Actsophia 2009. Actsophia LLC. App.Google Scholar

Addison, Joseph 1721. Works of the Right Honourable Joseph Addison.Google Scholar

Advertisement for ‘The Penny Shakespeare’. 1845. Publishers’ Circular 8:186 (16 June), advert number 670, p. 181.Google Scholar

Allentuck, Marcia 1976. ‘Sir Thomas Hanmer Instructs Francis Hayman: An Editor’s Notes to his Illustrator (1744)’, Shakespeare Quarterly 27: 288–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allott, Robert 1600. Englands Parnassus: or The Choysest Flowers of our Moderne Poets.Google Scholar

Andersen, Jennifer, and Sauer, Elizabeth (eds.) 2002. Books and Readers in Early Modern England: Material Studies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Dorothy 1980. ‘Reflections on Librarianship: Observations Arising from Examination of the Garrick Collection of Old Plays in the British Library’, British Library Journal 6: 1–6.Google Scholar

Anon. 1573. New custome.Google Scholar

Anon. 1591. The troublesome raigne of Iohn King of England.Google Scholar

Anon. 1592. Present remedies against the plague.Google Scholar

Anon. 1594a. A pleasant conceited historie, called the taming of a shrew.Google Scholar

Anon. 1594b. Present remedies against the plague.Google Scholar

Anon. 1594c. The true tragedie of Richard the third.Google Scholar

Anon. 1595. The lamentable tragedie of Locrine, the eldest sonne of King Brutus.Google Scholar

Anon. 1596a. A pleasant conceited comedie, called, A knacke to know an honest man.Google Scholar

Anon. 1596b. The raigne of King Edward the third.Google Scholar

Anon. 1605a. Captain Thomas Stukeley.Google Scholar

Anon. 1605b. The London prodigall.Google Scholar

Anon. 1607. The Merrie Conceited Jests of George Peele Gentleman.Google Scholar

Anon. 1609? Pimlyco. Or, Runne Red-Cap.Google Scholar

Anon. 1619. Two Wise Men And All The Rest Fooles.Google Scholar

Anon. 1648. Lord have Mercy upon us, or the Visitation at Oxford.Google Scholar

Anon. 1659. Lady Alimony.Google Scholar

Appignanesi, Richard 2007. The Tempest, illustrated by Duffield, Paul. London: SelfMadeHero.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas 1913. The ‘Summa Theologica’ of St. Thomas Aquinas. Trans. fathers of the English Dominican province. London: Burns Oates and Washbourne.Google Scholar

Arber, Edward 1875–94. A Transcript of the Registers of the Company of Stationers of London, 1554–1640 AD.Google Scholar

Argus (newspaper), story concerning Field, Richard, 29 June 1878: 586.Google Scholar

Ariosto, Lodovico 1591. Orlando furioso in English heroical verse, by Iohn Haringto[n].Google Scholar

Armin, Robert 1600. Quips upon Questions.Google Scholar

Austen, Jane 1816. Mansfield Park. 3 vols.Google Scholar

Babington, Gervase 1588. A profitable exposition of the Lords prayer, by way of questions and answers.Google Scholar

Bald, R. C. 1931. ‘“Assembled” Texts’, The Library. 4th ser. 12: 243–8.Google Scholar

Bald, R. C. 1938. Bibliographical Studies in the Beaumont & Fletcher Folio of 1647. London: Oxford University Press for the Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar

Baldwin, T. W. 1947. Shakespeare’s Five-Act Structure. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Bales, Peter 1590. The Writing Schoolmaster.Google Scholar

Banham, Rob 2007. ‘The Industrialization of the Book 1800–1900’, in Eliot, Simon and Rose, Jonathan (eds.) A Companion to the History of the Book. Oxford: Blackwell, 273–90.Google Scholar

Barnes, Barnabe 1593. Parthenophil and Parthenope.Google Scholar

Barnfield, Richard 1595. Cynthia. With certaine sonnets, and the legend of Cassandra.Google Scholar

Barnfield, Richard 1598. The encomion of Lady Pecunia.Google Scholar

Barroll, Leeds 1991. Politics, Plague and Shakespeare’s Theatre: The Stuart Years. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland 1977. ‘The Death of the Author’, in Image, Music Text, trans. Heath, Stephen. New York: Hill & Wang, 142–8.Google Scholar

Bate, Jonathan 2000. ‘Pictorial Shakespeare: Text, Stage, Illustration’, in Golden, Catherine J. (ed.) Book Illustrated: Text, Image, and Culture, 1770–1930, New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll Press, 31–59.Google Scholar

Bate, Jonathan, and Rasmussen, Eric (eds.) 2007. William Shakespeare: Complete Works. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Bawcutt, N. W. (ed.) 1991. Measure for Measure. By Shakespeare, William. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bawcutt, N. W. 1993. ‘Ralph Crane’s Transcript of A Game at Chess, Bodleian Manuscript Malone 25’, Collections XV. London: Malone Society.Google Scholar

Beal, Peter 1980. Catalogue of English Literary Manuscripts. https://celm2.dighum.kcl.ac.uk (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar

Beaumont, Francis, and Fletcher, John 1647. Comedies and Tragedies.Google Scholar

Beckerman, Bernard 1980. ‘The Persons Personated: Character Lists in English Renaissance Play Texts’, Poetry and Drama in the English Renaissance: in Honour of Professor Jiro Ozu. Tokyo: Kinokuniya Company Ltd., 61–70.Google Scholar

Bednarz, James 2001. Shakespeare and the Poets’ War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bell, J. 1773. The Tempest.Google Scholar

Benedetti, Jean 2001. David Garrick and the Birth of the Modern Theatre. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew 2005. The Author. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bennett, Stuart 2004. Trade Bookbinding in the British Isles 1660–1800. New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll Press.Google Scholar

Bentley, Gerald Eades 1941–68. The Jacobean and Caroline Stage. 7 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bentley, Gerald Eades 1971. The Profession of Dramatist in Shakespeare’s Time, 1590–1642. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Berger, Thomas L. 2007. ‘Shakespeare Writ Small: Early Single Editions of Shakespeare’s Plays’, in Murphy, Andrew (ed.) A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text. Oxford: Blackwell, 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Thomas L., and Massai, Sonia (eds.) 2014. The Paratexts in English Printed Drama to 1642. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergeron, David M. 2002. ‘The King’s Men’s King’s Men: Shakespeare and Folio Patronage’, in White, Paul Whitfield and Westfall, Suzanne R. (eds.) Shakespeare and Theatrical Patronage in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45–63.Google Scholar

Bertram, Paul 1981. White Spaces in Shakespeare: The Development of the Modern Text. Cleveland, Ohio: Bellflower Press.Google Scholar

Best, Michael 2009. ‘Standing in Rich Place: Electrifying the Multiple-Text Edition or, Every Text is Multiple’. College Literature 36.1: 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Best, Michael(ed.). n.d. Internet Shakespeare Editions. www.internetshakespeare.uvic.ca (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar

Bevington, David 2004. ‘Modern Spelling: The Hard Choices’, in Erne, Lukas and Kidnie, Margaret Jane (eds.) Textual Performances: The Modern Reproduction of Shakespeare’s Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 143–57.Google Scholar

Black, M. W., and Shaaber, M. A. (eds.) 1937. Shakespeare’s Seventeenth-Century Editors, 1632–1685. New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar

Blair, Ann 2010. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. Cambridge, Mass.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Blayney, Peter W. M. 1991. The First Folio of Shakespeare. Washington, DC: Folger Library Publications.Google Scholar

Blayney, Peter W. M. 1997. ‘The Publication of Playbooks’, in Cox, John and Kastan, David Scott (eds.) A New History of Early English Drama. New York: Columbia University Press, 383–422.Google Scholar

Blostein, David A. (ed.) 1978. Parasitaster or The Fawn. The Revels Plays. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Blostein, James 1825. Memoirs of the Life of John Philip Kemble, Esq. 2 vols. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green.Google Scholar

Boas, F. S. (ed.) 1968 [1929]. Elizabethan and other Essays. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar

Bodenham, John 1600. Bel-vedére: or The Garden of the Muses.Google Scholar

Bolden Auction Galleries. n.d. Lot 505. www.ukauctioneers.com/lots/1238417 (accessed June 2013). No longer available.Google Scholar

Bondy, Louis W. 1981. Miniature Books: Their History from the Beginnings to the Present Day. London: Sheppard.Google Scholar

