Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:29:19.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2009

Valerie J. Hoekstra
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, Henry J., and Barbara A. Perry. 1998. Freedom and the Court: Civil Rights and Liberties in the United States. 7th Ed. New York: Oxford University Press
Adamany, David. 1973. “Legitimacy, Realigning Elections, and the Supreme Court.” Wisconsin Law Review. 3: 790–84Google Scholar
Adamany, David, and Joel, B. Grossman. 1983. “Support for the Supreme Court as a National Policymaker.” Law & Policy Quarterly. 5 (October): 405–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker v. Carr. 1962. 369 U.S. 186
Bass, Larry R., and Thomas, Dan. 1984. “The Supreme Court and Policy Legitimation: Experimental Tests.” American Politics Quarterly. 12: (July): 335-60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkson, Larry C. 1978. The Supreme Court and Its Publics: The Communication of Policy Decisions. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books
Board of Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus. 1987. 482 U.S. 569
Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet. 1994. 512 U.S. 687
Board of Education of Westside Comm. Schools v. Mergens. 1990. 496 U.S. 226
Boninger, David S., Matthew, K. Berent, and Jon, A. Krosnick. 1995. “Origins of Attitude Importance: Self-Interest, Social Identification, and Value Relevance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 68 (January): 61–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale. 2000. 530 U.S. 640
Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic. 1993. 506 U.S. 263
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. 1954. 347 U.S. 483
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. 1955. 349 U.S. 294
Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior, et al., v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon, et al. 1995. 515 U.S. 687
Bush v. Gore. 2000. 530 U.S. 98
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1986. “Neither the Purse nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review. 80 (December): 1209–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1991. “Courts and Public Opinion.” In The American Courts. Ed. John B. Gates and Charles A. Johnson. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press
Caldeira, Gregory A., and James, L. Gibson. 1992. “Etiology of Public Support for the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science. 36 (August): 635–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., and Charles A. Johnson. 1999. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. 2d ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press
Capital Square Review and Advisory Bard v. Pinette. 1995. 505 U.S. 753
Casey, Gregory. 1974. “The Supreme Court and Myth.” Law and Society Review. 8 (Spring): 385–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casper, Jonathan D. 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy Making.” American Political Science Review. 70 (March): 50–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choper, Jesse. 1980. Judicial Review and the National Political Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Cipollone v. Liggett. 1992. 505 U.S. 504
City of Boerne v. Flores. 1997. 521 U.S. 507
Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decision Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy Maker.” Journal of Public Law. 6 (Fall): 279–95Google Scholar
Davis, James A., Tom W. Smith, and Peter V. Marsden. 1998. General Social Surveys, 1972–1998 [Cumulative File].[Computer file]. 3rd version. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center [producer]. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut/Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors]
Davis, Richard. 1994. Decisions and Images. The Supreme Court and the Press. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Dolbeare, Kenneth M. 1967. “The Public Views the Supreme Court,” in Herbert Jacob (ed), Law, Politics, and the Federal Courts. Boston: Little-Brown
Dolbeare, Kenneth M., and Phillip, E. Hammond. 1968. “The Political Party Basis of Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 32 (Spring): 16–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durr, Robert H., Andrew, D. Martin, and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. “Ideological Divergence and Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science. 44 (October): 768–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Live. New York: Wiley
Easton, David. 1975. “Reassessment of Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science. 5 (October): 435–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, David, and Jack Dennis. 1969. “Children in the Political System: Origins of Political Legitimacy.” New York: McGraw-Hill
Finkel, Steve. 1995. Causal Analysis with Panel Data. Sage University Paper on Quantitative Applications in Social Science, 07-105. CA
Fiske, Susan, and Shelly Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition. 2d ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc
Flemming, Roy B., and Wood, B. Dan. 1997. “The Public and the Supreme Court: Individual Justice Responsiveness to American Policy Moods.” American Journal of Political Science. 41 (April): 468–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Roy B., Bohte, John, and Wood, B. Dan. 1997. “One Voice Among Many: The Supreme Court's Influence on Attentiveness to Issues in the United States, 1947–1992.” American Journal of Political Science. 41 (October): 1224–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Charles, and Liane, C. Kosaki. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review. 83 (September): 751–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, Charles, and Liane C. Kosaki. 1995. “Media, Knowledge, and Public Evaluations of the Supreme Court.” In Contemplating Courts. Ed. Lee J. Epstein. CQ Press, Washington, D.C.
