Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Syama Prasad as the Finance Minister of Bengal, 1941−1942
- 2 Syama Prasad and Hindu Mahasabha’s Ascendancy in Indian Politics, 1938−1944
- 3 Syama Prasad and Hindu Mahasabha’s Transitory Resuscitation after Reverses, 1945−1947
- 4 Syama Prasad’s Achievements as the Central Cabinet Minister, 1947−1950
- 5 Syama Prasad and the Establishment of Bharatiya Jana Sangh, 1950−1953
- 6 Conclusion
- Appendix I Proceedings of the Hindu Mahasabha Working Committee under the Presidency of Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee which laid down Mahasabha Policy Towards the Congress, January 1945
- Appendix II The Great Calcutta Killing – Who is Responsible
- Appendix III Asutosh Lahiry, General Secretary, All-India Hindu Mahasabha, to Governor of Bengal and Secretary of State of India, on Noakhali Riot
- Appendix IV Indian Legislative Assembly Debates,Vol. 8 (1946) pp. 1053–55
- Appendix V Letter to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru dated 15 April 1950 by Dr S. P. Mookerjee tendering resignation from the Central Cabinet and replies dated 15 April 1950 from Prime Minister and Speaker
- Appendix VI Presidential speech by Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee at the Annual Function of R.S.S. (Rastriya Swayamsevak Sangh) New Delhi on 3rd December, 1950
- Appendix VII Programme of Bharatiya Jana Sangh
- Bibliography
- Index
Appendix II - The Great Calcutta Killing – Who is Responsible
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2022
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- 1 Syama Prasad as the Finance Minister of Bengal, 1941−1942
- 2 Syama Prasad and Hindu Mahasabha’s Ascendancy in Indian Politics, 1938−1944
- 3 Syama Prasad and Hindu Mahasabha’s Transitory Resuscitation after Reverses, 1945−1947
- 4 Syama Prasad’s Achievements as the Central Cabinet Minister, 1947−1950
- 5 Syama Prasad and the Establishment of Bharatiya Jana Sangh, 1950−1953
- 6 Conclusion
- Appendix I Proceedings of the Hindu Mahasabha Working Committee under the Presidency of Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee which laid down Mahasabha Policy Towards the Congress, January 1945
- Appendix II The Great Calcutta Killing – Who is Responsible
- Appendix III Asutosh Lahiry, General Secretary, All-India Hindu Mahasabha, to Governor of Bengal and Secretary of State of India, on Noakhali Riot
- Appendix IV Indian Legislative Assembly Debates,Vol. 8 (1946) pp. 1053–55
- Appendix V Letter to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru dated 15 April 1950 by Dr S. P. Mookerjee tendering resignation from the Central Cabinet and replies dated 15 April 1950 from Prime Minister and Speaker
- Appendix VI Presidential speech by Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee at the Annual Function of R.S.S. (Rastriya Swayamsevak Sangh) New Delhi on 3rd December, 1950
- Appendix VII Programme of Bharatiya Jana Sangh
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Speech of Dr S.P. Mookerjee at the Bengal Legislative Assembly on 20th September 1946 in support of the no confidence motion against the Muslim League Ministry headed by Mr H.S. Suhrawardy for the responsibility of the ‘Great Calcutta Killing’, on 16th August, 1946 the ‘Direct Action Day’ called by Mr M.A. Jinnah, President of Muslim League.
Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee: Mr Speaker, Sir, since yesterday we have been discussing the motions of non-confidence under circumstances which perhaps have no parallel in the deliberation of any legislature in any part of the civilised world. What happened in Calcutta is without a parallel in modern history. St Bartholomew's Day of which history records some grim events of murder and butchery pales into insignificance compared to the brutalities that were committed in the streets, lanes and by-lanes of this first city of British India. We have been discussing, Sir, as to the genesis of these disturbances. Time will not permit me to go through the detailed history and course of events during the last few years. But let me say this that what has happened is not the result of a sudden explosion, but it is the culmination of an administration, inefficient, corrupt and communal, which has disfigured the life of this great province. But so far as the immediate cause is concerned, rightly reference has been made by members belonging to the Muslim League and also to the opposition that we have to look to the resolution that was passed at Bombay at the all-India session of the Council of the Muslim League. Now what happened there? It is said, on behalf of the Muslim League that the Cabinet Mission proved faithless to Muslim interests and thereby created a situation which has had no parallel in the history of Anglo-Muslim relationship in this country. What did actually the Cabinet Mission do? The Muslim League, the spoilt and pampered child of the British imperialists for the last thirty years, was disowned for the first time by the British Labour Government … (Loud noise from the Government benches) … I know it that members, when they hear the bitter truth, can hardly repress their feelings.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Syama Prasad Mookerjee and Indian Politics , pp. 337 - 348Publisher: Foundation BooksPrint publication year: 2010