relationship of Lexical Proficiency to the Quality of ESL Compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), 139–155.Google Scholar

Espada-Gustilo, L. (2011). Linguistic Features That Impact Essay Scores: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of ESL Writing in Three Proficiency Levels. 3 L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 17(1), 55–64.Google Scholar

Evans, S., & Green, C. (2007). Why EAP Is Necessary: A Survey of Hong Kong Tertiary Students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 3–17.Google Scholar

Evans, S., & Morrison, B. (2011). The First Term at University: Implications for EAP. ELT Journal, 65(4), 837–397.Google Scholar

Fagan, W. T. (1981). A Longitudinal Study of Grade Five and Grade Eleven Students’ Written Language and a Comparison with Teachers’ Written Language. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 27(3), 217–231.Google Scholar

Fellbaum, C. (Ed.) (1998). WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fernández, E. M., & Cairns, H. S. (2017). The Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Ferris, D. (1994). Lexical and Syntactic Features of ESL Writing by Students at Different Levels of L2 Proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 414–420.Google Scholar

Finn, P. J. (1977). Computer-Aided Description of Mature Word Choices in Writing. In Cooper, C. R. & Odell, L. (Eds.), Evaluating Writing: Describing, Measuring, Judging (pp. 69–89). Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. (1957). Modes of Meaning. In Papers in linguistics 1934–1951 (pp. 190–215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. (1968). A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930–55. In Palmer, F. R. (Ed.), Selected Papers of J. R. Firth 1952–1959 (pp. 168–205). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, J., & Spiegel, D. L. (1986). Textual Cohesion and Coherence in Children’s Writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(3), 263–280.Google Scholar

Flahive, D. E., & Snow, B. G. (1980). Measures of Syntactic Complexity in Evaluating ESL Compositions. In Oller, J. W. & Perkins, K. (Eds.), Research in Language Testing (pp. 171–176). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Flesch, R. (1948). A New Readability Yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221–233.Google Scholar

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–387.Google Scholar

Fox, B. (1982). Cognitive and Stylistic Features of Reporting and Classificatory Writing by Senior High School Students. From https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED246427 (last accessed 13 August 2019).Google Scholar

Friginal, E., Li, M., & Weigle, S. (2014). Revisiting Multiple Profiles of Learner Compositions: A Comparison of Highly Rated NS and NNS Essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 23, 1–16.Google Scholar

Friginal, E., & Weigle, S. (2014). Exploring Multiple Profiles of L2 Writing Using Multi-Dimensional Analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 80–95.Google Scholar

Fung, D. (2006). Telling Tales: A Fresh Look at Student Experience and Learning in Higher Education. Paper presented at the BERA Conference, University of Warwick, UK. 2006.Google Scholar

Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Collocations in Corpus-Based Language Learning Research: Identifying, Comparing, and Interpreting the Evidence. Language Learning, 67 (S1), 155–179.Google Scholar

Gardner, D. (2008). Validating the Construct of Word in Applied Corpus-Based Vocabulary Research: A Critical Survey. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 241–265.Google Scholar

Garner, J. (2016). A Phrase-Frame Approach to Investigating Phraseology in Learner Writing across Proficiency Levels. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 2(1), 31–68.Google Scholar

Garner, J., Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K. (2018). Beginning and Intermediate L2 Writers’ Use of N-Grams: An Association Measures Study. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 58(1), 51–74.Google Scholar

Garner, J., Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K. (2019). N-Gram Measures and L2 Writing Proficiency. System, 80, 176–187.Google Scholar

Garside, R., & Smith, N. (1997). A Hybrid Grammatical Tagger: CLAWS4. In Garside, R., Leech, G., & McEnery, A. (Eds.), Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information for Computer Text Corpora (pp. 102–121). London: Longman.Google Scholar

Gené-Gil, G., Juan-Garau, M., & Salazer-Noguera, J. (2015). Development of EFL Writing over Three Years in Secondary Education: CLIL and Non-CLIL Settings. The Language Learning Journal, 43(3), 286–303.Google Scholar

Gilquin, G. (2017). POS Tagging a Spoken Learner Corpus_Testing Accuracy Testing. Paper presented at the Learner Corpus Research Conference, Bozen/Bolzano, Italy.Google Scholar

Gilquin, G., & Gries, S. T. (2009). Corpora and Experimental Methods: A State-of-the-Art Review. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Golub, L. S., & Fredrick, W. C. (1970). An Analysis of Children’s Writing under Different Stimulus Conditions. Research in the Teaching of English, 4(2), 168–180.Google Scholar

Golub, L. S., & Frederick, W. C. (1979). Linguistic Structures in the Discourse of Fourth and Sixth Graders. Madison, Wisconsin: Center for Cognitive Learning, The University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar

González-Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2019). Word Knowledge: Exploring the Relationships and Order of Acquisition of Vocabulary Knowledge Components. Applied Linguistics, 41(4), 481–505, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy057.Google Scholar

Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and Practice of Writing: An Applied Linguistic Perspective. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. (2011). Computational Analyses of Multilivel Discourse Comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 371–398.Google Scholar