Franklin, Charles, Liane C. Kosaki, and Herbert Kritzer. 1993. “The Salience of United States Supreme Court Decisions.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
Gibson, James L. 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law and Society Review. 25 (August): 631–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Gregory, A. Caldeira. 1992. “Blacks and the United States Supreme Court: Models of Diffuse Support.” Journal of Politics. 54 (November): 1120–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Gregory, A. Caldeira, and Baird, Vanessa. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review. 92 (June): 343–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Lester Kenyatta Spence. 2001. “The Supreme Court and the U.S. Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?” Working Paper #182. The Russell Sage Foundation
Graber, Doris. 1997. Mass Media and American Politics. 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press
Grosskopf, Anke, and Jeffrey, J. Mondak. 1998. “Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? The Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly. 51 (September): 633–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handberg, Roger. 1984. “Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court, 1935–1981.” International Social Science Review. 59 (Winter): 3–1Google Scholar
Handberg, Roger, and William, S. Maddox. 1982. “Public Support for the Supreme Court in the 1970s.” American Politics Quarterly. 10 (July): 333–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press
Hill v. Colorado. 2000. 530 U.S. 703
Hochschild, Jennifer L. 1984. The New American Dilemma. New Haven: Yale University Press
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 1995. “The Supreme Court and Opinion Change: An Experimental Study of the Court's Ability to Change Opinion.” American Politics Quarterly. 23 (January): 109–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2000. “The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review. 94 (March): 89–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J., and Jeffrey, A. Segal. 1996. “The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb's Chapel.” The Journal of Politics. 58 (November): 1079–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISKCON v. Lee. 1992. 505 U.S. 672
Iyengar, Shanto. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Iyengar, Shanto, Mark, D. Peters, and Donald, S. Kinder. 1982. “Experimental Demonstrations of the ‘Not-so-Minimal’ Consequences of Television News Programs.” American Political Science Review. 76 (December): 848–58Google Scholar
Jaros, Dean, and Roper, Robert. 1980. “The United States Supreme Court” Myth, Diffuse Support, Specific Support, and Legitimacy.” American Politics Quarterly. 8 (January): 85–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Timothy R., and Andrew, D. Martin. 1998. “The Public's Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review. 92 (June): 299–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaniss, Phyllis. 1991. Making Local News. Chicago, Il.: University of Chicago Press
Katsh, Ethan. 1983. “The Supreme Court Beat: How Television Covers the Supreme Court.” Judicature. 67 (June/July): 6–12Google Scholar
Kessel, John. 1966. “Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court.” Midwest Journal of Political Science. 10 (May): 167–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. 2001. “The Impact of Bush v. Gore on Public Perceptions and Knowledge of the Supreme Court.” Judicature. 85 (July/August): 32–38Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A., Boninger, David, and Chuang, Yao. 1993. “Attitude Strength: One Construct or Many Related Constructs?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 65 (December): 1132–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Free Union School District 1993. 508 U.S. 384
Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc. 1982. 459 U.S. 116
Lemon v. Kurtzman. 1971. 403 U.S. 602
Lodge, Milton, Kathleen, M. McGraw, and Stroh, Patrick. “An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review. 83 (June): 399–419CrossRef
Lodge, Milton, Marco, R. Steenbergen, and Brau, Shawn. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review. 89 (June): 309–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch v. Donnelly. 1984. 465 U.S. 668
Lyons, John M., and Scheb, William. 2000. “The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court.” Social Science Quarterly. 81 (December): 928–4Google Scholar
Madsen et al., v. Women's Health Center Inc., et al. 1994. 512 U.S. 753
George, Marcus, and MacKuen, Michael. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and involvement During Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review. 87 (June): 672-85Google Scholar
Markus, Gregory. 1990. Analysis of Panel Data. Sage University Paper on Quantitative Applications in Social Science, 07-018. CA
Marshall, Thomas. 1988. “Public Opinion, Representation, and the Modern Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly. 16: 296–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Thomas. 1989. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. Unwin Hyman, Inc. Boston, MA
