Book contents
- Frontmatter
- The Power of Magic: From Endimion to The Tempest
- Reading The Tempest
- The Latter End of Prospero’s Commonwealth
- Henry VIII and the Deconstruction of History
- The Politics of Conscience in All is True (or Henry VIII)
- Shakespeare’s Romantic Innocents and the Misappropriation of the Romance Past: The Case of The Two Noble Kinsmen
- The Hand of John Fletcher in Double Falsehood
- ‘The Duke my Father’s Wrack’: The Innocence of the Restoration Tempest
- ‘Remember/First to Possess his Books’: The Appropriation of The Tempest 1700-1800
- The Tempest and After
- Poetry’s Sea-Changes: T. S. Eliot and The Tempest
- The New Function of Language in Shakespeare’s Pericles: Oath versus ‘Holy Word’
- The Discovery of The Rose Theatre: Some Implications
- The Origins of the Roxana and Messallina Illustrations
- Recycling the Early Histories: ‘The Wars of the Roses’ and ‘The Plantagenets’
- Shakespeare Production in England in 1989
- Professional Shakespeare Productions in the British Isles, January-December 1988
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespeare Studies: 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times, and Stage
- 3 Editions and Textual Studies
- Books Received
- Index
3 - Editions and Textual Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2007
- Frontmatter
- The Power of Magic: From Endimion to The Tempest
- Reading The Tempest
- The Latter End of Prospero’s Commonwealth
- Henry VIII and the Deconstruction of History
- The Politics of Conscience in All is True (or Henry VIII)
- Shakespeare’s Romantic Innocents and the Misappropriation of the Romance Past: The Case of The Two Noble Kinsmen
- The Hand of John Fletcher in Double Falsehood
- ‘The Duke my Father’s Wrack’: The Innocence of the Restoration Tempest
- ‘Remember/First to Possess his Books’: The Appropriation of The Tempest 1700-1800
- The Tempest and After
- Poetry’s Sea-Changes: T. S. Eliot and The Tempest
- The New Function of Language in Shakespeare’s Pericles: Oath versus ‘Holy Word’
- The Discovery of The Rose Theatre: Some Implications
- The Origins of the Roxana and Messallina Illustrations
- Recycling the Early Histories: ‘The Wars of the Roses’ and ‘The Plantagenets’
- Shakespeare Production in England in 1989
- Professional Shakespeare Productions in the British Isles, January-December 1988
- The Year's Contributions to Shakespeare Studies: 1 Critical Studies
- 2 Shakespeare’s Life, Times, and Stage
- 3 Editions and Textual Studies
- Books Received
- Index
Summary
The experience of watching Deborah Warner’s RSC production of King John in the Pit at the Barbican two days after having seen the whole Henry VI-Richard III cycle, adapted as The Plantagenets, in the main theatre convinced me that in King John scenes are more subtly and dramatically conceived than in the Henry VI plays. They are more apt to be built around conflicts within characters as well as between them, to pose moral dilemmas, to be sharpened by ironies and shaped by tensions, and to develop towards climax and resolution. The progress in Shakespeare’s art is apparent both in public scenes in which those motivated by ‘commodity’ manoeuvre to defend or enhance their power and in more private scenes in which individuals suffer the consequences of these political machinations. And the poetry is more complex, the verse more flexible. A. R. Braunmuller must surely be right in deciding, after a careful consideration of the matter, that the anonymous The Troublesome Reign of King John (1591) was not derivative from Shakespeare’s play but served as a source for it, and that ‘King John was composed and performed in the mid 1590s, most probably 1595–6’ (p. 15).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare Survey , pp. 255 - 270Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1991