Booth, Stephen (ed.). 1977. Shakespeare’s Sonnets. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Boswell, J., and Malone, E. (eds.) 1821. Plays and Poems of William Shakespeare. 21 vols. London: R. C. and J. Rivington.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson 1950–51. ‘Some Relations of Bibliography to Editorial Problems’, Studies in Bibliography 3: 37–62.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson 1955. On Editing Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Dramatists. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Library.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson 1962. Principles of Bibliographical Description. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson 1974. ‘Beggars Bush: A Reconstructed Prompt-Book and its Copy’, Studies in Bibliography 27: 114–36.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson 1982. ‘Historical Collation in an Old-Spelling Shakespeare Edition: Another View’, Studies in Bibliography 35: 234–58.Google Scholar

Bowers, Fredson 1990. ‘The Problem of Semi-Substantive Variants: An Example from the Shakespeare–Fletcher Henry VIII’, Studies in Bibliography 43: 80–95.Google Scholar

Bradbrook, Muriel 1964. ‘St. George for Spelling Reform! Social Implications of Orthography – Cheke to Whythorn; Mulcaster to Shakespeare’s Holofernes’, Shakespeare Quarterly 15: 129–41.Google Scholar

Brathwait, Richard 1631. Whimzies.Google Scholar

Brayman Hackel, Heidi 2005. Reading Material in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Briggs, Julia 1998. ‘“The Lady Vanishes”: Problems of Authorship and Editing in the Middleton Canon’, in Hill, W. Speed (ed.) New Ways of Looking at Old Texts, II: Papers of the Renaissance English Text Society, 1992–1996. Tempe, Ariz.: Medieval & Renaissance Text & Studies in conjunction with Renaissance English Text Society, 109–20.Google Scholar

Briggs, Julia (ed.) 2007. The Lady’s Tragedy, in Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John (eds.) Thomas Middleton: The Collected Works. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 833–906.Google Scholar

Brinsley, John 1662. The Christians cabala.Google Scholar

Bristow, Richard 1580. A reply to Fulke, In defense of M. D. Allens scroll of articles.Google Scholar

Brooke, Christopher 1614. Ghost of Richard the Third.Google Scholar

Brooks, Douglas 1998. From Playhouse to Printing House: Drama and Authorship in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Arthur (ed.) 1953. The Captives by Thomas Heywood. Malone Society Reprints. London: Malone Society.Google Scholar

Brown, John Russell 1954. ‘The Printing of John Webster’s Plays (I)’, Studies in Bibliography 6: 117–40.Google Scholar

Brown, John Russell (ed.)1955. The Merchant of Venice. Arden 2. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Brown, John Russell (ed.) 1964. The Duchess of Malfi. The Revels Plays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Brownlow, James Arthur 1996. The Last Trumpet. Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press.Google Scholar

Bruster, Douglas 2000. ‘The Structural Transformation of Print in Late Elizabethan England’, in Marotti, Arthur F. and Bristol, Michael D. (eds.) Print, Manuscript, & Performance: The Changing Relations of the Media in Early Modern England. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 49–89.Google Scholar

Bruster, Douglas 2013a. ‘Shakespeare the Stationer,’ in Straznicky, Marta (ed.) Shakespeare’s Stationers: Studies in Cultural Bibliography. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 112–31.Google Scholar

Bruster, Douglas 2013b. ‘Shakespearean Spellings and Handwriting in the Additional Passages Printed in the 1602 Spanish Tragedy’, Notes and Queries 60: 420–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bullokar, William 1585. Aesop’s Fables in True Orthography.Google Scholar

Sir Bunbury, Henry (ed.) 1838. The Correspondence of Sir Thomas Hanmer. London: Edward Moxon.Google Scholar

Burdick, Anne, Drucker, Johanna, Lunenfeld, Peter, et al. 2012. Digital_Humanities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgoyne, Frank J. 1904. Collotype Facsimile & Type Transcript of an Elizabethan Manuscript Preserved at Alnwick Castle, Northumberland. London: Longmans, Green, & Co.Google Scholar

Burnim, Kalman A., and Highfill, Philip H. Jr. 1998. John Bell Patron of British Theatrical Portraiture: A Catalog of the Theatrical Portraits in His Editions of Bell’s Shakespeare and Bell’s British Theatre. Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Burton, Jonathan 2005. Traffic and Turning: Islam and English Drama, 1579–1624. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar

Butler, Martin (ed.) 2005. Cymbeline. New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson [2012]. ‘Guidelines’. Unpublished.Google Scholar

Camp, Robert Quillen 2006. The Secret Bear. Brooklyn, NY: Paper Theatre.Google Scholar

Capell, Edward (ed.) 1767–68. The Works of Shakespeare. 10 vols. London.Google Scholar

Capell, Edward 1774. Notes and various readings to Shakespeare. London: Printed for Edw. and Cha. Dilly, in the Poultry.Google Scholar

Carr, Nicholas 2010. The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains. London: Atlantic.Google Scholar

Carson, Christie 2008. ‘eShakespeare and Performance’, Shakespeare 4.3: 270–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, E. K. 1923. The Elizabethan Stage. 4 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Chambers, R. W. 1939. Man’s Unconquerable Mind: Studies of English Writers, from Bede to A. E. Housman and W. R. Ker. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Chapman, George 1605. All Fools.Google Scholar

Chapman, George 1613. The Revenge of Bussy D’Ambois.Google Scholar

Chartier, Roger, and Stallybrass, Peter 2013. ‘What is a Book?’, in Freistat, Neil and Flanders, Julia (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Textual Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 188–204.Google Scholar

Cheney, Patrick 2008. Shakespeare’s Literary Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cheney, Patrick 2004. Shakespeare, National Poet–Playwright. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chettle, Henry 1593. Kind-Harts Dreame.Google Scholar

Child, Harold 1935. ‘The Shakespearean Productions of John Philip Kemble’, Papers of the Shakespeare Association 19: 6.Google Scholar

Chorney, Tatjana 2006. ‘Book History and Reader-Response Theory: Teaching Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and King Lear’, in Hawkins, Anne (ed.) Teaching Bibliography, Textual Criticism and Book History. London: Pickering & Chatto, 167–73.Google Scholar

Cibber, Colley 1700. The Tragical History of King Richard III.Google Scholar

Citron, Marcia J. 1993. Gender and the Musical Canon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Collier, J. P. (ed.) 1858. Shakespeare’s Comedies, Histories, Tragedies and Poems. 2nd edn. 6 vols. London: Whittaker.Google Scholar

Collinson, Patrick 2006. From Cranmer to Sancroft. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Constable, Henry 1595? Diana. Or, The excellent conceiftul sonnets of H. C.Google Scholar

Cook, Megan 2011. ‘The Poet and the Antiquaries: Renaissance Readers and Chaucerian Scholarship’. PhD dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Coombs, James H., Renear, Allen H., and DeRose, Steven J.. 1987. ‘Markup Systems and the Future of Scholarly Text Processing’. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 30.11: 933–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cormack, Bradin, and Mazzio, Carla 2005. Book Use, Book Theory, 1500–1700. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Corti, Claudia 1996. Shakespeare illustrato. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar

Covell, William 1595. Polimanteia.Google Scholar

Cowden Clarke, Charles 1863. Shakespeare-characters; Chiefly those Subordinate.Google Scholar

Craig, Hugh, and Kinney, Arthur 2009. Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craik, T. W. (ed.) 1995. King Henry V. Arden 3. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Crane, Mary Thomas 1997. Framing Authority: Sayings, Self, and Society in Sixteenth-Century England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Craven, Alan E. 1965. ‘Justification of Prose and Jaggard Compositor B’, English Language Notes 3: 15–17.Google Scholar

Crystal, David, and Crystal, Ben 2004. Shakespeare’s Words: A Glossary & Language Companion. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Vanessa 2008. Shakespeare and Garrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cupper, William 1592. Certaine sermons concerning Gods late visitation in the citie of London.Google Scholar

Cutts, J. P. 1967. ‘New Findings with Regard to the 1624 Protection List’, Shakespeare Survey 19: 101–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dane, Joseph A. 2012. What is a Book? The Study of Early Printed Books. South Bend, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Dane, Joseph A., and Gillespie, Alexandra 2010. ‘The Myth of the Cheap Quarto’, in King, John N. (ed.) Tudor Books and Readers: Materiality and the Construction of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 24–45.Google Scholar

