Book contents
- Frontmatter
- ‘Henry IV’ and ‘Hamlet’
- Prince Hal and Tragic Style
- The True Prince and the False Thief: Prince Hal and the Shift of Identity
- Falstaff, the Prince, and the Pattern of ‘2 Henry IV’
- Whatever Happened to Prince Hal?: An Essay on ‘Henry V’
- ‘Henry V’ and the Bees’ Commonwealth
- ‘All’s Well that Ends Well’
- ‘Hamlet’ and the Power of Words
- Hamlet the Bonesetter
- ‘Hamlet’: A Time to Die
- Shakespeare, Lyly and Ovid: The Influence of ‘Gallathea’ on ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream’
- Making a Scene: Language and Gesture in ‘Coriolanus’
- Freedom and Loss in ‘The Tempest’
- Inigo Jones at The Cockpit
- Theory and Practice: Stratford 1976
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times, and Stage
- 3 Textual Studies
- Index
- Plate Section
3 - Textual Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2007
- Frontmatter
- ‘Henry IV’ and ‘Hamlet’
- Prince Hal and Tragic Style
- The True Prince and the False Thief: Prince Hal and the Shift of Identity
- Falstaff, the Prince, and the Pattern of ‘2 Henry IV’
- Whatever Happened to Prince Hal?: An Essay on ‘Henry V’
- ‘Henry V’ and the Bees’ Commonwealth
- ‘All’s Well that Ends Well’
- ‘Hamlet’ and the Power of Words
- Hamlet the Bonesetter
- ‘Hamlet’: A Time to Die
- Shakespeare, Lyly and Ovid: The Influence of ‘Gallathea’ on ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream’
- Making a Scene: Language and Gesture in ‘Coriolanus’
- Freedom and Loss in ‘The Tempest’
- Inigo Jones at The Cockpit
- Theory and Practice: Stratford 1976
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespearian Study 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times, and Stage
- 3 Textual Studies
- Index
- Plate Section
Summary
Although this review is not the appropriate place for extended obituary comment, the deaths, within one year, of A. C. Cairncross, J. W. Lever and J. C. Maxwell, must mark 1975–6 as a season of dreadful and irreplaceable loss to Shakespearian editing and textual studies and cannot pass unnoted. All three made important contributions to the revised Arden Shakespeare and Maxwell had the unique distinction of belonging as well to Dover Wilson’s team for the new Cambridge Shakespeare.
Coriolanus and Pericles, which may have been written in the same year but have little in common either as plays or in the tasks they offer to editors, are the latest volumes to appear, respectively, in the New Arden and New Penguin Shakespeares, the former edited by Philip Brockbank, the latter by Philip Edwards.
Brockbank's long introduction to Coriolanus, for all its divisions into sections on ‘The Text’ and ‘The Play’, is a seamless garment. His deepest engagement with the play is revealed in his commentary on Shakespeare's handling of his sources and in his pages on ‘The Tragedy of Coriolanus’, but the same questioning alertness which distinguishes his critical discussion is equally apparent in his treatment of the historical and technical issues of dating, stage history and text.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare Survey , pp. 203 - 210Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1977