Mishler, William, and Reginald, S. Sheehan. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Counter-majoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review. 87 (March): 87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, William, and Reginald, S. Sheehan. 1996. “Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making: A Micro-Analytic Perspective.” The Journal of Politics. 58 (February): 169–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell v. Helms. 2000. 530 U.S. 793
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1990. “Perceived Legitimacy of Supreme Court Decisions: Three Functions of Source Credibility.” Political Behavior. 12 (December): 363–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1991. “Substantive and Procedural Aspects of Supreme Court Decisions as Determinants of Approval.” American Politics Quarterly. 19 (April): 174–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1992. “Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly. 20 (October): 457–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1994. Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The Sources and Contexts of Legitimation. Political Research Quarterly. 47 (September): 675–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1995. Nothing to Read: Newspapers and Elections in a Social Experiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Mondak, Jeffery J., and Smithey, Shannon Ishiyama. 1997. “The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” The Journal of Politics. 59 (November): 1114–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, William K., Jr. 1973. Law and Attitude Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Murphy, Walter F., and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1968a. “Public Opinion and the Supreme Court: The Goldwater Campaign.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 32 (Spring): 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Walter F., and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1968b. “Public Opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court: Mapping of Some Prerequisites for Court Legitimation of Regime Changes.” Law and Society Review. 2 (May): 357–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Walter F., and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1972. The Study of Public Law. New York: Random House
Newland, Chester. 1964. “Press Coverage of the United States Supreme Court.” Western Political Quarterly. 19 (March): 15–3Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut, and Jeffrey, A. Segal. 1994. “Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review. 88 (September): 711–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, David M. 1986. Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Chickasaw Nation. 1995. 515 U.S. 450
Pacelle, Richard L. 1991. The Transformation of the Supreme Court's Agenda: From the New Deal to the Reagan Administration. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1991
Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo. 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. (Volume 19). Ed. L. Berkowitz. New York, NY: Academic Press
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. 1992. 505 U.S. 833
Quill Corp. v. North Dakota. 1992. 504 U.S. 298
R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul. 1992. 505 U.S. 377
Rehnquist, William H. 1999. “On Doing the Right Thing and Giving Public Satisfaction.” Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association. 36 (Fall): 8–9Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade. 1973. 410 U.S. 113
Rosenberg, Gerald. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of University of Virginia. 1995. 505 U.S. 819
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe. 2000. 530 U.S. 290
Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Wester New York. 1997. 519 U.S. 357
Sears, David O. 1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51 (September): 515–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press
Segal, Jennifer A. 1995. “Diffuse Support for the United States Supreme Court: Reliable Reservoir or Fickle Foundation?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Il
Sigelman, Lee. 1979. “Black-White Differences in Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court.: A Replication in the 1970s.” Social Science Quarterly. 60 (June): 113–19Google Scholar
Slotnick, Elliot E., and Jennifer A. Segal. 1998. Television News and the Supreme Court: All the News that's Fit to Air? New York: Cambridge University Press
Slotnick, Elliot E., Jennifer A. Segal, and Lisa M. Compoli. 1994. “Television News and the Supreme Court: Correlates of Decisional Coverage.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, NY
Spaeth, Harold J. 1998. United States Supreme Court Judicial Data Base, 1953–1996 terms. 8th ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research
Sternberg, et al., v. Carhart. 2000. 530 U.S. 914
Stimson, James A., Michael, B. MacKuen, and Robert, S. Erikson. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review. 89 (September): 543–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, Joseph, and Walter, Murphy. 1981. “Patterns of Public Support for the Supreme Court: A Panel Study.” The Journal of Politics. 43 (February): 24–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Texas v. Johnson. 1989. 491 U.S. 397
Troxel v. Granville. 2000. 530 U.S. 57
United States v Kokinda. 1990. 497 U.S. 720
United States Bureau of the Census. 1990. Census on Population and Housing, 1990. Bureau of the Census. Washington, D.C.
