Aboulafia, Mitchell. The Mediating Self: Mead, Sartre, and Self-Determination (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Aboulafia, Mitchell. The Cosmopolitan Self: George Herbert Mead and Continental Philosophy (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor W.Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life, E. F. N. Jephcott (trans.) (London and New York: Verso, 1974).Google Scholar

Adorno, Theodor W.. “Probleme der Moralphilosophie,” in Nachgelassene Schriften, Vol. 10 (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996).Google Scholar

Allen, Danielle S.Talking to Strangers (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, Danielle S.. “Invisible Citizens: Political Exclusion and Domination,” in Williams, M. & Macedo, S. (eds.), Nomos (New York: New York University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses,” in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Anderson, E.Value in Ethics and Economics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Anderson, Joel. “Translator's Introduction,” in Honneth, Axel, The Struggle for Recognition (Cambridge: Polity 1995).Google Scholar

Anderson, Joel & Axel Honneth. “Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition and Justice,” in Christman, John & Anderson, Joel (eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. New Essays (New York: 2005) 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anzieu, Didier. The Group and the Unconscious (London: Routledge, 1985).Google Scholar

Archard, D. “Political Disagreement, Legitimacy, and Civility,” in Philosophical Explorations IV/3 (2001), 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. “Understanding and Politics,” in Essays in Understanding, 1930–1954, Kohn, Jerome (ed.), (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1994).Google Scholar

Ariès, Philip. Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life, trans. Robert Baldick (New York: Knopf, 1962).Google Scholar

Austin, John L.How to Do Things with Words (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baars, J.De mythe van de totale beheersing (Amsterdam, SUA: 1987).Google Scholar

Bader, Veit, & Benschop, A.. Ungleichheiten (Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bader, Veit, & Benschop, A.. Kollektives Handeln (Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bader, Veit, & Benschop, A.. Rassismus, Ethnizität und Bürgerschaft (Münster: Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot, 1995).Google Scholar

Bader, Veit, & A. Benschop. “Ethnicity and Class,” in Isajiw, Wsevolod W. (ed.), Comparative Perspectives on Interethnic Relations and Social Incorporation (Toronto: CanadianScholars' Press, 1997), 103–128.Google Scholar

Bader, Veit, & Benschop, A.. “Culture and Identity. Contesting constructivism,” in Ethnicities 1/2 (2001), 251–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bader, Veit, & A. Benschop. “Problems and Prospects of Associative Democracy,” in Hirst, P. & Bader, V. (eds.), Associative Democracy – The Real Third Way (London: Frank Cass 2001), 31–70.Google Scholar

Bader, Veit, & A. Benschop. “Associative Democracy and Minorities Within Minorities,” in Spinner, J. & Eisenberg, A. (eds.), Minorities Within Minorities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Bader, Veit, & A. Benschop. “Immigration,” in Caney, S. & Lehning, P. (eds.), International Distributive Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Bader, Veit, & Benschop, A.. “Taking Religious Pluralism Seriously. Introduction,” in Religious Pluralism, Politics, and the State. Special Volume of Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6/1 (2003), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bader, Veit, & A. Benschop. “Pluralism,” in Harrington, A.. (eds.) Routledge Encyclopedia of Social Theory (London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar

Bader, Veit, & A. Benschop. “Defending Differentiated Policies of Multiculturalism,” Portuguese translation: “Em Defesa de Políticas Multiculturais Diferenciadas,” in Rosas, J. C. (ed.), Ideias e Políticas para o Nosso Tempo (Braga: Universidade Do Minho; Hespérides/Filosofia 4, 2004[2002]), 207–240.Google Scholar

Bader, Veit, Benschop, A. & Saharso, S.. “Introduction: Contextualized Morality and Ethno-Religious Diversity,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7/2 (2004), 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bader, Veit, & A. Benschop. “Against Monism: Pluralist Critical Comments on D. Allen and P. Pettit,” in Williams, M. & Macedo, S. (eds.), Nomos (New York: New York University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Barry, Brian. Justice as Impartiality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Barry, Brian. Culture and Equality (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Barshack, Lior. Passions and Convictions in Matters Political (Lanham: University Press of America, 2000).Google Scholar

Barshack, Lior. “The Holy Family and the Law,” in International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 18/2 (2004).Google Scholar

Barshack, Lior. “Constituent Power as Body: Outline of a Constitutional Theology,” in University of Toronto Law Journal 57/1 (forthcoming, 2007).Google Scholar

Bayle, Pierre. Philosophical Commentary, trans. & ed. Tannenbaum, Amie Godman (New York: Peter Lang, 1987).Google Scholar

Bayle, Pierre. Historical and Critical Dictionary, trans. Richard H. Popkin (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1991).Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich (ed.) Die Zukunft von Arbeit und Demokratie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000).Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy,” in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), 67–94.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Jessica. The Bonds of Love (New York: Pantheon, 1988).Google Scholar

Benjamin, Jessica. “Recognition and Destruction: An Outline of Intersubjectivity,” in Like Subjects, Love Objects: Essays on Recognition and Sexual Difference (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995), 27–48.Google Scholar

Berghöfer, A.An Examination of Beneficiary Participation in Post-Conflict Development Assistance, master's thesis, ISHSS (Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, 2003).Google Scholar

Bernstein, Jay. “Confession and Forgiveness: Hegel's Poetics of Action,” in Eldridge, Richard (ed.), Beyond Representation: Philosophy and Poetic Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 34–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, Jay. Adorno: Ethics and Disenchantment (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertram, H. “Arbeit, Familie, und Bindungen,” in Kocka, J. & Offe, C. (eds.), Geschichte und Zukunft der Arbeit (Frankfurt/New York: Campus, 1998).Google Scholar

Bion, Wifred Ruprecht. Experiences in Groups (London: Tavistock, 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blasche, S., & Döring, D.. Sozialpolitik und Gerechtigkeit (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1998).Google Scholar

