Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword: The Harmful Legacy of Lawlessness in Vietnam
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- PART I THE US ROLE IN VIETNAM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
- PART II WAR AND WAR CRIMES
- PART III THE VIETNAM WAR AND THE NUREMBERG PRINCIPLES
- PART IV THE LEGACY OF THE VIETNAM WAR
- 12 Learning from Vietnam
- 13 The Vietnam Syndrome: From the Gulf of Tonkin to Iraq
- 14 “The Vietnam Syndrome”: The Kerrey Revelations Raise Anew Issues of Morality and Military Power
- 15 Why the Legal Debate on the Vietnam War Still Matters: The Case for Revisiting the International Law Debate
- Index
14 - “The Vietnam Syndrome”: The Kerrey Revelations Raise Anew Issues of Morality and Military Power
from PART IV - THE LEGACY OF THE VIETNAM WAR
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 December 2017
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword: The Harmful Legacy of Lawlessness in Vietnam
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- PART I THE US ROLE IN VIETNAM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
- PART II WAR AND WAR CRIMES
- PART III THE VIETNAM WAR AND THE NUREMBERG PRINCIPLES
- PART IV THE LEGACY OF THE VIETNAM WAR
- 12 Learning from Vietnam
- 13 The Vietnam Syndrome: From the Gulf of Tonkin to Iraq
- 14 “The Vietnam Syndrome”: The Kerrey Revelations Raise Anew Issues of Morality and Military Power
- 15 Why the Legal Debate on the Vietnam War Still Matters: The Case for Revisiting the International Law Debate
- Index
Summary
The Kerrey disclosures have surfaced an array of both laudable and lamentable sentiments, but perhaps none worse than those associated with William Safire's April 30 tirade directed at the so-called Vietnam Syndrome. Safire defines the syndrome as “that revulsion at the use of military power that afflicted our national psyche for decades after our defeat.” At least we can be grateful that Safire nowhere makes clear what the wars since Vietnam were that America was prevented from entering because of what he calls the “national affliction” that accompanied the syndrome. It is this alleged inhibition on warmaking that has now resurfaced in the debate about Bob Kerrey's degree of guilt and accountability, vividly presented in these pages by Christopher Hitchens and Jonathan Schell. Overall, Safire wants to affirm Ronald Reagan's embrace of illusion by regarding the Vietnam War as an occasion of national heroism and honor. Safire ends his column plaintively: “Are there no voices left, after that costly loss of life, to reject the Syndrome's humiliating accusation of national arrogance – and to recall a noble motive?”
Alas, there are plenty such voices, most strident among them perhaps that of Senator John McCain, who writes with the authority of a former POW who was tortured during a long period of captivity in Vietnam. For McCain, despite the disclosure of the deliberate killing of civilians in the village hamlet of Thanh Phong back in February 1969, Kerrey remains “a war hero” who should be understood as having done what needed to be done in the sort of war being fought in Vietnam. Most disturbing, McCain argues that Vietnam was the kind of war that required its participants to hate the enemy, and he unabashedly makes a combat virtue out of hate. In his words: “I hated my enemies even before they held me captive because hate sustained me in my devotion to their complete destruction and helped me overcome the virtuous human impulse to recoil in disgust from what had to be done by my hand.” It is bad enough when a pilot holds such views but, when hatred informs the spirit of a ground war carried on in the midst of a densely inhabited civilian society, it is worse.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Revisiting the Vietnam War and International LawViews and Interpretations of Richard Falk, pp. 378 - 387Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017