(1875) 23 Journal of the Society of Arts 567.

(1876) Solicitors’ Journal 402 (18 Mar. 1876).

(1879) 23 Solicitors’ Journal 819 (16 Aug. 1879).

Aaker, D., and Joachimsthaler, E., Brand Leadership: The Next Level of the Brand Revolution (New York: The Free Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Actes de la Conférence de Bruxelles 1897 et 1900 (Berne: Bureau International de l'Union, 1901).

Adams, F. M., A Treatise on the Law of Trade Marks (London: George Bell and Sons, 1874).Google Scholar

Adams, F. M.,A Treatise on the Law of Trade-Marks: With the Trade-Marks Registration Act of 1875 and Rules (London: Butterworths, 1876).Google Scholar

Adams, J., The Doctrine of Equity (London: William Benning and Co., 1850).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N., ‘Court Endorses Rent Seeking: Arsenal Football Club v Reed (Adidas-Salomon AG v Fitness Trading Ltd en passant)’ (2004) 1 Intellectual Property Quarterly114–20.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N., and Prichard Jones, K. V., Franchising (4th edn, London: Butterworths, 1997).Google Scholar

‘Advertisements’ (1855) 97 Quarterly Review183–225.

Aitchison, Jean, Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. (3rd edn, Oxford: Blackwell, 2003).Google Scholar

Akerlof, G., ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’ (1970) 84 Quarterly Journal of Economics488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alford, Bernard, W. D. and H. O. Wills and the Development of the UK Tobacco Industry, 1786–1965 (London: Methuen, 1973).Google Scholar

Allen, T., and J. Simmons, ‘Visual and Verbal Identity’ in Clifton, R. and Simmons, J. (eds.), Brands and Branding (Princeton, N. J.: Bloomberg, 2003).Google Scholar

Ambler, T., Are Brands Good for Britain? British Brands Group Inaugural Lecture (London: British Brands Group, 2000).Google Scholar

Anderson, Kim (ed.), The World's Wine Markets: Globalization at Work (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnheim, Rudolf, The Dynamics of Architectural Form (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Arvidsson, A., Brands: Meaning and Value in Media Culture (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

‘Associated Chambers of Commerce’ The Times, 24 Sept. 1873, p. 12c.

‘Association in Birmingham’ (1866) 14 Journal of the Society of Arts131.

‘Association of Chambers of Commerce’ The Times, 7 Feb. 1861, p. 12f.

Auriol, E. et al., ‘France’ in Anderson, Kim (ed.), The World's Wine Markets: Globalization at Work (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, Graeme, ‘The Story of Steele v. Bulova: Trademarks on the Line’ in Ginsburg, Jane C. and Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper (eds.), Intellectual Property Stories (New York: Foundation Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Austin, Graeme,‘Trademarks and the Burdened Imagination’ (2004) 69 Brooklyn Law Review827–922.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L., Philosophical Papers, ed. Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Ayling, R. (1999) ‘British Airways Brand Leadership Results from being True to our Long-term Vision’ in Gilmore, F. (ed.), Brand Warriors: Corporate Leaders Share Their Winning Strategies (London: HarperCollins Business, 1999).Google Scholar

Bagwell, L., and Bernheim, B., ‘Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption’ (1996) 86 American Economic Review349–73.Google Scholar

Baker, C. Edwin, ‘Paternalism, Politics, and Citizen Freedom: The Commercial Speech Quandary in Nike’ (2004) 54 Case Western Reserve Law Review1161.Google Scholar

Barham, E., ‘Translating Terroir: The Global Challenge of French AOC Labelling’ (2003) 19 Journal of Rural Studies127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, Charles, The Bunyip and Other Mythical Monsters and Legends (Melbourne: Reed and Harris, 1946).Google Scholar

Barwise, P., A. Dunham and M. Ritson, ‘Ties that Bind: Consumers and Businesses’ in Pavitt, J. (ed.), Brand.new (London: V&A Publications, 2000).Google Scholar

Bashkow, I., and Dobrin, L., ‘Pigs for Sance Songs’: Reo Fortune's Empathetic Ethnography of the Arapesh Roads’ (n.d.) Histories of Anthropology Annual 2.

Baudrillard, J., ‘The Evil Demon of Images and the Precession of Simulacra’ in Docherty, T. (ed.), Postmodernism: A Reader (Hemel Hempstead, Herts.: Harvester, 1993).Google Scholar

BBC news, ‘EU Wine Reform’ 22 June 2006, available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/5107400.stm.

Becker, G., and Murphy, K., ‘A Theory of Rational Addiction’ (1988) 96 Journal of Political Economy675–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, G., and Murphy, K.,(eds.), Social Economics: Market Behaviour in a Social Environment (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beebe, Barton, ‘An Empirical Study of the Multifactor Tests for Trademark Infringement’ (2006) 94 California Law Review1581–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beebe, Barton,‘Search and Persuasion in Trademark Law’ (2005) 103 Michigan Law Review2020–72.Google Scholar

Beebe, Barton,‘The Semiotic Analysis of Trademark Law’ (2004) 51 U.C.L.A. Law Review621–704.Google Scholar

Beier, F. K., and Preimer, A., ‘Preparatory Study for the Establishment of a Uniform International Trademark Definition’ (1955) 45 Trademark Reporter1266.Google Scholar

Bentham, J., An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, [1789] 1996).Google Scholar

Bently, Lionel, ‘From Communication to Thing: Historical Aspects of the Conceptualisation of Trade Marks as Property’ in Dinwoodie, Graeme and Janis, Mark (eds.), Trademark Law and Theory: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bently, Lionel, and Sherman, Brad, Intellectual Property Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001; 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Bérard, L., and P. Marchenay, ‘A Market Culture: Produits de Terroir or the Selling of Culture’ in Blowen, S (ed.), Recollections of France: Memories, Identities and Heritage in Contemporary France (New York: Berghahn Books, 2000).Google Scholar

Berg, Donna Lee, A Guide to the Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Berger, John, Ways of Seeing (London: Penguin, 1972).Google Scholar

Best, J. ‘Orange and easyMobile Go to War over Colour’, 21 Feb. 2005. http://networks.silicon.com/mobile/0.39024665.39128035.00.htm.Google Scholar

Bezanson, Randall P., ‘Institutional Speech’ (1994–5) 80 Iowa Law Review735.Google Scholar

Birks, P. (ed.), The Classification of Obligations (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar

‘Birmingham Chamber of Commerce’ The Times, 2 Aug. 1872, p. 12e.

Biss, A., and Smith, O., The Wines of Chablis (Bournemouth: Writers International, 2000).Google Scholar

Blackett, T., Trademarks (London: Macmillan Business and Interbrand, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blakemore, Diane, Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).Google Scholar

Bone, Robert G., ‘Enforcement Costs and Trademark Puzzles’ (2004) 90 Virginia Law Review2099–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boorstin, Daniel, ‘Advertising and American Civilization’ in Brozen, Yale (ed.), Advertising and Society (New York: New York University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

Borgerson, Janet L., and Jonathan E. Schroeder, ‘Identity in Marketing Communications: An Ethics of Visual Representation’ in Kimmel, Allan J. (ed.), Marketing Communications: Emerging Trends and Developments (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Borgerson, Janet L., Schroeder, Jonathan E., Blomberg, Britta and Thorssén, Erika, ‘The Gay Family in the Ad: Consumer Responses to Non-Traditional Families in Marketing Communications’ (2006) 22 Journal of Marketing Management955–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosland, Jason, ‘The Culture of Trade Marks: An Alternative Cultural Studies Perspective’ (2005) 10 Media and Arts Law Review99–116.Google Scholar

Bouckaert, B., and Geest, G. (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Law and Economics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2000).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, Distinction – A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Bragg, R., Trade Descriptions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Branson, R., ‘Virgin: The Virtues of a Diversified Brand’ in Gilmore, F. (ed.), Brand Warriors: Corporate Leaders Share Their Winning Strategies (London: HarperCollins Business, 1999).Google Scholar

Brown, R., ‘Advertising and the Public Interest: Legal Protection of Trade Symbols’ (1948) 57 Yale Law Journal1165–206, reprinted in (1999) 108 Yale Law Journal1619–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruni, L., and Stanca, L., ‘Income Aspirations, Television and Happiness: Evidence from the World Values Survey’ (2006) 59 Kyklos209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryce, J., The Trade Marks Registration Acts 1875 and 1876 (London: William Maxwell and Sons, 1877).Google Scholar

Bucheim, C., ‘Aspects of XIXth Century Anglo-German Trade Rivalry Reconsidered’ (1981) 10 Journal of European Economic History273–89.Google Scholar

Burrell, R., and Handler, M., ‘Making Sense of Trade Mark Law’ (2003) 1(4) Intellectual Property Quarterly388–409.Google Scholar

Cable, D. M., and Graham, M. E., ‘The Determinants of Job Seekers’ Reputation Perceptions’ (2000) 21 Journal of Organisational Behaviour929–47.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calabresi, G., and Melamed, D., ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral’ (1972) 85 Harvard Law Review1089–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calleja, R., ‘R. v Johnstone [2003] UKHL 28: Bootlegging and Legitimate Use of an Artist's Trade Mark’ (2003) 14(7) Entertainment Law Review186–8.Google Scholar