Bohman, James. “Reflexive Toleration in a Deliberative Democracy,” in McKinnon, Catriona & Castiglione, Dario (eds.), The Culture of Toleration in Diverse Societies, in The Culture of Toleration in Diverse Societies (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohman, James. “Deliberative Democracy and Effective Social Freedom,” in Bohman, J. & Rehg, W. (eds.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Bossuet, Jacques-Benigne. Politics Drawn from the Very Words of Holy Scripture, trans. & ed. by Riley, Patrick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. La Misère du Monde (Paris: Seuil, 1998).Google Scholar

Boxhill, B. R. “Self-Respect and Protest,” in Dillion, R. (ed.), Dignity, Character and Self-Regard (London: Routledge, 1995), 93–104.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. Making it Explicit (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Brown, Wendy. “Reflections on Tolerance in the Age of Identity,” in Botwinick, A. & Connolly, W. E. (eds.), Democracy and Vision (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001), 99–117.Google Scholar

Bubeck, D. E.Care, Gender, and Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Judith. “Conscience Doth Make Subjects of Us All – Althusser's Subjection,” in The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. “Subjection, Resistance, Resignification,” in The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Castel, R.Les Metamorphoses de la Question Sociale (Paris: Gallimard, 1999).Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. “Knowing and Acknowledging,” in Cavell, , Must We Mean What We Say: A Book of Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976), 238–266.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Celikates, Robin. Nicht versöhnt. Der Kampf im Kampf um Anerkennung (unpublished ms. 2005)

Chavkin, N., & Gonzalez, J.. Mexican immigrant youth and resiliency (Charleston, WV: AEL Inc., 2000).Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A.History, Labour and Freedom. Themes from Marx (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A.. If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich? (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. & Arato, A.. Civil Society and Political Theory (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Conze, W. “Arbeit,” in Brunner, O., Conze, W., & Koselleck, R. (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (Stuttgart: Klei Cotta Verlag, 1997[1979ff]).Google Scholar

Cook, Gary A.George Herbert Mead: The Making of a Social Pragmatist (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Dahrendorf, R. “Wenn der Arbeitsgesellschaft die Arbeit ausgeht,” in Matthes, J. (ed.), Krise der Arbeitsgesellschaft? Verhandlungen des 21. Deutschen Soziologentages in Bamberg 1982, (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1983).Google Scholar

Dante, Alighieri. Dante's Monarchia, trans. Richard Kay (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1998).Google Scholar

Darwall, S. L. “Two Kinds of Respect,” in Dillion, R. (ed.), Dignity, Character and Self-Regard (London: Routledge, 1995), 181–197.Google Scholar

Detel, Wolfgang. Macht, Moral, Wissen. Foucault und die klassische Antike (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1998).Google Scholar

Deveaux, M. “A Deliberative Approach to Conflicts of Culture,” in Eisenberg, A. & Spinner, J. (eds.), Minorities within Minorities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Dewey, John. The Public and its Problems (Chicago: Gateway Books, 1946).Google Scholar

Dewey, John. “Self-Realization as the Moral Ideal,” in The Early Works, 1882–1898, Vol. 4 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Dewey, John. “The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology,” in The Early Works, 1882–1898, Vol. 5 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Dewey, John. “The Public and its Problems,” in The Later Works, 1925–1953, Vol. 2 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Dews, Peter. “Communicative Paradigms and Subjectivity: Habermas, Mead, and Lacan” in Dews, Peter (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999).Google Scholar

Doorne-Huyskes, A. V. “The Unpaid Work of Mothers and Housewives in the Different Types of Welfare States,” in Koslowski, P. & Foellesdal, A. (eds.), Restructuring the Welfare State (Berlin: Springer, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dornes, M. “Frisst die Emanzipation ihre Kinder?” in Honneth, A. (ed.) Befreiung aus der Muendigkeit. Paradoxien des gegenwaertigen Kapitalismus (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 2002).Google Scholar

Douglass, Frederick. “The Meaning of July Fourth for the Negro,” in Foner, Philip S. (ed.), The Life and Writings of Frederick Douglass, Vol. 2. Pre-Civil War Decade, 1850–1860 (New York: International Publishers, 1950).Google Scholar

Douglass, Frederick. “What Are the Colored People Doing for Themselves,” The North Star (July 14, 1848), in The Life and Writings of Frederick Douglass, vol. 1, Early Years, 1817–1949, ed. Foner, Philip S. (New York: International Publishers,” 1950).Google Scholar

Du Bois, W. E. B.The Souls of Black Folk (New York: Signet, 1995).Google Scholar

Dumont, Louis. Affinity as a Value (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Elster, J. “The Market and the Forum,” in Bohman, James & Rehg, William (eds.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997), 3–34.Google Scholar

Emcke, Carolin. Kollektive Identitäten. Sozialphilosophische Grundlagen (Frankfurt/New York: Campus, 2000).Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, G.The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth (New York: Grove Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Fanuzzi, Robert. Abolition's Public Sphere (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Feffer, Andrew. The Chicago Pragmatists and American Progressivism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Festenstein, M.Pragmatism and Political Theory (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Fetscher, I. “Nachwort,” in Marx, Karl & Engels, Friedrich, Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1969).Google Scholar

