Book contents
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Part I National Constitutions and Sociological Method
- Part II Constitutional Sociology between the National and the Transnational
- 4 Constitutionalism between Nation States and Global Law
- 5 Politics and the Political in Sociological Constitutionalism
- 6 Constitutions as Symbolic Orders
- 7 The Rule of the Market
- Part III Constitutional Law and Transnational Society
- Index
- References
7 - The Rule of the Market
Economic Constitutionalism Understood Sociologically
from Part II - Constitutional Sociology between the National and the Transnational
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 October 2017
Book contents
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Sociological Constitutionalism
- Part I National Constitutions and Sociological Method
- Part II Constitutional Sociology between the National and the Transnational
- 4 Constitutionalism between Nation States and Global Law
- 5 Politics and the Political in Sociological Constitutionalism
- 6 Constitutions as Symbolic Orders
- 7 The Rule of the Market
- Part III Constitutional Law and Transnational Society
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sociological Constitutionalism , pp. 241 - 264Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (eds) (1998). Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Albert, Gert (2007). ‘Idealtypen und das Ziel der Soziologie’, Berliner Journal für Soziologie, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 51–75.Google Scholar
Beckert, Jens and Streeck, Wolfgang, (2008). ‘Economic Sociology and Political Economy: A Programmatic Perspective’. MPIfG Working Paper 08/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies [http://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp08-4.pdf].Google Scholar
Berman, Harold J. (2003). Law and Revolution, II. The Impact of the Protestant Reformations on the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blokker, Paul (2012). ‘Constitutions and Democracy in Post-National Times: A Political-Sociological Approach’, Irish Journal of Sociology, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 68–90.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel (1998). ‘Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics’, in Callon, Michel (ed.), The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–57.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile, 1984 [orig. 1893]. The Division of Labour in Society. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. (2004). ‘Rivers of Law and Contested Terrain: A Law and Society Approach to Economic Rationality’, Law and Society Review, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 181–197.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, and Teubner, Gunther (2004). ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search For Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 999–1046.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979 (edited by Sennelart, Michel). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine (2008). Judicial Governance in der europäischen Rechtsgemeinschaft: Integration durch Recht jenseits des Staates. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine (2009). ‘The Legal Constitution of Market Society: Probing the Economic Sociology of Law’, Economic Sociology – European Electronic Newsletter, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 20–25 [http://econsoc.mpifg.de/archive/econ_soc_10–3.pdf].Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine (2010). ‘Constitutional Ideal Types in the Global Age: A Sociological Review’, in Tuori, Kaarlo and Sankari, Suvi (eds), The Many Constitutions of Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 69–88.Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine (2011). ‘Re-embedding Neo-liberal Constitutionalism: A Polanyian Case for the Economic Sociology of Law’, in Joerges, Christian, and Falke, Josef (eds), Karl Polanyi, Globalisation and the Potential of Law in Transnational Markets. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 65–84.Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine (2012). What Constitutes the Market Society? Studies in the Economic Sociology of Law. Habilitation thesis, University of Bamberg.Google Scholar
Frerichs, Sabine (2016). ‘The Law of Market Society: A Sociology of International Economic Law and Beyond’, Finnish Yearbook of International Law 2012/2013, Vol. 23, pp. 173–237.Google Scholar
Gephart, Werner (1993). Gesellschaftstheorie und Recht: Das Recht im soziologischen Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Gephart, Werner (2003). Einführung in die Rechtssoziologie Max Webers. Vorlesung im Sommersemester 2003. [https://www.politik-soziologie.uni-bonn.de/de/institut/lehrkoerper/kaete-hamburger-kolleg-recht-als-kultur/prof.-dr.-werner-gephart/Gephart_Webers_Rechtssoziologie_SS03.doc].Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark (1985). ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 481–510.Google Scholar
Grundmann, Stefan (2008). ‘The Concept of the Private Law Society: After 50 Years of European and European Business Law’, European Review of Private Law, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 553–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heise, Michael (2013). Emerging from the Euro Debt Crisis: Making the Single Currency Work. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul (1994). Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Christopher (2014). ‘“Whatever It Takes”: Polanyian Perspectives on the Eurozone Crisis and the Gold Standard’, Economy and Society, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 582–602.Google Scholar
Joerges, Christian (2005). ‘What is Left of the European Economic Constitution? A Melancholic Eulogy’, European Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 461–489.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan (2006). ‘Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850–2000’, in Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.), The New Law and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Lang, Andrew T.F. (2013). ‘The Legal Construction of Economic Rationalities’, Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 155–171.Google Scholar