Callman, R., ‘Unfair Competition Without Competition? The Importance of the Property Concept in the Law of Trade-marks’ (1947) 95 University of Pennsylvania Law Review443–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callon, M., Meadel, C. and Rabehariosa, V., ‘The Economy of Qualities’ (May 2002) 31(2) Economy and Society194–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. and Prelec, D., ‘Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience can Inform Economics’ (2005) 43 Journal of Economic Literature9–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caminiti, S., ‘Ralph Lauren: The Emperor has Clothes’ (11 Nov. 1998) 137(9) Fortune80–9.Google Scholar

Campbell, C., Phylloxera: How Wine was Saved for the World (London: Harper Perennial, 2004).Google Scholar

Capus, J., L’Évolution de la législation sur les Appellations d'Origine: genèse des Appellations Contrôlées (Paris: Institut National des Appellations d'Origine, 1947).Google Scholar

Carboni, Anna, ‘Distinctive Character Acquired through Use: Establishing the Facts’ in Phillips, Jeremy and Simon, Ilanah (eds.), Trade Mark Use (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Carboni, Anna,‘Two Stripes and You're Out: Added Protection for Trade Marks With a Reputation’ (2004) 5 European Intellectual Property Review229–33.Google Scholar

Carroll, Lewis, Through the Looking-glass and What Alice Found There, illus. Helen Oxenbury (London: Walker Books, [1871] 2005).Google Scholar

Carter, Ronald, Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk (London: Routledge, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, Stephen, ‘Does it Matter Whether Intellectual Property is Property?’ (1993) 68 Chicago-Kent Law Review715–23.Google Scholar

Carter, Stephen,‘The Trouble with Trademark’ (1990) 99 Yale Law Journal759–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carty, Hazel, ‘Character Merchandising and the Limits of Passing Off’ (1993) 13 Legal Studies289–307.Google Scholar

Caruana, Wally, ‘Black Art on White Walls’ in Kleinert, Sylvia and Neale, Margot (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Aboriginal Art and Culture (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Casperie-Kerdel, S. ‘Dilution Disguised: Has the Concept of Trade Mark Dilution Made its Way into the Laws of Europe?’ (2001) European Intellectual Property Review185.Google Scholar

Caton, Charles E. (ed.), Philosophy and Ordinary Language (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1970).Google Scholar

Caves, R. E., and W. F. Murphy, ‘Franchising: Forms, Markets and Intangible Assets’ in Hoy, F. and Murphy, J. (eds.), Franchising: An International Perspective (London: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar

Chamberlin, E., The Theory of Monopolistic Competition (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1933).Google Scholar

Chandler, A. D., Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Chapman, Siobhan, Philosophy for Linguists (London: Routledge, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charters, Steve, ‘Aesthetic Products and Aesthetic Consumption: A Review’ (2006) 9 Consumption Markets and Culture 3 235–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chipman, J., and Moore, J., ‘The New Welfare Economics 1939–74’ (1978) 19 International Economic Review547–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, R., ‘Advertising Consumer Goods in Nineteenth-Century Britain: Reinterpretations’ (2000) 53(4) Economic History Review621–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, R.,‘New Perspectives on the History of Products, Firms, Marketing and Consumers in Britain and the United States Since the Mid-Nineteenth Century’ (1999) 52 Economic History Review405–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Nancy L., ‘Issues in the Federal Registration of Flavors as Trademarks for Pharmaceutical Products’ (1993) University of Illinois Law Review105–32.Google Scholar

Coase, R., ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) Journal of Law and Economics1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Felix, ‘Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach’ (1935) 35 Columbia Law Review809–49. Committee Appointed by the Board of Trade to Inquire into the Duties, Organisation, and Arrangements of the Patent Office Under the Patents, Designs and Trade Marks Act, 1883, So Far as it Relates to Trade Marks and Designs, Report (London: HMSO, 1888).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conway, Hazel, and Roenisch, Rowan, Understanding Architecture (London: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar

Coombe, Rosemary, The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties. Authorship, Appropriation, and the Law (Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coombe, Rosemary,‘Objects of Property and Subjects of Politics: Intellectual Property Laws and Democratic Dialogue’ (1991) 69 Texas Law Review1853–80.Google Scholar

Cooper, Douglas, The Courtauld Collection (London: Athlone Press, 1954).Google Scholar

Cooter, R., and Ulen, T., Law and Economics (4th edn, London: Pearson Addison Wesley, 2004).Google Scholar

Corley, T. A. B., Quaker Enterprise in Biscuits: Huntley and Palmers of Reading, 1822–1972 (London: Hutchinson, 1972).Google Scholar

Cornish, W., and Phillips, J., ‘The Economic Function of Trade Marks: An Analysis with Special Reference to Developing Countries’ (1982) 13 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law41–56.Google Scholar

Crafts, N., ‘Long-run Growth’ in Floud, R. and Johnson, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, vol. II: Economic Maturity, 1860–1939 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Cresswell, T., Place: A Short Introduction (Oxford, Blackwell, 2004)Google Scholar

Cresswell, T., and Vertstraete, G., Mobilizing Place, Placing Mobility: The Politics of Representation in a Globalized World (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2003).Google Scholar

Croft, William, and Cruse, D. A., Cognitive Linguistics (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crystal, David, A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (5th edn, Oxford: Blackwell, 2003).Google Scholar

Cummings, Louise, Pragmatics: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Cutler, J., On Passing Off; Or Illegal Substitution of the Goods of One Trader for the Goods of Another Trader (London, 1904).Google Scholar

Daniel, E. M., The Trade Mark Registration Act (London: Stevens and Haynes, 1876).Google Scholar

Davis, Jennifer, ‘A European Constitution for IPRs? Competition, Trade Marks and Culturally Significant Signs’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Reports1005–26.Google Scholar

Davis, Jennifer,‘European Trade Mark Law and the Enclosure of the Commons’ (2002) 4 Intellectual Property Quarterly342–67.Google Scholar

Davis, Jennifer,Intellectual Property Law (2nd edn, London: Butterworths, 2003).Google Scholar

Davis, Jennifer,‘Locating the Average Consumer: His Judicial Origins, Intellectual Influences and Current Role in European Trade Mark Law’ (2005) Intellectual Property Quarterly 2 183–203.Google Scholar

Davis, Jennifer,‘Protecting the Common: Delineating a Public Domain in Trade Mark Law’ in Dinwoodie, Graeme and Janis, Mark (eds.), Trademark Law and Theory: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007).Google Scholar

Davis, Jennifer,‘To Protect or Serve? European Trade Mark Law and the Decline of the Public Interest’ (2003) 25(4) European Intellectual Property Review180–7.Google ScholarPubMed

Davis, Jennifer,‘The Value of Trade Marks: Economic Assets and Cultural Icons’ in Gendreau, Y. (ed.), Intellectual Property: Bridging Aesthetics and Economics – Propriété intellectuelle: entre l'art et l'argent (Montreal: Éditions Themis, 2006).Google Scholar

Day, J. ‘Easy Brand's Future may not be Orange’ Guardian, 16 Aug. 2004.Google Scholar

Planhol, X., An Historical Geography of France, trans. J. Lloyd (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Deakin, S., and Hughes, A., ‘Economic Efficiency and the Proceduralisation of Company Law’ (1999) Company Financial and Insolvency Law Review169–89.Google Scholar

DellaVigna, S., and Malmendier, U., ‘Paying Not to Go to the Gym’ (2006) 96 American Economic Review694–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demian, M., ‘Custom in the Courtroom, Law in the Village: Legal Transformations in Papua New Guinea’ (2003) 9 (1) Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demossier, M., ‘Culinary Heritage and Produits de Terroir in France: Food for Thought’ in Blowen, S., Demossier, M. and Picard, J. (eds.), Recollections of France: Memories, Identities and Heritage in Contemporary France (New York: Berghahn Books, 2000).Google Scholar

Denicola, Robert C., ‘Trademarks as Speech: Constitutional Implications of the Emerging Rationales for the Protection of Trade Symbols’ (1982) Wisconsin Law Review158–207.Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, Graeme B., ‘The Death of Ontology: A Teleological Approach to Trademark Law’ (1999) 84 Iowa Law Review611–752.Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, Graeme B.,‘Reconceptualizing the Inherent Distinctiveness of Product Design Trade Dress’ (1997) 75 North Carolina Law Review471–606.Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, Graeme B.,‘The Story of Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.: Breakfast with Brandeis’ in Ginsburg, Jane C. and Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper (eds.), Intellectual Property Stories (New York: Foundation Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, Graeme B.,Trademark Law and Social Norms (Working Paper, March 2007), available at www.ssrn.com.