Granger, S. (2019). Formulaic Sequences in Learner Corpora: Collocations and Lexical Bundles. In Siyanova-Chanturia, A. & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (Eds.), Understanding Formulaic Language: A Second Language Acquisition Perspective (pp. 228–245). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Granger, S., & Bestgen, Y. (2014). The Use of Collocations by Intermediate vs. Advanced Non-Native Writers: A Bigram-Based Study. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 52(3), 229–252.Google Scholar

Grant, L., & Ginther, A. (2000). Using Computer-Tagged Linguistic Features to Describe L2 Writing Differences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 123–145.Google Scholar

Green, C. (2012). A Computational Investigation of Cohesion and Lexical Network Density in L2 Writing. English Language Teaching, 5(8), 57–69.Google Scholar

Gregori-Signes, C., & Clavel-Arroiti, B. (2015). Analysing Lexical Density and Lexical Diversity in University Students’ Written Discourse. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 198, 546–556.Google Scholar

Gries, S. T. (2009). Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gries, S. T. (2013). 50-Something Years of Work on Collocations: What Is or Should Be Next … International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(1), 137–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gries, S. T., Hampe, B., & Schönfeld, D. (2005). Converging Evidence: Bringing Together Experimental and Corpus Data on the Association of Verbs and Constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(4), 635–676.Google Scholar

Grobe, C. (1981). Syntactic Maturity, Mechanics, and Vocabulary as Predictors of Quality Ratings. Research in the Teaching of English, 15(1), 75–85.Google Scholar

Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. (2013). Predicting Human Judgments of Essay Quality in Both Integrated and Independent Second Language Writing Samples: A Comparison Study. Assessing Writing, 18, 218–238.Google Scholar

Gyllstad, H. (2007). Testing English Collocations: Developing Receptive Tests for Use with Advanced Swedish Learners. (PhD). Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar

Gyllstad, H., Granfeldt, J., Bernardini, P., & Källkvist, M. (2014). Linguistic Correlates to Communicative Proficiency Levels of the CEFR: The Case of Syntactic Complexity in Written L2 English, L3 French and L4 Italian. EURASLA Yearbook, 14, 1–30.Google Scholar

Gyllstad, H., & Schmitt, N. (2019). Testing Formulaic Language. In Siyanova-Chanturia, A. & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (Eds.), Understanding Formulaic Language: A Second Language Acquisition Perspective (pp. 174–191). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haegeman, L. (1991). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Hall-Mills, S., & Apel, K. (2015). Linguistic Feature Development across Grades and Genre in Elementary Writing. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 242–255.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction of Functional Grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (1990). The Development of Second Language Proficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harpin, W. S. (1976). The Second ‘R’: Writing Development in the Junior School. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Harrison, J., & Barker, F. (2015). English Profile in Practice (Vol. 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hasan, R. (1984). Coherence and Cohesive Harmony. In Flood, J. (Ed.), Understanding Reading Comprehension (pp. 181–263). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar

Hasko, V. (2012). Capturing the Dynamics of Second Language Development via Learner Corpus Research: A Very Long Engagement. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 1–10.Google Scholar

Haslett, B. J. (1983). Children’s Strategies for Maintaining Cohesion in Their Written and Oral Stories. Communication Education, 32(1), 91–105.Google Scholar

Haswell, R. (1991). Gaining Ground in College Writing: Tales of Development and Interpretation. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.Google Scholar

Hawkey, R., & Barker, F. (2004). Developing a Common Scale for the Assessment of Writing. Assessing Writing, 9, 122–159.Google Scholar

Henriksen, B. (1999). Three Dimensions of Vocabulary Development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 303–317.Google Scholar

Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction Grammar and Its Application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Hirano, K. (1991). The Effect of Audience on the Efficacy of Objective Measures of EFL Proficiency in Japanese University Students. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan, 2, 21–30.Google Scholar

Ho-Peng, L. (1983). Using T-Unit Measures to Assess Writing Proficiency of University ESL Students. RELC Journal, 14(2), 35–43.Google Scholar

Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Homburg, T. J. (1984). Holistic Evaluation of ESL Compositions: Can It Be Validated Objectively? TESOL Quarterly, 18(1), 87–107.Google Scholar

Horst, M., & Collins, L. (2006). From Faible to Strong: How Does Their Vocabulary Grow? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 83–106.Google Scholar

Hou, J., Loerts, H., & Verspoor, M. (2016). Chunk Use and Development in Advanced Chinese L2 Learners of English. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 148–168.Google Scholar

Hou, J., Verspoor, M., & Loerts, H. (2016). An Exploratory Study into the Dynamics of Chinese L2 Writing Development. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 65–96.Google Scholar

Houck, C. K., & Billingsley, B. S. (1989). Written Expression of Students with and without Learning Disabilities: Differences across the Grades. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(9), 561–572.Google Scholar

Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473.Google Scholar

Hsu, J.- y. (2007). Lexical Collocations and Their Relation to the Online Writing of Taiwanese College English Majors and Non-English Majors. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(2), 192–209.Google Scholar

Huang, K. (2015). More Does Not Mean Better: Frequency and Accuracy Analysis of Lexical Bundles in Chinese EFL Learners’ Essay Writing. System, 53, 13–23.Google Scholar

Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hudson, R. (2010). An Introduction to Word Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hunston, S. (2012). Afterword: The Problems of Applied Linguistics. In Hyland, K., Huat, C. M., & Handford, M. (Eds.), Corpus Applications in Applied Linguistics (pp. 242–247). London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical Structures Written at Three Grade Levels: NCTE Research Report No. 3. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar

Hunt, K. W. (1966). Sentence Structures Used by Superior Students in Grades Four and Twelve, and by Superior Adults: Research Report No. 3. Urbana, IL: NCTE.Google Scholar

Huot, B. (1990a). The Literature of Direct Writing Assessment: Major Concerns and Prevailing Trends. Review of Educational Research, 60(2), 237–263Google Scholar

Huot, B. (1990b). Reliability, Validity, and Holistic Scoring: What We Know and What We Need to Know. College Composition and Communication, 41(2), 201–213.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2008). As Can Be Seen: Lexical Bundles and Disciplinary Variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2019). Second Language Writing (2nd Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. H. (1972). On Communicative Competence. In Pride, J. B. & Holmes, J. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

IELTS. (2018a). IELTS Public Writing Rubric for Task 1. From https://takeielts.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/ielts_task_1_writing_band_descriptors.pdf (last accessed 6 October 2020).Google Scholar

IELTS. (2018b). IELTS Public Writing Rubric for Task 2. From https://takeielts.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/ielts_task_2_writing_band_descriptors.pdf (last accessed 22 May 2020).Google Scholar

Intaraprawat, P., & Steffensen, M. S. (1995). The Use of Metadiscourse in Good and Poor ESL Essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 253–272.Google Scholar

Ishikawa, S. (1995). Objective Measurement of Low-Proficiency EFL Narrative Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(1), 51–69.Google Scholar

Jafarpur, A. (1991). Cohesiveness as a Basis for Evaluating Compositions. System, 19(4), 459–465.Google Scholar

Jarvis, S. (2002). Short-Texts, Best-Fitting Curves and New Measures of Lexical Diversity. Language Testing, 19(1), 57–84.Google Scholar

Jarvis, S. (2013). Capturing the Diversity in Lexical Diversity. Language Learning, 63(1), 87–106.Google Scholar

Jarvis, S., Grant, L., Bikowski, D., & Ferris, D. (2003). Exploring Multiple Profiles of Highly Rated Learner Compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 377–403.Google Scholar

Jin, B. (2015). Exploring the Development of Lexical Verbs in Academic Writing: A Multiple-Case Study of Three Chinese Novice Researchers. The Asian ESP Journal, 2(1), 7–38.Google Scholar

Johnson, P. (1992). Cohesion and Coherence in Compositions in Malay and English. RELC Journal, 23(2), 1–17.Google Scholar

Jones, S., & Sinclair, J. M. (1974). English Lexical Collocations: A Study in Computational Linguistics. Cahiers de lexicologie, 24, 15–61.Google Scholar

Kameen, P. T. (1979). Syntactic Skill and ESL Writing Quality. In On TESOL ’79: The Learner in Focus (pp. 343–350). Washington DC: TESOL.Google Scholar

Kaszubski, P. (2000). Selected Aspects of Lexicon, Phraseology and Style in the Writing of Polish Advanced Learners of English: A Contrastive, Corpus-Based Approach (PhD). Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznán.Google Scholar

Kawata, K. (1992). Evaluation of Free English Composition. CASELE Research Bulletin, 22, 49–53.Google Scholar

Kim, J.-Y. (2014). Predicting L2 Writing Proficiency Using Linguistic Complexity Measures: A Corpus-Based Study. English Teaching, 69(4), 27–51.Google Scholar

Kim, M., & Crossley, S. A. (2018). Modelling Second Language Writing Quality: A Structural Equation Investigation of Lexical, Syntactic, and Cohesive Features in Source-Based and Independent Writing. Assessing Writing, 37, 39–56.Google Scholar

Kim, M., Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K. (2018). Lexical Sophistication as a Multidimensional Phenomenon: Relations to Second Language Lexical Proficiency, Development, and Writing Quality. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 120–141.Google Scholar

Kim, Y.-S., Al Otaiba, S., Folsom, J. S., Greulich, L., & Puranik, C. S. (2014). Evaluating the Dimensionality of First-Grade Written Composition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 199–211.Google Scholar

King, M. L., & Rentel, V. M. (1982). Transition to Writing: Final report. Volume II. Washington, DC.: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar

Knoch, U., Rouhshad, A., Oon, S. P., & Storch, N. (2015). What Happens to ESL Students’ Writing after Three Years of Study at an English Medium University? Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 39–52.Google Scholar

Knoch, U., Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N. (2014). Does the Writing of Undergraduate ESL Students Develop after One Year of Study in an English-Medium University? Assessing Writing, 21, 1–17.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C. (2013). L1/L2/L3 Writing Development: Longitudinal Case Study of a Japanese Multicompetent Writer. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 4–33.Google Scholar

Kojima, M., & Yamashita, J. (2014). Reliability of Lexical Richness Measures Based on Word Lists in Short Second Language Productions. System, 42, 23–33.Google Scholar

