Walker, PD, Cavallo, T, Bonsib, SM, Ad Hoc Committee on Renal Biopsy Guidelines of the Renal Pathology Society. Practice guidelines for the renal biopsy. Mod Pathol 2004;17(12):1555–1563.Google Scholar

Isse, K, Grama, K, Abbott, IM, et al. Adding value to liver (and allograft) biopsy evaluation using a combination of multiplex quantum dot immunostaining, high-resolution whole-slide digital imaging, and automated image analysis. Clin Liver Dis 2010;14(4):669–685.Google Scholar

Isse, K, Lesniak, A, Grama, K, et al. Digital transplantation pathology: combining whole slide imaging, multiplex staining and automated image analysis. Am J Transplant 2012;12(1):27–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Macedo, C, Walters, JT, Orkis, EA, et al. Long-term effects of alemtuzumab on regulatory and memory T-cell subsets in kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2012;93(8):813–821.Google Scholar

Kyriacou, K, Nearchou, M, Zouvani, I, et al. The Many Faces of Thin Basement Membrane Nephropathy; A Population Based Study. In Mubarrak, M (Ed.), Topics in Renal Biopsy and Pathology, InTech, 2012.Google Scholar

Rojo, MG, Garcia, GB, Mateos, CP, Garcia, JG, Vicente, MC. Critical comparison of 31 commercially available digital slide systems in pathology. Int J Surg Pathol 2006;14(4):285–305.Google Scholar

Rottenfusser, R, Wilson, EE, Davidson, MW. Numerical Aperture and Resolution. Available from: http://zeiss-campus.magnet.fsu.edu/articles/basics/resolution.htmlGoogle Scholar

Keller, H, Spring, K, Long, J, Davidson, M. Optical Microscopy Primer: Physics of Light and Color. 2015; Available from: www.micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/aberrations/chromatic/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Montalto, MC, McKay, RR, Filkins, RJ. Autofocus methods of whole slide imaging systems and the introduction of a second-generation independent dual sensor scanning method. J Pathol Inform 2011;2:44.Google Scholar

Yagi, Y, Gilbertson, JR. Digital pathology from the past to the future. J eHealth Technol Appl 2010;8(2):73–80.Google Scholar

Thorstenson, S. DIGITAL ROUTINE HISTOPATHOLOGY The future is here! 2010; Available from: www.telepathology2010.com/uploads/_fck/1_vilnius_digital_routine_histopathology_[compatibility_mode].pdfGoogle Scholar

Velez, N, Jukic, D, Ho, J. Evaluation of 2 whole-slide imaging applications in dermatopathology. Hum Pathol 2008;39(9):1341–1349.Google Scholar

Evered, A, Dudding, N. Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology. Cytopathology 2011;22(2):82–87.Google Scholar

Varga, VS, Molnár, B, Virág, T. Automated high throughput whole slide imaging using area sensors, flash light illumination and solid state light engine. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012;179:187–202.Google ScholarPubMed

Gustashaw, K, Najmabadi, P, Potts, S. Measuring protein expression in tissue: the complementary roles of brightfield and fluorescence in whole slide scanning. Lab Med 2010;41(3):135–142.Google Scholar

Varga, VS, Ficsor, L, Kamarás, V, et al. Automated multichannel fluorescent whole slide imaging and its application for cytometry. Cytometry A 2009;75(12):1020–1030.Google Scholar

Ghaznavi, F, Evans, A, Madabhushi, A, Feldman, M. Digital imaging in pathology: whole-slide imaging and beyond. Annu Rev Pathol 2013;8:331–359.Google Scholar

Price, JH, Gough, DA. Comparison of phase-contrast and fluorescence digital autofocus for scanning microscopy. Cytometry 1994;16(4):283–297.Google Scholar

North, AJ. Seeing is believing? A beginners’ guide to practical pitfalls in image acquisition. J Cell Biol 2006;172(1):9–18.Google Scholar

Riley, RS, Ben-Ezra, JM, Massey, D, Slyter, RL, Romagnoli, G. Digital photography: a primer for pathologists. J Clin Lab Anal 2004;18(2):91–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davidson, M. Education in Microscopy and Digital Imaging. 04/24/2015]; Available from: http://zeiss-campus.magnet.fsu.edu/articles/basics/digitalimaging.htmlGoogle Scholar

