Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:43:28.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Reproductive technologies and challenges in avian conservation and management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2010

Ann M. Donoghue
Affiliation:
Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, Fayetteville, AZ 72701, U.S.A.
Juan Manuel Blanco
Affiliation:
Centro de Estudios de Rapaces Ibericas, Toledo, Spain. Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, Fayetteville, AZ 72701, U.S.A.
George F. Gee
Affiliation:
Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD 20708, U.S.A.
Yvonne K. Kirby
Affiliation:
Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, Fayetteville, AZ 72701, U.S.A.
David E. Wildt
Affiliation:
Conservation & Research Center, National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution, Front Royal, VA 22630 and Washington, DC 20008, U.S.A.
William V. Holt
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London
Amanda R. Pickard
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London
John C. Rodger
Affiliation:
Marsupial CRC, New South Wales
David E. Wildt
Affiliation:
Smithsonian National Zoological Park, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

From a conservation perspective, bird species represent some of the most tragic as well as encouraging examples of efforts to preserve the world's biodiversity. Rachel Carson's classic book Silent Spring (1962) was a resounding alarm showing how humans can destroy ecosystems and the avian diversity within them. Carson dramatically described the severe loss in songbirds and raptors (birds of prey) throughout the 1940s–1960s, offering convincing arguments for how indiscriminate use of organochlorine pesticides caused eggshell thinning and infertility.