Dinwoodie, Graeme B.,‘Trademarks and Territoriality: Detaching Trademark Law from the Nation-State’ (2004) 41 Houston Law Review885–973.Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, Graeme B., and Janis, Mark D., ‘Confusion over Use: Contextualism in Trademark Law’ (2007) 92 Iowa Law Review1597.Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, Graeme B., and Janis, Mark D.,‘Lessons from the Trademark Use Debate’ (2007) 92 Iowa Law Review1703.Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, Graeme B., and Janis, Mark D.,Trademarks and Unfair Competition: Law and Policy (New York: Aspen Publishers, 2004).Google Scholar

Dogan, Stacey L., and Lemley, Mark A., ‘The Merchandising Right: Fragile Theory or Fait Accompli?’ (2005) 54 Emory Law Journal461–506.Google Scholar

Dogan, Stacey L., and Lemley, Mark A.,‘Trademark and Consumer Search Costs on the Internet’ (2004) 41 Houston Law Review777–839.Google Scholar

Dogan, Stacey L., and Lemley, Mark A.,‘What the Right of Publicity can Learn from Trademark Law’ (2006) 58 Stanford Law Review1161–220.Google Scholar

Dollinger, M. J., Golden, P. A. and Saxton, T., ‘The Effect of Reputation on the Decision to Joint Venture’ (1997) 18(2) Strategic Management Journal127–40.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drescher, T., ‘The Transformation and Evolution of Trademarks: From Signals to Symbols to Myth’ (1992) 82 Trademark Reporter301–40.Google Scholar

Drewry, Charles Stewart, The Law of Trade Marks (London: Knight, 1878).Google Scholar

Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper, ‘Expressive Genericity: Trademarks as Language in the Pepsi Generation’ (1990) 65 Notre Dame Law Review397–424.Google Scholar

Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper,‘We are Symbols and Inhabit Symbols, So Should We Be Paying Rent? Deconstructing the Lanham Act and Rights of Publicity’ (1996) 20 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law and the Arts123–56.Google Scholar

Dryberg, P., and Skylv, M., ‘Does Trade Mark Infringement Require that the Infringing Use be Trade Mark Use and if so, what is “Trade Mark Use”?’ (2003) 5 European Intellectual Property Review229–33.Google Scholar

Duguid, P., ‘Developing the Brand: The Case of Alcohol, 1800–1880’ (2003) 4 Enterprise and Society405–41.Google Scholar

Duxbury, Neil, Patterns of American Jurisprudence (paperback edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easthope, A., ‘Postmodernism and Critical and Cultural Theory’ in Sim, S. (ed.), The Icon Dictionary of Postmodern Thought (Cambridge: Icon Books, 1998).Google Scholar

Economides, N., ‘Economics of Trademarks’ (1988) 78 The Trademark Reporter523–39.Google Scholar

Economides, N.,‘Trademarks’ in Newman, P. (ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and Law, vol. III (London: Macmillan, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrenberg, A., Barnard, N. and Scriven, J., ‘Differentiation or Salience’ (1997) 37 Journal of Advertising Research7.Google Scholar

Ellwood, L. A., ‘The Industrial Property Convention and the “Telle Quelle” Clause’ (1956) 46 Trademark Reporter36–52.Google Scholar

Empson, William, The Structure of Complex Words (London: Chatto and Windus, [1951] 1979).Google Scholar

Evans-Jackson, J. E., ‘The Law of Trade Marks’ (1899) 47 Journal of Society of Arts563–70.Google Scholar

Faith, N., The Story of Champagne (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1988).Google Scholar

Fama, E., and Jensen, M., ‘Agency Problems and Residual Claims’ (1983) 26 Journal of Law and Economics327–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Felstead, A., The Corporate Paradox: Power and Control in the Business Franchise (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar

Finnis, John, ‘The Priority of Persons’ in Horder, Jeremy (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Fourth Series) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Fisher, W., ‘Theories of Intellectual Property’ in Munzer, Stephen R. (ed.), New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, R., ‘Rowntree and Market Strategy, 1897–1939’ (1989) 18 Business and Economic History47–8.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, R.,Rowntree and the Marketing Revolution, 1862–1969 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Fleischer, V., ‘Brand New Deal: The Branding Effect of Corporate Deal Structures’ (2006) 104 Michigan Law Review1581–637.Google Scholar

Floud, R., ‘Britain, 1860–1914: A Survey’ in Floud, R. and McCloskey, D. N. (eds.), The Economic History of Britain Since 1700 (2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Folliard-Monguiral, A., ‘Distinctive Character Acquired through Use: The Law and the Case Law’ in Phillips, Jeremy and Simon, Ilanah (eds.), Trade Mark Use (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Foster, R. (ed.), Nation Making. Emergent Identities in Postcolonial Melanesia (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Foulkes, C. (ed.), Larousse Encyclopedia of Wine (2nd edn, London: Hamlyn, 2001).Google Scholar

Frankel, Susy, ‘Trade Marks and Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Intellectual Property Rights’ in Dinwoodie, Graeme and Janis, Mark (eds.), Trademark Law and Theory: A Handbook of Contemporary Research (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007).Google Scholar

Frankel, Susy, and Megan Richardson, ‘Cultural Property and the Public Domain: Case Studies from New Zealand and Australia’ in Antons, Christoph (ed.), Traditional Knowledge, Traditional Cultural Expressions and Intellectual Property Law in the Asia-Pacific Region (Alphen aar de Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2008).Google Scholar

Gade, D. W., ‘Tradition, Territory, and Terroir in French Viniculture: Cassis, France, and Appellation Contrôlée’ (2004) 94 Annals of the Association of American Geographers848–67.Google Scholar

Gaines, J., Contested Culture: The Image, the Voice and the Law (London: bfi Publishing, 1991).Google Scholar

Gangjee, D., Protecting Geographical Indications as Trademarks: The Prospects and Pitfalls (Tokyo: Institute of Intellectual Property, 2006).Google Scholar

Gangjee, D.,‘Quibbling Siblings: Conflicts between Trade Marks and GIs’ (2007) 82 Chicago-Kent Law Review1253.Google Scholar

Gangjee, D.,‘Say Cheese: A Snapshot of Genericide through the Feta Dispute’ (2007) European Intellectual Property Review (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Gannon, M. J., Understanding Global Cultures (3rd edn, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2004).Google Scholar

Gell, A., The Art of Anthropology: Essay and Diagrams, ed. Hirsch, E. (London: The Athlone Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Gendreau, Y. (ed.), Intellectual Property: Bridging Aesthetics and Economics (Montreal: Éditions Themis, 2006).Google Scholar

Raymond, Gibbs Jr, Intentions in the Experience of Meaning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Gilmore, F. (ed.), Brand Warriors: Corporate Leaders Share Their Winning Strategies (London: HarperCollins Business, 1999).Google Scholar

Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. and Kahneman, D. (eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsburg, Jane C., ‘Of Mubarh Copyrights, Mangled Trademarks, and Babie's Bereficence: The Influence of Copyright on Trademark Law’ in Dinwoodie, Graeme and Janis, Mark (eds.), Trademark Law and Theory: A Hardbook of Contemporary Research (Chelferhan: Edward Elgar, forthcoming 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsburg, Jane C., Litman, Jessica and Kevlin, Mary L., Trademark and Unfair Competition Law (4th edn, New York: Foundation Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Godson, R., A Practical Treatise on the Law of Patents for Inventions and of Copyright (London: Butterworth, 1823).Google Scholar

Goldman, L., Science, Reform, and Politics in Victorian Britain: The Social Science Association, 1857–1886 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldman, L.,‘The Social Science Association, 1857–1886: A Context for Mid-Victorian Liberalism’ (1986) 101 English Historical Review95–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gombrich, Ernst, The Uses of Images: Studies in the Social Function of Art and Visual Communication (London: Phaidon, 1999).Google Scholar

Gourlay, K. A., Sound Producing Instruments in Traditional Society: A Study of Esoteric Instruments and their Role in Male–Female Relations’ (New Guinea Research Bulletin 60) (Canberra: Australian National University, 1975).Google Scholar

Gower, L. C. B., The Principles of Modern Company Law (London: Stevens and Sons, 1954; 3rd edn, London: Stevens and Sons, 1969).Google Scholar

Graburn, Nelson, ‘Introduction: Arts of the Fourth World’ in Graburn, Nelson, (ed.), Ethnic and Tourist Arts: Cultural Expressions from the Fourth World (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Granovetter, M., ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’ (1985) 91(3) American Journal of Sociology481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, Kevin, ‘Property in Thin Air’ (1991) 50 Cambridge Law Journal252–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenawalt, Kent, Speech, Crime and the Uses of Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Greenbaum, Arthur J., Jane, C. Ginsburg and Weinberg, Steven M., ‘A Proposal for Evaluating Genericism after “Anti–Monopoly”’ (1983) 73 Trademark Reporter 101.Google Scholar

Gregory, C., Gifts and Commodities (London: Academic Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Griffith, S., ‘Work your Way around France’ Independent Online, 14 Jan. 2006, http://travel.independent.co.uk/europe/article338402.ece.