Vacco v. Quill. 1997. 521 U.S. 793
Washington v. Glucksberg. 1997. 521 U.S. 702
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
Wyer, Robert S., Budesheim, Robert S., Lee, Thomas, and Shavitt, Sharon. 1991. “Image, Issues, and Ideology: The Processing of Information about Political Candidates.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 61 (October): 533–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District. 1993. 509 U.S. 1
Abraham, Henry J., and Barbara A. Perry. 1998. Freedom and the Court: Civil Rights and Liberties in the United States. 7th Ed. New York: Oxford University Press
Adamany, David. 1973. “Legitimacy, Realigning Elections, and the Supreme Court.” Wisconsin Law Review. 3: 790–84Google Scholar
Adamany, David, and Joel, B. Grossman. 1983. “Support for the Supreme Court as a National Policymaker.” Law & Policy Quarterly. 5 (October): 405–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker v. Carr. 1962. 369 U.S. 186
Bass, Larry R., and Thomas, Dan. 1984. “The Supreme Court and Policy Legitimation: Experimental Tests.” American Politics Quarterly. 12: (July): 335-60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkson, Larry C. 1978. The Supreme Court and Its Publics: The Communication of Policy Decisions. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books
Board of Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus. 1987. 482 U.S. 569
Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet. 1994. 512 U.S. 687
Board of Education of Westside Comm. Schools v. Mergens. 1990. 496 U.S. 226
Boninger, David S., Matthew, K. Berent, and Jon, A. Krosnick. 1995. “Origins of Attitude Importance: Self-Interest, Social Identification, and Value Relevance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 68 (January): 61–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale. 2000. 530 U.S. 640
Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic. 1993. 506 U.S. 263
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. 1954. 347 U.S. 483
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. 1955. 349 U.S. 294
Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior, et al., v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon, et al. 1995. 515 U.S. 687
Bush v. Gore. 2000. 530 U.S. 98
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1986. “Neither the Purse nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review. 80 (December): 1209–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1991. “Courts and Public Opinion.” In The American Courts. Ed. John B. Gates and Charles A. Johnson. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press
Caldeira, Gregory A., and James, L. Gibson. 1992. “Etiology of Public Support for the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science. 36 (August): 635–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., and Charles A. Johnson. 1999. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. 2d ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press
Capital Square Review and Advisory Bard v. Pinette. 1995. 505 U.S. 753
Casey, Gregory. 1974. “The Supreme Court and Myth.” Law and Society Review. 8 (Spring): 385–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casper, Jonathan D. 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy Making.” American Political Science Review. 70 (March): 50–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choper, Jesse. 1980. Judicial Review and the National Political Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Cipollone v. Liggett. 1992. 505 U.S. 504
City of Boerne v. Flores. 1997. 521 U.S. 507
Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decision Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy Maker.” Journal of Public Law. 6 (Fall): 279–95Google Scholar
Davis, James A., Tom W. Smith, and Peter V. Marsden. 1998. General Social Surveys, 1972–1998 [Cumulative File].[Computer file]. 3rd version. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center [producer]. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut/Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors]
Davis, Richard. 1994. Decisions and Images. The Supreme Court and the Press. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Dolbeare, Kenneth M. 1967. “The Public Views the Supreme Court,” in Herbert Jacob (ed), Law, Politics, and the Federal Courts. Boston: Little-Brown
Dolbeare, Kenneth M., and Phillip, E. Hammond. 1968. “The Political Party Basis of Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 32 (Spring): 16–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durr, Robert H., Andrew, D. Martin, and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. “Ideological Divergence and Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science. 44 (October): 768–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Live. New York: Wiley
Easton, David. 1975. “Reassessment of Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science. 5 (October): 435–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, David, and Jack Dennis. 1969. “Children in the Political System: Origins of Political Legitimacy.” New York: McGraw-Hill
Finkel, Steve. 1995. Causal Analysis with Panel Data. Sage University Paper on Quantitative Applications in Social Science, 07-105. CA
Fiske, Susan, and Shelly Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition. 2d ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc
Flemming, Roy B., and Wood, B. Dan. 1997. “The Public and the Supreme Court: Individual Justice Responsiveness to American Policy Moods.” American Journal of Political Science. 41 (April): 468–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Roy B., Bohte, John, and Wood, B. Dan. 1997. “One Voice Among Many: The Supreme Court's Influence on Attentiveness to Issues in the United States, 1947–1992.” American Journal of Political Science. 41 (October): 1224–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Charles, and Liane, C. Kosaki. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review. 83 (September): 751–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, Charles, and Liane C. Kosaki. 1995. “Media, Knowledge, and Public Evaluations of the Supreme Court.” In Contemplating Courts. Ed. Lee J. Epstein. CQ Press, Washington, D.C.
Franklin, Charles, Liane C. Kosaki, and Herbert Kritzer. 1993. “The Salience of United States Supreme Court Decisions.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
Gibson, James L. 1989. “Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance.” Law and Society Review. 25 (August): 631–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Gregory, A. Caldeira. 1992. “Blacks and the United States Supreme Court: Models of Diffuse Support.” Journal of Politics. 54 (November): 1120–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Gregory, A. Caldeira, and Baird, Vanessa. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review. 92 (June): 343–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Lester Kenyatta Spence. 2001. “The Supreme Court and the U.S. Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?” Working Paper #182. The Russell Sage Foundation
Graber, Doris. 1997. Mass Media and American Politics. 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press
Grosskopf, Anke, and Jeffrey, J. Mondak. 1998. “Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? The Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly. 51 (September): 633–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handberg, Roger. 1984. “Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court, 1935–1981.” International Social Science Review. 59 (Winter): 3–1Google Scholar
Handberg, Roger, and William, S. Maddox. 1982. “Public Support for the Supreme Court in the 1970s.” American Politics Quarterly. 10 (July): 333–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press
Hill v. Colorado. 2000. 530 U.S. 703
Hochschild, Jennifer L. 1984. The New American Dilemma. New Haven: Yale University Press
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 1995. “The Supreme Court and Opinion Change: An Experimental Study of the Court's Ability to Change Opinion.” American Politics Quarterly. 23 (January): 109–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2000. “The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review. 94 (March): 89–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J., and Jeffrey, A. Segal. 1996. “The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb's Chapel.” The Journal of Politics. 58 (November): 1079–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISKCON v. Lee. 1992. 505 U.S. 672
Iyengar, Shanto. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Iyengar, Shanto, Mark, D. Peters, and Donald, S. Kinder. 1982. “Experimental Demonstrations of the ‘Not-so-Minimal’ Consequences of Television News Programs.” American Political Science Review. 76 (December): 848–58Google Scholar
Jaros, Dean, and Roper, Robert. 1980. “The United States Supreme Court” Myth, Diffuse Support, Specific Support, and Legitimacy.” American Politics Quarterly. 8 (January): 85–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Timothy R., and Andrew, D. Martin. 1998. “The Public's Conditional Response to Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review. 92 (June): 299–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaniss, Phyllis. 1991. Making Local News. Chicago, Il.: University of Chicago Press
Katsh, Ethan. 1983. “The Supreme Court Beat: How Television Covers the Supreme Court.” Judicature. 67 (June/July): 6–12Google Scholar
Kessel, John. 1966. “Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court.” Midwest Journal of Political Science. 10 (May): 167–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. 2001. “The Impact of Bush v. Gore on Public Perceptions and Knowledge of the Supreme Court.” Judicature. 85 (July/August): 32–38Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A., Boninger, David, and Chuang, Yao. 1993. “Attitude Strength: One Construct or Many Related Constructs?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 65 (December): 1132–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Free Union School District 1993. 508 U.S. 384
Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc. 1982. 459 U.S. 116
Lemon v. Kurtzman. 1971. 403 U.S. 602
Lodge, Milton, Kathleen, M. McGraw, and Stroh, Patrick. “An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review. 83 (June): 399–419CrossRef
Lodge, Milton, Marco, R. Steenbergen, and Brau, Shawn. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review. 89 (June): 309–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch v. Donnelly. 1984. 465 U.S. 668
Lyons, John M., and Scheb, William. 2000. “The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court.” Social Science Quarterly. 81 (December): 928–4Google Scholar
Madsen et al., v. Women's Health Center Inc., et al. 1994. 512 U.S. 753
George, Marcus, and MacKuen, Michael. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and involvement During Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review. 87 (June): 672-85Google Scholar
Markus, Gregory. 1990. Analysis of Panel Data. Sage University Paper on Quantitative Applications in Social Science, 07-018. CA
Marshall, Thomas. 1988. “Public Opinion, Representation, and the Modern Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly. 16: 296–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Thomas. 1989. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. Unwin Hyman, Inc. Boston, MA
Mishler, William, and Reginald, S. Sheehan. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Counter-majoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review. 87 (March): 87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, William, and Reginald, S. Sheehan. 1996. “Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making: A Micro-Analytic Perspective.” The Journal of Politics. 58 (February): 169–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell v. Helms. 2000. 530 U.S. 793