Folbre, N.Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structure of Constraint (London: Routledge, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forst, Rainer. “Foundations of a Theory of Multicultural Justice,” in Constellations 4 (1997), 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forst, Rainer. “Die Rechtfertigung der Gerechtigkeit. Rawls' Politischer Liberalismus und Habermas' Diskurstheorie in der Diskussion,” in Brunkhorst, Hauke & Niesen, Peter (eds.), Das Recht der Republik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1999), 105–168.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer. “The Basic Right to Justification,” in Constellations 6 (1999), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forst, Rainer. “Tolerance as a Virtue of Justice,” in Philosophical Explorations IV (2001), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forst, Rainer. “Towards a Critical Theory of Transnational Justice,” in Pogge, Thomas (ed.), Global Justice (Oxford: Blackwell, 2001), 169–187.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer. Contexts of Justice, trans. J. Farrell (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer. “A Tolerant Republic?” in Müller, Jan-Werner (ed.), German Ideologies Since 1945 (New York: Palgrave, 2003), 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forst, Rainer. Toleranz im Konflikt. Geschichte, Gehalt und Gegenwart eines umstrittenen Begriffs (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2003.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer. “Toleration, Justice and Reason,” in McKinnon, Catriona & Castiglione, Dario (eds.), The Culture of Toleration in Diverse Societies (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forst, Rainer. “The Limits of Toleration,” in Constellations 11 (2004), 312–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forst, Rainer. “Moral Autonomy and the Autonomy of Morality,” in Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 26 (2005), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortes, Meyer. Kinship and the Social Order (Chicago: Aldine, 1969).Google Scholar

Fortes, Meyer. “Pietas in Ancestral Worship,” in Time and Social Structure (London: Athlone, 1970).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish, trans. Alan Sheridan (New York: Vintage, 1979).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality: Volume 1, trans. R. Hurley (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1979).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. “The Subject and Power,” in Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 2nd ed., Dreyfus, Herbert & Rabinow, Paul (eds.) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, volume I, ed. Rabinow, Paul, trans. Robert Hurley et al. (New York: New Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The Politics of Truth, ed. Lotriner, S. & Hochroth, L. (New York: Semiotext(e), 1997).Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. “What is Critique?” trans. Kevin Paul Geiman, in Schmidt, James (ed.), What is Enlightenment: Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Franchot, Jenny. “The Punishment of Esther: Frederick Douglass and the Construction of the Feminine,” in Sundquist, Eric J. (ed.), Frederick Douglass: New Literary and Historical Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Frank, Jill. “Citizens, Slaves, and Foreigners: Aristotle on Human Nature,” in American Political Science Review 98/1 (2004), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, Jill. A Democracy of Distinction: Aristotle and the Work of Politics (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry G.Necessity, Volition, and Love (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. “From Redistribution to Recognition?” New Left Review 212 (1995), 68–93.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. “After The Family Wage: A Post-Industrial Thought Experiment,” in Justice Interruptus (New York: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. “Socialist Justice in the Age of Identity Politics,” in Tanner Lectures XIX (Salt Lake City: Univ. of Utah Press, 1998), 1–67.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking Recognition,” in New Left Review 3 (2000), 107–120.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution. Recognition, and Participation,” in Fraser, Nancy & Honneth, Axel, Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange (London: Verso Books, 2003), 7–109.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. “Distorted Beyond all Recognition: A Rejoinder to Axel Honneth,” in Fraser, Nancy & Honneth, Axel, Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange (London: Verso Books, 2003), 198–236.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy & Honneth, Axel. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange (London: Verso Books, 2003).Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. “Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 7 (London: Hogarth, 1953).Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. “Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego,” section IX, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 18 (London: Hogarth, 1955).Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. “Mourning and Melancholia,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 14 (London: Hogarth, 1957).Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. “The Ego and the Id,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 19 (London: Hogarth, 1961).Google Scholar

Friedan, Betty. The Feminine Mystique (New York: W. W. Norton & Co, 1983).Google Scholar

Fromm, Erich. Escape from Freedom (New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1941).Google Scholar

Fromm, Erich. Man for Himself (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1947).Google Scholar

Fromm, Erich. The Art of Loving (New York: Harper, 1962).Google Scholar

Galeotti, Anna Elisabetta. Toleration as Recognition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galston, William. “Diversity, Toleration, and Deliberative Democracy: Religious Minorities and Public Schooling,” in Macedo, Stephen (ed.), Deliberative Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 39–48.Google Scholar

Galston, William. Liberal Pluralism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gauthier, David. Morals by Agreement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Gerhard, Ute. (eds.), Erwerbstaetige Muetter. Ein europaeischer Vergleich (München: Beck, 2003)Google Scholar

Geuss, Raymond. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. “Maximen und Reflexionen”, in Werke 6 (Frankfurt am Main: Insel, 1981).Google Scholar

Goodrich, Peter. Law in the Courts of Love (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar

Goodrich, Peter. “Epistolary Justice: The Love Letter as Law,” in Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 9 (1997).Google Scholar

Gorz, A.Reclaiming Work. Beyond the Wage-Based Society (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Green, Thomas Hill. Prolegomena to Ethics, ed. Bradley, A. C., 3rd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1890).Google Scholar

Grell, Ole P., Israel, Jonathan I., & Tyacke, Nicholas (eds.), From Persecution to Toleration (Oxford: Clarendon, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guertler, Sabine. “Drei philosophische Argumente fuer ein Recht auf Arbeit,” in Deutsche Zeitschrift fuer Philosophie 48/6 (2000), 867–88.

Guertler, Sabine. “Die ethische Dimension der Arbeit,” in Deutsche Zeitschrift fuer Philosophie 49 (2001), 723–41.

Gutmann, Amy, & Thompson, Dennis. Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, & Dennis Thompson. “Democratic Disagreement,” in Macedo, Stephen (ed.), Deliberative Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1968).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Die Krise des Wohlfartsstaates und die Erschoepfung utopischer Energien,” in Die neue Unübersichtlichkeit (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1985).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2, “Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason,” trans. Thomas McCarthy (Boston: Beacon Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Individuation through Socialization: On George Herbert Mead's Theory of Subjectivity,” in Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, trans. William Mark Hohengarten (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. Christian Lenhardt & Shierry Weber Nicholson (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Afterword,” in Deflem, M. (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law (London: Sage, 1996), 135–50.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. William Rehg (Cambridge: Polity Press 1996).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Kampf um Anerkennung im demokratischen Rechtsstaat,” in Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1999), 237–276Google Scholar

Hacker-Cordon, C. Our Deliberative Situation (PhD unpublished dissertation, 2003).