Griffiths, Andrew, ‘The Impact of the Global Appreciation Approach on the Boundaries of Trade Mark Protection’ (2001) Intellectual Property Quarterly326–60.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Andrew,‘Modernising Trade Mark Law and Promoting Economic Efficiency: An Evaluation of the Baby-Dry Judgement and its Aftermath’ (2003) 1 Intellectual Property Quarterly1–37.Google Scholar

Grossman, G., and Shapiro, C., ‘Counterfeit-product Trade’ (1988) 78 American Economic Review59–75.Google Scholar

Guthey, Eric, and Jackson, Brad, ‘CEO Portraits and the Authenticity Paradox’ (2005) 42 Journal of Management Studies July 1057–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guy, Koleen M., ‘Rituals of Pleasure in the Land of Treasures: Wine Consumption and the Making of French Identity in the Late Nineteenth Century’ in Belasco, W. J. and Scranton, P. (eds.), Food Nations: Selling Taste in Consumer Societies (London: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar

Haan, Sarah C., ‘The “Persuasion Route” of the Law: Advertising and Legal Persuasion’ (2000) 100 Columbia Law Review1281–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hahn, F., and Hollis, M., Philosophy and Economic Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Haigh, D., Brand Valuation: Understanding, Exploiting and Communicating Brand Values (London: Financial Times, 1998).Google Scholar

Hall, Stuart (ed.), Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices (London: Sage, 1997).Google Scholar

Halliday, J., and Johnson, H., The Art and Science of Wine (London: Mitchell Beazley, 1994).Google Scholar

Handler, Milton, ‘Are the State Antidilution Laws Compatible With the National Protection of Trademarks?’ (1985) 75 Trademark Reporter269–87.Google Scholar

Handler, Milton, and Pickett, Charles, ‘Trade-marks and Trade Names – An Analysis and Synthesis’ (1930) 30 Columbia Law Review168–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanson, A., Burgundy (London: Mitchell Beazley, 2003).Google Scholar

Hanson, Jon, and Kysar, Douglas A., ‘Taking Behavioralism Seriously: Some Evidence of Market Manipulation’ (1999) 112 Harvard Law Review1420–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harbutt, J., Cheese: A Complete Guide to Over 300 Cheeses of Distinction (Minoqua, Wis.: Willow Creek Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Harris, J. W., Property and Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Harris, R., and Taylor, T. J., Landmarks in Linguistic Thought, vol. I: The Western Tradition from Socrates to Saussure (2nd edn, London: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar

Harrison, S., ‘The Commerce of Cultures in Melanesia’ (1993) (28) Man (n.s.) 139–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S.,Fracturing Resemblances. Identity and Conflict in Melanesia and the West (Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books, 2006).Google Scholar

Harrison, S.,The Mask of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Harrison, S.,‘The Past Altered by the Present: A Melanesian Village after Twenty Years’ (2001) 17 Anthropology Today3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S.,‘Ritual as Intellectual Property’ (1992) 27 Man (n.s.) 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S.,Stealing People's Names. History and Politics in a Sepik River Cosmology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartman, S., ‘Brand Equity Impairment – The Meaning of Dilution’ (1997) 87 Trademark Reporter418–35.Google Scholar

Haslam, Malcolm, Marks and Monograms of the Modern Movement 1875–1930 (Guildford: Lutterworth, 1977).Google Scholar

Hays, C., Pop: Truth and Power at the Coca-Cola Company (London: Arrow, 2005).Google Scholar

Hays, T., ‘Distinguishing Use versus Functional Use: Three Dimensional Marks’ in Phillips, Jeremy and Simons, Ilanah (eds.), Trade Mark Use (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Heilbrunn, Benoît, ‘Cultural Branding between Utopia and A-topia’ in Schroeder, Jonathan E. and Salzer-Mörling, Miriam (eds.), Brand Culture (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Henry, M., ‘Trade Marks’ (1862) 10 Journal of the Royal Society of Arts255.Google Scholar

Hettinger, E. C., ‘The Justification of Intellectual Property’ (1989) 18 Philosophy and Public Affairs31–52.Google Scholar

Higgins, D. M., “Made in Sheffield?”: Trade Marks, the Cutlers’ Company and the Defence of “Sheffield” in Binfield, C. and Hey, D. (eds.), Mesters to Masters: A History of the Company of Cutlers in Hallamshire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Higgins, D. M.,‘Mutton Dressed as Lamb? The Misrepresentation of Australian and New Zealand Meat in the British Market, c. 1890–1914’ (2004) 44 Australian Economic History Review161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, D. M., and James, T., The Economic Importance of Trade Marks in the UK (1973–1992): A Preliminary Investigation (London: The Intellectual Property Institute, 1996).Google Scholar

Higgins, D. M., and Tweedale, G., ‘Asset or Liability? Trade Marks in the Sheffield Cutlery and Tool Trades’ (1995) 37 Business History1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgins, D. M., and Tweedale, G.,‘The Trade Marks Question and the Lancashire Cotton Industry, 1870–1914’ (1996) 27 Textile History207–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hindmarch, W. M., A Treatise on the Law Relating to Patent Privileges (London: Stevens, 1846).Google Scholar

Alan, Hirsch, and Nader, Ralph, ‘“The Corporate Conscience” and Other first Amendment Follies in Pacific Gas of Electric’ (2004) San Diego Law Review483.Google Scholar

Hoffman, David, ‘The Best Puffery Article Ever’ (Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2006–11, 2006).

Hoffman, R. J. S., Great Britain and the German Trade Rivalry, 1875–1914 (New York: Russell and Russell, 1964).Google Scholar

Hohufeld, Wesley Newcomb, ‘Nature of Shockholders’ Individual Liability for Corporation Desk’ (1909) 9 Columbia Law Review285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holt, D. B., How Brands Become Icons: The Principles of Cultural Branding (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Hoy, F., and Starworth, J. (eds.), Franchising: An International Perspective (London: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar

Ilersic, A. R., and Liddle, P. F. B., Parliament of Commerce: The Story of the Association of British Chambers of Commerce, 1860–1960 (London: Association of British Chambers of Commerce and Newman Neame, 1960).Google Scholar

In, Sung, ‘Death of a Trademark: Genericide in the Digital Age’ (2002) 21 Review of Litigation159–89.Google Scholar

Indemaur, J., A Manual of the Principles of Equity (2nd edn, London: Geo Barber ‘Law Students’ Journal’ Office, 1890).Google Scholar

International Bureau of Intellectual Property, The Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks from 1891 to 1991 (Geneva: WIPO, 1991).

Jackson, Howard, Lexicography: An Introduction (London: Routledge, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, P., Lowe, M., Miller, D. and Mort, F. (eds.), Commercial Cultures: Economies, Practices, Spaces (Oxford: Berg, 2000).Google Scholar

Jacoby, J., ‘The Psychological Foundations of Trademark Law: Second Meaning, Genericism, Fame, Confusion and Dilution’ (2001) 91 Trademark Reporter1013–71.Google Scholar

Jaffey, Peter, ‘Likelihood of Association’ (2002) European Intellectual Property Review3–8.Google Scholar

Jaffey, Peter,‘Merchandising and the Law of Trade Marks’ (1998) Intellectual Property Quarterly240–66.Google Scholar

James, R., ‘Burgundy Can't Agree on AOC Reform’ (2004) Decanter, available at www.decanter.com/news/56418.html.

Jamieson, M., ‘The Place of Counterfeits in Regimes of Value: An Anthropological Approach’ (1999) 5 Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janke, Terri, Case Studies on Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions prepared for WIPO (Geneva: WIPO, 2003).Google Scholar

Janke, Terri,Our Culture: Our Future (Surry Hills, New South Wales: Michael Frankel and Company, 1999).Google Scholar

Janke, Terri, and Quiggin, Robynne, Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property: The Main Issues for the Indigenous Art Industry in 2006 prepared for the Australian and Torres Strait Islander Arts Board, Australia Council (Sydney: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Arts Board, 2006).Google Scholar

Jensen, M., and Meckling, W., ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Capital Structure’ (1976) 3 Journal of Financial Economics305–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, E., ‘Trade Marks’ (1881) 29 Journal of the Society of Arts493–506.Google Scholar

Jones, E., ‘Marketing the Nettlefold Woodscrew by GKN 1850–1939’ in Davenport-Hines, R. P. T (ed.), Markets and Bagmen: Studies in the History of Marketing and British Industrial Performance, 1830–1939 (Aldershot: Gower, 1986).Google Scholar

Jones, Philip, Boomerang: Behind an Australian Icon (Kent Town, South Australia: Wakefield Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. and Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., and Thaler, R., ‘Utility Maximisation and Experienced Utility’ (2006) 20 Journal of Economic Perspectives221–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, K. L., ‘Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity’ (1993) 57 Journal of Marketing1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerly, D. M.The Law of Trade-Marks and Trade Name, and Merchandise Marks (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1894).Google Scholar

Kingsley, Charles, Westward Ho! (Cambridge: Macmillan and Co., 1855).Google Scholar

Kintsch, Walter, Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Kitchin, D., Llewelyn, D., Mellor, J., Meade, R., Moody-Stuart, T. and Jacob, R., Kerly's Law of Trade Marks and Trade Names (13th edn, London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2001).Google Scholar

Kitchin, D., Llewelyn, D., Mellor, J.et al., Kerly's law of Trade Marks and Trade Names (14th rev. edn, London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2005).Google Scholar

Klein, B., and Leffler, K., ‘The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance’ (1981) 89 Journal of Political Economy615–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klein, Naomi, No Logo (London: Flamingo, 2000).Google Scholar