Lindbekk, Tore (1992). ‘The Weberian Ideal-type: Development and Continuities’, Acta Sociologica, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 285–297.Google Scholar
Menéndez, Agustín José (2013) ‘The Existential Crisis of the European Union’, German Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 453–526.Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf (2009). ‘Global Legal Pluralism’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 5, pp. 243–262.Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf (2011). ‘Of Islands and the Ocean: The Two Rationalities of European Private Law’, in Brownsword, Roger, Micklitz, Hans-W., Niglia, Leone, Weatherill, Stephen (eds), The Foundations of European Private Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 139–158.Google Scholar
Münch, Richard and Frerichs, Sabine (2008). ‘Markt und Moral: Transnationale Arbeitsteilung und Netzwerksolidarität’, in Maurer, Andrea (ed.), Handbuch der Wirtschaftssoziologie. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 394–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1872). Die Geburt der Tragödie aus dem Geiste der Musik. Leipzig: Verlag von F. W. Fritzsch.Google Scholar
O’Hara, Erin A. and Ribstein, Larry E. (2009). The Law Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ortino, Federico and Ortino, Matteo (2008). ‘Law of the Global Economy: In Need of a New Methodological Approach?’, in Picker, Colin B., Bunn, Isabella D. and Arner, Douglas W. (eds), International Economic Law: The State and Future of the Discipline. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 89–106.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (2011), ‘The Future of International Economic Law: A Research Agenda’, in Joerges, Christian and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and International Economic Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 533–575.Google Scholar
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (2012). ‘Methodological Pluralism and Its Critics in International Economic Law Research’, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 921–970.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl (1996) [orig. 1947]. ‘Our Obsolete Market Mentality’, in Swedberg, Richard (ed.), Economic Sociology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 146–154.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl (2001) [orig. 1957]. ‘The Economy as Instituted Process’, in Granovetter, Mark and Swedberg, Richard (eds.), The Sociology of Economic Life (second edition). Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
Rex, John, (1977). ‘Value-Relevance, Scientific Laws, and Ideal Types: The Sociological Methodology of Max Weber’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 151–166.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard (1982). ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, International Organization, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 379–415.Google Scholar
Sauter, Wolf (1998). ‘The Economic Constitution of the European Union’, Columbia Journal of European Law, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 27–68.Google Scholar
Sciarra, Silvana (2001). ‘Integration Through Courts: Article 177 as a Pre-federal Device’, in Sciarra, Silvana (ed.), Labour Law in the Courts. National Judges and the European Court of Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang (2009). Re-forming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Supiot, Alain (2007). Homo Juridicus: On the Anthropological Function of the Law. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard (2003). ‘The Case for an Economic Sociology of Law’, Theory and Society, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Swedberg, Richard (2006). ‘Max Weber’s Contribution to the Economic Sociology of Law’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 2, pp. 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. (2008). ‘Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global’, Sydney Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 375–411.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (2011). ‘Constitutionalizing Polycontexturality’, Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 210–229.Google Scholar
Thomasberger, Claus (2015). ‘Europe at a Crossroads: Failed Ideas, Fictional Facts, and Fatal Consequences’, Forum for Social Economics, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 179–200.Google Scholar
Thornhill, Chris (2011). A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaarlo (2010). ‘The Many Constitutions of Europe’, in Tuori, Kaarlo and Sankari, Suvi (eds), The Many Constitutions of Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Tuori, Kaarlo (2015). European Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Tuori, Kaarlo and Tuori, Klaus (2014). The Eurozone Crisis: A Constitutional Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil (2002). ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’, Modern Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 317–359.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1978) [orig. 1922]. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, edited by Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1981) [orig. 1913]. ‘Some Categories of Interpretive Sociology’, Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 151–180.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (2004) [orig. 1904]. ‘The “Objectivity” of Knowledge in Social Science and Social Policy’, in Whimster, Sam (ed.), Essential Weber: A Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 359–404.Google Scholar
Wilsher, Daniel (2014). ‘Law and the Financial Crisis: Searching for Europe’s New Gold Standard’, European Law Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 241–283.Google Scholar
Zafirovski, Milan (2001). ‘Sociology of Economics or Sociology of Economy? Theoretical-Methodological Arguments for Sociological Economics’, Forum for Social Economics, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 27–58.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by