Koutsoftas, A. D., & Gray, S. (2012). Comparison of Narrative and Expository Writing in Students with and without Language-Learning Disabilities. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 43, 395–409.Google Scholar

Kroll, B. M. (1983). Antecedents of Individual Differences in Children’s Writing Attainment. In Kroll, B. M. & Wells, G. (Eds.), Explorations in the Development of Writing (pp. 95–118). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Krzeminska-Adamek, M. (2016). Lexis in Writing: Investigating the Relationship between Lexical Richness and the Quality of Advanced Learners’ Texts. In Pawlak, M. (Ed.), Classroom-Oriented Research: Reconciling Theory and Practice (pp. 195–197). Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2015). Automatically Assessing Lexical Sophistication: Indices, Tools, Findings, and Application. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 757–786.Google Scholar

Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2016). The Relationship between Lexical Sophistication and Independent and Source-Based Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 12–24.Google Scholar

Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2017). Assessing Syntactic Sophistication in L2 Writing: A Usage-Based Approach. Language Testing, 34(4), 513–535.Google Scholar

Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2018). Measuring Syntactic Complexity in L2 Writing Using Fine-Grained Clausal and Phrasal Indices. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 333–349.Google Scholar

LaBrant, L. L. (1933). A Study of Certain Language Developments of Children in Grades Four to Twelve Inclusive. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 14, 387–491.Google Scholar

LaBrant, L. L. (1934). The Changing Sentence Structure of Children. The Elementary English Review, 11(3), 59–65, 86.Google Scholar

Lahuerta Martínez, A. C. (2018). Analysis of Syntactic Complexity in Secondary Education ELF Writers at Different Proficiency levels. Assessing Writing, 35, 1–11.Google Scholar

Lanes, A., Love, R., Kalman, B., & Brenchley, M. (2019). Updating the A2 Key and B1 Preliminary Vocabulary Lists. From www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/561337-key-preliminary-revisions-wordlists.pdf (last accessed 6 October 2020).Google Scholar

Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume 1 – Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Langer, J. A. (1984). The Effects of Available Information on Responses to School Writing Tasks. Research in the Teaching of English, 18(1), 27–44.Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1978). An ESL Index of Development. TESOL Quarterly, 12(4), 439–448.Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1983). Assessing Global Second Language Proficiency. In Seliger, H. W. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom-Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 287–304). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The Emergence of Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in the Oral and Written Production of Five Chinese Learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029.Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Adjusting Expectations: The Study of Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 579–589.Google Scholar

Laufer, B. (1994). The Lexical Profile of Second Language Writing: Does It Change over Time? RELC Journal, 25(2), 21–33.Google Scholar

Laufer, B. (1998). The Development of Passive and Active Vocabulary in a Second Language: Same or Different? Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 255–271.Google Scholar

Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary Size and Use: Lexical Richness in L2 Written Production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307–322.Google Scholar

Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-Noun Collocations in Second Language Writing: A Corpus Analysis of Learners’ English. Language Learning, 61(2), 647–672.Google Scholar

Lawton, D. (1963). Social Class Differences in Language Development: A Study of Some Samples of Written Work. Language and Speech, 6(3), 120–143.Google Scholar

Lemmouh, Z. (2008). The Relationship between Grades and the Lexical Richness of Student Essays. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 7(3), 163–180.Google Scholar

Levitzky-Aviad, T., & Laufer, B. (2013). Lexical Properties in the Writing of Foreign Language Learners over Eight Years of Study: Single Words and Collocations. In Bardel, C., Lindquist, C., & Laufer, B. (Eds.), L2 Vocabulary Acquisition, Knowledge and Use: New Perspectives on Assessment and Corpus Analysis (pp. 127–148). European second language association.Google Scholar

Lewis, M. (2000). There Is Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory. In Lewis, M. (Ed.), Teaching Collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach (pp. 10–27). Boston: Thomson.Google Scholar

Li, J., & Schmitt, N. (2009). The Acquisition of Lexical Phrases in Academic Writing: A Longitudinal Case Study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 85–102.Google Scholar

Lines, H. (2014). ‘It’s a Matter of Individual Taste, I Guess’: Secondary School English Teachers’ and Students’ Conceptualisations of Quality in Writing (PhD). University of Exeter, Exeter.Google Scholar

Linnarud, M. (1986). Lexis in Composition: A Performance Analysis of Swedish Learners’ Written English. Sweden: Gleerup.Google Scholar

Liu, D. (2012). The Most Frequently-Used Multi-Word Constructions in Academic Written English: A Multi-Corpus Study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(1), 25–35.Google Scholar

Liu, M., & Braine, G. (2005). Cohesive Features in Argumentative Writing Produced by Chinese Undergraduates. System, 33, 623–636.Google Scholar

Llanes, À. , Tragant, E., & Serrano, R. (2015). Examining the Role of Learning Context and Individual Differences in Gains in L2 Writing Performance: The Case of Teenagers on an Intensive Study-Abroad Programme. The Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 201–216.Google Scholar

Loban, W. (1976). Language Development: Kindergarten through Grade Twelve – NCTE Committee on Research Report No. 18. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar

Longacre, R. E. (1983). The Grammar of Discourse. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Lorenzo, F., & Rodríguez, L. (2014). Onset and Expansion of L2 Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency in Bilingual Settings: CALP in CLIL. System, 47, 64–72.Google Scholar

Lu, X. (2010). Automatic Analysis of Syntactic Complexity in Second Language Writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474–496.Google Scholar

Lu, X. (2011). A Corpus-Based Evaluation of Syntactic Complexity Measures as Indices of College-Level ESL Writers’ Language Development. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 36–62.Google Scholar

Lu, X. (2012). The Relationship of Lexical Richness to the Quality of ESL Learners’ Oral Narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208.Google Scholar

Luke, S. G. & Christianson, K. (2018). The Provo Corpus: A Large Eye-Tracking Corpus with Predictability Norms. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 826–833.Google Scholar

Lynne, P. (2004). Coming to Terms: A Theory of Writing Assessment. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar

Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (1997). A New Measure of Lexical Diversity. In Ryan, A. & Wray, A. (Eds.), Evolving Models of Language (pp. 58–71). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2000). Validation of a New Measure of Lexical Diversity. In Beers, M., van den Bogaerde, B., Bol, G., de Jong, J., & Rooijmans, C. (Eds.), From Sound to Sentence: Studies on First Language Acquisition (pp. 81–96). Groningen: Centre for language and cognition.Google Scholar

Malvern, D., Richards, B. J., Chipere, N., & Duran, P. (2004). Lexical Diversity and Language Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Manchón, R. M. (Ed.) (2012). L2 Writing Development: Multiple Perspectives. Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S. J., & McClosky, D. (2014). The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, 55–60.Google Scholar

Marshall, B. (2011). Testing English: Formative and Diagnostic Approaches in English Assessment. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R. (2003). Cohesion and Texture. In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 35–53). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Massey, A. J., & Elliott, G. L. (1996). Aspects of Writing in 16+ English Examinations between 1980 and 1994. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.Google Scholar

Massey, A. J., Elliott, G. L., & Johnson, N. K. (2005). Variations in Aspects of Writing in 16+ English Examinations between 1980 and 2004: Vocabulary, Spelling, Punctuation, Sentence Structure, Non-Standard English. Cambridge: Cambridge Assessment.Google Scholar

Mazgutova, D., & Kormos, J. (2015). Syntactic and Lexical Development in an Intensive English for Academic Purposes Programme. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 3–15.Google Scholar

McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, voc-D, and HD-D: A Validation Study of Sophisticated Approaches to Lexical Diversity Assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381–392.Google Scholar

McCawley, J. D. (1998). The Syntactic Phenomena of English (2nd edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McClure, E., & Platt, E. (1988). The Development of the Expression of Temporality in the Written English Narratives of Monolingual American and Bilingual Mexican Pupils. World Englishes, 7(2), 197–210.Google Scholar

McCulley, G. A. (1985). Writing Quality, Coherence, and Cohesion. Research in the Teaching of English, 19(3), 269–282.Google Scholar

McCutchen, D. (1986). Domain Knowledge and Linguistic Knowledge in the Development of Writing Ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 431–444.Google Scholar

McCutchen, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (1982). Coherence and Connectedness in the Development of Discourse Production. Pittsburgh: Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McNamara, D., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai, Z. (2014). Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring Second Language Performance. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Meara, P. (1990). A Note on Passive Vocabulary. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 6(2), 150–154.Google Scholar

Meara, P. (1996). The Dimensions of Lexical Competence. In Brown, G., Malmkjær, K., & Williams, J. (Eds.), Performance and Competence in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 35–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Meara, P., & Bell, H. (2001). P-Lex: A Simple and Effective Way of Describing the Lexical Characteristics of Short L2 Texts. Prospect, 16(3), 5–19.Google Scholar

Melka, F. (1997). Receptive vs. Productive Aspects of Vocabulary. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp. 84–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. (1995). WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Communications of the ACM, 38(11), 39–41.Google Scholar

Moore, E. M. (1977). Lexical Characteristics of Adolescent Prose: Writer and Task Effects. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 285–295.Google Scholar

Moreno Espinosa, S. (2005). Can P_Lex Accurately Measure Lexical Richness in the Written Production of Young Learners of EFL? Porta Linguarum, 4, 7–21.Google Scholar

Morris, L., & Cobb, T. (2004). Vocabulary Profiles as Predictors of the Academic Performance of Teaching English as a Second Language Trainees. System, 1, 75–87.Google Scholar

Morris, N. T., & Crump, W. D. (1982). Syntactic and Vocabulary Development in the Written Language of Learning Disabled and Non-Learning Disabled Students at Four Age Levels. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5(2), 163–172.Google Scholar

Mulac, A., Studley, L. B., & Blau, S. (1990). The Gender-Linked Language Effect in Primary and Secondary Students’ Impromptu Essays. Sex Roles, 23(9/10), 439–469.Google Scholar

Myford, C. M., & Wolfe, E. W. (2003). Detecting and Measuring Rater Effects Using Many-Faceted Rasch Measurement: Part 1. Journal of Applied Measurement, 4(4), 386–422.Google Scholar