Daniel, Samuel 1595. Delia and Rosamond augmented.Google Scholar

Davies, John 1599. ‘Cosmum’, in Epigrammes and elegies.Google Scholar

Davies, Thomas 1780. Memoirs of the Life of David Garrick, Esq. vol. 1. Dublin: Joseph Hill.Google Scholar

Dawson, Giles E. 1946. ‘The Copyright of Shakespeare’s Dramatic Works’, in Prouty, Charles T. (ed.) The University of Missouri Studies in Honor of A. H. R. Fairchild. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2, 11–35.Google Scholar

Day, John 1950. Law Tricks. Ed. Crow, John. Malone Society Reprints. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Day, John, Wilkins, George, and Rowley, William 1607. The Travels of Three English Brothers.Google Scholar

Daybell, James. 2012. The Material Letter in Early Modern England: Manuscript Letters and the Culture and Practices of Letter-Writing, 1512–1635. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Grazia, Margreta 1991a. ‘Shakespeare in Quotation Marks’, in Marsden, Jean I. (ed.) The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Works and the Myth. New York: St Martin’s, 57–71.Google Scholar

de Grazia, Margreta 1991b. Shakespeare Verbatim: The Reproduction of Authenticity and the 1790 Apparatus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Grazia, Margreta, and Stallybrass, Peter 1993, ‘The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text’, Shakespeare Quarterly 44: 255–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Lafontaine, Henry Cart (ed.) 1909. The king’s musick; a transcript of records relating to music and musicians, 1460–1700. London: Novello.Google Scholar

De Ricci, Seymour 1930. English Collectors of Books and Manuscripts, 1530–1930, and their Ownership. Sandars Lectures, 1929–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Deegan, Marilyn, and Sutherland, Kathryn. 2009. Transferred Illusions: Digital Technology and the Forms of Print. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

DEEP: Database of Early English Playbooks 2007. Eds. Farmer, Alan B. and Lesser, Zachary. deep.sas.upenn.edu (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar

Deighton, K. (ed.) 1890. The Tempest. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Deighton, K. (ed.) 1891. Much Ado About Nothing.Google Scholar

Dekker, Thomas 1600a. Old Fortunatus.Google Scholar

Dekker, Thomas 1600b. The Shomakers Holiday.Google Scholar

Dekker, Thomas 1607. The Whore of Babylon.Google Scholar

Dekker, Thomas 1609. The guls horne-booke.Google Scholar

Dekker, Thomas 1612. If it be not Good the Devil is in it.Google Scholar

Dekker, Thomas, and Webster, John 1607. Northward Ho!Google Scholar

Dekker, Thomas, and Webster, John 1607. Westward Ho!Google Scholar

Dekker, Thomas, and Middleton, Thomas 1611. The Roaring Girl.Google Scholar

Dent, R. W. 1981. Shakespeare’s Proverbial Language: An Index. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dent, R. W. 1984. Proverbial Language in English Drama Exclusive of Shakespeare, 1495–1616: An Index. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derrida, Jacques 1987. The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond. Trans. Bass, Alan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dessen, Alan 1995. ‘Sick Chairs and Sick Thrones’, in Recovering Shakespeare’s Theatrical Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devonshire, William Cavendish (Duke of) n.d. Chatsworth Library: Kemble-Devonshire Collection of English Plays & Play-Bills. London: Sotheby, Wilkinson & Hodge.Google Scholar

Dibdin, T. F. 1824. The Library Companion. London: Harding, Triphook and Lepard.Google Scholar

Dicks, J. (ed.) 1864. Complete Works of Shakespeare. London: John Dicks.Google Scholar

Dimmock, Matthew 2015. ‘Shakespeare’s Non-Christian Religions’, in Loewenstein, David and Whitmore, Michael (eds.) Shakespeare and Early Modern Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dobson, E. J. 1968. English Pronunciation, 1500–1700. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Dobson, M. 1992. The Making of the National Poet: Shakespeare, Adaptation and Authorship, 1660–1769. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Dolby, T. (ed.) 1824. The Tempest.Google Scholar

Donaldson, George 2008. ‘The First Folio: “My Shakespeare”/ “Our Shakespeare”: Whose Shakespeare?’, in Meek, Richard, Rickard, Jane, and Wilson, Richard (eds.) Shakespeare’s Book: Essays in Reading, Writing and Reception. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 187–206.Google Scholar

Donatus, Aelius. n.d. ‘Aeli Donati Quod Fertur Commentum Terenti’. Hyperdonat/Hyperdonatus. http://hyperdonat.tge-adonis.fr/editions/index.html (accessed 4 October 2013).Google Scholar

Donker, Marjorie 1992. Shakespeare’s Proverbial Themes: A Rhetorical Context for the Sententia as Res. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Donnellan, Declan 2002. The Actor and the Target. [New York]: Theatre Communications Group.Google Scholar

Donno, E. S. (ed.) 1985. Twelfth Night. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Downes, John 1708. Roscius Anglicanus.Google Scholar

Downes, Thomas 1620? Bookes as they are sold bound.Google Scholar

Drakakis, John (ed.) 2010. The Merchant of Venice. Arden 3. London: A & C Black.Google Scholar

Drayton, Michael 1593. Idea the shepheards garland.Google Scholar

Drayton, Michael 1598. Englands Heroicall Epistles. London.Google Scholar

Drayton, Michael 1599. Englands Heroicall Epistles. London.Google Scholar

Dryden, John, and Davenant, William 1676. The Tempest, or the Enchanted Island. A Comedy.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, Katherine, and Woudhuysen, H. R. (eds.) 2007. Shakespeare‘s Poems. Arden. London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar

Dusinberre, Juliet (ed.) 2006. As You Like It. Arden 3. London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar

Dutton, Richard 2011. ‘A Jacobean Merry Wives?’, Ben Jonson Journal 18: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Earle, John 1628. Micro-cosmographie.Google Scholar

Early English Books Online (EEBO). Chadwyick Healy. http://eebo.chadwyck.com (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar

Egan, Gabriel 2010. The Struggle for Shakespeare’s Text: Twentieth-Century Editorial Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egan, Gabriel 2011. ‘Precision, Consistency and Completeness in Early-Modern Playbook Manuscripts: The Evidence from Thomas of Woodstock and John a Kent and John a Cumber’, The Library 7th ser. 12.4: 376–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. 1980 [1979]. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communication and Cultural Transformations in Early Modern Europe. 2 vols.; repr as single vol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eliot, John 1592. The suruay or topographical description of France.Google Scholar

Eliot, Simon 1994. Some Patterns and Trends in British Publishing 1800–1919. London: Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar

English Short Title Catalogue (ESTC). British Library. http://estc.bl.uk.Google Scholar

Erne, Lukas 2003. Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Erne, Lukas 2008. Shakespeare’s Modern Collaborators. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Erne, Lukas 2013. Shakespeare and the Book Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erne, Lukas, and Kidnie, Margaret Jane 2004. ‘Introduction’, Textual Performances: The Modern Reproduction of Shakespeare’s Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–20.Google Scholar

Estill, Laura 2015. Dramatic Extracts in Seventeenth-Century English Manuscripts: Watching, Reading, Changing Plays. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar

Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.) 1960–96. Shakespearean Prompt-books of the Seventeenth Century. vol. 1 pts. 1–2 (1960); vol. 2, pts. 1–2 (1963); vol. 3, pts. 1–2 (1964); vol. 4 (1966); vol. 5 (1970); vol. 6 (1980); vol. 7 (1989); vol. 8 (1996) Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia and Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia. Online edition. http://bsuva.org/bsuva/promptbook/ (accessed 29 April 2012).Google Scholar

Evans, G. Blakemore 1962. ‘The Douai Manuscript: Six Shakespearean Transcripts (1694–95)’, Philological Quarterly 41.1: 158–72.Google Scholar

Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.) 1974a. The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Evans, G. Blakemore(ed.) 1974b. ‘Shakespeare’s Text’, in The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 27–41.Google Scholar

Evans, G. Blakemore 1987. ‘The Merry Wives of Windsor: The Folger Manuscript’, in Fabian, Bernhard and Tetzeli von Rosador, Kurt (eds.) Shakespeare: Text, Language, Criticism: Essays in Honour of Martin Spevack. Zurich and New York: Olms-Weidman, 57–79.Google Scholar