Kleinert, Sylvia, ‘Art and Aboriginality in the South-East’ in Kleinert, Sylvia and Neale, Margot (eds.), The Oxford Companion to Aboriginal Art and Culture (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Knick Harley, C., ‘Trade, 1870–1919: From Globalisation to Fragmentation’ in Floud, R. and Johnson, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, vol. II: Economic Maturity, 1860–1939 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Koehn, N., Brand New: How Entrepreneurs Earned Consumers’ Trust from Wedgwood to Dell (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Kozinsky, Alex, ‘Trademarks Unplugged’ (1993) 68 New York University Law Review 960, 961–75.Google Scholar

Krissoff, B., Bohman, M. and Caswell, J. A., Global Food Trade and Consumer Demand for Quality (New York: Kluwer, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladas, S. P., Patents, Trademarks, and Related Rights: National and International Protection (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Landau, Sidney, Dictionaries: The Art and Craft of Lexicography (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Landes, William M., and Posner, Richard A., The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law (Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Landes, William M., and Posner, Richard A.,‘Trademark Law: An Economic Perspective’ (1987) 30 Journal of Law and Economics265–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane, Shelley, ‘Goodwill Hunting: Assignments and Licences in Gross after Scandecor’ [1999] 2 Intellectual Property Quarterly264–79.Google Scholar

Lange, D., ‘Recognizing the Public Domain’ (1981) 44 Law and Contemporary Problems147–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lash, Scott, and Urry, John, The Economies of Sign and Space (London: Sage, 1994).Google Scholar

Lass, Roger, Phonology: An Introduction to Basic Concepts. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Lawrence, P., ‘The Ngaing of the Rai Coast’ in Lawrence, P. and Meggitt, M. (eds.), Gods, Ghosts and Men in Melanesia (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1965).Google Scholar

Layard, R., Happiness: Lessons from a New Science (London: Penguin, 2005).Google Scholar

Leach, J., Creative Land. Place and Procreation on the Rai Coast of Papua New Guinea (Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books, 2003).Google Scholar

Leach, J.,‘Drum and Voice: Aesthetics and Social Process on the Rai Coast of Papua New Guinea’ (2002) 8 Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute713–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leach, J.,‘Modes of Creativity’ in Hirsch, E. and Strathern, M. (eds.), Transactions and Creations. Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia (Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books, 2004).Google Scholar

Leach, J.,‘Out of Proportion? Anthropological Description of Power, Regeneration and Scale on the Rai Coast of PNG’ in Coleman, S. and Collins, P. (eds.), Locating the Field. Space, Place and Context in Anthropology. ASA Monograph 42. (Oxford: Berg, 2006).Google Scholar

Leff, Arthur A., Swindling and Selling (New York: Free Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Leiss, William, Kline, Stephen, Jhally, Sot and Botterill, Jacqueline, Social Communication in Advertising: Consumption in the Mediated Marketplace (New York, Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar

Lemley, Mark A., ‘The Modern Lanham Act and the Death of Common Sense’ (1999) 108 Yale Law Journal1687–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemley, Mark A.,‘Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding’ (2005) 83 Texas Law Review1031–75.Google Scholar

Leval, Pierre N., ‘Trademark: Champion of Free Speech’ (2004) 27 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts187–210.Google Scholar

Levi, L., ‘An International Commercial Code’, The Times, 27 August 1878, p. 6f.

Levi, L.,International Commercial Law (London: V. and R. Stevens, 1863).Google Scholar

Levi, L.,‘On Trade Marks’ (1859) 7 Journal of the Society of Arts262–70.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C., The Elementary Structures of Kinship, trans. J. H. Bell, J. R.von Sturmer and R. Needham (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen, Pragmatics. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levitt, Theodore, The Marketing Imagination (expanded edn, New York: Free Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Lewis, D., ‘Dispositional Theories of Value’ (1989), reprinted in D. Lewis, Papers in Ethics and Social Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Lewis, D.,‘Finkish Dispositions’ (1997), reprinted in D. Lewis, Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Litman, Jessica, ‘Breakfast with Batman: The Public Interest in the Advertising Age’ (1999) 108 Yale Law Journal1717–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, I., A Critique of Welfare Economics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950).Google Scholar

Lloyd, E. ‘On the Law of Trade Marks No. V’ (1861) Solicitors’ Journal and Reporter614.Google Scholar

Locke, J., The Second Treatise of Civil Government: And a Letter Concerning Toleration (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1946).Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G., and D. Schkade, ‘Wouldn't it be Nice? Predicting Future Feelings’ in Kahneman, D., Diener, E. and Schwarz, N. (eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (New York: Russell Sage, 1999).Google Scholar

Loubére, Leo A., The Wine Revolution in France – The Twentieth Century (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Ludlow, H., and Jenkins, H., A Treatise on the Law of Trade-Marks and Trade-Names (London: W. Maxwell and Son, 1873).Google Scholar

Lunney, Glynn S. Jr, ‘Trademark Monopolies’ (1999) 48 Emory Law Journal367–487.Google Scholar

Lury, Celia, Brands: The Logos of the Global Economy (Oxford: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar

Lury, Celia,Consumer Culture (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Lury, Celia,Cultural Rights: Technology, Legality and Personality (London: Routledge, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lury, Celia,‘Portrait of the Artist as a Brand’ in McClean, D. and Schubert, K. (eds.), Dear Images: Art, Copyright and Culture (London: Ridinghouse and ICA, 2002).Google Scholar

Lury, Celia,‘Trade Mark Style as a Way of Fixing Things’, paper presented at the Trade Marks Workshop, University of Cambridge (3 July 2006).

Lury, G., Brandwatching (Dublin: Blackhall Publishing, 1998).Google Scholar

Lyons, Christopher, Definiteness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyons, John, Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackinolty, Chips, ‘Whose Boomerang Won't Come Back?’ in Loveday, Peter and Cooke, Peter (eds.), Aboriginal Arts and Crafts and the Market (Darwin: Australian National University North Australia Research Unit, 1983).Google Scholar

Madison, Michael J., ‘Complexity and Copyright in Contradiction’ (2000) 18 Carchozo Art & Entertainment Law Journal125.Google Scholar

The Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks from 1891 to 1991 (Geneva: International Bureau of Intellectual Property, 1991).

Martino, T., Trademark Dilution (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Massey, D., ‘A Global Sense of Place’ in Barnes, T. and Gregory, D. (eds.), Reading Human Geography: The Politics and Poetics of Enquiry (London: Arnold, 1994).Google Scholar

Mauss, M., ‘Essai sur le don: forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques’ (1925) 1 Année Sociologique (n.s.) 30–186.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. Thomas, Trademarks and Unfair Competition (4th edn, Rochester, N.Y.: Lawyers Co-operative Pub. Co., 2002).Google Scholar

McClean, D., and Schubert, K. (eds.), Dear Images: Art, Copyright and Culture (London: Ridinghouse and ICA, 2002).Google Scholar

McEnerney, Thomas W., ‘Note: Fraudulent Material is Entitled to Copyright Protection in Action for Injunctive Relief and Damages’ (1974) 74 Columbia Law Review1351–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKitrick, J., ‘The Case for Extrinsic Dispositions’ (2003) 81 Australasian Journal of Philosophy155–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNie, N., Champagne (London: Faber and Faber, 1999).Google Scholar

Mead, M., The Mountain Arapesh: An Importing Culture (American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers no. 36, 1938).Google Scholar

‘The Merchandise Marks Act, 1887’ (5 Nov. 1887) Solicitors’ Journal3–4, 20–1, 40–1, 56.

Mercuro, N., and Medema, S., Economics and the Law: From Posner to Postmodernism (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Moorby, R. L.et al. for The Patent Office, A Century of Trade Marks 1876–1976 (London: HMSO, 1976).Google Scholar

Moore, C., ‘Streets of Style: Fashion Retailing Within London and New York’ in Jackson, P., Lowe, M., Miller, D. and Mort, F. (eds.), Commercial Cultures: Economies, Practices, Spaces (Oxford: Berg, 2000).Google Scholar

Moran, W., ‘The Wine Appellation as Territory in France and California’ (1993) 83 Annals of the Association of American Geographers694–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morico, Paul, ‘Protecting Color Per Se in the Wake of Qualitex v. Jacobson’ (1995) 77 Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society571–82.Google Scholar

Morrin, M., Lee, J., and Allenby, G. M., ‘Determinants of Trademark Dilution’ (2006) 33 Journal of Consumer Research248–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moskin, J. E., ‘Dilution or Delusion: The Rational Limits of Trademark Protection’ (1993) 83 Trademark Reporter122–48.Google Scholar

Mostert, Frederick W., ‘Well-Known and Famous Marks: Is Harmony Possible in the Global Village?’ (1996) 86 Trademark Reporter103–41.Google Scholar

Moutu, A., ‘Names Are Thicker Than Blood’ (Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, Department of Social Anthropology, 2004).