Myhill, D. (1999). Writing Matters: Linguistic Characteristics of Writing in GCSE English Examinations. English in Education, 33(3), 70–81.Google Scholar

Myhill, D. (2008). Towards a Linguistic Model of Sentence Development in Writing. Language and Education, 22(5), 271–288.Google Scholar

Myhill, D. (2009). From Talking to Writing: Linguistic Development in Writing. BJEP Monograph Series II, Number 6 – Teaching and Learning Writing, 27(44), 27–44.Google Scholar

Myles, F. (2015). Second Language Acquisition Theory and Learner Corpus Research. In Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research (pp. 309–331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. A. (2000). Vocabulary Processes. In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 458–475). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Nation, P. (2013). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, N. W., & Van Meter, A. M. (2007). Measuring Written Language Ability in Narrative Samples. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 23(3), 287–309.Google Scholar

Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nesselhauf, N. (2004). What Are Collocations? In Allerton, D. J., Nesselhauf, N., & Skandera, P. (Eds.), Phraseological Units: Basic Concepts and Their Application (pp. 1–21). Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar

Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a Learner Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Nihalani, N. K. (1981). The Quest for the L2 Index of Development. RELC Journal, 12(2), 50–56.Google Scholar

Nippold, M. A., Ward-Lonergan, J. M., & Fanning, J. L. (2005). Persuasive Writing in Children, Adolescents, and Adults: A Study of Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Development. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(2), 125–138.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards and Organic Approach to Investigating CAF in Instructed SLA: The Case of Complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578.Google Scholar

Noyce, R., & Christie, J. (1985). Characteristics of Subordinate Clauses in Children’s Free Writing. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 18(68–71).Google Scholar

O’Donnell, R. C., Griffin, W. J., & Norris, R. C. (1967). Syntax of Kindergarten and Elementary School Children: A Transformational Analysis. Champaign, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar

Ohlrogge, A. (2009). Formulaic Expressions in Intermediate EFL Writing Assessment. In Corrigan, R., Moravcsik, E. A., Ouali, H., & Wheatley, K. M. (Eds.), Formulaic Language, Volume 2: Acquisition, Loss, Psychological Reality and Functional Explanations (pp. 375–386). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Olinghouse, N. G., & Graham, S. (2009). The Relationship between the Discourse Knowledge and the Writing Performance of Elementary-Grade Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 37–50.Google Scholar

Olinghouse, N. G., & Leaird, J. T. (2009). The Relationship between Measures Vocabulary and Narrative Writing Quality in Second- and Fourth-Grade Students. Reading and Writing, 22, 545–565.Google Scholar

Olinghouse, N. G., Santangelo, T., & Wilson, J. (2012). Examining the Validity of Single-Occasion, Single-Genre, Holistically Scored Writing Assessments. Measuring Writing: Recent Insights into theory, Methodology and Practice. Studies in Writing, 27, 55–82.Google Scholar

Olinghouse, N. G., & Wilson, J. (2013). The Relationship between Vocabulary and Writing Quality in Three Genres. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 45–65.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R., & Torrance, N. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Palfreyman, D. M., & Karaki, S. (2017). Lexical Sophistication across Languages: A Preliminary Study of Undergraduate Writing in Arabic (L1) and English (L2). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(8), 992–1015, https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1326456.Google Scholar

Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, Refining and Differentiating Constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601.Google Scholar

Palmer, H. E. (1933). Second Interim Report on English Collocations. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar

Papp, S., & Rixon, S. (Eds.). (2018). Examining Young Learners: Research and Practice in Assessing the English of School-Age Learners (Vol. 47). Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Paquot, M. (2018). Phraseological Competence: A Missing Component in University Entrance Language Tests? Insights from a Study of EFL learners’ Use of Statistical Collocations. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(1), 29–43.Google Scholar

Paquot, M. (2019). The Phraseological Dimension in Interlanguage Complexity Research. Second Language Research, 35(1), 121–145.Google Scholar

Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. B. (1993). Reading Comprehension and Second Language Development in a Comprehension-Based ESL Program. TESL Canada Journal, 11(1), 9–29.Google Scholar

Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J. (2014). Development of Noun Phrase Complexity in the Writing of English for Academic Purposes Students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 48–59.Google Scholar

Parliament. House of Commons. (2017). Primary Assessment – Eleventh Report of Session 2016–17 (HC 682). London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar

Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory: Nativelike Selection and Nativelike Fluency. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 191–226). New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (2000). The One-Clause-at-a-Time Hypothesis. In Riggenbach, H. (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (pp. 163–199). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Pellegrini, A. D., Galda, L., & Rubin, D. L. (1984). The Development of Oral and Written Language in Two Genres. Child Development, 55(4), 1549–1555.Google Scholar

Peltz, F. K. (1973). The Effect upon Comprehension of Repatterning Based on Students’ Writing Patterns. Reading Research Quarterly, 9(4), 603–621.Google Scholar

Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Frazee, J., Lavergne, G. M., & Beaver, D. I. (2014). When Small Words Foretell Academic Success: The Case of College Admissions Essays. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e115844.Google Scholar

Percival, E. (1966). The Dimensions of Ability in English Composition. Educational Review, 18(3), 205–212.Google Scholar