Evans, G. Blakemore, and Williams, George Walton (eds.) 1974. The History of King Henry IV, as revised by Sir Edward Dering, Bart. Charlottesville: Published for the Folger Shakespeare Library by the University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar

Farmer, Alan B. n.d. ‘Playbooks and the Question of Ephemerality’. Unpublished typescript.Google Scholar

Farmer, Alan B., and Lesser, Zachary 2000. ‘Vile Arts: The Marketing of English Printed Drama, 1512–1660’, Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 39: 77–165.Google Scholar

Farmer, Alan B., and Lesser, Zachary 2005. ‘The Popularity of Playbooks Revisited’, Shakespeare Quarterly 56: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farmer, Alan B., and Lesser, Zachary 2006. ‘Canons and Classics: Publishing Drama in Caroline England’, in Zucker, Adam and Farmer, Alan B. (eds.) Localizing Caroline Drama: Politics and Economics of the Early Modern English Stage, 1625–1642. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehrenbach, Robert and Leedham-Green, Elisabeth 1992. Private Libraries in Renaissance England. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts & Studies.Google Scholar

Feuillerat, A. 1953. The Composition of Shakespeare’s Plays: Authorship, Chronology. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fitzgeffrey, Henry 1617. Satyres and Satyricall Epigrams: The Third Booke of Humours: Intituled Notes from Black-Fryers.Google Scholar

Fleming, Juliet 2011. ‘Changed Opinion as to Flowers’, in Smith, Helen and Wilson, Louise (eds.) Renaissance Paratexts, 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, Giles 1593. Licia, or poemes of love.Google Scholar

Fletcher, John 1610. The Faithful Shepherdess.Google Scholar

Fletcher, John, and Shakespeare, William 1634. The two noble kinsmen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foakes, R. A. (ed.) 2002. Henslowe’s Diary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Foot, Mirjam 2006. Bookbinders at Work: Their Roles and Methods. New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel 1979. ‘What Is an Author?’, in Harari, Josué V. (ed.) Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 141–60.Google Scholar

Foulface, Philip of Ale-foord, student in good felloship (pseud. ) 1593. Baccus bountie, describing the debonaire dietie of his bountifull godhead.Google Scholar

Foxon, David 1975. ‘Stitched Books’, Book Collector 24: 111–24.Google Scholar

Freeman, Arthur, and Freeman, Janet Ing 2001. ‘Did Halliwell Steal and Mutilate the First Quarto of Hamlet?’, The Library 7th ser. 2: 349–63.Google Scholar

Freeman, Arthur, and Freeman, Janet Ing 2004. John Payne Collier: Scholarship and Forgery in the Nineteenth Century. 2 vols. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, Thomas 1614. Rubbe and a great cast.Google Scholar

Frye, Northrop (ed.) 1970 [1959]. The Tempest. The Pelican Shakespeare. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Fuller, Steve 2013. ‘Deviant Interdisciplinarity as Philosophical Practice: Prologomena to Deep Intellectual History’. Synthese 190: 1899–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, Thomas [1662]. The History of the Worthies of England.Google Scholar

Fulwell, Ulpian 1991. ‘Like Will to Like’, in Happé, Peter (ed.) Two Moral Interludes. Malone Society Reprints. London: Malone Society.Google Scholar

Furness, H. H. 1870. ‘The Cambridge Shakespeare’, Athenaeum 2212: 388.Google Scholar

Furness, H. H. (ed.) 1871. A New Variorum Edition of Romeo and Juliet. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co.Google Scholar

Furness, H. H. (ed.) 1890. A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare. 8 vols. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co.Google Scholar

Furness, H. H. (ed.) 1892. A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare, The Tempest. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar

Gabrieli, Vittorio, and Melchiori, Giorgio (eds.) 1990. Sir Thomas More. The Revels Plays. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Galbraith, Steven K. 2010. ‘English Literary Folios 1593–1623: Studying Shifts in Format’, in King, John N. (ed.) Tudor Books and Readers: Materiality and the Construction of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 46–67.Google Scholar

Galey, Alan. n.d. Visualizing Variation. http://individual.utoronto.ca/alangaley/visualizingvariation/.Google Scholar

Galey, Alan. 2012. ‘Seeing the Spider: Visualizations of Textual Variation in Shakespearean Editing’. Unpublished paper presented at the Shakespeare Association of American meeting in Boston.Google Scholar

Galey, Alan. 2014. The Shakespearean Archive: Experiments in New Media from the Renaissance to Postmodernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garnier, Robert 1595. The tragedie of Antonie. Doone into English by the Countesse of Pembroke.Google Scholar

Gaskell, Philip 1995 [1972]. A New Introduction to Bibliography. New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll.Google Scholar

Genette, Gerard 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Trans. Lewin, Jane E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gentleman, Francis 1771. The Dramatic Censor. 2 vols.Google Scholar

Gentleman, Francis 1772. The Theatres: A Poetical Dissection.Google Scholar

Gentleman, Francis 1773. The Modish Wife.Google Scholar

Gerritsen, J. (ed.) 1952. The Honest Mans Fortune: A Critical Edition of MS Dyce 9 (1625). Groningen: Wolters.Google Scholar

Gervinus, G. G. 1883 [1862]. Shakespeare Commentaries. Trans. Bunnett, F. E.. London: Smith, Elder & Co.Google Scholar

Gibbons, Brian 1999. ‘The New Cambridge Shakespeare: The Early Quartos’, in Irace, Kathleen (ed.) The First Quarto of Hamlet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, Eugene 2011. How to Read a Shakespearean Play Text. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gieskes, Edward 2006. Representing the Professions: Administration, Law, and Theater in Early Modern England. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar

Gillespie, Alexandra 2004. ‘Poets, Printers, and Early English Sammelbände’, Huntington Library Quarterly 67.2: 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Jonathan 1991. Writing Matter: From the Hands of the English Renaissance. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Gondris, J. (ed.) 1998. Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare Editing in the Eighteenth Century. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickenson University Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, George 1624. Babels balm: or The honey-combe of Romes religion.Google Scholar

Gossett, Suzanne (ed.) 2004. ‘Introduction’, Pericles. Arden 3. London: Thomson Learning, 1–163.Google Scholar

Gossett, Suzanne 2005. ‘Emendations, Reconstructions, and the Uses of the Past’, Text 17: 35–54.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony 1997. ‘Is the History of Reading a Marginal Enterprise? Guillaume Budé and his Books’, Papers of the Bibliographic Society of America 91:2: 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grafton, Anthony 1999. The Footnote: A Curious History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony 2011. The Culture of Correction in Renaissance Europe. London: British Library.Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony, and Jardine, Lisa 1990. ‘Studied for Action: How Gabriel Harvey Read His Livy’, Past and Present 129:1: 30–78.Google Scholar

Graham-White, Anthony 1994. Punctuation and its Dramatic Value in Shakespearean Drama. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar

Graves, Thornton S. 1924. ‘Ralph Crane and the King’s Players’, Studies in Philology 21: 362–6.Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen 2004. Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Greene, Robert n.d. The honorable historie of frier Bacon, and frier Bongay.Google Scholar

Greene, Robert n.d. Pandosto the triumph of time.Google Scholar

Greene, Robert 1592a. The Repentance of Robert Greene.Google Scholar

Greene, Robert 1592b. Greenes, groats-worth of witte, bought with a million of repentance [ed. Chettle, Henry].Google Scholar

Greene, Robert 1599. Alphonsus, King of Aragon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, Robert 1994. Greene’s Groatsworth of Wit. Ed. Carroll, D. Allen. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts & Studies.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W. 1908. ‘On Certain False Dates in Shakespearian Quartos’, The Library 9: 113–31.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W. (ed.) 1909. The Second Maiden’s Tragedy 1611. Malone Society Reprints. London: Malone Society.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W. (ed.) 1910. Shakespeare’s Merry Wives of Windsor 1602. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W. (ed.) 1911. The Book of Sir Thomas More. Malone Society Reprints. Oxford: Malone Society.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W. 1931. Dramatic Documents from the Elizabethan Playhouses: Stage Plots, Actors’ Parts, Prompt Books. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W. 1942. ‘Some Notes on Crane’s Manuscript of The Witch’, The Library. 4th ser. 22: 208–22.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W. 1950–51. ‘The Rationale of Copy-Text’, Studies in Bibliography 3: 19–36.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W. (ed.) 1951. Bonduca. Malone Society Reprints. London: Malone Society.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W. 1954 [1942]. The Editorial Problem in Shakespeare: A Survey of the Foundations of the Text. 3rd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W. 1955. The Shakespeare First Folio: Its Bibliographical and Textual History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., and Boswell, E. 1930. Records of the Court of the Stationers’ Company, 1576 to 1602: From Register B. London: Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., and Wilson, F. P. (eds.) 1950. The Witch, by Thomas Middleton. Malone Society Reprints. Oxford: Malone Society.Google Scholar