Krupinski, EA, Johnson, JP, Jaw, S, Graham, AR, Weinstein, RS. Compressing pathology whole-slide images using a human and model observer evaluation. J Pathol Inform 2012;3:17.Google Scholar

Sharma, A, Bautista, P, Yagi, Y. Balancing image quality and compression factor for special stains whole slide images. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 2012;35(2):101–106.Google Scholar

Faas, FG, Avramut, MC, van den Berg, BM, et al. Virtual nanoscopy: generation of ultra-large high resolution electron microscopy maps. J Cell Biol 2012;198(3):457–469.Google Scholar

D’Agati, VD, Mengel, M. The rise of renal pathology in nephrology: structure illuminates function. Am J Kidney Dis 2013;61(6):1016–1025.Google Scholar

Kim, SC, Page, EK, Knechtle, SJ. Urine proteomics in kidney transplantation. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2014;28(1):15–20.Google Scholar

Sigdel, TK, Ng, YW, Lee, S, et al. Perturbations in the urinary exosome in transplant rejection. Front Med (Lausanne) 2014;1:57.Google Scholar

Sigdel, TK, Salomonis, N, Nicora, CD, et al. The identification of novel potential injury mechanisms and candidate biomarkers in renal allograft rejection by quantitative proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2014;13(2):621–631.Google Scholar

Bestard, O, Cruzado, JM, la Franquesa, M, Grinyo, JM. Biomarkers in renal transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2010;15(4):467–473.Google Scholar

Morath, C, Zeier, M. Transplantation: molecular diagnosis of kidney transplant rejection. Nat Rev Nephrol 2014;10(8):429–430.Google Scholar

Al-Kofahi, Y, Lassoued, W, Grama, K, et al. Cell-based quantification of molecular biomarkers in histopathology specimens. Histopathology 2011;59(1):40–54.Google Scholar

Chan, P, Yuen, T, Ruf, F, Gonzalez-Maeso, J, Sealfon, SC. Method for multiplex cellular detection of mRNAs using quantum dot fluorescent in situ hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33(18):e161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Choi, Y, Kim, HP, Hong, SM, et al. In situ visualization of gene expression using polymer-coated quantum-dot–DNA conjugates. Small 2009;5(18):2085–2091.Google Scholar

Isse, K, Specht, SM, Lunz, JG, 3rd, et al. Estrogen stimulates female biliary epithelial cell interleukin-6 expression in mice and humans. Hepatology 2010;51(3):869–880.Google Scholar

Isse, K, Lesniak, A, Grama, K, et al. Preexisting epithelial diversity in normal human livers: a tissue-tethered cytometric analysis in portal/periportal epithelial cells. Hepatology 2013;57(4):1632–1643.Google Scholar

Sweeney, E, Ward, TH, Gray, N, et al. Quantitative multiplexed quantum dot immunohistochemistry. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008;374(2):181–186.Google Scholar

Tholouli, E, Hoyland, JA, Di Vizio, D, et al. Imaging of multiple mRNA targets using quantum dot based in situ hybridization and spectral deconvolution in clinical biopsies. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006;348(2):628–636.Google Scholar

Tholouli, E, Sweeney, E, Barrow, E, et al. Quantum dots light up pathology. J Pathol 2008;216(3):275–285.Google Scholar

Nederlof, M, Watanabe, S, Burnip, B, Taylor, DL, Critchley-Thorne, R. High-throughput profiling of tissue and tissue model microarrays: combined transmitted light and 3-color fluorescence digital pathology. J Pathol Inform 2011;2:50.Google Scholar

Ho, J, Ahlers, SM, Stratman, C, et al. Can digital pathology result in cost savings? A financial projection for digital pathology implementation at a large integrated health care organization. J Pathol Inform 2014;5:33.Google Scholar

Forman, LM, Lewis, JD, Berlin, JA, Feldman, HI, Lucey, MR. The association between hepatitis C infection and survival after orthotopic liver transplantation. Gastroenterology 2002;122(4):889–896.Google Scholar

Hipp, J, Cheng, J, Pantanowitz, L, et al. Image microarrays (IMA): digital pathology’s missing tool. J Pathol Inform 2011;2:47.Google Scholar

Haas, M. A reevaluation of routine electron microscopy in the examination of native renal biopsies. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997;8(1):70–76.Google Scholar

Cornish, TC, Swapp, RE, Kaplan, KJ. Whole-slide imaging: routine pathologic diagnosis. Adv Anat Pathol 2012;19(3):152–159.Google Scholar