Haeussermann, H., & Siebel, W. (eds.) Dienstleistungsgesellschaften (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995).Google Scholar

Hausen, “Karin Die Polarisierung der ‘Geschlechtsckaraktere’ – Eine Spiegelung der Dissoziation von Erwerbs- und Familienleben,” in Conze, Werner (ed.), Sozialgeschichte der Familie in der Neuzeit Europas (Stuttgart: Klett, 1976), 363–393.Google Scholar

Hausen. “Arbeit und Geschlecht,” in Kocka, J. & Offe, C. (eds.), Geschichte und Zukunft der Arbeit (Frankfurt/New York: Campus, 1998).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.The Phenomenology of Mind, trans. J. B. Baillie (London: Allen & Unwin, 1966).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. Philosophy of Right, transl. T. M. Knox (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Arts, 2 Volumes, trans. T. M. Knox (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. Hegel's Logic, trans. William Wallace (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. System of Ethical Life and First Philosophy of Spirit, trans. and ed. Harris, H. S. and Knox, T. M. (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1979).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. “Jena Lectures in the Philosophy of Spirit,” in Hegel and the Human Spirit: A Translation of the Jena Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit (1805–6) with Commentary, trans. and ed. Rauch, Leo (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. “Philosophie des Rechts,” in Werke in 20 Bänden und Register, Vol. 7 (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1990).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, Allen, trans. H. B. Nisbet (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. “Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften I,” in Werke in 20 Bänden und Register, Vol. 8 (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991).Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.. “Phänomenologie des Geistes,” in Hauptwerke in sechs Bänden, Vol. 2 (Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1999).Google Scholar

Herzog, Don. Poisoning the Minds of the Lower Orders (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Hill Jr., Thomas E. “Self-respect reconsidered,” in Hill, , Autonomy and Self-Respect (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991), 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirschmann, Nancy J.The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Hochschild, A.The Second Shift (London: Piatkus, 1990).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Arbeit und instrumentelles Handeln,” in Honneth, A. & Jaeggi, U. (eds.), Arbeit, Handlung, Normativitaet (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1980).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel & Joas, Hans. Social Action and Human Nature, trans. Raymond Meyer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory, trans. Kenneth Baynes (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Author's Introduction,” in The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, ed. Wright, Charles W. (Albany: SUNY Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Decentered Autonomy: The Subject After the Fall,” in The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, ed. Wright, Charles W. (Albany: SUNY Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Foucault and Adorno: Two Forms of the Critique of Modernity,” in The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, ed. Wright, Charles W., trans. Jeremy Gaines (Albany: SUNY Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “From Adorno to Habermas: On the Transformation of Critical Social Theory,” in The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, ed. Wright, Charles W., trans. Jeremy Gaines (Albany: SUNY Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “The Limits of Liberalism: On the Political-Ethical Discussion Concerning Communitarianism,” in The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy, ed. Wright, Charles W., trans. Jeremy Gaines (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, trans. Joel Anderson (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “The Perpetuation of the State of Nature: on the Cognitive Content of Elias Canetti's Crowds and Power,” in Thesis Eleven 45 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Recognition and Moral Obligation,” in Social Research 64/1 (1997), 16–35.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Democracy as Reflexive Co-operation: John Dewey and Democratic Theory Today,” in Political Theory 26/6 (1998), pp. 771–2Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Postmodern Identity and Object-Relations Theory: On the Seeming Obsolescence of Psychoanalysis,” in Philosophical Explorations 3 (1999), 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honneth, Axel. Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. Suffering from Indeterminacy: An Attempt at a Reactivation of Hegel's Philosophy of Right, Introduction by Beate Rössler, trans. Jack Ben-Levi (Assen: Van Gorcum, 2000).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Zwischen Gerechtigkeit und affektiver Binding. Die Familie im Brennpunkt moralischer Kontroversen,” in Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit. Aufsätze zur praktischen Philosophie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2000), 193–215.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Facetten des vorsozialen Selbst: Eine Erwiderung auf Joel Whitebook,” in Psyche 55 (2001), 790–802.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel & Margalit, A.. “Recognition,” in Supplement to the Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 75/1 (2001), 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honneth, Axel. (ed.), Befreiung aus der Muendigkeit. Paradoxien des gegenwaertigen Kapitalismus (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 2002).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Between Hermeneutics and Hegelianism: J. McDowell and the Challenge of Moral Realism,” in Smith, Nicholas H. (ed.), Reading McDowell. On Mind and World (London: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Grounding Recognition: A Rejoinder to Critical Questions,” Inquiry 45/4 (2002), 499–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Redistribution as Recognition: A Response to Nancy Fraser,” in Fraser, Nancy & Honneth, Axel, Redistribution or Recognition: A Political-Philosophical Exchange, trans. Joel Golb, James Ingram, & Christiane Wilke (London/New York: Verso, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “The Point of Recognition,” in Fraser, Nancy & Honneth, Axel, Redistribution or Recognition: A Political-Philosophical Exchange, trans. Joel Golb, James Ingram, & Christiane Wilke (London/New York: Verso, 2003), pp. 237–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Zwischen Hermeneutik und Hegelianismus,” in Unsichtbarkeit (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2003).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Antworten auf die Beiträge der Kolloquiumsteilnehmer,” in Halbig, Christoph & Quante, Michael (eds.), Axel Honneth: Sozialphilosophie zwischen Kritik und Anerkennung (Münster: Lit, 2004), 99–121Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Between Justice and Affection: The Family as a Field of Moral Disputes,” in Rössler, Beate (ed.), Privacies (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Der Grund der Anerkennung. Eine Erwiderung auf kritische Rückfragen,” in Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit. Mit einem neuen Nachwort (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2004).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Die Unhintergehbarkeit des Fortschritts. Kants Bestimmung des Verhältnisses von Moral und Geschichte,” in Nagl-Docekal, Herta & Langthaler, Rudolf (eds.), Tagungsband “Recht – Geschichte – Religion. Die Bedeutung Kants für die Philosophie der Gegenwart (Berlin: Akademie, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “Gerechtigkeit und kommunikative Freiheit. Überlegungen im Anschluss an Hegel,” in Merker, Barbara, Mohr, Georg & Quante, Michael (eds.), Subjektivität und Anerkennung (Paderborn: Mentis-Verlag, 2004), 213–227.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. Kampf um Anerkennung: Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Mit einem neuen Nachwort (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2004).Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. Reification. A Recognition-Theoretical View [Cambridge: Oxford University Press (forthcoming)].Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel. “The Social Dynamics of Disrespect,” in The Other of Justice [Cambridge, UK: Polity Press (forthcoming)].Google Scholar

