Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:45:03.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Reconsideration of Edward III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2007

Get access

Summary

Since 1760, when Capell claimed that Edward III was written by Shakespeare, its authorship has been discussed by numerous critics. In the nineteenth century, Tennyson, Ward and Fleay believed that the Countess scenes were Shakespearian, while Swinburne, Saintsbury, Symonds and Moore Smith denied their authenticity. In the present century, Tucker Brooke, while admitting that these scenes were much more Shakespearian at first sight than the rest of the play, came to the conclusion that they were by the same author as the remaining scenes, and that this author was George Peele. F. W. Moorman argued that Shakespeare revised the play between 1590 and 1596, and that he completely rewrote the Countess scenes. R. M. Smith showed that Froissart provided the main source of the play, and that the Countess episode was derived from this source as well as from Painter’s Palace of Pleasure. Smith, however, went beyond the evidence when he concluded that the whole play must have been written “at one time by one playwright”, and that this playwright could not have been Shakespeare. At about the same time, Platt argued that as “Lilies that fester smell far worse than weeds” and “scarlet ornaments” were both more appropriate to their contexts in the Sonnets than to those in the play, the unknown author must have seen some of the sonnets in manuscript. Sir Edmund Chambers cautiously supported the view that Shakespeare wrote not only the Countess scenes, but also IV, iv. Finally, Alfred Hart, by means of vocabulary tests, came to the conclusion that the whole play must be either by Shakespeare or by some author unknown—not by Peele, Greene, or Marlowe.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare Survey , pp. 39 - 48
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×