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1990. “Perceived Legitimacy of Supreme Court Decisions: Three Functions of Source Credibility.” Political Behavior. 12 (December): 363–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1991. “Substantive and Procedural Aspects of Supreme Court Decisions as Determinants of Approval.” American Politics Quarterly. 19 (April): 174–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1992. “Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly. 20 (October): 457–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1994. Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The Sources and Contexts of Legitimation. Political Research Quarterly. 47 (September): 675–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1995. Nothing to Read: Newspapers and Elections in a Social Experiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Mondak, Jeffery J., and Smithey, Shannon Ishiyama. 1997. “The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” The Journal of Politics. 59 (November): 1114–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, William K., Jr. 1973. Law and Attitude Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Murphy, Walter F., and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1968a. “Public Opinion and the Supreme Court: The Goldwater Campaign.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 32 (Spring): 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Walter F., and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1968b. “Public Opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court: Mapping of Some Prerequisites for Court Legitimation of Regime Changes.” Law and Society Review. 2 (May): 357–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Walter F., and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1972. The Study of Public Law. New York: Random House
Newland, Chester. 1964. “Press Coverage of the United States Supreme Court.” Western Political Quarterly. 19 (March): 15–3Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut, and Jeffrey, A. Segal. 1994. “Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review. 88 (September): 711–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, David M. 1986. Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Chickasaw Nation. 1995. 515 U.S. 450
Pacelle, Richard L. 1991. The Transformation of the Supreme Court's Agenda: From the New Deal to the Reagan Administration. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1991
Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo. 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. (Volume 19). Ed. L. Berkowitz. New York, NY: Academic Press
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. 1992. 505 U.S. 833
Quill Corp. v. North Dakota. 1992. 504 U.S. 298
R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul. 1992. 505 U.S. 377
Rehnquist, William H. 1999. “On Doing the Right Thing and Giving Public Satisfaction.” Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association. 36 (Fall): 8–9Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade. 1973. 410 U.S. 113
Rosenberg, Gerald. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of University of Virginia. 1995. 505 U.S. 819
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe. 2000. 530 U.S. 290
Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Wester New York. 1997. 519 U.S. 357
Sears, David O. 1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51 (September): 515–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press
Segal, Jennifer A. 1995. “Diffuse Support for the United States Supreme Court: Reliable Reservoir or Fickle Foundation?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Il
Sigelman, Lee. 1979. “Black-White Differences in Attitudes Toward the Supreme Court.: A Replication in the 1970s.” Social Science Quarterly. 60 (June): 113–19Google Scholar
Slotnick, Elliot E., and Jennifer A. Segal. 1998. Television News and the Supreme Court: All the News that's Fit to Air? New York: Cambridge University Press
Slotnick, Elliot E., Jennifer A. Segal, and Lisa M. Compoli. 1994. “Television News and the Supreme Court: Correlates of Decisional Coverage.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, NY
Spaeth, Harold J. 1998. United States Supreme Court Judicial Data Base, 1953–1996 terms. 8th ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research
Sternberg, et al., v. Carhart. 2000. 530 U.S. 914
Stimson, James A., Michael, B. MacKuen, and Robert, S. Erikson. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review. 89 (September): 543–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, Joseph, and Walter, Murphy. 1981. “Patterns of Public Support for the Supreme Court: A Panel Study.” The Journal of Politics. 43 (February): 24–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Texas v. Johnson. 1989. 491 U.S. 397
Troxel v. Granville. 2000. 530 U.S. 57
United States v Kokinda. 1990. 497 U.S. 720
United States Bureau of the Census. 1990. Census on Population and Housing, 1990. Bureau of the Census. Washington, D.C.
Vacco v. Quill. 1997. 521 U.S. 793
Washington v. Glucksberg. 1997. 521 U.S. 702
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
Wyer, Robert S., Budesheim, Robert S., Lee, Thomas, and Shavitt, Sharon. 1991. “Image, Issues, and Ideology: The Processing of Information about Political Candidates.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 61 (October): 533–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District. 1993. 509 U.S. 1

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Valerie J. Hoekstra, Arizona State University
  • Book: Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions
  • Online publication: 02 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509827.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Valerie J. Hoekstra, Arizona State University
  • Book: Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions
  • Online publication: 02 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509827.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Valerie J. Hoekstra, Arizona State University
  • Book: Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions
  • Online publication: 02 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509827.011
Available formats
×