Horkheimer, Max. “Traditional and Critical Theory,” in Critical Theory (New York: Herder and Herder, 1972).Google Scholar

Horkheimer, Max & Adorno, Theodor W.. Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. John Cummings (New York: Continuum Publishing, 1972).Google Scholar

Ikäheimo, Heikki. “On the Genus and Species of Recognition,” in Inquiry 45/4 (2002), 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ikäheimo, Heikki. “Taylor on Something Called ‘Recognition’,” in Laitinen, Arto & Smith, Nicholas H. (eds.), Perspectives on the Philosophy of Charles Taylor, Acta Philosophica Fennica 71 (Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica, 2002), 99–111.Google Scholar

Ikäheimo, Heikki. “On the Role of Intersubjectivity in Hegel's Encyclopaedic Phenomenology and Psychology,” in Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, 49/50 (2004), 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irigaray, Luce. Speculum of the Other Woman, trans. Gillian C. Gill (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

James, William. The Principles of Psychology, 2 vols. (New York: Henry Holt, 1890).Google Scholar

Jefferson, T., & King, J. E.. “‘Never Intended To Be A Theory Of Everything’: Domestic Labour in Neoclassical and Marxian Economics,” in Feminist Economics 7/3 (2001).Google Scholar

Joas, Hans. The Creativity of Action, trans. Jeremy Gaines & Paul Keast (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Joas, Hans. G. H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought, trans. Raymond Meyer (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Kambartel, F.Philosophie und politische Oekonomie (Goettingen: Wallstein, 1998).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. H. J. Paton (New York: Harper and Row, 1964).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’” in Political Writings, ed. Reiss, H., trans. H. B. Nisbet, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Mary Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Kantorowicz, Ernst. The King's Two Bodies (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957).Google Scholar

Kaufmann, F. X.Varianten des Wohlfahrtstaats. Der deutsche Sozialstaat im internationalen Vergleich (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2003).Google Scholar

Kernberg, Otto F. “Regression in Groups,” in Internal World and External Reality (Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson/Rowman & Littlefield, 1980).Google Scholar

Kernberg, Otto F.. Love Relations: Normality and Pathology (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Kickbusch, I., & Riedmueller, B. (eds.) Die armen Frauen. Frauen und Sozialpolitik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1984).Google Scholar

King, Preston. Toleration (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Kittay, Eva. Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency (New York: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar

Kocka, J. “Arbeit frueher, heute, morgen: Zur Neuartigkeit der Gegenwart,” in Kocka, J. & Offe, C. (eds.), Geschichte und Zukunft der Arbeit (Frankfurt/New York: Campus, 1998).Google Scholar

Kocka, J.. “Erwerbsarbeit ist nur ein historisches Konstrukt,” in Frankfurter Rundschau (May 9, 2000).

Kompridis, Nikolas “From Reason to Self-Realization? Axel Honneth and the ‘Ethical Turn’ in Critical Theory,” in Critical Horizons 5/1(2004).Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine. The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krebs, A.Arbeit und Liebe. Die philosophischen Grundlagen sozialer Gerechtigkeit (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2002).Google Scholar

Kühn, Bärbel. “Vom Schalten und Walten der Hausfrau. Hausarbeit in Rat, Tat und Forschung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert,” in Bolognese-Leuchtenmüller, Birgit & Mitteerauer, Michael (eds.), Frauen-Arbeitswelten. Zur historischen Genese gegenwärtiger Probleme (Vienna: Verlag für Gesellschaftskritik, 1993), pp. 43–66.Google Scholar

Kurz-Scherf, I. “Kritik an Kambartels Arbeit und Praxis,” in Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 41/2 (1993).Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will. Contemporary Political Philosophy. An Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Kymlicka, Will. Multicultural Citizenship (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Lacan, Jacques. “The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I,” in Ecrits: A Selection, trans. Alan Sheridan (London: Tavistock, 1977).Google Scholar

Lacan, Jacques. “The Instance of the Letter in the Unconscious,” in Écrits: A Selection, trans. Bruce Fink (New York: Norton, 2004).Google Scholar

Laden, Anthony Simon. “Outline of a Theory of Reasonable Deliberation,” in Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (2000), 551–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laden, Anthony Simon. Reasonably Radical: Deliberative Liberalism and the Politics of Identity (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Laden, Anthony Simon. “Reasonable Liberals, Radical Feminists,” in Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (2003), 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laitinen, Arto. “Interpersonal Recognition – A Response to Value or A Precondition of Personhood?” in Inquiry 45/4 (2002), 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laitinen, Arto. Strong Evaluation Without Sources. On Charles Taylor's Philosophical Anthropology and Cultural Moral Realism. (Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research 224, 2003).Google Scholar

Laitinen, Arto. “Hegel on Retrospective and Intersubjective Determination of Intention,” in Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 49/50 (2004), 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laitinen, Arto. “Social Equality, Recognition and Good Life” (unpublished ms).

Laitinen, Arto. “Interpersonal Recognition and Responsiveness to Relevant Differences,” in Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (March 2006).