Perera, K. (1984). Children’s Writing and Reading: Analysing Classroom Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Pérez-Paredes, P., & Díez-Bedmar, M. B. (2012). The Use of Intensifying Adverbs in Learner Writing. In Tono, Y., Kawaguchi, Y., & Minegishi, M. (Eds.), Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research (pp. 105–125). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The Lexical Quality Hypothesis. In Verhoeven, L., Elbro, C., & Reitsma, P. (Eds.), Precursors of Functional Literacy (pp. 189–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Perkins, K. (1980). Using Objective Methods of Attained Writing Proficiency to Discriminate among Holistic Evaluations. TESOL Quarterly, 14(1), 61–69.Google Scholar

Péry-Woodley, M.-P. (1991). Writing in L1 and L2: Analysing and Evaluating Learners’ Texts. Language Teaching, 24(2), 69–83.Google Scholar

Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2017). Exploring the Relationship of Organization and Connection with Scores in Integrated Writing Assessment. Assessing Writing, 31, 98–112.Google Scholar

Plakans, L., Gebril, A., & Bilki, Z. (2019). Shaping a Score: Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Integrated Writing Performances. Language Testing, 36(2), 161–179.Google Scholar

Polio, C. (2017). Second Language Development: A Research Agenda. Language Teaching, 50(2), 261–275.Google Scholar

Pollard, C., & Sag, I. A. (1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Pollitt, A. (1991). Response to Charles Alderson’s Paper: ‘Bands and Scores’. In Alderson, J. C. & North, B. (Eds.), Language Testing in the 1990s: The Communicative Legacy (pp. 87–94). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Potter, R. R. (1967). Sentence Structure and Prose Quality: An Exploratory Study. Research in the Teaching of English, 1(1), 17–28.Google Scholar

Prater, D. L. (1985). The Effects of Modes of Discourse, Sex of Writer, and Attitude toward Task on Writing Performance in Grade 10. Educational and Psychological Research, 5, 241–259.Google Scholar

Puranik, C. S., Lombardino, L. J., & Altmann, L. J. P. (2008). Assessing the Microstructure of Written Language Using a Retelling Paradigm. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(2), 107–120.Google Scholar

Qin, W., & Uccelli, P. (2016). Same Language, Different Functions: A Cross-Genre Analysis of Chinese EFL Learners’ Writing Performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 3–17.Google Scholar

Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (1999). Technical Accuracy in Writing in GCSE English: Research Findings. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.Google Scholar

Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (2007). The National Curriculum: Level Descriptors. Coventry: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.Google Scholar

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Core Team, R. (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, www.R-project.org.Google Scholar

Ravid, D., & Berman, R. A. (2010). Developing Noun Phrase Complexity at School Age: A Text-Embedded Cross-Linguistic Analysis. First Language, 30(1), 3–26.Google Scholar

Ravid, D., & Tolchinsky, L. (2002). Developing Linguistic Literacy: A Comprehensive Model. Journal of Child Language, 29(2), 417–447.Google Scholar

Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Reid, S., & Findlay, G. (1986). Writer’s Workbench Analysis of Holistically Scored Essays. Computers and Composition, 3(2), 6–32.Google Scholar

Richards, B., & Malvern, D. (2010). Validity and Threats to the Validity of Vocabulary Measurement. In Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (Eds.), Modelling and Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge (pp. 79–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. (1976). The Role of Vocabulary Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77–89.Google Scholar

Roessingh, H., Elgie, S., & Kover, P. (2015). Using Lexical Profiling Tools to Investigate Children’s Written Vocabulary in Grade 3: An Exploratory Study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 12(1), 67–86.Google Scholar

Römer, U. (2009). The Inseparability of Lexis and Grammar: Corpus Linguistic Perspectives. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 7, 140–162.Google Scholar

Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to Write/Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar

Ruan, Z. (2017). Lexical Bundles in Chinese Undergraduate Academic Writing at an English medium university. RELC Journal, 48(3), 327–340.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. L. (1982). Adapting Syntax in Writing to Varying Audiences as a Function of Age and Social Cognitive Ability. Journal of Child Language, 9(2), 497–510.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. L., & Piché, G. L. (1979). Development in Syntactic and Strategic Aspects of Audience Adaptation Skills in Written Persuasive Communication. Research in the Teaching of English, 13(4), 293–316.Google Scholar

Ruegg, R., Fritz, E., & Holland, J. (2011). Rater Sensitivity to Qualities of Lexis in Writing. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 63–80.Google Scholar

Sampson, G. (2003). The Structure of Children’s Writing: Moving from Spoken to Adult Written Norms. Language and Computers, 48(1), 177–193.Google Scholar

Sampson, O. C. (1964). Written Composition at 10 Years as an Aspect of Linguistic Development: A Longitudinal Study Continued. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 34(2), 143–150.Google Scholar

Sanders, T., & Pander Maat, H. (2006). Cohesion and Coherence: Linguistic Approaches. In Brown, K. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Edition (pp. 591–595). London: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Santos, V. D. O., Verspoor, M., & Nerbonne, J. (2012). Identifying Important Factors in Essay Grading Using Machine Learning. In Tsagiri, D, Papdima-Sophocleus, S, & Ioannu-Georgiou, S (Eds.), International Experiences in Language Testing and Assessment: Selected Papers in Memory of Pavlos Pavlou (pp. 259–309). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge: What the Research Shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913–951.Google Scholar