Mozley, L. B., Trade Marks Registration. A Concise View of the Law and Practice (London: 1877).Google Scholar

Mullins, M. G.et al., The Biology of the Grapevine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Munn, N., The Fame of Gawa. A Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim (Papua New Guinea) Society (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Murphy, J., ‘What is Branding?’ in Hart, S. and Murphy, J. (eds.), Brands (Macmillan: Basingstoke, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Musson, A. E., Enterprise in Soap and Chemicals: Joseph Crosfield and Sons Ltd, 1815–1965 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1965).Google Scholar

Myers, Gary, ‘Trademark Parody: Lessons From the Copyright Decision in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.’ (1996) 59 Journal of Law and Contemporary Problems181–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers, Greg, Words in Ads (London: Arnold, 1994).Google Scholar

Nelson, P., ‘Information and Consumer Behaviour’ (1970) 78 Journal of Political Economy311–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nevett, T. R., Advertising in Britain: A History (London: Heinemann / History of Advertising Trust, 1982).Google Scholar

New, W., ‘WTO Meeting Reopens Discussions On Geographical Indications Register’ Intellectual Property Watch, 12 December 2006, 1.

‘The New Patents, Designs and Trade-Marks Bills’ (7 Apr. 1883) Solicitors’ Journal374.

‘The New Patents, Designs and Trade-Marks Bills II’ (5 May 1883) Solicitors’ Journal444.

Ng, Catherine, ‘The Dilution of the Law of Passing-off: Toward a Rational Basis for Irrational Trade Mark protection’ (D. Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, 2004).

Ng, Catherine,‘The Limits of Comparative Advertising in Civil Actions: Just When you Dare to Compare’ (1998) 15 Canadian Intellectual Property Review143–66; (1999) 16 Canadian Intellectual Property Review 149–70.Google Scholar

Nisbet, Robert, ‘Men and Money: Reflections by a Sociologist’ in Nisbet, Robert, Wagg, Susan and Tucker, Anne W. (eds.), Money Matters: A Critical Look at Bank Architecture (New York: McGraw Hill, 1990).Google Scholar

Nisbett, R., and Kanouse, D., ‘Obesity, Hunger, and Supermarket Shopping Behavior’ (1968) 3 Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association683–4.Google Scholar

Norman, Helen, ‘Time to Blow the Whistle on Trade Mark Use’ (2004) 1 Intellectual Property Quarterly1–34.Google Scholar

Norman, Helen,‘Trade Mark Licences in the United Kingdom: Time for Bostitch to be Re-evaluated’ (1994) 16(4) European Intellectual Property Review154–8.Google Scholar

‘Note: The Besmirched Plaintiff and the Confused Public: Unclean Hands in Trademark Infringement’ (1965) 65 Columbia Law Review109–22.CrossRef

O'Gorman, James F., A B C of Architecture (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998).Google Scholar

O'Reilly, Daragh, ‘Cultural Brands/Branding Cultures’ (2005) 21 Journal of Marketing Management573–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

OECD, Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications in OECD Member Countries: Economic and Legal Implications (COM/AGR/APM/TD/WP(2000)15/FINAL).

Offer, A., The Challenge of Affluence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Ogden, C. K., and Richards, I. A., The Meaning of Meaning (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1923).Google Scholar

Ogus, A., ‘Economics and Law Reform: Thirty Years of Law Commission Endeavour’ (1995) 111 Law Quarterly Review407–20.Google Scholar

Ogus, A.,Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Oldham, J., English Common Law in the Age of Mansfield (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Olszak, N., Droit des Appellations d'Origine et Indications de Provenance (Paris: TEC and DOC, 2001).Google Scholar

‘On Fraudulent Trade Marks’ (1861) Solicitors’ Journal and Reporter820.

Onians, John, Bearers of Meaning: The Classical Orders in Antiquity, the Middle Ages, and the Renaissance (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Ostertag, Gary (ed.), Definite Descriptions: A Reader (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Otieno-Odek, J., ‘The Way Ahead – What Future for Geographical Indications?’, paper presented at the WIPO conference, Parma, Italy (27–29 June 2005).

Panesar, S., General Principles of Property Law (Harlow: Pearson Education, 2001).Google Scholar

Parness, Hillel, ‘Note: The Curse of the Pink Panther: The Legacy of the Owens-Corning Fiberglass Dissent and Its Role in the Qualitex Supreme Court Appeal’ (1994) 18 Columbia VLA Journal of Law and the Arts327–84.Google Scholar

Pattishall, Beverly W., ‘Dawning Acceptance of the Dilution Rationale for Trademark–Trade Identity Protection’ (1984) 74 Trademark Reporter289–310.Google Scholar

Pavitt, J. (ed.), Brand.new (London: VandA Publications, 2000).Google Scholar

Payne, P. L., British Entrepreneurship in the Nineteenth Century (London: Macmillan, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pendergrast, Mark, For God, Country and Coca-Cola (revised updated edn, New York: Thomson Texere, 2000).Google Scholar

Penner, J. E., The Idea of Property in Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Perry, N., Hyperreality and Global Culture (London: Routledge, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, Jeremy, Trade Mark Law: A Practical Anatomy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Phillips, Jeremy, and Simon, Ilanah (eds.), Trade Mark Use (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Pinner, H. L. (ed.), World Unfair Competition Law: An Encyclopedia, vol. II (Leyden: Sijthoff, 1965).Google Scholar

Png, I., and Reitman, D., ‘Why are Some Products Branded and Others Not?’ (1995) 38 Journal of Law and Economics207–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poland, H. B., The Merchandise Marks Act 1862 (London: J. Crockford, 1862).Google Scholar

Posner, R., Economic Analysis of Law (6th edn, New York: Aspen Publishing, 2002).Google Scholar

Post, Robert, ‘Compelled Subsidization of Speech: Johams v Livestock Marketing Association’ (2005) Sup. Ct Rev. 195.

Poulter, A., ‘What is “Use”: Reconciling Divergent Views on the Nature of Infringing Use’ (December 2003 / January 2004) 163 Trademark World23–4.Google Scholar

Preston, Ivan L., The Tangled Web They Weave: Truth, Falsity and Advertisers (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Procès Verbaux de la Conférence de Madrid de 1890 de Union Pour la Protection de la Propriété Industrielle (Madrid: Bureau International de l'Union, 1892).

‘Proposed Alterations in the law of Trade Marks’ (1861) Solicitors’ Journal and Reporter2.

Rahmatian, A., ‘Music and Creativity as Perceived by Copyright Law’ (2005) 3 Intellectual Property Quarterly267–93.Google Scholar

Ramello, G., ‘What's in a Sign? Trademark Law and Economic Theory’ (2006) 20 Journal of Economic Surveys547–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rampley, Matthew (ed.), Exploring Visual Culture: Definitions, Concepts, Contexts (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Ramsey, Lisa P., ‘Descriptive Trademarks and the First Amendment’ (2003) 70 Tennessee Law Review1095–176.Google Scholar

Rawkins, Jason, ‘Entry Denied: Visa for Condoms Rejected in the UK’ (2002) Trade Mark World22.Google Scholar

Ray, C., Bollinger: The Story of a Champagne (London: Peter Davies, 1971).Google Scholar

Redish, Martin H., and Wassman, Heward M., ‘What's Good fer General motors: Corporate Speech and the Theory of Free Expression’ (1997–8) 66 George Washington Law Review235.Google Scholar

‘The Registration of Trade Marks’ (1861) Solicitors’ Journal and Reporter839.

‘Registration of Trade Marks – Notes on the Register’ (20 June 1885) Solicitors’ Journal550–2, 569–70, 586.

‘Registration of Trade-Marks: The Three-Mark Rule’ (25 April 1885) Solicitors’ Journal414–15, 432–3.

Richards, T., The Commodity Culture of Victorian England: Advertising and Spectacle, 1851–1914 (London: Verso, 1991).Google Scholar

Richardson, Megan, ‘Copyright in Trade Marks? On Understanding Trade Mark Dilution’ (2000) 1 Intellectual Property Quarterly66–83.Google Scholar

Richardson, Megan,‘Trade Marks and Language’ (2004) 26 Sydney Law Review193–220.Google Scholar

Richardson, Megan, and Lesley Hitchens, ‘Celebrity Privacy and Benefits of Simple History’ in Kenyon, Andrew T. and Richardson, Megan (eds.), New Dimensions in Privacy Law: International and Comparative Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rimmer, Matthew, ‘Authenticity Marks and Identity Politics’ (2004) 3 Indigenous Law Journal139–79.Google Scholar

Ritzer, George, The McDonaldization of Society (Boston: Pine Forge Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Robertson, W., ‘On Trade Marks’ (1869) 14 Journal of the Society of Arts414–17.Google Scholar

Robinson, Jancis (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Wine (2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Rogers, Edward S., ‘The Lanham Act and the Social Function of Trademarks’ (1949) 14 Law and Contemporary Problems173–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, A. (ed.), No Sweat: Fashion, Free Trade, and the Rights of Garment Workers (New York: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar

Rowe, R. C., ‘Bile Beans: For Inner Health’ (2003) 17(3–4) International Journal of Pharmaceutical Medicine137–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Royle, T., Working for McDonald's in Europe: The Unequal Struggle? (London: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar

Ryland, A., ‘The Fraudulent Imitation of Trade Marks’ (1859) Transactions of the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science229.Google Scholar

Salaman, J. S., A Manual of the Practice of Trade Mark Registration (London: Shaw and Son, 1876).Google Scholar