Guillory, John 2010. ‘Genesis of the Media Concept’. Critical Inquiry 36.2: 321–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gurr, Andrew 2004a. Playgoing in Shakespeare’s London. 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gurr, Andrew 2004b. The Shakespeare Company 1594–1642. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gurr, Andrew (ed.) 2005. King Henry V. New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gurr, Andrew 2006. ‘Editing Stephano’s Book’, Shakespeare Survey 59: 91–107.Google Scholar

Hailey, R. Carter 2007. ‘The Dating Game: New Evidence for the Dates of Q4 Romeo and Juliet and Q4 Hamlet’, Shakespeare Quarterly 58: 367–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halasz, Alexandra 2013. ‘The Stationers’ Shakespeare’, in Straznicky, Marta (ed.) Shakespeare’s Stationers: Studies in Cultural Bibliography, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Peter 2003. Shakespeare’s Advice to the Players. London: Oberon Books.Google Scholar

Hallett, Charles A. and Hallett, Elaine S. 1991. Analyzing Shakespeare’s Action: Scene versus Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliwell-Phillipps, J. O. (ed.) 1853. The Works of William Shakespeare. 9 vols.Google Scholar

Halliwell-Phillipps, J. O. 1887. Outlines of the Life of Shakespeare. 2 vols.Google Scholar

Halpern, Richard 1991. The Poetics of Primitive Accumulation: English Renaissance Culture and the Genealogy of Capital. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammond, Paul 2009. The Strangeness of Tragedy. Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampden, J. (ed.) 1926. The Tempest. Teaching of English Series. London: T. Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar

Hanna, Ralph 1996. Pursuing History: Middle English Manuscripts and their Texts. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Hardinge, George 1801. Another Essence of Malone, Or, The ‘Beauties’ of Shakespeare’s Editor. London: T. Becket.Google Scholar

Harrison, Peter 2007. ‘Philosophy and the Crisis of Religion’, in Hankins, James (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 234–49.Google Scholar

Hart, H. C. (ed.) 1905. Measure for Measure. Arden 1. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Hattaway, Michael 2009. ‘Dating As You Like It and the Problems of “As the Dial Hand Tells O’er”’, Shakespeare Quarterly 60: 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, Anne (ed.) 2006 Teaching Bibliography, Textual Criticism and Book History. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine 2005. My Mother was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine 2012. How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayley, Emma 2010. ‘Manga Shakespeare’, in Johnson-Woods, Toni (ed.) Manga: An Anthology of Global and Cultural Perspectives. New York and London: Continuum, 267–80.Google Scholar

Hayward, John 1604. A treatise of vnion of the two realms of England and Scotland.Google Scholar

Hedbäck, Ann-Mari 1979. ‘The Douai Manuscript Reexamined’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 73: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helgerson, Richard 1983. Self-Crowned Laureates: Spenser, Jonson, Milton and the Literary System. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Helgerson, Richard 1992. Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hentzner, Paul 1757. A Journey into England in the year M.D.XC.VIII. Trans. Walpole, Horace.Google Scholar

Herford, C. H., Simpson, Evelyn, and Simpson, Percy (eds.) 1925–52. Ben Jonson. 11 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Heywood, Thomas 1611. The Golden Age.Google Scholar

Heywood, Thomas 1615. The foure prentises of London.Google Scholar

Highfill, Philip A., Burnim, Kalman A., and Langhans, Edward A. (eds.) 1973–93. A Biographical Dictionary of Actors, Actresses, Musicians, Dancers, Managers & other Stage Personnel in London, 1660–1800. 16 vols. Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Hinman, Charlton 1963. The Printing and Proof-Reading of the First Folio of Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hinman, Charlton (ed.) 1968. The Norton Facsimile: The First Folio of Shakespeare. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Hinman, Charlton, and Blayney, Peter W. M. (eds.) 1996. The First Folio of Shakespeare: The Norton Facsimile. Based on Folios in the Folger Shakespeare Library. 2nd edn. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Brett (ed.) n.d. Digital Renaissance Editions. http://digitalrenaissance.uvic.ca (accesed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar

Hirsch, Brett 2011. ‘The Kingdom Has Been Digitized: Electronic Editions of Renaissance Drama and the Long Shadows of Shakespeare and Print’, Literature Compass 8.9: 568–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschfeld, Heather Anne 2004. Joint Enterprises: Collaborative Drama and the Institutionalization of the English Renaissance Theater. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Hirsh, James E. 1981. The Structure of Shakespearean Scenes. New Haven, Conn. and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hirsh, James E. 2002. ‘Act Divisions in the Shakespeare First Folio’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 96: 219–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodgdon, Barbara (ed.) 1997. The First Part of King Henry the Fourth. Boston, Mass.: Bedford.Google Scholar

Hodnett, Edward 1982. Image and Text: Studies in the Illustration of English Literature. London: Scolar Press.Google Scholar

Hoenselaars, Ton (ed.) 2012. ‘Shakespeare: Colleagues, Collaborators, Co-authors’, The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Contemporary Dramatists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holderness, Graham 2003. Textual Shakespeare: Writing and the Word. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar

Holderness, Graham, and Banks, Carol 1995. ‘Mimesis: Text and Reproduction’, Critical Survey 7: 332–8.Google Scholar

Holinshed, Raphael 1587. The first and second volumes of Chronicles.Google Scholar

Holland, Peter 2001. ‘Beginning in the Middle’, Proceedings of the British Academy: Lectures and Memoirs. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 127–55.Google Scholar

Holland, Peter (ed.) 2013. Coriolanus. Arden 3. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Hollyband, Claudius 1591. The French Littelton.Google Scholar

Honan, Park 1998. Shakespeare: A Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honigmann, E. A. J. 1965. The Stability of Shakespeare’s Text. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Honigmann, E. A. J. 1996. The Texts of ‘Othello’ and Shakespearian Revision. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Honigmann, E. A. J. (ed.) 1997. Othello. Arden 3. Walton-on-Thames: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar

Honigmann, E. A. J. 2004. ‘The New Bibliography and its Critics’, in Erne, Lukas and Kidnie, Margaret Jane (eds.) Textual Performances: The Modern Reproduction of Shakespeare’s Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–93.Google Scholar

Hooks, Adam 2008. ‘Booksellers’ Catalogues and the Classification of Printed Drama’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 102:4: 445–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hooks, Adam 2011. ‘Shakespeare at the White Greyhound’, Shakespeare Survey 64, 260–75.Google Scholar

Hooks, Adam 2012, ‘Book Trade’, in Kinney, Arthur F. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 126–42.Google Scholar

Hooks, Adam 2013. ‘Wise Ventures: Shakespeare and Thomas Playfere at the Sign of the Angel,’ in Straznicky, Marta (ed.) Shakespeare’s Stationers: Studies in Cultural Bibliography. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard-Hill, T. H. 1965. ‘Ralph Crane’s Parentheses’, Notes and Queries 210: 334–40.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T. H. 1966. ‘Knight, Crane and the Copy for the Folio Winter’s Tale’, Notes and Queries 211: 139–40.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T. H. 1974. Ralph Crane and Some Shakespeare First Folio Comedies. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T. H. (ed.) 1979. Sir John Van Olden Barnavelt by John Fletcher and Philip Massinger. Malone Society Reprints. London: Malone Society.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T. H. 1991. ‘Shakespeare’s Earliest Editor, Ralph Crane’, Shakespeare Survey 44: 113–30.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T. H. 1995. Middleton’s ‘Vulgar Pasquin’: Essays on A Game at Chess. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T. H. 2002. ‘Ralph Crane: The Life and Works of a Jacobean Scribe in the Next Millennium’, Shakespearean International Yearbook 2: 150–7.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T. H. 2004. ‘Ralph Crane (fl. 1589–1632)’ (q.v.) Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Online edition. www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/6605.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T. H. 2006. ‘Early Modern Printers and the Standardization of English Spelling’, Modern Language Review 101: 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoy, Cyrus 1956. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 8:129–46.Google Scholar

