Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:25:18.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Afterword: fiction and the Sokal hoax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Elizabeth Spiller
Affiliation:
Texas Christian University
Get access

Summary

In May of 1996, New York University physicist Alan Sokal published what has become a well-known essay on postmodern physics in a special “Science Wars” issue of the journal Social Text. Entitled “Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity,” Sokal's article promised to offer a practicing physicist's support for the premise that

physical “reality,” no less than social “reality,” is at bottom a social and linguistic construct; that scientific “knowledge,” far from being objective, reflects and encodes the dominant ideologies and power relations of the culture that produced it; that the truth claims of science are inherently theory-laden and self-referential; and consequently, that the discourse of the scientific community, for all its undeniable value, cannot assert a privileged epistemological status with respect to counterhegemonic narratives emanating from dissident or marginalized communities.

Sokal undertook this project by offering to describe how recent developments in studies of “quantum gravity” both “synthesized and superseded” Heisenberg's quantum mechanics and Einstein's general theory of relativity. After suggesting that this new work emphasized how phenomena such as gravitational fields were non-linear, fluid, and interconnected, Sokal issued a call for a “liberatory science” that would recognize and be responsive to the social and political implications of these scientific arguments. If the theory of gravitational fields were understood to be non-linear, so could the study of science: in the process, the “dominion” of science would be radically changed in favor of more politically desirable (more inclusive, less hierarchical, less sexist, less colonial, etc.) ends.

Type
Chapter
Information
Science, Reading, and Renaissance Literature
The Art of Making Knowledge, 1580–1670
, pp. 178 - 183
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×