Sampson, J., ‘Brand Valuation Today and Tomorrow’ in Perrier, R. (ed.), Brand Valuation (London: Interbrand, 1997).Google Scholar

Schechter, Frank I., The Historical Foundations of the Law Relating to Trade-Marks (New York: Columbia University Press, 1925).Google Scholar

Schechter, Frank I.,‘The Rational Basis of Trademark Protection’ (1927) 40 Harvard Law Review813–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schechter, Roger E., and Thomas, John R., Intellectual Property: The Law of Copyrights, Patents and Trademarks (St Paul, Minn.: Thomson West, 2003).Google Scholar

Scherer, F., and Ross, D., Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1990).Google Scholar

Schroeder, Jonathan E., ‘Architectural Expression in the Electronic Age’ in Scott, Linda M. and Batra, Rajeev (eds.), Persuasive Imagery: A Consumer Response Perspective (Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003).Google Scholar

Schroeder, Jonathan E.,‘The Artist and the Brand’ (2005) 39 European Journal of Marketing1291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Jonathan E.,‘Critical Visual Analysis’, in Belk, Russell W. (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Jonathan E.,Visual Consumption (London: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar

Schroeder, Jonathan E., and Borgerson, Janet L., ‘An Ethics of Representation for International Marketing’ (2005) 22 International Marketing Review578–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schroeder, Jonathan E., and Salzer-Mörling, Miriam (eds.), Brand Culture (London: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Schroeder, Jonathan E., and Zwick, Detlev, ‘Mirrors of Masculinity: Representation and Identity in Advertising Images’ (2004) 7 Consumption Markets and Culture21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, B., The Paradox of Choice (New York: Harper Collins, 2004).Google Scholar

Searle, G. R., Entrepreneurial Politics in Mid-Victorian Britain (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sebastian, Lewis, A Digest of Cases of Trade Mark, Trade Name, Trade Secret … decided in the courts of the United Kingdom, India, the Colonies and the United States of America (London: Stevens and Sons, 1879).Google Scholar

Sebastian, Lewis,The Law of Trade Marks and their Registration (London: Stevens and Sons, 1878; 2nd edn, 1884; 3rd edn, 1890).Google Scholar

Semple, E., Influences of Geographic Environment on the Basis of Ratzel's System of Anthropo-Geography (New York and London: H. Holt and Co., 1911).Google Scholar

Sennett, R., The Culture of the New Capitalism (New Haven, Mass.: Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Sherman, Brad, and Bently, Lionel, The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law – The British Experience, 1760–1911 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Sherman, Brad, and Leanne Wiseman, ‘Towards an Indigenous Public Domain?’ in Guibault, Lucie and Hugenholtz, P. Bernt (eds.), The Future of the Public Domain: Identifying the Commons in Information Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2006).Google Scholar

Shiffrin, S. V., ‘Lockean Arguments for Private Intellectual Property’ in Munzer, Stephen R. (ed.), New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Shuy, Roger, Language Crimes: The Use and Abuse of Language Evidence in the Courtroom (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993).Google Scholar

Shuy, Roger,Linguistic Battles in Trademark Disputes (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siebeck, W. (ed.), Strengthening Protection of Intellectual Property in Developing Countries (World Bank Discussion Paper no 112, 1990).

Simmons, D. A., Schweppes: The First 200 Years (London: Springwood Books, 1983).Google Scholar

Simon, A. L., The History of Champagne (London: Ebury Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Simon, I., ‘Dilutive Trade Mark Applications: ‘Trading on Reputations or Just Playing Games’ (2004) European Intellectual Property Review 26(2), 67–74.Google Scholar

Simonson, A. F., ‘How and When Do Trademarks Dilute: A Behavioural Framework to Judge “likelihood” of Dilution’ (1993) 83 Trademark Reporter149–74.Google Scholar

Simpson, J., ‘Selling to Reluctant Drinkers: The British Wine Market, 1860–1914’ (2004) 57 Economic History Review80–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skuras, D., and Dimara, E., ‘Regional Image and the Consumption of Regionally Denominated Products’ (2004) 41(4) Urban Studies801–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, G. V., Trade Mark Valuation (New York: J. Wiley and Sons, 1997).Google Scholar

Smith, L. Richard, A Guide to Wedgwood Marks (Sydney: Wedgwood Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Smith, P., ‘Tommy Hilfiger in the Age of Mass Customization’ in Ross, A. (ed.), No Sweat: Fashion, Free Trade, and the Rights of Garment Workers (New York: Verso, 2000).Google Scholar

Spence, Michael, ‘Intellectual Property and the Problem of Parody’ (1998) 114 Law Quarterly Review594.Google Scholar

Spence, Michael,‘The Mark as Expression / The Mark as Property’ (2005) 58 Current Legal Problems491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spence, M., ‘Passing Off and the Misappropriation of Valuable Intangibles’ (1996) 112 Law Quarterly Review472–98.Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson, ‘Irony and the Use–Mention Distinction’ in Cole, P. (ed.), Radical Pragmatics (New York: Academic Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan, and Wilson, Deirdre,Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edn, Oxford: Blackwell, 1995).Google Scholar

Spirits: Compilation of Issues and Points 23 May 2003 (TN/IP/W/7/Rev.1), available at http://docsonline.wto.org/DDFDocuments/t/tn/ip/W7R1.doc.

Stanziani, A., ‘Wine Reputation and Quality Controls: The Origin of the AOCs in 19th Century France’ (2004) 18(2) European Journal of Law and Economics149–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‘State of Trade’ The Times, 3 December 1860, p. 4f.

Stadler, Sara K., ‘The Wages of Ubiquity in Trademark Law’ (2003) 88 Iowa Law Review731.Google Scholar

Stern, Barbara B., and Schroeder, Jonathan E., ‘Interpretive Methodology from Art and Literary Criticism: A Humanistic Approach to Advertising Imagery’ (1994) 28 European Journal of Marketing114–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, Barbara B., Zinkhan, George M. and Holbrook, Morris, ‘The Netvertising Image: Netvertising Image Communication Model (NICM) and Construct Definition’ (2002) 31 Journal of Advertising Fall15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevenson, T., Champagne (London: Sotheby's Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Stigler, G., and Becker, G., ‘De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum’ (1977) 67 American Economic Review76–90.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J., Whither Socialism? (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Strathern, M., The Gender of the Gift. Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strathern, M.,Kinship, Law and the Unexpected. Relatives are Always a Surprise (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strathern, M.,Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things (London: Athlone Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Strathern, M.,Transactions: An Analytical Foray’ in Hirsch, E. and Strathern, M. (eds.), Transactions and Creations. Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia (New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2004).Google Scholar

Stubbs, Michael, Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002).Google Scholar

Stutzer, A., and B. Frey, ‘What Happiness Research can Tell us about Self-control Problems and Utility Misprediction’ in Frey, B. and Stutzer, A. (eds.), Economics and Psychology: A Promising New Cross-disciplinary Field (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Sumroy, R., and C. Badger, ‘Infringing “Use in the Course of Trade”: Trade Mark Use and the Essential Function of a Trade Mark’ in Phillips, Jeremy and Simon, Ilanah (eds.), Trade Mark Use (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Sunstein, C., Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sutton, G. B., ‘The Marketing of Ready Made Footwear in the Nineteenth Century: A Study of the Firm of C. and J. Clark’ (1964) 6 Business History93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swann, J. B., ‘Trademarks and Marketing’ (2001) 91 Trademark Reporter787–832.Google Scholar

Swann, J. B., and Davis, T. H., ‘Dilution, An Idea Whose Time has Gone; Brand Equity as Protectible Property, the New/Old Paradigm’ (1994) 84 Trademark Reporter267–99.Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve, From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tadelis, S., ‘What's in a Name? Reputation as a Tradeable Asset’ (1999) 89 American Economic Review548–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thackery, William, The Virginians (London: Bradbury and Evans, 1858–9).Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny, Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics (London: Longman, 1995).Google Scholar

Thompson, A., and Magee, G., ‘A Soft Touch? British Industry, Empire Markets, and the Self-Governing Dominions, c.1870–1914’ (2003) 56 Economic History Review689–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Times, 10 Sept. 1875, p. 8a.

The Times, 24 Sept. 1873, p. 12c.

Torremans, P., Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law (4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

‘Trade Marks’ (1858) 6 Journal of the Society of Arts595–7 (20 August 1858).

‘Trade Marks and Property Marks’ (1861) 14 Solicitors’ Journal and Reporter3.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Dasher, Richard, Regularity in Semantic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Tumbridge, J., ‘Trade Marks: The Confusion of “Use’’’ (2004) 9 European Intellectual Property Review431–4.Google Scholar

Turban, D. B., and Greening, D. W., ‘Corporate Social Performance and Organisational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees’ (1996) 40(3) Academy of Management Journal658–72.Google Scholar

Turner-Kerr, P., ‘Trade Mark Tangles: Recent Twists and Turns in EC Trade Mark Law’ (2004) 29(3) European Law Review345–65.Google Scholar

Tweedale, G., Steel City: Entrepreneurship, Strategy, and Technology in Sheffield, 1743–1993 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Twitchell, J., Lead us into Temptation: The Triumph of American Materialism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Tzonis, Alexander, and Lefaivre, Liane, Classical Architecture: The Poetics of Order (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Underdown, E. M., The Law of Artistic Copyright (London: John Crockford, 1863).Google Scholar

Underdown, E. M.,‘On the Piracy of Trade Marks’ (1866) 14 Journal of the Society of Arts370–4.Google Scholar

‘The United States Trademark Association Trademark Review Commission Report and Recommendations to USTA President and Board of Directors” (1987) 77 Trademark Reporter375.

Unwin, T., Wine and the Vine: An Historical Geography of Viticulture and the Wine Trade (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar

Upton, Francis H., A Treatise on the Law of Trade Marks, With a Digest and Review of the English and American Authorities (Albany: W. C. Little, 1860).Google Scholar

Urry, J., Global Complexity (Cambridge: Polity, 2003).Google Scholar

Ittersum, K., et al., ‘The Influence of the Image of a Product's Region of Origin on Product Evaluation’ (2003) 56 Journal of Business Research215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leeuwen, Theo, and Jewitt, Carey (eds.), Handbook of Visual Analysis (London: Sage, 2001).Google Scholar

Vaver, D., ‘Does Intellectual Property have Personality?’ in Zimmerman, R. and Whitty, N. (eds.), Rights of Personality in Scots Law: a Comparative Perspective (Dundee: University of Dundee Press, 2007, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Veblen, T., The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions (London: Unwin Books, 1899; reprinted New York: Dover Publications, 1994].Google Scholar

Venkatesh, Alladi, and Meamber, Laurie, ‘Arts and Aesthetics: Marketing and Cultural Production’ (2006) 6 Marketing Theory March 11–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wadlow, C., The Law of Passing Off: Unfair Competition by Misrepresentation (3rd edn, London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2004).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy, ‘Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternative’ (1992) 25 Michigan Journal of Law Reform751–93.Google Scholar

Waldrop, M., Complexity (London: Penguin, 1994).Google Scholar

Warner, Charles K., The Winegrowers of France and the Government since 1875 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1960).Google Scholar

Wasserman, Howard M., ‘Compelled Expression and the Public Forum Doctrine’ (2002) 77 Tulare Law Review163.Google Scholar

Weiner, A., Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-while-giving (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wells Fargo Bank 1999 Annual Report (San Francisco: Wells Fargo, 2000).

White, H.Markets from Networks: Socioeconomic Models of Production (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

White, M., ‘A Kantian Critique of Law and Economics’ (2006) 18 Review of Political Economy235–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Robert E., Soils for Fine Wines (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Whittle, J. Lowry, ‘The Late Earl Cairns’ (1885–6) 11 Law Magazine and Law Review (5th ser.) 133.Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna, English: Meaning and Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkins, M., ‘The Neglected Intangible Asset: The Influence of the Trade Mark on the Rise of the Modern Corporation’ (1992) 34 Business History66–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkof, N. J., and Burkitt, D., Trade Mark Licensing (2nd edn, London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2005).Google Scholar

Williams, E. E., Made in Germany (London: Heinemann, 1896).Google Scholar

Williamson, Judith, Decoding Advertisements: Ideology and Meaning in Advertising (reprint, London and New York: Marion Boyers, 2002).Google Scholar

Wilson, A. N., The Victorians (London: Arrow Books, 2005).Google Scholar

Wilson, C., ‘Economy and Society in Late Victorian Britain’ (1965) 18 Economic History Review183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, C.,The History of Unilever: A Study in Economic Growth and Social Change, vol. I (London: Cassell, 1954).Google Scholar

Wilson, J. E., Terroir: The Role of Geology, Climate, and Culture in the Making of French Wines (London: Mitchell Beazley, 1998).Google Scholar

Wilson, Richard, ‘Selling Beer in Victorian England’ in Jones, Geoffrey and Morgan, Nicholas (eds.), Adding Value: Brands and Marketing in Food and Drink (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar

WIPO, Report on Fact-finding Missions on Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge (1998–9).

WIPO,Secretariat Document SCT/6/3: Rev. on Geographical Indications: Historical Background, Nature of Rights, Existing Systems for Protection and Obtaining Protection in Other Countries (SCT/8/4) 2 Apr. 2002.

WIPO,Web Site on Geographical Indications, available at www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/geographical_ind.html.

WIPO Secretariat, ‘The Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions/Expressions of Foelzlore: Overview of Policy Objectives and Core Principles’ 20 Aug. 2004 (WIPO/GRTKF/IC/7/3) at Annex II [38–41].

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M Anscombe (Oxford: Blackwell, 1953).Google Scholar

Wood, J. B., The Law of Trade Marks (London: Stevens, 1876).Google Scholar

‘Words as Trade-Marks’ (1900) 44 Solicitors’ Journal548–9 (23 June 1900).

Wray, Alison, Trott, Kate and Bloomer, Aileen, Projects in Linguistics: A Practical Guide to Researching Language (London: Arnold, 1998).Google Scholar

WTO, Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Article 22 (1)

WTO Secretariat, ‘Discussions on the Establishment of a Multilateral System of Notification And Registration of Geographical Indications for Wines And Spirits: Compilation of Issues and Points’ 23 May 2003 (TN/IP/W/7/Rev.1) available at www.dsgiplc.com 12 Jan. 2007; www.orange.com, 3 March 2006.

Yoe, Craig (ed.), The Art of Barbie (New York, Workman, 1994).Google Scholar

Zaichowsky, Judith Lynne, The Psychology behind Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting (Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005).Google Scholar

Zhao, W., ‘Understanding Classifications: Empirical Evidence from the American and French Wine Industries’ (2005) 33 Poetics179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

(1862) Minutes of Evidence of the Select Committee to whom the Trade Marks Bill, and the Merchandise Marks Bill were Referred XII.

(1862) Report from the Select Committee on Trade Marks Bill, and Merchandize Marks Bill (London: House of Commons Papers, 1862).

(1862) Select Committee on Trade Marks Bill and Merchandize Marks Bill, Report, Proceedings and Minutes of Evidence 12 Parliamentary Papers 431

(1872) Reports Relative to Legislation in Foreign Countries on the Subject of Trade Marks C. 596 54 Parliamentary Papers 585.

(1872) Treaty Stipulations Between Great Britain and Foreign Powers on the Subject of Trade Marks C. 633 54 Parliamentary Papers 673.

(1875) Declaration for extending to German Empire Stipulations in Commercial Treaty Between Great Britain and Zollverein, May 1865, for Protection of Trade Marks, London, April 1875 C. 1207 82 Parliamentary Papers 585.

(1878) Declaration between Great Britain and United States for Protection of Trade Marks C. 1901 80 Parliamentary Papers 439.

(1878) Reports of the Commissioners of Patents for Inventions (C. 335) 26 Parliamentary Papers 809.

(1879) Reports Relative to Legislation in Foreign Countries on the Subject of Trade Marks C. 2284 73 Parliamentary Papers 469

(1880) Declaration between Great Britain and Denmark for the Protection of Trade Marks, Copenhagen, November 28, 1879 C. 2463 78 Parliamentary Papers 295

(1884) International Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, C. 4043.

(1887) Special Report from the Select Committee on Merchandise Marks Act (1862) Amendment Bill C. 203 10 Parliamentary Papers 357.

(1888) Correspondence Relative to the Protection of Industrial Property, C. 5521.

(1888) Extracts from Treaties and Declarations Now in Force Between Great Britain and Foreign Powers Relating to Trade Marks, Designs and Industrial Property (C. 5554) 98 Parliamentary Papers 745.

(1888) Report of a Commission Appointed by the Board of Trade to Inquire into the Duties, Organisation and Arrangements of the Patent Office under the Patents, Designs and Trade Marks Act 1883, so far as relates to Trade Marks and Designs, C. 5350 81 Parliamentary Papers 37.

(1888) Report of the Committee Appointed by the Board of Trade to Inquire into the Duties, Organisation, and Arrangements of the Patent Office, C. 5350.

(1890) Papers and Correspondence Relative to the Recent Conference at Madrid on the Subject of Industrial Property and Merchandise Marks C. 6023.

(1890) Report from the Select Committee on Merchandise Marks Act, 1887 C. 334 15 Parliamentary Papers 19.

(1893) Report from the Select Committee on Marking of Foreign Meat C. 214 12 Parliamentary Papers 341.

(1897) Report and Special Report from the Select Committee on the Agricultural Produce (Marks) Bill C. 365 8 Parliamentary Papers 227.

(1897) Report from the Select Committee on Merchandise Marks C. 346 11 Parliamentary Papers 29.

(1900) Reports from Her Majesty's Representatives Abroad on Trade-Marks Laws and Regulations Cd 104 1900 Parliamentary Papers 269.

(1905) Report and Special report from the Select Committee on the Trade Marks Bill Cd 231 8 Parliamentary Papers 257.

(1934) Board of Trade, Report of the Departmental Committee on the Law and Practice Relating to Trade Marks, Cmd 4568.

(1974) Under-Secretary of State for Trade, Report of the Committee to Examine British Trade Mark Law and Practice, Cmnd 5601.

(1990) The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, White Paper on Reform of Trade Marks Law, Cm 1203.