Hoy, Cyrus 1957. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 9:143–62 (II).Google Scholar

Hoy, Cyrus 1958. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 11:85–106 (III).Google Scholar

Hoy, Cyrus 1959. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 12:91–116 (IV).Google Scholar

Hoy, Cyrus 1960. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 13:77–108 (V).Google Scholar

Hoy, Cyrus 1961. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 14:45–67 (VI).Google Scholar

Hoy, Cyrus 1962. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 15: 71–90 (VII).Google Scholar

Hudson, H. N. (ed.) 1883 [1879]. The Tempest. Boston: Ginn, Heath.Google Scholar

Hulme, P., and Sherman, W. H. (eds.) 2000. The Tempest and its Travels. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar

Humphreys, A. R. (ed.) 1960. King Henry IV Part 1. Arden 2. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hunt, Maurice 1999. ‘New Variorum Shakespeares in the Twenty-First Century’. Yearbook of English Studies 29: 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, G. K. 1951. ‘The Marking of Sententiae in Elizabethan Printed Plays, Poems and Romances’, The Library 6: 171–88.Google Scholar

Hunter, G. K. 2003. ‘The Social Function of Annotation’, in Thompson, Ann and McMullan, Gordon (eds.) In Arden: Editing Shakespeare. Essays in Honour of Richard Proudfoot. Arden Shakespeare. London: Thomson Learning, 177–93.Google Scholar

‘Iambic Pentameter’ (q.v.) Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iambic_pentameter (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar

Ioppolo, Grace 2006. Dramatists and their Manuscripts in the Age of Shakespeare, Jonson, Middleton and Heywood: Authorship, Authority and the Playhouse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ioppolo, Grace (ed.) 2012. The Honest Man’s Fortune. Malone Society Reprints. London: Malone Society.Google Scholar

Iser, Wolfgang 1978. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, MacDonald P. 1975. ‘Punctuation and the Compositors of Shakespeare’s Sonnets, 1609’, The Library 5th ser. 30: 2–23.Google Scholar

Jackson, MacDonald P. 1979. Studies in Attribution: Middleton and Shakespeare. Salzburg: Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik.Google Scholar

Jackson, MacDonald P. 1990. ‘The Additions to “The Second Maiden’s Tragedy”: Shakespeare or Middleton?’, Shakespeare Quarterly 41: 402–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarvis, Simon 1995. Scholars and Gentlemen: Shakespearian Textual Criticism and Representations of Scholarly Labour, 1725–1765. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jayne, Sears 1956. Library Catalogues of the English Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffries, Neil 2012. ‘Representing Knowledge – Metadata, Data and Linked Data’. The Signpost. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-07-02/Op-ed (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar

Jensen, M. P. 2011. ‘Shakespeare and the Comic Book’, in Burnett, Mark, Streete, Adrian, and Wray, Ramona (eds.) The Edinburgh Companion to Shakespeare and the Arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 388–405.Google Scholar

Johns, Adrian 1998. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Gerald D. 1992. ‘Thomas Pavier, the Publisher, 1600–25’, The Library 6th ser. 14: 12–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Nora 2003. The Actor as Playwright in Early Modern Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel (ed.) 1765. The Plays of William Shakespeare.Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel 1790. ‘Life of Rowe’, The Works of the English poets. With Prefaces, Biographical and Critical, 3 vols. London: Printed by John Nichols, 88–99.Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel 1916. Johnson on Shakespeare. Ed. Raleigh, Walter. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel 1923 [1756]. Johnson’s Proposal for his Edition of Shakespeare, 1756. Printed in Typefacsimile. Oxford and London: Oxford University Press and Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar

Johnson, Samuel 1968. ‘Preface to Shakespeare 1765’, in Sherbo, Arthur (ed.) Johnson on Shakespeare. The Yale Edition of the Works of Johnson, Samuel. 7 vols. New Haven, Conn. and London: Yale University Press, 7. 59–113.Google Scholar

Jones, Emrys 1971. Scenic Form in Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Jonson, Ben 1600. Every Man out of his Humor.Google Scholar

Jonson, Ben 1601a. Cynthia’s Revels.Google Scholar

Jonson, Ben 1601b. The Fountaine of Selfe-Love.Google Scholar

Jonson, Ben 1607. Volpone.Google Scholar

Jonson, Ben 1616a. Cynthias Revels.Google Scholar

Jonson, Ben 1616b. Every man out of his humor.Google Scholar

Jonson, Ben 1631. ‘The iust indignation the Authour tooke at the vulgar censure of his Play, by some malicious spectators, begat this following Ode to himselfe’, in The Nevv Inne. Or, The Light Heart. H1^v–H2^v.Google Scholar

Jonson, Ben 2012. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson. Eds. Bevington, David, Butler, Martin, and Donaldson, Ian. 7 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jowett, John 1983. ‘New Created Creatures: Ralph Crane and the Stage Directions in The Tempest’, Shakespeare Survey 36: 107–20.Google Scholar

Jowett, John 2006. ‘Editing Shakespeare in the Twentieth Century’, Shakespeare Survey 59: 1–19.Google Scholar

Jowett, John 2007a. Shakespeare and Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jowett, John 2007b. ‘Women, Beware Women’, in Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John (eds.) Thomas Middleton and Early Modern Textual Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1140–8.Google Scholar

Jowett, John (ed.) 2011. Sir Thomas More. Arden 3. London: A. & C. Black.Google Scholar

Jowett, John 2013. ‘Private Iteration and Public Life: The Dering Manuscript of Henry IV’. Unpublished paper presented at the European Shakespeare Research Association congress (ESRA), Montpellier, France.Google Scholar

Kahrl, George M., and Anderson, Dorothy 1982. The Garrick Collection of Old English Plays: A Catalogue with an Historical Introduction. London: British Library.Google Scholar

Kastan, David Scott (ed.) 1999. ‘Shakespeare and the “Element” He Lived In’, in A Companion to Shakespeare. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 3–8.Google Scholar

Kastan, David Scott 2001. Shakespeare and the Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kastan, David Scott 2002a. ‘The Great Variety of Readers’, Critical Survey 14:1: 111–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kastan, David Scott (ed.) 2002b. King Henry IV, Part One. Arden. London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar

Kean, C. (ed.) 1857. The Tempest. London. John K. Chapman.Google Scholar

Kelemen, Erick. 2006. ‘“Not to pick bad from bad, but by bad mend”: What Undergraduates Learn from Bad Editions,’ in Hawkins, Anne (ed.) Teaching Bibliography, Textual Criticism and Book History. London: Pickering & Chatto, 161–6.Google Scholar

Kellett, E. E. (ed.) 1896. The Tempest. Madras: Srinivasa, Varadachari.Google Scholar

Kemble, J. P. 1817 Macbeth and King Richard the Third: An Essay, in answer to Remarks on some of the Characters of Shakespeare.Google Scholar

Kermode, F. (ed.) 1954. The Tempest. Arden 2. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Kidnie, Margaret Jane 2009. Shakespeare and the Problem of Adaptation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kidnie, Margaret Jane (ed.) forthcoming. A Woman Killed with Kindness. By Heywood, Thomas. Arden Early Modern Drama. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Kirsch, Arthur C. 1969. ‘A Caroline Commentary on the Drama’, Modern Philology 66: 256–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. 2006. ‘How Things Work: Teaching the Technologies of Literature,’ in Hawkins, Anne (ed.) Teaching Bibliography, Textual Criticism and Book History. London: Pickering & Chatto, 155–60.Google Scholar

Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. 2008. Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kittler, Friedrich A. 2006. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Kliman, Bernice W. 1997. ‘Samuel Johnson and Tonson’s 1745 Shakespeare: Warburton, Anonymity, and the Shakespeare Wars’, in Gondris, J. (ed.) Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare Editing in the Eighteenth Century. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickenson University Press, 299–317.Google Scholar

Knapp, Jeffrey 2009. Shakespeare Only. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, Charles 1864. Passages of a Working Life During Half a Century: With a Prelude of Early Reminiscences. London: Bradbury and Evans.Google Scholar

Knight, Jeffrey Todd 2009. ‘Making Shakespeare’s Books: Assembly and Intertextuality in the Archives’, Shakespeare Quarterly 60: 304–40.Google Scholar