McClintock, DS, Lee, RE, Gilbertson, JR. Using computerized workflow simulations to assess the feasibility of whole slide imaging full adoption in a high-volume histology laboratory. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 2012;35(1):57–64.Google Scholar

Brady, DJ, Gehm, ME, Stack, RA, et al. Multiscale gigapixel photography. Nature 2012;486(7403):386–389.Google Scholar

Youn, SH, Son, HS, Marks, DL, et al. Optical performance test and validation of microcameras in multiscale, gigapixel imagers. Opt Express 2014;22(3):3712–3723.Google Scholar

Xu, Z, Ke, J, Lam, EY. High-resolution lightfield photography using two masks. Opt Express 2012;20(10):10971–10983.Google Scholar

Cornish, TC, McClintock, DS. Medicolegal and regulatory aspects of whole slide imaging-based telepathology. Diagn Histopathol 2014;20(12):475–481.Google Scholar

Rojo, MG, Castro, AM, Goncalves, L. COST Action “EuroTelepath”: digital pathology integration in electronic health record, including primary care centres. Diagn Pathol 2011;6(Suppl 1):S6.Google Scholar

Specht, S, Isse, K, Nozaki, I, Lunz, JG, 3rd, Demetris, AJ. SPRR2A expression in cholangiocarcinoma increases local tumor invasiveness but prevents metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis 2013;30(7):877–890.Google Scholar

Aswani, K, Jinadasa, Y, Brown, C. Fluorescence microscopy light sources. Microscopy Today 2012;20:22–28.Google Scholar

Huisman, A, Looijen, A, van den Brink, SM, van Diest, PJ. Creation of a fully digital pathology slide archive by high-volume tissue slide scanning. Hum Pathol 2010;41(5):751–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pantanowitz, L, Dickinson, K, Evans, AJ, et al. American Telemedicine Association clinical guidelines for telepathology. J Pathol Inform 2014;5:39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DICOM Standards Committee WG, Pathology. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Supplement 145: Whole Slide Microscopic Image IOD and SOP Classes. [cited 2015 4/25]; Available from: ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/dicom/final/sup145_ft.pdfGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, J. CAP Diagnostic Work Station. Cited 2015; available from: www.cap.org/apps/docs/snomed/documents/diagnostic_work_station_information_sheet.pdfGoogle Scholar

Anderson, N. Technical Performance Assessment of Digital Pathology Whole Slide Imaging Devices; Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff; Availability. Cited 2015; available from: https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%;2F%Google Scholar

Daniel, C, Rojo, MG, Klossa, J, et al. Standardizing the use of whole slide images in digital pathology. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2011;35:496–505.Google Scholar

Jara-Lazaro, AR, Thamboo, TP, Teh, M, Tan, PH. Digital pathology: exploring its applications in diagnostic surgical pathology practice. Pathology 2010;42(6):512–518.Google Scholar

Pantanowitz, L, Wiley, CA, Demetris, A, et al. Experience with multimodality telepathology at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. J Pathol Inform 2012;3:45.Google Scholar

Wiley, CA, Murdoch, G, Parwani, A, et al. Interinstitutional and interstate teleneuropathology. J Pathol Inform 2011;2:21.Google Scholar

Daniel, C, Macary, F, Rojo, MG, et al. Recent advances in standards for Collaborative Digital Anatomic Pathology. Diagn Pathol 2011;6(Suppl 1):S17.Google Scholar

Brennan, DJ, O’Connor, DP, Rexhepaj, E, Ponten, F, Gallagher, WM. Antibody-based proteomics: fast-tracking molecular diagnostics in oncology. Nature Rev Cancer 2010;10(9):605–617.Google Scholar

Carrein, G. White Paper In Plane Switching-Pro technology for medical imaging. 2007 [cited 2015 9/18/2015]. Available from: www.barco.com/barcoview/downloads/An_Introduction_to_IPS_pro_LCD_Technology.pdfGoogle Scholar

Yagi, Y. Color standardization and optimization in whole slide imaging. Diagn Pathology 2011;6(Suppl 1):S15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Open Slide. Cited 2015; available from: http://openslide.orgGoogle Scholar

Della Mea, V, Demichelis, F, Viel, F, Dalla Palma, P, Beltrami, CA. User attitudes in analyzing digital slides in a quality control test bed: a preliminary study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006;82(2):177–186.Google Scholar