Lange, E. M. “Glueck, Sinn und Arbeit,” in Rechtsphilosophische Hefte, Vol. 5 (1996).Google Scholar

Larmore, Charles, “Pluralism and Reasonable Disagreement,” in The Morals of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laufer, J.. (eds.), Le Travail du Genre. Les Sciences Sociales du Travail a l'épreuve des Différences de Sexe (Paris: La Découverte: 2003).Google Scholar

Legendre, Pierre. Law and the Unconscious: A Legendre Reader, ed. by Goodrich, Peter (London: Macmillan, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leipert, C., & Opielka, M. (eds.) Erziehungsgehalt 2000 (Bonn: Institut für Sozialökologie, 1998).Google Scholar

Levy, J.The Multiculturalism of Fear (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, J. David. “A Social Behaviorist Interpretation of the Meadian ‘I’,” in Aboulafia, Mitchell (ed.), Philosophy, Social Theory, and the Thought of George Herbert Mead (Albany: SUNY Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Lilburne, John. “Englands Birth-Right Justified” (1645), in Tracts on Liberty in the Puritan Revolution III, ed. Haller, W. (New York: Octagon, 1965), 257–308.Google Scholar

Locke, John. A Letter Concerning Toleration, ed. Tully, J. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983).Google Scholar

Lovibond, Eva. Ethical Formation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. Rechtssoziologie (Reinbeck: Rowohlt, 1972).Google Scholar

Macedo, Stephen. “Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The Case of God v. John Rawls?” in Ethics 105 (1995), 468–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacGilvray, Eric A.Reconstructing Public Reason (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catharine. “Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination,” in Feminism Unmodified (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J., & Morris, A. (eds.), The Subjective Roots of Social Protest (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert. “Repressive Tolerance,” in Wolff, Robert P., Moore, Barrington, & Marcuse, Herbert, A Critique of Pure Tolerance (Boston: Beacon Press, 1965), 81–118.Google Scholar

Margalit, Avishai. “Recognition II: Recognizing the Brother and the Other,” in Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (2001), 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markell, Patchen. “The Recognition of Politics: A Comment on Emcke and Tully,” in Constellations 7/4 (2000), 496–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markell, Patchen. Bound by Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Markell, Patchen. “Arendt on Democratic Rule” (unpublished ms).

Marx, Karl. “Die deutsche Ideologie,” in Marx, Karl & Engels, Friedrich, Marx-Engels-Werke, Vol. 3 (Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1969)Google Scholar

Marx, Karl & Engels, Friedrich. Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1969).Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte (Leipzig: Reclam, 1970).Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. Capital. A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. I (London: Penguin, 1976).Google Scholar

Matthes, J. (ed.). Krise der Arbeitsgesellschaft? Verhandlungen des 21. Deutschen Soziologentages in Bamberg 1982 (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1983).Google Scholar

McDowell, John. “Two Sorts of Naturalism,” in Mind, Value and Reality. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

McIntosh, Peggy. “White Privilege and Male Privilege,” in Atherton, Margaret & Collins, Patricia Hill (eds.), Race, Class, and Gender (New York: Wadsworth, 1995).Google Scholar

Mead, George Herbert. “The Definition of the Psychical,” in The Decennial Publications of the University of Chicago, 1st series, Vol. 3 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1903).Google Scholar

Mead, George Herbert. Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, ed. Morris, Charles W. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934).Google Scholar

Mead, George Herbert. “The Mechanism of Social Consciousness,” in Selected Writings, ed. Reck, Andrew J. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964).Google Scholar

Mead, George Herbert. “Social Psychology as a Counterpart to Physiological Psychology,” in Selected Writings, ed. Reck, Andrew J. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Mead, George Herbert. “Suggestions toward a Theory of the Philosophical Disciplines,” in Selected Writings, ed. Reck, Andrew J. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Mead, George Herbert. “The Social Self,” in Selected Writings, ed. Reck, Andrew J. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Mead, George Herbert. The George Herbert Mead Papers (University of Chicago: Regenstein Library, Department of Special Collections).

Mendus, Susan. Toleration and the Limits of Liberalism (Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menke, C. “Grenzen der Gleichheit,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 50/6 (2002), 897–906.Google Scholar

Mesch, Walter. “Sittlichkeit und Anerkennung in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie. Kritische Überlegungen zu Theunissen und Honneth,” in Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 53 (2005), 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. “Considerations on Representative Government,” in On Liberty and Other Essays, ed. Gray, John (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Miller, David. On Nationality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).

Mills, Charles. Blackness Visible (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Moore, Barrington. Injustice: The Social Basis of Obedience and Revolt (White Plains: M. E. Sharpe, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muirhead, R.Just Work (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Müller-Doohm, Stefan. Die Soziologie Theodor W. Adornos (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 2000), 188–198.Google Scholar

Nelson, H., & Lasswell, T.. “Status Indices, Social Stratification, and Social Class,” in Sociology and Social Research 44 (1960).Google Scholar

Nelson, J. A. “Of Markets and Martyrs: Is it o.k. to Pay Well for Care?” in Feminist Economics 5/3 (1999).Google Scholar

Nelson, J. A. & England, P.. “Feminist Philosophies of Love and Work,” in Hypatia 17 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neuhouser, Frederick. Foundations of Hegel's Social Philosophy: Actualizing Freedom (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Newey, Glen. Virtue, Reason and Toleration (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Gay Science, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Random House, 1974).Google Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Genealogy of Morality, trans. C. Diethe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Nyberg, A. “From Foster Mothers to Child Care Centers: A History of Working Mothers and Child Care in Sweden,” in Feminist Economics 6/1 (2000).Google Scholar

Offe, C. “Arbeit als soziologische Schluesselkategorie?” in Matthes, J., (ed.), Krise der Arbeitsgesellschaft? Verhandlungen des 21. Deutschen Soziologentages in Bamberg 1982 (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1983).Google Scholar

Offe, C.. “Anmerkungen zur Gegenwart der Arbeit,” in Kocka, J. & Offe, C. (eds.), Geschichte und Zukunft der Arbeit (Frankfurt/New York: Campus 1998).Google Scholar