Knight, Jeffrey Todd 2010. ‘Invisible Ink: A Note on Ghost Images in Early Printed Books’, Textual Cultures 5.2: 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, Jeffrey Todd 2013. Bound to Read: Compilations, Collections, and the Making of Renaissance Literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knolles, Richard 1606. The Six Bookes of a Commonweale written by I. Bodin … out of the French and Latine Copies, done into English.Google Scholar

Knowles, Richard 2003. Shakespeare Variorum Handbook: A Manual of Editorial Practice. 2nd edn. New York: Modern Language Association. www.mla.org/variorum_handbook/.Google Scholar

Knutson, Roslyn Lander 2001. Playing Companies and Commerce in Shakespeare’s Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konkola, Kari 2000. ‘“People of the Book”: The Production of Theological Texts in Early Modern England,’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 94: 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kristeva, Julia 1980. ‘Word, Dialogue, and Novel’, Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, New York: Columbia University Press, 64–91.Google Scholar

Krivatsy, Nati H., and Yeandle, Laetitia 1992. ‘Sir Edward Dering’, in Fehrenbach, R. J. and Leedham-Green, E. S. (eds.) Private Libraries in Renaissance England: A Collection and Catalogue of Tudor and Early Stuart Book-Lists. 7 vols. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, vol. 1, 137–269.Google Scholar

Kulick, Brian. 2012. Email to Worthen, W. B.. 8 April. Unpublished.Google Scholar

Kyd, Thomas 1989. The Spanish Tragedy. Ed. Mulryne, J. R.. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Kyd, Thomas 1592. The Tragedie of Solyman and Perseda.Google Scholar

L.S. 1593. Resurgendum. A notable sermon concerning the resurrection.Google Scholar

Lackington, James 1794. Memoirs of the Forty-Five First Years in the Life of James Lackington.Google Scholar

Lake, David J. 1975. The Canon of Thomas Middleton’s Plays: Internal Evidence for the Major Problems of Authorship. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lancashire, Anne (ed.) 1978. The Second Maiden’s Tragedy. The Revels Plays. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Langbaine, Gerard 1691. An Account of the English Dramatick Poets.Google Scholar

Langhans, Edward A. 1981. Restoration Promptbooks. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Sidney 1898. Life of William Shakespeare.Google Scholar

Leech, Clifford 1970. ‘On Editing One’s First Play’, Studies in Bibliography 23: 61–70.Google Scholar

Leedham-Green, Elisabeth 1986. Books in Cambridge Inventories: Book-Lists from Vice-Chancellor’s Court Probate Inventories in the Tudor and Stuart Periods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Hans-Thies. 2006. Postdramatic Theatre. Trans. Jürs-Munby, Karen. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lennam, T. N. 1995. ‘Sir Edward Dering’s Collection of Playbooks, 1619–1624’, Shakespeare Quarterly 16: 145–53.Google Scholar

Lerer, Seth 2003. ‘Medieval English Literature and the Idea of the Anthology’, Publications of the Modern Language Association 118: 1251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lesser, Zachary 2004. Renaissance Drama and the Politics of Dramatic Publication: Readings in the English Book Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lesser, Zachary, and Stallybrass, Peter 2008. ‘The First Literary Hamlet and the Commonplacing of Professional Plays’, Shakespeare Quarterly 59: 371–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levenson, Jill L. (ed.) 2000. Romeo and Juliet. The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Levine, Nina 2007. ‘Citizens’ Games: Differentiating Collaboration and Sir Thomas More’, Shakespeare Quarterly 58: 31–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liebman, Dave. n.d. ‘Summary of the Transcription Process’. www.daveliebman.com/Feature_Articles/.Google Scholar

Lindley, D. (ed.) 2002. The Tempest. Cambridge: New Cambridge Shakespeare.Google Scholar

Little, David M., and Kahrl, George M. 1963. The Letters of David Garrick. 3 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Liu, Alan 2013. ‘The Meaning of the Digital Humanities’, PMLA 128: 409–23.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Megan 2002. ‘“To Speak Welsh”: Nonsense and Subversion in Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1’, North American Journal of Welsh Studies 2:2: 7–14.Google Scholar

Lodge, Thomas 1593. Phillis: honoured with Pastorall sonnets, elegies, and amorous delights.Google Scholar

Lodge, Thomas, and Greene, Robert 1594. A looking glasse for London and England.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, Joseph 2002. Ben Jonson and Possessive Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Logan, Robert 2007. Shakespeare’s Marlowe: The Influence of Christopher Marlowe on Shakespeare’s Artistry. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

London Chronicle, 31 August–2 September 1769. ‘Some Strictures relative to Mr. Shakespeare and Mr. Garrick’, 221–2.Google Scholar

Long, William B. 1989. ‘John a Kent and John a Cumber: An Elizabethan Playbook and its Implications,’ in Elton, W. R. and Long, William B. (eds.) Shakespeare and Dramatic Tradition: Essays in Honor of S. F. Johnson, Newark: University of Delaware Press, 125–43.Google Scholar

Long, William B. 1999. ‘“Precious Few”: English Manuscript Playbooks,’ in Kastan, David Scott (ed.) A Companion to Shakespeare, Oxford: Blackwell, 414–33.Google Scholar

Loomis, Catherine 2002. William Shakespeare: A Documentary Volume, Dictionary of Literary Biography, vol. 263, Detroit, Mich.: Thomson Gale.Google Scholar

Love, Harold 2002. Attributing Authorship: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luce, M. (ed.) 1901. The Tempest. Arden 1. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Luminary Shakespeare iPad App. https://luminarydigitalmedia.com (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar

Lupton, D. 1632. London and the Countrey Carbonadoed.Google Scholar

Lupton, Thomas 1904. ‘All for Money’. Ed. Vogel, Ernst. Shakespeare Jahrbuch 40: 129–86.Google Scholar

Lyons, Tara 2011. ‘Pressing Issues: English Printed Drama in Collection before Jonson and Shakespeare’. Dissertation, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Lyons, Tara 2013. ‘Serials, Spinoffs, and Histories: Making “Shakespeare” in Collection before the Folio’. Philological Quarterly 91.2: 185–220.Google Scholar

McCarty, Willard 2005. Humanities Computing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGann, Jerome 1991. The Textual Condition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McGann, Jerome 2001a. Radiant Textuality: Literature after the World Wide Web. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGann, Jerome 2001b. ‘Visible and Invisible Books: Hermetic Images in N-Dimensional Space’. New Literary History 32.2: 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGann, Jerome 2002. ‘Visible and Invisible Books: Hermetic Images in N-Dimensional Space’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 17.1: 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGann, Jerome 2004. ‘Visible and Invisible Books: Hermetic Images in N-Dimensional Space’, in Stoicheff, Peter and Taylor, Andrew (eds.), The Future of the Page. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 143–58.Google Scholar

McKenzie, D. F. 1959. ‘Shakespearian Punctuation – A New Beginning’, Review of English Studies 10: 361–70.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, Norman H. (ed.). 1991. The Later Poetic Manuscripts of Gerard Manley Hopkins. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

McLeod, Randall 1981. ‘Unemending Shakespeare’s Sonnet 111’, Studies in English Literature 21: 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLeod, Randall 1982. ‘UnEditing Shak-speare’, Sub-stance 33/34: 26–55.Google Scholar

McLeod, Randall 1991. ‘Information on Information’. TEXT 5: 241–81.Google Scholar

McLunan, Marshall 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: Signet Books.Google Scholar

McManaway, James C. 1967. ‘Excerpta Quaedam per A.W. Adolescentem’, in Harrison, Thomas P., Hill, Archibald A., Mossner, Ernest C., and Sledd, James (eds.) Studies in Honor of DeWitt T. Starnes. Austin: University of Texas Press, 117–29.Google Scholar

McMillin, Scott 1987. The Elizabethan Theatre and The Book of Sir Thomas More. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNamara, Jeremy n.d. ‘“Ovidius Naso Was the Man”: Shakespeare’s Debt to Ovid’. http://department.monm.edu/history/faculty_forum/ovid.htm (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar

Maguire, Laurie E. 1996. Shakespearean Suspect Texts: the “Bad” Quartos and their Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maguire, Laurie E. (forthcoming). ‘Textual Embodiment: The Case of Etcetera’, in Traub, Valerie (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Embodiment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Malone, Edmond (ed.) 1790. The Plays and Poems of William Shakespeare. 10 vols. London: J. Rivington and Sons.Google Scholar