Jen, KY, Olson, JL, Brodsky, S, et al. Reliability of whole slide images as a diagnostic modality for renal allograft biopsies. Hum Pathol 2013;44(5):888–894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pantanowitz, L, Sinard, JH, Henricks, WH, et al. Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013;137(12):1710–1722.Google Scholar

Têtu, B. [The Canadian association of pathology guidelines for establishing a diagnostic telepathology service using whole slide imaging]. Ann Pathol 2014;34(4):256–257.Google Scholar

Bernard, C, Chandrakanth, SA, Cornell, IS, et al. Guidelines from the Canadian Association of Pathologists for establishing a telepathology service for anatomic pathology using whole-slide imaging. J Pathol Inform 2014;5:15.Google Scholar

Leung, ST, Kaplan, KJ. Medicolegal aspects of telepathology. Hum Pathol 2009;40(8):1137–1142.Google Scholar

Al-Janabi, S, Huisman, A, Vink, A, et al. Whole slide images for primary diagnostics of gastrointestinal tract pathology: a feasibility study. Hum Pathol 2011;43:707–707.Google Scholar

Al-Janabi, S, Huisman, A, Vink, A, et al. Whole slide images for primary diagnostics in dermatopathology: a feasibility study. J Clin Pathol 2012;65(2):152–158.Google Scholar

Buck, TP, Dilorio, R, Havrilla, L, O’Neill, DG. Validation of a whole slide imaging system for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology: a community hospital experience. J Pathol Inform 2014;5:43.Google Scholar

Krishnamurthy, S, Mathews, K, McClure, S, et al. Multi-institutional comparison of whole slide digital imaging and optical microscopy for interpretation of hematoxylin–eosin-stained breast tissue sections. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013;137(12):1733–1739.Google Scholar

Thomas, L, Capistrant, G. 50 State Telemedicine Gaps Analysis Physician Practice Standards & Licensure. American Telemedicine Association; 2014.Google Scholar

Federation of State Medical Boards web site. Telemedicineoverview: board by board approach. 2015 Available from: www.fsmb.org/pdf/grpol_telemedicine_licensure.pdfGoogle Scholar

Giambrone, D, Rao, BK, Esfahani, A, Rao, S. Obstacles hindering the mainstream practice of teledermatopathology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014;71(4):772–780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hiemenz, MC, Leung, ST, Park, JY. Crossing boundaries: a comprehensive survey of medical licensing laws and guidelines regulating the interstate practice of pathology. Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38(3):e1–5.Google Scholar

Chaudhry, HJ, Robin, LA, Fish, EM, Polk, DH, Gifford, JD. Improving access and mobility – the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact. N Engl J Med 2015;372(17):1581–1583.Google Scholar

Hamilton, PW, Bankhead, P, Wang, Y, et al. Digital pathology and image analysis in tissue biomarker research. Methods 2014;70(1):59–73.Google Scholar

Wick, MR. Medicolegal liability in surgical pathology: a consideration of underlying causes and selected pertinent concepts. Semin Diagn Pathol 2007;24(2):89–97.Google Scholar

Antoniotti, NM, Drude, KP, Rowe, N. Private payer telehealth reimbursement in the United States. Telemed J eHealth 2014;20(6):539–543.Google Scholar

Al-Janabi, S, Huisman, A, Jonges, GN, et al. Whole slide images for primary diagnostics of urinary system pathology: a feasibility study. J Renal Inj Prev 2014;3(4):91–96.Google Scholar

Tworek, JA, Volmar, KE, McCall, SJ, Bashleben, CP, Howanitz, PJ. Q-Probes studies in anatomic pathology: quality improvement through targeted benchmarking. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014;138(9):1156–1166.Google Scholar

Wu, X, Liu, H, Liu, J, et al. Immunofluorescent labeling of cancer marker Her2 and other cellular targets with semiconductor quantum dots. Nat Biotechnol 2003;21(1):41–46.Google Scholar

InVitrogen. Qdot® Streptavidin Conjugates. Cited 2015; Available from: https://tools.lifetechnologies.com/content/sfs/manuals/mp19000.pdfGoogle Scholar

Fountaine, TJ, Wincovitch, SM, Geho, DH, Garfield, SH, Pittaluga, S. Multispectral imaging of clinically relevant cellular targets in tonsil and lymphoid tissue using semiconductor quantum dots. Mod Pathol 2006;19(9):1181–1191.Google Scholar

