Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Maps, Illustrations, and Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Transliteration
- Note on Sources and Methodology
- Glossary
- Two regions of the Black Earth, Voronezh and Kharkiv oblasti, 1991–present
- Voronezh oblast' in the twenty-first century
- Kharkiv oblast' in the twenty-first century
- The Post-Soviet Potemkin Village
- Introduction: Land Reform in Post-Communist Europe
- 1 Things Fall Apart
- 2 Keeping the Collectives
- 3 The Social Origins of Private Farmers
- 4 A Return to Regulation
- 5 The Politics of Payment
- 6 The Facade
- Conclusion: Rural Proletarians in the Potemkin Village
- Index
6 - The Facade
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Maps, Illustrations, and Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Transliteration
- Note on Sources and Methodology
- Glossary
- Two regions of the Black Earth, Voronezh and Kharkiv oblasti, 1991–present
- Voronezh oblast' in the twenty-first century
- Kharkiv oblast' in the twenty-first century
- The Post-Soviet Potemkin Village
- Introduction: Land Reform in Post-Communist Europe
- 1 Things Fall Apart
- 2 Keeping the Collectives
- 3 The Social Origins of Private Farmers
- 4 A Return to Regulation
- 5 The Politics of Payment
- 6 The Facade
- Conclusion: Rural Proletarians in the Potemkin Village
- Index
Summary
By July 2005, Ukraine's national newspaper The Day had described Ukraine as a “country of nominal owners.” The director of Ukraine's Koretsky Institute of State and Law observed, “Farmers are merely nominal owners of their plots. Neither domestic nor foreign investors will want to do business with such bogus landowners.” Only a few months earlier, across the border in Russia, a pensioner by the name of N. Volkova wrote to the newspaper Krest'ianskaia Rossiia asking, “Explain to me, please, how I can get rid of my land share.” The Russian tax inspectorate had demanded a 1,500 ruble payment on her land share. Like so many other landowners in Russia and Ukraine, Volkova had never learned the location of her share and received no profit from the land. She continued:
Here's the thing. In 1993 our collective farm distributed land as property shares to the workers. Each received a certificate of land ownership. Then in the course of several years the former collective farm leased the shares and gave out feed grain, at first two hundred kilograms, then one hundred. Now the enterprise has finally fallen apart. … But where is my land? Maybe someone is sowing it, maybe there's already a mansion built on it.
Volkova was far from alone. The paper records of results in Ukraine and Russia emphasized the distribution of land share certificates and the opportunity to allot land, thus confirming the existence of private ownership, but observation of changes on the ground told a far different story.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Post-Soviet Potemkin VillagePolitics and Property Rights in the Black Earth, pp. 166 - 188Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007