There now are an estimated 9672 bird species on the planet, widely distributed across a great number of habitats. Little is known about the basic biology of most birds, a matter of concern given that 321 species are listed as ‘Endangered’ and another 182 as ‘Critical’ (IUCN, 2000) (Table 21.1). There have been 104 documented bird extinctions world-wide. One of the best known examples is the dodo, discovered in 1598 by Portuguese sailors on the island of Mauritius. With no known predators and lacking fear of humans, the dodo was slaughtered for its meat and was extinct by 1681. Commercial hunting a little more than a century ago reduced the passenger pigeon, then the most numerous bird species on Earth, to 250 000 birds by 1896. Most of this flock was subsequently destroyed on a single day. The last passenger pigeon died on 1 September 1915 at the Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden, perhaps the only time in history when the exact moment an extinction occurred was recorded.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bercovitz, A. B., Collins, J., Price, P. & Tuttle, D. (1982). Noninvasive assessment of seasonal hormone profile in captive Bald Eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). Zoo Biology 1, 111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhead, T. R. & Fletcher, F. (1995). Depletion determines sperm numbers in male Zebra Finches. Animal Behavior 49, 451–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco, J. M., Gee, G., Wildt, D. E. & Donoghue, A. M. (2000). Species variation in osmotic, cryoprotectant, and cooling rate tolerance in Poultry, Eagle, and Peregrine Falcon spermatozoa. Biology of Reproduction 63, 1164–1171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brock, M. K. & Bird, D. M. (1991). Prefreeze and postthaw effects of glycerol and dimethylolacetamide on motility and fertilizing ability of American Kestrel (Falco sparverius) spermatozoa. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 22, 453–459Google Scholar
Bronson, F. H. (1989). Mammalian Reproductive Biology, pp. 28–89. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA
Cockrem, J. F. & Rounce, J. R. (1995). Noninvasive assessment of the annual gonadal cycle in free-living Kakapo, Strigops habroptilus, using fecal steroid measurements. The Auk 112, 253–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D. M. (1977). Artificial insemination. In Poultry Diseases (Ed. R. F. Gordon), pp. 302–307. Baillière Tindall, London
Czekala, N. M. &. Lasley, B. L. (1977). A technical note on sex discrimination in monomorphic birds using fecal steroid analysis. International Zoo Yearbook 17, 209–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMatteo, K. E., Asa, C. S., Macek, M. S. & Snyder, T. L. (1998) Artificial insemination and semen preservation of the common Piping Guan. Cracid Specialists Group, Piple Symposium. American Ornithologists Union, St Louis, MI
Donoghue, A. M. & Wishart, G. J. (2000). Storage of poultry semen. Animal Reproduction Science 62, 213–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, D. H., Gee, G. F. & Mirande, C. M. (Eds.) (1996). Cranes: Their Biology, Husbandry and Conservation. US Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington DC; International Crane Foundation, Baraboo, WI, in cooperation with the US Fish & Wildlife Service
Gee, G. F. (1995). Artificial insemination and cryopreservation of semen from non-domestic birds. In First International Symposium on the Artificial Insemination of Poultry (Eds. M. R. Bakst & G. J. Wishart), pp. 262–279. Poultry Science Association. Savoy, IL
Gee, G. F., Bakst, M. R. & Sexton, T. J. (1985). Cryogenic preservation of semen from the Greater Sandhill Crane. Journal of Wildlife Management 49, 480–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gvaryaku, G., Robinson, B., Meltzer, A., Perek, M. & Snapir, N. (1984). An improved method for obtaining semen from muscovy drakes and some of its quantitative and qualitative characteristics. Poultry Science 63, 548–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerstedt, R. H. & Graham, J. K. (1992). Cryopreservation of poultry sperm: the enigma of glycerol. Cryobiology 29, 26–38CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammerstrom, F. (1970). An Eagle in the Sky. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA
Hoffman, C. (1998). Peregrine to soar off endangered species list. Endangered Species Bulletin 23, 20–21Google Scholar
Howell, T. R. & Bartholomew, G. A. (1952). Experiments on the mating behavior of the Brewer Blackbird. Condor 54, 140–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. (2000). Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland
Kofuji, H., Kanda, M. & Oishi, T. (1999). Breeding cycles and fecal gonadal steroids in the Brown Dipper, Cinclus pallasii. General and Comparative Endocrinology 91, 216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korn, N., Thurston, R. J., Pooser, B. P. &. Scott, T. R. (2000). Ultrastructure of spermatozoa from Japanese Quail. Poultry Science 79, 86–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J. V., Whaling, C. S., Lasley, B. L. & Marier, P. (1995). Validation of an enzyme immunoassay for measurement of excreted estrogen and testosterone metabolites in White-Crowned Sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys oriantha). Zoo Biology 14, 97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, C., Staines, H. J., McCormick, P., McCallum, C., Choulani, F. & Wishart, G. J. (1999). Variability in the size of the nucleus in spermatozoa from Houbara Bustards, Chlamydotis undulata undulata. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 117, 307–313CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liptrap, R. M. (1993). Stress and the reproduction in domestic animals. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 697, 275–284CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFarlane, R. W. (1962). The taxonomic significance of avian sperm. Masters thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
McFarlane, R. W. (1971). Ultrastructure and phylogenetic significance of avian spermatozoa. Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
McIntyre, D. R. & Christensen, V. L. (1985). Effect of initial insemination and insemination interval on fertility in turkey hens. Poultry Science 64, 1549–1552CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meine, C. D. & Archibald, G. W (compilers) (1996). Status Survey and Conservation Action Plans: The Cranes. In International Union for the Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources, pp. 282. M.O.M. Priority, Ottawa, Canada
O'Brien, J. K., Oehler, D. A., Malowski, S. P. & Roth, T. L. (1999). Semen collection, characterization, and cryopreservation in a Magellanic Penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus). Zoo Biology 18, 199–2143.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paster, M. B. (1991). Avian reproductive endocrinology. Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice 21, 1343–1359CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polge, C. (1951). Functional survival of fowl spermatozoa after freezing at -70 ℃. Nature 167, 949–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, J. P. & Burrows, W. H. (1936). Artificial insemination in fowls. Journal of Heredity 27, 31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint Jalme, M., Gaucher, P. & Paillat, P. (1994). Artificial insemination in Houbara Bustards (Chlamydotis undulata): influence of the number of spermatozoa and insemination frequency on fertility and ability to hatch. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 100, 93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samour, J. H. (1986). Recent advances in artificial breeding techniques in birds and reptiles. International Zoo Yearbook 24/25, 143–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tell, L. A. & Lasley, B. L. (1991). An automated assay for fecal estrogen conjugates in the determination of sex in avian species. Zoo Biology 10, 361–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasser, S. K., Bevis, K., King, G. & Hanson, E. (1997). Noninvasive physiological measures of disturbance in the Northern Spotted Owl. Conservation Biology 11, 1019–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, M. (1957). An improved technique of the artificial insemination in ducks. Journal of the Faculty of Fisheries & Animal Husbandry, Hiroshima University 1, 363–370Google Scholar
Wingfield, J. C. & Farner, D. S. (1980). Endocrinologic and reproductive states of bird populations under environmental stress. United States Environmental Protection Agency Report. Contract No. cc699095
Wingfield, J. C., Smith, J. P. & Farner, D. S. (1982). Endocrine responses of White-Crowned Sparrows to environmental stress. Condor 84, 399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wishart, G. J. (1989). Physiological changes in fowl and turkey spermatozoa during in vitro storage. British Poultry Science 30, 443–454CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wishart, G. J. (2001). The cryopreservation of germplasm in domestic and non-domestic birds. In Cryobanking the Genetic Resource; Wildlife Conservation for the Future? (Eds. P. F. Watson & W. V. Holt), pp. 179–200. Taylor & Francis, London

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×