Toso, C, Isse, K, Demetris, AJ, et al. Histologic graft assessment after clinical islet transplantation. Transplantation 2009;88(11):1286–1293.Google Scholar

Chan, WC, Nie, S. Quantum dot bioconjugates for ultrasensitive nonisotopic detection. Science 1998;281(5385):2016–2018.Google Scholar

Levenson, RM, Mansfield, JR. Multispectral imaging in biology and medicine: slices of life. Cytometry Part A 2006;69(8):748–758.Google Scholar

Schubert, W, Gieseler, A, Krusche, A, Serocka, P, Hillert, R. Next-generation biomarkers based on 100-parameter functional super-resolution microscopy TIS. New Biotechnol 2012;29(5):599–610.Google Scholar

Mizuguchi, Y, Specht, S, Isse, K, et al. Breast tumor kinase/protein tyrosine kinase 6 (Brk/PTK6) activity in normal and neoplastic biliary epithelia. J Hepatol 2015;63:399–407.Google Scholar

Mizuguchi, Y, Isse, K, Specht, S, et al. Small proline rich protein 2a in benign and malignant liver disease. Hepatology 2014;59(3):1130–1143.Google Scholar

Snyder, A, Bahramali, H, Hawker, T, Mitchell, DJ. Savant-like numerosity skills revealed in normal people by magnetic pulses. Perception 2006;35(6):837–845.Google Scholar

Snyder, AW, Thomas, M. Autistic artists give clues to cognition. Perception 1997;26(1):93–96.Google Scholar

Prasad, K, Prabhu, GK. Image analysis tools for evaluation of microscopic views of immunohistochemically stained specimen in medical research – a review. J Med Syst 2012;36:2621–2631.Google Scholar

Rojo, MG, Bueno, G, Slodkowska, J. Review of imaging solutions for integrated quantitative immunohistochemistry in the Pathology daily practice. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2009;47(3):349–354.Google Scholar

Mansfield, JR. Multispectral imaging: a review of its technical aspects and applications in anatomic pathology. Vet Pathol 2014;51(1):185–210.Google Scholar

Webster, JD, Dunstan, RW. Whole-slide imaging and automated image analysis: considerations and opportunities in the practice of pathology. Vet Pathol 2014;51(1):211–223.Google Scholar

Kothari, S, Phan, JH, Stokes, TH, Wang, MD. Pathology imaging informatics for quantitative analysis of whole-slide images. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20(6):1099–1108.Google Scholar

ImageJ. Available from: http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Roysam, B. FarSight Toolkit. Available from: www.farsight-toolkit.orgGoogle Scholar

Definiens. Cited 2015; available from: www.definiens.comGoogle Scholar

Visiopharm. Cited 2015; available from: www.visiopharm.com/Google Scholar

Akakin, HC, Gurcan, MN. Content-based microscopic image retrieval system for multi-image queries. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2012;16(4):758–769.Google Scholar

Sharma, H, Alekseychuk, A, Leskovsky, P, et al. Determining similarity in histological images using graph-theoretic description and matching methods for content-based image retrieval in medical diagnostics. Diagn Pathol 2012;7:134.Google Scholar

Qi, X, Wang, D, Rodero, I, et al. Content-based histopathology image retrieval using CometCloud. BMC Bioinformatics 2014;15:287.Google Scholar

Jones, NC, Nazarian, RM, Duncan, LM, et al. Interinstitutional whole slide imaging teleconsultation service development: assessment using internal training and clinical consultation cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015;139:627–635.Google Scholar

Al-Janabi, S, Huisman, A, Van Diest, PJ. Digital pathology: current status and future perspectives. Histopathology 2012;61(1):1–9.Google Scholar

Pantanowitz, L, Valenstein, PN, Evans, AJ, Kaplan, KJ, Pfeifer, JD, Wilbur, DC et al. Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology. J Pathol Inform 2011;2:36.Google Scholar

Demetris, AJ, Ruppert, K, Ekong, U, et al. Prospective evaluation of histopathologic biopsy features that predict successful weaning and comparison to protocol follow-up biopsies 2 years after complete immunosuppression withdrawal in living-related pediatric liver allograft recipients. Hepatology 2010;52(4):6.Google Scholar

Garcia Rojo, M, Punys, V, Slodkowska, J, et al. Digital pathology in Europe: coordinating patient care and research efforts. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;150:997–1001.Google Scholar

