Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:34:15.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

Introduction

Maurizio Esposito
Affiliation:
University of Santiago, Chile
Get access

Summary

If you want to describe life and gather its meaning,

To drive out its spirit be your beginning,

Then though fast your hand lie the parts one by one,

The spirit that linked them, alas is gone,

And ‘Nature's Laboratory’ is only a name,

That the chemist bestows on it to hide his own shame.

J. W. von Goethe, Faust

Romanticism is an epoch. The Romantic is a state of mind not limited to one period. It found its fullest expression in the Romantic epoch, but it does not end with that age; the Romantic exists to the present day

R. Safranski

At the end of the nineteenth century an oft-quoted sentence circulated among critics of Matthias Jakob Schleiden's cell theory and was usually attributed to the German botanist and mycologist Anton de Bary (1831–88): ‘Die Pflanze bildet Zellen, nicht die Zelle bildet Pflanzen’ (‘The plant forms cells; the cell does not form plants’). Although in the beginning the aphorism was employed against the widespread practice (since the development of Schleiden's cell theory) of starting textbooks on botany with the study of cells rather than of whole plants, its use was quickly extended. In the hands of embryologists and physiologists, the aphorism acquired a polemic charge against the mechanistic interpretation of organic development and indicated a holistic way to conceive the process of morphogenesis. In Europe and the United States the sentence spread and was repeated as a refrain by many first-rank zoologists working in old or emerging institutions. One of the most convinced advocates of de Bary's idea was the influential nineteenth-century American biologist Charles Otis Whitman (1842–1910). Indeed, in 1893 Whitman published an article that inspired many young biologists who were critical of mechanistic and ‘elementalist’ interpretations of living phenomena. The article, titled ‘The Inadequacy of the Cellular Theory of Development’, began by criticizing Schleiden's cell theory.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Pickering & Chatto
First published in: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×