Oliver, Kelly. Witnessing: Beyond Recognition (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001).Google Scholar

O'Neill, Onora. “Practices of Toleration,” in Lichtenberg, Judith (ed.), Democracy and the Mass Media (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 155–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Opitz, Sven. Gouvernementabilität im Postfordismus. Macht, Wissen und Techniken des Selbst im Feld unternehmerischer Rationalität (Hamburg: Argument, 2004).Google Scholar

Ostner, I., & Pieper, B. (eds.) Arbeitsbereich Familie. Umrisse einer Theorie der Privatheit (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1980).Google Scholar

Ostner I., B. Pieper & A. Willms. “Strukturelle Veraenderungen der Frauenarbeit in Haushalt und Beruf,” in Matthes, J. (ed.), Krise der Arbeitsgesellschaft? Verhandlungen des 21. Deutschen Soziologentages in Bamberg 1982 (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1983).Google Scholar

Ostner I., B. Pieper & A. Willms. “Arbeits- und Industriegesellschaft,” in Kneer, G.. (eds.), Klassische Gesellschaftsbegriffe der Soziologie (Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2001).Google Scholar

Owen, David. Nietzsche, Politics and Modernity (London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995).Google Scholar

Owen, David & Bentley, Russell. “Ethical Loyalties, Civic Virtue and the Circumstances of Politics,” in Philosophical Explorations 4 (2001).Google Scholar

Parekh, B.Rethinking Multiculturalism (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Parsons, Talcott. “An Analytical Approach to the Theory of Social Stratification,” in Parsons, Sociological Theory (New York: Free Press, 1954), 69–88.Google Scholar

Perrons, D. “Care, Paid Work, and Leisure: Rounding the Triangle,” in Feminist Economics 6/1 (2000).Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. “Complaining about Domination,” in Williams, M. & Macedo, S. (eds.), Nomos (New York: New York University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, pb. ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phelps, E. S.Rewarding Work. How to Restore Participation and Self-Support to Free Enterprise (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert. Hegel's Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pippin, Robert. Henry James and Modern Moral Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert. “What is the Question for Which Hegel's ‘Theory of Recognition’ is the Answer?” in The European Journal of Philosophy 8/2 (August 2000).Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert. Hegel's Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life (forthcoming).

Proast, Jonas. The Argument of the Letter Concerning Toleration, Briefly Consider'd and Answer'd, (New York and London: Garland, 1984).Google Scholar

Raiethel, Gert. Geschichte der nordamerikanischen Kultur, Vol. I: Vom Puritanismus bis zum Bürgerkrieg 1600–1800 (Frankfurt am Main: Zweitausendeins, 1995).Google Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. “Autonomy, Toleration, and the Harm Principle,” in Mendus, Susan (ed.), Justifying Toleration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raz, Joseph. The Practice of Value (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Reck, Andrew J. “The Influence of William James on John Dewey in Psychology,” in Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 20/2 (1984), 87–117.Google Scholar

Renault, Emmanuel. “Reconnaissance, Institutions, Injustice,” in De la Connaissance. Revue de Mauss, Semestrielle 23 (2004), 180–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rössler, Beate. The Value of Privacy (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Rose, Gillian. The Melancholy Science: An Introduction to the Thought of Theodor W. Adorno (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Rösner, Hans-Uwe. Jenseits normalisierender Anerkennung. Reflexionen zum Verhältnis von Macht und Behindertsein (Frankfurt/New York: Campus, 2002).Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Emile (New York: Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The First and Second Discourses, trans. & ed. Gourevitch, Victor (New York: Harper and Row, 1986).Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “Discourse on the Origins of Inequality,” in The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings, trans. Victor Gourevitch (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Ryan, Alan. John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism (New York: Norton, 1995).Google Scholar

Saage, Richard. Herrschaft, Toleranz, Widerstand (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981).Google Scholar

Säätelä, Simo. “Human Beings and Automatons,” in Kanzian, Christian, Quitterer, Josef, & Runggaldier, Edmund (eds.), Persons – An Interdisciplinary Dialogue, Papers of the 25th International Wittgenstein Symposium (The Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, 2002).Google Scholar

Saharso, S. “Female Autonomy and Cultural Imperative,” in Kymlicka, W. & Norman, W. (eds), Citizenship in Diverse Societies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 224–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augustine, Saint, Letters, Vol. II, No. 93, trans. W. Parsons (New York: Fathers of the Church, 1953).Google Scholar

Sandel, Michael. “Moral Argument and Liberal Toleration: Abortion and Homosexuality,” in California Law Review 77 (1989), 521–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sayers, S. “The Need to Work. A Perspective from Philosophy,” in Pahl, R. (ed.), On Work. Historical, Comparative, and Theoretical Approaches (Oxford: Blackwell, 1988).Google Scholar

Scanlon, Thomas. What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Schattschneider, E.The Semisovereign People (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1960).Google Scholar

Schilling, René. Kriegshelden. Deutungsmuster heroischer Männlichkeit in Deutschland 1813–1945 (Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2002).Google Scholar

Schlothfeld, S.Erwerbsarbeitslosigkeit als sozialethisches Problem (Freiburg: Alber, 1999).Google Scholar

Schlothfeld, S.. “Braucht der Mensch Arbeit? Zur normativen Relevanz von Beduerfnissen,” in Deutsche Zeitschrift fuer Philosophie 49 (2001).Google Scholar

Schmidt am Busch, H. C. “Marktwirtschaft und Anerkennung. Zu Axel Honneths Theorie sozialer Wertschaetzung,” in Halbig, C. & Quante, M. (eds.), Axel Honneth: Sozialphilosophie zwischen Kritik und Anerkennung (Muenster: LIT, 2004).Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. “Meaningful Work,” in Ethics 92/4 (1982).Google Scholar

Schwarzenbach, Sybil. “Rawls, Hegel, and Communitarianism,” in Political Theory 19 (1991), 539–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, J.Weapons of the Weak (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Scott, J.. Domination and the Arts of Resistance. Hidden Transcripts (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Seel, M.Versuch ueber die Form des Gluecks. Studien zur Ethik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995).Google Scholar

Sennett, R.The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism (New York: W. W. Norton, 1998).Google Scholar

Shapiro, I.Democratic Justice (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Shils, E. “Reflections on Deference,” in Center and Periphery (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968).Google Scholar

Shklar, J. “The Liberalism of Fear,” in Rosenblum, N. (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sigrist, C.Regulierte Anarchie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1967).Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “The Republican Ideal of Political Liberty,” in Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, & Viroli, Maurizio (eds.), Machiavelli and Republicanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 293–309.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Smith, Rogers. “Law's Races,” paper presented at the conference on Identities, Affiliations, Allegiances (New Haven: Yale, 2003).Google Scholar

Soper, K.On Human Needs (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Stiegler, B. “Mutter, Kind und Vater Staat,” in Digitale Bibliothek der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (http:/library.fes.de, 2000).

Sunstein, Cass. The Partial Constitution (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. “The Politics of Recognition,” in Gutmann, Amy (ed.), Multiculturalism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P.The Making of the English Working Class (London: Victor Gollancz, 1963).Google Scholar

Tronto, Joan. Moral Boundaries (New York: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar

Trzcinski, E. “Family Policy in Germany: A Feminist Dilemma?” in Feminist Economics 6/1 (2000).Google Scholar

Tully, James. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tully, James. “Agonic Freedom of Citizens,” in Economy and Society 28/2 (1999), 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tully, James. “Exclusion and Assimilation,” in Williams, M. & Macedo, S. (eds.), Nomos (New York: New York University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Tully, James. “Political Philosophy as a Critical Activity,” in Political Theory 30/4 (2002), 533–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helmut, Ulshofer (ed.). Liebesbriefe an Adolf Hitler – Briefe in den Tod (Frankfurt am Main: VAS, 1994).Google Scholar

Valadez, J.Deliberative Democracy, Political Legitimacy, and Self-determination in Multicultural Societies (Boulder: Westview Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Berg, P. “Be Prestige-Resilient!” in Saharso & Bader (eds.), Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6/2 (2004), 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brink, Bert. “Gesellschaftstheorie und Übertreibungskunst: Für eine alternative Lesart der ‘Dialektik der Aufklärung,’” in Neue Rundschau 108/1 (1997), 37–59.Google Scholar

Brink, Bert. The Tragedy of Liberalism (Albany: SUNY, 2000).Google Scholar

Brink, Bert. “Political Liberalism's Conception of Citizenship,” German version, in Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 50/6 (2002), 907–924.Google Scholar

Parijs, P.Real Freedom for All. What (if Anything?) Can Justify Capitalism? (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Verweyst, Markus. Das Begehen der Anerkennung. Subjekttheoretische Positionen bei Heidegger, Sartre, Freud und Lacan (Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus, 2000).Google Scholar

Vinken, B.Die deutsche Mutter. Der lange Schatten eines Mythos (Munich: Piper, 2001).Google Scholar

Vlastos, Gregory. “The Individual as Object of Love in Plato,” in Platonic Studies (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Voltaire, François-Marie Arouet de. Dictionnaire Philosophique, ed. Pous, A. (Paris: Gallimard, 1994).Google Scholar

Voß, Günter, & Pongratz, Hans J.. “Der Arbeitskraftunternehmer. Eine neue Grundform der Ware Arbeitskraft?” in Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 50/I (1989), 131–158.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Locke, Toleration, and the Rationality of Persecution,” in Liberal Rights. Collected Papers 1981–1991 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Cultural Identity and Civic Responsibility,” in Kymlicka, W. & Norman, W. (eds.), Citizenship in Diverse Societies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Toleration and Reasonableness,” in McKinnon, Catriona & Castiglione, Dario (eds.), The Culture of Toleration in Diverse Societies (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003), 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walwyn, William. “A Helpe to the Right Understanding of a Discourse Concerning Independency” (1644/45), in The Writings of William Walwyn, ed. McMichel, J. R. & Taft, B. (Athens: The University of Georgia Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael. Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983).Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael. “Response,” in Miller, D. & Walzer, M. (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Max. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Tübingen: Mohr, 1972).Google Scholar

Weinstock, D. “Group Rights: Reframing the Debate,” in Spinner, J. & Eisenberg, A. (eds.), Minorities Within Minorities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Wetterer, A. (ed.). Die soziale Konstruktion von Geschlecht in Professionalisierungs-prozessen (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1995).Google Scholar

Whitebook, Joel. “Mutual Recognition and the Work of the Negative,” in Rehg, William & Bohman, James (eds.), Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Wildt, Andreas. “‘Anerkennung’ in der Psychoanalyse,” in Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 53 (2005), 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (London: Fontana Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard. Shame and Necessity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Williams, Melissa S.Voice, Trust, and Memory (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Winnicott, Donald. “The Theory of the Parent-Infant Relationship,” in Winnicott, The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment (London: Karnac, 1990).Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958).Google Scholar

Yarborough, Richard. “Race, Violence, and Manhood: The Masculine Ideal in Frederick Douglass's ‘The Heroic Slave,’” in Sundquist, Eric J. (ed.), Frederick Douglass: New Literary and Historical Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion. “Communication and the Other,” in Benhabib, Seyla (ed.), Democracy and Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), 120–135.Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion. “Difference as a Resource for Democratic Communication,” in Bohman, James & Rehg, William (eds.), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Young, Iris Marion. “A Room of One's Own: Privacy and Old Age Residence,” in On Female Body Experience: ‘Throwing Like a Girl’ and Other Essays (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Zurn, Christopher F. “The Normative Claims of Three Types of Feminist Struggles for Recognition,” in Philosophy Today (Supplement 1997), 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar