Book contents
- Frontmatter
- CONTENTS
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Old and New Organicisms
- 2 Romantic Biology: Establishing Connections in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries
- 3 The British Version: J. S. Haldane, D'Arcy Thompson and the Organism as a Whole
- 4 The New Generation: A Failed Organismal Revolution
- 5 The American Version: Chicago and Beyond
- 6 Romantic Biology from California's Shores: W. E. Ritter, C. M. Child and the Scripps Marine Association
- Conclusion: Whatever Happened to Organismal Biologies?
- Notes
- Works Cited
- Index
Introduction
- Frontmatter
- CONTENTS
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Old and New Organicisms
- 2 Romantic Biology: Establishing Connections in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries
- 3 The British Version: J. S. Haldane, D'Arcy Thompson and the Organism as a Whole
- 4 The New Generation: A Failed Organismal Revolution
- 5 The American Version: Chicago and Beyond
- 6 Romantic Biology from California's Shores: W. E. Ritter, C. M. Child and the Scripps Marine Association
- Conclusion: Whatever Happened to Organismal Biologies?
- Notes
- Works Cited
- Index
Summary
If you want to describe life and gather its meaning,
To drive out its spirit be your beginning,
Then though fast your hand lie the parts one by one,
The spirit that linked them, alas is gone,
And ‘Nature's Laboratory’ is only a name,
That the chemist bestows on it to hide his own shame.
J. W. von Goethe, FaustRomanticism is an epoch. The Romantic is a state of mind not limited to one period. It found its fullest expression in the Romantic epoch, but it does not end with that age; the Romantic exists to the present day
R. SafranskiAt the end of the nineteenth century an oft-quoted sentence circulated among critics of Matthias Jakob Schleiden's cell theory and was usually attributed to the German botanist and mycologist Anton de Bary (1831–88): ‘Die Pflanze bildet Zellen, nicht die Zelle bildet Pflanzen’ (‘The plant forms cells; the cell does not form plants’). Although in the beginning the aphorism was employed against the widespread practice (since the development of Schleiden's cell theory) of starting textbooks on botany with the study of cells rather than of whole plants, its use was quickly extended. In the hands of embryologists and physiologists, the aphorism acquired a polemic charge against the mechanistic interpretation of organic development and indicated a holistic way to conceive the process of morphogenesis. In Europe and the United States the sentence spread and was repeated as a refrain by many first-rank zoologists working in old or emerging institutions. One of the most convinced advocates of de Bary's idea was the influential nineteenth-century American biologist Charles Otis Whitman (1842–1910). Indeed, in 1893 Whitman published an article that inspired many young biologists who were critical of mechanistic and ‘elementalist’ interpretations of living phenomena. The article, titled ‘The Inadequacy of the Cellular Theory of Development’, began by criticizing Schleiden's cell theory.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Romantic Biology, 1890–1945 , pp. 1 - 12Publisher: Pickering & ChattoFirst published in: 2014