Grimaldi, L, Silvestri, A, Brandi, C, et al. Digital epiluminescence dermoscopy for pigmented cutaneous lesions, primary care physicians, and telediagnosis: a useful tool? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62(8):1054–1058.Google Scholar

Houghton, JP, Ervine, AJ, Kenny, SL, et al. Concordance between digital pathology and light microscopy in general surgical pathology: a pilot study of 100 cases. J Clin Pathol 2014;67(12):1052–1055.Google Scholar

Minervini, MI, Yagi, Y, Marino, IR, et al. Development and experience with an integrated system for transplantation telepathology. Hum Pathol 2001;32(12):1334–1343.Google Scholar

Gilbertson, JR, Ho, J, Anthony, L, et al. Primary histologic diagnosis using automated whole slide imaging: a validation study. BMC Clin Pathol 2006;6:4.Google Scholar

Barisoni, L, Nast, CC, Jennette, JC, et al. Digital pathology evaluation in the multicenter Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;8(8):1449–1459.Google Scholar

Barisoni, L, Jennette, JC, Colvin, R, et al. Novel quantitative method to evaluate globotriaosylceramide inclusions in renal peritubular capillaries by virtual microscopy in patients with fabry disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012;136(7):816–824.Google Scholar

Ozluk, Y, Blanco, PL, Mengel, M, et al. Superiority of virtual microscopy versus light microscopy in transplantation pathology. Clin Transplant 2012;26(2):336–344.Google Scholar

Brazdziute, E, Laurinavicius, A. Digital pathology evaluation of complement C4d component deposition in the kidney allograft biopsies is a useful tool to improve reproducibility of the scoring. Diagn Pathol 2011;6(Suppl 1):S5.Google Scholar

Farris, AB, Chan, S, Climenhaga, J, et al. Banff fibrosis study: multicenter visual assessment and computerized analysis of interstitial fibrosis in kidney biopsies. Am J Transplant 2014;14(4):897–907.Google Scholar

Farris, AB, Adams, CD, Brousaides, N, et al. Morphometric and visual evaluation of fibrosis in renal biopsies. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011;22(1):176–186.Google Scholar

Denis, CJ, Van Acker, N, De Schepper, S, et al. Mapping of carboxypeptidase m in normal human kidney and renal cell carcinoma: expression in tumor-associated neovasculature and macrophages. J Histochem Cytochem 2013;61(3):218–235.Google Scholar

Yeh, FC, Parwani, AV, Pantanowitz, L, Ho, C. Automated grading of renal cell carcinoma using whole slide imaging. J Pathol Inform 2014;5:23.Google Scholar

Yeh, FC, Ye, Q, Hitchens, TK, et al. Mapping stain distribution in pathology slides using whole slide imaging. J Pathol Inform 2014;5:1.Google Scholar

WS Recognizer. Cited 2015; available from: http://ws-recognizer.labsolver.orgGoogle Scholar

Kakimoto, T, Okada, K, Hirohashi, Y, et al. Automated image analysis of a glomerular injury marker desmin in spontaneously diabetic Torii rats treated with losartan. J Endocrinol 2014;222(1):43–51.Google Scholar

Kakimoto, T, Okada, K, Fujitaka, K, et al. Quantitative analysis of markers of podocyte injury in the rat puromycin aminonucleoside nephropathy model. Exp Toxicol Pathol 2015;67(2):171–177.Google Scholar

Immune Tolerance Network. Available from: www.immunetolerance.orgGoogle Scholar

Feng, S, Ekong, UD, Lobritto, SJ, et al. Complete immunosuppression withdrawal and subsequent allograft function among pediatric recipients of parental living donor liver transplants. J Am Med Assoc 2012;307(3):283–293.Google Scholar

Feng, S, Demetris, AJ, Ekong, U, et al. Serum and Tissue DSA Subclass, Stellate and Endothelial Phenotype Monitoring in ITN029ST Tolerance Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients over 5+ Years of Follow-up. In: Joint International Conference of ILTS, ELITA & LICAGE; 2014; London; 2014.Google Scholar

Demetris, AJ, Ruppert, K, Ekong, U, et al. Morphometric and histopathologic analysis of protocol biopsies from stable, long-surviving pediatric recipients of living-related liver allografts: a comparison to liver age and sex-matched controls. Am J Transplant 2007;7:909.Google Scholar

Corista. Available from: www.corista.com/Google Scholar