Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:15:10.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Public health research ethics

Is non-exploitation the new principle for population-based research ethics?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2011

John McMillan
Affiliation:
Flinders University
Angus Dawson
Affiliation:
Keele University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The ethical principles that should govern public health research must accommodate public health's focus upon the health of populations, as well as the different research methodologies that it tends to use. Whereas biomedical research ethics has tended to emphasize the centrality of consent, research upon populations often raises additional ethical issues and consent may often be insufficient or inappropriate. The Belmont principles of respect for persons, justice and beneficence are intended to cover all biomedical and behavioural research involving human subjects, so should be applicable to public health research. However, because of the population-based focus of public health research work, the scope and application of these principles need to be reconsidered. An additional consideration is whether once their scope and application has been reconfigured, the three Belmont principles are suited to the ethics of public health research. Non-exploitation is a moral concept that has been mooted as an additional principle for biomedical research. Given that a principle of non-exploitation can be readily applied to populations and some unethical public research can be described as exploitative, this would appear at first to be a promising principle for public health research. This chapter will consider the merit of these claims and conclude that the Belmont principles can be interpreted so that they imply that exploitative public health research is wrong.

Type
Chapter
Information
Public Health Ethics
Key Concepts and Issues in Policy and Practice
, pp. 174 - 190
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annas, G. and Grodin, M. (1995) The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, G. and Grodin, M. (1998) Human rights and maternal child HIV transmission prevention trials in Africa. American Journal of Public Health, 88: 560–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelbaum, P. S., Roth, L. H., Lidz, C. W., Benson, P. and Winslade, W. (1987) False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Center Report, 17(2): 20–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arneson, R. (2001) Exploitation. Mind, 110: 888–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, R. (1998) Research to prevent maternal-fetal transmission of HIV: racist exploitation or exploitation of racism?American Journal of Public Health, 88: 567–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, T. (2007) The ‘four principles’ approach to healthcare ethics. In The Principles of Healthcare Ethics, 2nd edn, ed. Ashcroft, R., Dawson, A., Draper, H. and McMillan, J.. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T. and Childress, J. (1994) The Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beecher, H. (1966) Ethics and clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 274: 1354–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, A. (1992) Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. When Evil Intrudes, Hastings Center Report, 22: 29–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Childress, J. F., Faden, R. R., Gaare, R. D., et al.(2002) Public health ethics: mapping the terrain. Journal of Law and Medical Ethics, 30: 17–18.CrossRefPubMed
,Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) (2002) CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS.Google Scholar
Daniels, N. (1985) Just Health Care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dworkin, G. (1988) The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (2006) Research Ethics Framework. Swindon:ESRC.Google Scholar
Emmanuel, E., Wendler, D. and Grady, C. (2000) What makes clinical research ethical?Journal of American Medical Association, 283(20): 2701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faden, R. and Beauchamp, T. (1986) A History and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1990) Harmless Wrongdoing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gauld, R. and McMillan, J. (1999) Ethics committees and qualitative health research in New Zealand. New Zealand Medical Journal, 112: 195–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Gostin, L. (1991) Ethical principles for the conduct of human subject research: population-based research and ethics. Law, Medicine and Health Care, 19: 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, T. and McMillan, J. (2004) Challenge studies of human volunteers: ethical issues. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30: 110–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Institute of Medicine (1988) The Future of Public Health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Karim, S. (1998) Placebo controls in HIV perinatal transmission trials: a South African's viewpoint. American Journal of Public Health, 88: 564–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lurie, P. and Wolfe, S. (1997) Unethical trials of interventions to reduce perinatal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus in developing countries. New England Journal of Medicine, 337: 1159–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMillan, J. and Conlon, C. (2002) Developing world research and the Nuffield Council's Report. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30: 204–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacQueen, K. and Buehler, J. (2004) Ethics, practice and research in public health. American Journal of Public Health, 94(6): 928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mastroianni, A. and Kahn, J. (2002) Risk and responsibility: ethics, Grimes v Kennedy Krieger, and public health research involving children. American Journal of Public Health, 92: 1073–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, F. and Brody, B. (2003) A critique of clinical equipoise: therapeutic misconception of the ethics of clinical trials. Hastings Center Report, 33(3): 19–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, P. and Weijer, C. (2009) The trust based obligations of physicians to patients in clinical research. In The Limits of Consent: A Socio-legal Approach to Human Subject Research in Medicine, ed. Corrigan, O., Liddell, K., McMillan, J., Richards, M. and Weijer, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
,National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research (1979) The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Bethesda, MD: Office of Protection from Research Risks, US Public Health Service.Google Scholar
Northington Gamble, V. (1997) Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. American Journal of Public Health, 87: 1773–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappworth, M. (1968) Human Guinea Pigs: Experimentation on Man. London: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Punch, M. (1994) Politics and ethics in qualitative research. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, S. Yvonna.. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1972) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
,Research in Health and Behavioral Change (1989) Changing the Public Health. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
,Royal College of Physicians (1996) Guidelines on the Practice of Ethics Committees in Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, 3rd edn. London: Royal College of Physicians.Google Scholar
Stoljar, N. (2007) Theories of autonomy. In The Principles of Healthcare Ethics, 2nd edn, ed. Ashcroft, R., Dawson, A., Draper, H. and McMillan, J.. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Willigenburg, T. (2007) Reflective equilibrium as a method in health care ethics. In The Principles of Healthcare Ethics, 2nd edn, ed. Ashcroft, R., Dawson, A., Draper, H. and McMillan, J.. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Verweij, M. and Dawson, A. (2007) The meaning of ‘public’ in ‘public health’. In Ethics, Prevention and Public Health, ed. Dawson, A. and Verweij, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wade, D. (2005) Ethics, audit and research: all shades of grey. British Medical Journal, 330: 473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wertheimer, A. (1996) Exploitation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, A. (2007) Exploitation in health care. In The Principles of Healthcare Ethics, 2nd edn, ed. Ashcroft, R., Dawson, A., Draper, H. and McMillan, J.. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M. and Moore, A. (1997) Inducement in research. Bioethics, 11(5): 373–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,World Medical Association (2008) Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 59th WMA General Assembly, Seoul, Korea, October 2008. Available at: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm (accessed: 8/12/08).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×