Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- PART I GENERAL ISSUES
- PART II GERMANY AND GERMAN-OCCUPIED COUNTRIES AFTER 1945
- PART III LATIN AMERICA, POST COMMUNISM, AND SOUTH AFRICA
- 9 Paranoids May Be Persecuted: Post-totalitarian Transitional Justice
- 10 Transitional Justice in Argentina and Chile: A Never-Ending Story?
- 11 Transitional Justice in the German Democratic Republic and in Unified Germany
- 12 Rough Justice: Rectification in Post-authoritarian and Post-totalitarian Regimes
- 13 Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa Amnesty: The Price of Peace
- 14 Conclusion
- Index
- References
11 - Transitional Justice in the German Democratic Republic and in Unified Germany
from PART III - LATIN AMERICA, POST COMMUNISM, AND SOUTH AFRICA
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- PART I GENERAL ISSUES
- PART II GERMANY AND GERMAN-OCCUPIED COUNTRIES AFTER 1945
- PART III LATIN AMERICA, POST COMMUNISM, AND SOUTH AFRICA
- 9 Paranoids May Be Persecuted: Post-totalitarian Transitional Justice
- 10 Transitional Justice in Argentina and Chile: A Never-Ending Story?
- 11 Transitional Justice in the German Democratic Republic and in Unified Germany
- 12 Rough Justice: Rectification in Post-authoritarian and Post-totalitarian Regimes
- 13 Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa Amnesty: The Price of Peace
- 14 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
New political regimes are never created on a tabula rasa. Hence any new regime must establish some relationship to the actors and subjects of its predecessor regime. Also, it must establish reasons supporting the nature of this retrospective relationship. The retrospective relationship must be justifiable in terms of the new regime. Whereas new authoritarian regimes may be able to repress and destroy the traces and memories of the predecessor regime, this option is precluded in new democracies. The latter must deal, in order to secure their viability and credibility of their principles in the future, with past injustices through means and procedures that are consistent with presently valid standards of justice, such as the rule of law and equality before the law. This threefold temporal reference to the past, the present, and the future is constitutive of the problems of transition justice in new democracies. This chapter is about the way this backward-looking practices evolved in unified Germany with regard to the past of the now defunct state of the German Democratic Republic (GDR) and the dominant actors of this state, as well as its victims.
We deal here with “policies,” that is, initiatives taken and strategies chosen or sponsored by state actors (governments, the judiciary, and special agencies constituted by law), not the numerous exclusively civic actions in which conflicts are carried out among family members, by social and political movements, within occupational groups, or by the media. Policies of transition justice can focus on perpetrators and on victims.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Retribution and Reparation in the Transition to Democracy , pp. 239 - 275Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
- 3
- Cited by