Shaw, P., & Liu, E. T. K. (1998). What Develops in the Development of Second-Language Writing. Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 225–254.Google Scholar

Shaw, S. D., & Weir, C. (2007). Examining Writing: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Writing. Cambridge: UCLES/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shermis, M. D., & Burstein, J. (2003). Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross Disciplinary Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Shermis, M. D., & Burstein, J. (2013). Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shih, A., & Ma, M. (2012). Profiling EFL Learners’ Writing Performance by Syntactic Complexity: A Corpus-Based Study. In Tono, Y., Kawaguchi, Y., & Minegishi, M. (Eds.), Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research (pp. 125–138). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An Academic Formulas List: New Methods in Phraseology Research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. M. (1987). Collocation: A Progress Report. In Steele, R. & Threadgold, T. (Eds.), Language Topics: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday (Vol. 2, pp. 319–331). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. M. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. M. (2004). The Search for Units of Meaning. In Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse (pp. 24–48). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Singchai, P., & Jaturapitakkul, N. (2016). Cohesion in Narrative Essay Writing of EFL Secondary Students in Thailand. The New English Teacher, 10(2), 89–111.Google Scholar

Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2015). On the ‘Holistic’ Nature of Formulaic Language. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(2), 285–301.Google Scholar

Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2019). Formulaic Language: Setting the Scene. In Siyanova-Chanturia, A. & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (Eds.), Understanding Formulaic Language (pp. 1–15). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Slomp, D. H. (2012). Challenges in Assessing the Development of Writing Ability: Theories, Constructs and Methods. Assessing Writing, 17, 81–91.Google Scholar

Spiegel, D. L., & Fitzgerald, J. (1990). Textual Cohesion and Coherence in Children’s Writing Revisited. Research in the Teaching of English, 24(1), 48–66.Google Scholar

Standards and Testing Agency. (2015). National Curriculum Tests Key Stage 2: English Grammar, Spelling, and Punctuation: Mark Schemes. From https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/23390/3/Sample_ks2_EnglishGPS_markscheme.pdf (last accessed 13 March 2020).Google Scholar

Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & McClair, A. (2013). Formulaic Sequences and EAP Writing Development: Lexical Bundles in the TOEFL iBT Writing Section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 214–225.Google Scholar

Staples, S., & Reppen, R. (2016). Understanding First-Year L2 Writing: A Lexico-Grammatical Analysis across L1s, Genres, and Language Ratings. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 17–35.Google Scholar

Steedman, M. (2000). The Syntactic Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Storch, N. (2009). The Impact of Studying in a Second Language (L2) Medium University on the Development of L2 Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 103–118.Google Scholar

Storch, N., & Hill, K. (2008). What Happens to International Students’ English after One Semester at University? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Storch, N., & Tapper, J. (2009). The Impact of an EAP Course on Postgraduate Writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 207–223.Google Scholar

Struc, N., & Wood, N. (2010). A Corpus-Based Analysis of Japanese University-Level Learners’ L2 Writing Development over a One-Year Period. Reitaku University Journal, 90, 155–184.Google Scholar

Sun, L., & Nippold, M. A. (2012a). Narrative Writing in Children and Adolescents: Examining the Literate Lexicon. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 43(1), 2–13.Google Scholar

Sun, Y., Zhang, J., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Knowledge Building and Vocabulary Growth over Two Years, Grades 3 and 4. Instructional Science, 38, 147–171.Google Scholar

Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taguchi, N., Crawford, W. J., & Wetzel, D. (2013). What Linguistic Features Are Indicative of Writing Quality? A Case of Argumentative Essays in a College Composition Program. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 420–430.Google Scholar

Tanskanen, S.-K. (2006). Collaborating towards Coherence: Lexical Cohesion in English Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Taylor, A., Marcus, M., & Santorini, B. (2003). The Penn Treebank: An Overview. In Abeillé, A. (Ed.), Building and Using Parsed Corpora (pp. 5–22). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Taylor, D. S. (1988). The Meaning and Use of the Term ‘Competence’ in Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 148–168.Google Scholar

Tedick, D. J. (1990). ESL Writing Assessment: Subject-Matter Knowledge and Its Impact on Performance. English for Specific Purposes, 9, 123–143.Google Scholar

Thomas, M. (1994). Assessment of L2 Proficiecy in Second Language Acquisition Research. Language Learning, 44(2), 307–366.Google Scholar

Thomas, V. (1972). The Basic Writing Vocabulary of Elementary School Children. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 18(4), 243–248.Google Scholar

Thompson, N. C., Nemanich, D. D., & Bala, A. S. (1967). The Nebraska Study of the Syntax of Children’s Writing, 1966–67, Volume III. Nebraska: The University of Nebraska.Google Scholar

TOEFL. (2018). TOEFL Integrated and Independent Writing Task Rubric. From www.ets.org/s/toefl/pdf/toefl_writing_rubrics.pdf (last accessed 22 May 2020).Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar