Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- 1 INTRODUCTION: THE PROBLEM OF ORDER
- 2 THE FRAMEWORK OF SOCIAL RELATIONS: THE CITY ELITE
- 3 THE FRAMEWORK OF SOCIAL RELATIONS: LOCAL GOVERNMENT, NEIGHBOURHOOD, AND COMMUNITY
- 4 THE FRAMEWORK OF SOCIAL RELATIONS: THE LIVERY COMPANIES
- 5 SOCIAL POLICY
- 6 CRIME AND SOCIETY
- 7 CONCLUSION
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History
3 - THE FRAMEWORK OF SOCIAL RELATIONS: LOCAL GOVERNMENT, NEIGHBOURHOOD, AND COMMUNITY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- 1 INTRODUCTION: THE PROBLEM OF ORDER
- 2 THE FRAMEWORK OF SOCIAL RELATIONS: THE CITY ELITE
- 3 THE FRAMEWORK OF SOCIAL RELATIONS: LOCAL GOVERNMENT, NEIGHBOURHOOD, AND COMMUNITY
- 4 THE FRAMEWORK OF SOCIAL RELATIONS: THE LIVERY COMPANIES
- 5 SOCIAL POLICY
- 6 CRIME AND SOCIETY
- 7 CONCLUSION
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History
Summary
INTRODUCTION
In the last chapter we saw how important the solidarity of the elite was in maintaining stability. But it has also been argued that the limited formal coercive powers available to the aldermen meant that the perpetuation of elite control depended on a degree of responsiveness to popular grievances. It will be one of the major contentions of the next two chapters that the substructures of government, the livery companies, and the parishes and wards played crucial roles in containing tensions by providing channels of communication between rulers and ruled and institutional frameworks within which the redress of grievances could be pursued. Thus, for example, the acute tensions between freemen and strangers, which lay behind so much of the aldermen's anxieties about the fragile fabric of order were largely contained because artisans pursued their campaigns against the strangers by lobbying the authorities for ameliorative action rather than by taking to the streets. They chivvied the rulers of their livery companies into suing aliens in the law courts and promoting legislation in parliament to tighten restrictions on non-free labour, and they promoted petitions through the wardmotes to pressurise the aldermen into supporting their campaigns.
The success of these institutions in channelling popular grievances depended to a large extent on the degree to which they focused loyalties, integrating their members by creating communities.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Pursuit of StabilitySocial Relations in Elizabethan London, pp. 58 - 99Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1991
- 2
- Cited by