from PART I - GENERAL TOPICS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2015
Before modeling either of the two alternative sources of spatial dependence inherent in Galton's problem via a spatial lag or spatial error model, the researcher first has to determine whether her data exhibit spatial dependence. Is there spatial autocorrelation in the behavior or process the social scientist is seeking to explain? The first step in a spatial analysis involving areal data is to diagnose this spatial dependence in the absence of covariates. A variety of tests exist to diagnose univariate spatial autocorrelation in the absence of covariates. This chapter examines these tests and demonstrates how social scientists can employ them in their research.
The chapter is structured as follows. First, I examine global tests for spatial autocorrelation, which diagnose dependence in the data as a whole. Next, I examine local tests for spatial autocorrelation, which diagnose the particular units that are spatially autocorrelated with their neighbors (where neighbors are defined utilizing a neighbor definition such as those discussed in Chapter 2). Here, a particularly important class of statistics for local spatial autocorrelation, local indicators of spatial association (LISA) statistics, is examined in detail. The spatial dependence diagnosed via global and local measures of spatial autocorrelation may not reflect true spatial dependence, but instead, a second type of spatial effect, spatial heterogeneity. This spatial heterogeneity, the topic of Chapter 7, is examined briefly. The chapter concludes by discussing the global and local tests for spatial autocorrelation examined in this chapter and previewing the modeling of spatial dependence in Chapter 5. Throughout the chapter, diagnostics for spatial dependence are demonstrated utilizing a set of empirical applications to civil wars, poverty rates, partisan voting, and legislative roll-call voting behavior.
GLOBAL MEASURES OF SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION
Tests for spatial autocorrelation in areal data can proceed at either the global or local levels. Tests for global spatial autocorrelation examine whether the data as a whole exhibit spatial autocorrelation (against a null of spatial randomness) as well as the strength and direction (positive or negative) of any spatial autocorrelation. Tests for local spatial autocorrelation (again, against a null of spatial randomness) identify particular observations that are autocorrelated with neighboring observations on the random variable of interest and also determine the strength and, depending on the statistic, also the direction of this spatial autocorrelation.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.