Marcus, Leah S. 1996. Unediting the Renaissance: Shakespeare, Marlowe and Milton. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Marcus, Leah S. 1988. Puzzling Shakespeare: Local Reading and its Discontents. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Marcus, Leah S. 2007. ‘Editing Shakespeare in a Postmodern Age’, in Murphy, Andrew (ed.) A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text. Oxford: Blackwell, 128–44.Google Scholar

Marino, James J. 2011. Owning William Shakespeare: The King’s Men and their Intellectual Property. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markham, Gervase 1593. A discource of horsmanshippe.Google Scholar

Marlowe, Christopher 1594? The massacre at Paris.Google Scholar

Marlowe, Christopher 1968. Dido Queen of Carthage and The Massacre at Paris. Ed. Oliver, H. J.. The Revels Plays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Marlowe, Christopher 1978. The Jew of Malta. Ed. Bawcutt, N. W.. The Revels Plays. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Marotti, Arthur F. 1993. Manuscript, Print and the English Renaissance Lyric. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Marotti, Arthur F., and Estill, Laura 2012. ‘Manuscript Circulation’, in F. Kinney, Arthur (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 53–70.Google Scholar

Marston, John 1601. Jack Drum’s Entertainment.Google Scholar

Marston, John 1604. The Malcontent.Google Scholar

Marston, John 1605. The Dutch Courtesan.Google Scholar

Marston, John 1606. Parasitaster, or The Fawne.Google Scholar

Massai, Sonia 2007. Shakespeare and the Rise of the Editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Massai, Sonia 2009. ‘Shakespeare, Text, and Paratext’, Shakespeare Survey 62: 1–11.Google Scholar

Massai, Sonia 2011. ‘Editorial Pledges in Early Modern Dramatic Paratexts’, in Smith, Helen and Wilson, Louise (eds.), Renaissance Paratexts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Massai, Sonia 2012. ‘Early Readers’, in Kinney, Arthur F. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 143–61.Google Scholar

Massai, Sonia 2013. ‘Edward Blount, the Herberts, and the First Folio’, in Straznicky, Marta (ed.) Shakespeare’s Stationers: Studies in Cultural Bibliography. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press: 132–46.Google Scholar

Massinger, Philip 2010. The Renegado. Ed. Neill, Michael. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Masten, Jeffrey 1997a. ‘Playwriting: Collaboration and Authorship’, A New History of Early English Drama. New York: Columbia University Press, 357–82.Google Scholar

Masten, Jeffrey 1997b. Textual Intercourse: Collaboration, Authorship, and Sexuality in Renaissance Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maxwell, J. C. (ed.) 1960. Cymbeline. The New Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

May, Steven W., and Wolfe, Heather 2010. ‘Manuscripts in Tudor England’, in Cartwright, Kent (ed.) A Companion to Tudor Literature. Malden, Mass. and Oxford: Blackwell, 125–39.Google Scholar

Melchiori, Giorgio 1985. ‘Hand D in “Sir Thomas More”: An Essay in Misinterpretation’, Shakespeare Survey 38: 101–14.Google Scholar

Melchiori, Giorgio 1989. ‘The Book of Sir Thomas More: Dramatic Unity’, in Howard-Hill, T. H. (ed.) Shakespeare and Sir Thomas More: Essays on the Play and its Shakespearian Interest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–100.Google Scholar

Merchant, William Moelwyn 1959. Shakespeare and the Artist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Meres, Francis 1598. Palladis Tamia.Google Scholar

Middleton, Thomas 2007a. More Dissemblers Besides Women. Ed. Jowett, John. In Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John (Gen. Eds.) Thomas Middleton: The Collected Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Middleton, Thomas 2007b. Thomas Middleton: The Collected Works. Eds. Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Minami, R. 2010. ‘Shakespeare for Japanese Popular Culture: Shojo Manga, Takarazuka, and Twelfth Night’, in Kennedy, Dennis and Li Lan, Yong (eds.) Shakespeare in Asia: Contemporary Performance, 109–31.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T. 1994. Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Moore, J. K. 1992. Primary Materials Relating to Copy and Print in English Books of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Oxford Bibliographical Society Occasional Publications 24. Oxford: Bodleian Library.Google Scholar

Moore, Joseph S. (ed.) 1856. The Plays and Poems of William Shakespeare.Google Scholar

Morash, Christopher 2002. A History of Irish Theatre 1601–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moretti, Franco 2011. ‘Networks, Plots’, New Left Review, 2nd ser. 68 (March–April): 80–102.Google Scholar

Morley, Henry (ed.) 1888. King Lear.Google Scholar

Morris, D. (ed.) 1875. The Tempest. Collins School and College Classics. Glasgow: William Collins, Sons, and Co.Google Scholar

Moss, Gregory 2006. Play Viewed from a Distance. Brooklyn, NY: Paper Theatre.Google Scholar

Moulton, Ian Frederick 2000. Before Pornography: Erotic Writing in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mowat, Barbara A. 2000. ‘“Knowing I loved my books”: Reading The Tempest Intertextually’, The Tempest and its Travels. London: Reaktion, 27–36.Google Scholar

Mowat, Barbara A. 2005. ‘Q2 Othello and the 1606 “Acte to restraine Abuses of Players”’, Editio 22: 91–106.Google Scholar

Mowat, Barbara A., and Werstine, Paul (eds.) 1993. King Lear. By William Shakespeare. Folger Shakespeare Library. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar

Moxon, Joseph 1962. Mechanick Exercises on the Whole Art of Printing (1683–4). Eds. Davis, Herbert and Carter, Harry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mullett, Michael A. 2004. Martin Luther. Abindgon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mulryne, J. R. (ed.) 1975. Women Beware Women. By Middleton, Thomas. The Revels Plays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Munday, Anthony, et al. 1911. The Book of Sir Thomas More. Ed. Greg, W. W.. Oxford: Malone.Google Scholar

Munro, Lucy 2005. Children of the Queen’s Revels: A Jacobean Theatre Repertory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Andrew 2003. Shakespeare in Print: A History and Chronology of Shakespeare Publishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, Andrew (ed.) 2007. A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Andrew 2008. Shakespeare for the People: Working-class Readers, 1800–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, Andrew 2010. ‘Shakespeare Goes Digital: Three Open Internet Editions’, Shakespeare Quarterly 61.3: 401–14.Google Scholar

Murphy, Andrew 2013. ‘Configuring the Book’, Early Modern Literary Studies. Special Issue 21. http://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/si-21/02-Murphy_ConfiguringTheBook.htm (accessed June 2013).Google Scholar

Murray, Christopher 2004. Sean O’Casey: Writer at Work. A Biography. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray-John, Patrick. ‘Bill-Crit-O-Matic’. http://billcritomatic.org/.Google Scholar

Myklebost, Svenn-Arve forthcoming 2016. ‘Comic Books and Manga’, in Smith, Bruce (Gen. Ed.) The Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare. 2 vols. New York: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nashe, Thomas 1592. Pierce Penilesse his supplication to the diuell.Google Scholar

Nashe, Thomas 1593. The apologie of Pierce Pennilesse. Or, strange newes, of the intercepting certaine letters.Google Scholar

Nashe, Thomas 1594. The vnfortunate traueller.Google Scholar

Nashe, Thomas 1596. Haue vvith you to Saffron-vvalden.Google Scholar

Neidig, William J. 1910. ‘The Shakespeare Quartos of 1619’, Modern Philology 8: 145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neill, Michael 1994. ‘Broken English and Broken Irish: Nation, Language, and the Optic Power in Shakespeare’s Histories’, Shakespeare Quarterly 45:1: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neill, Michael (ed.) 2006. Othello. The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Nelson, Alan 2005. ‘Shakespeare and the Bibliophiles: From the Earliest Years to 1616’, in Myers, Robin, Harris, Michael, and Mandelbrote, Giles (eds.) Owners, Annotators, and the Signs of Reading. London: British Museum, 49–74.Google Scholar

‘The New Variorum Shakespeare Digital Challenge: The Second Round’. Modern Language Association. http://www.mla.org/nvs_challenge (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar

Norton, David. 2005. A Textual History of the King James Bible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norton, Thomas 1570. The tragidie of Ferrex and Porrex [Gorboduc].Google Scholar

Nunberg, Geoffrey (ed.) 1996. The Future of the Book. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

O’Casey, Sean 1942. Pictures in the Hallway. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar