Book contents
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Italian Renaissance
- Part II Sixteenth-Century France
- Part III The “Cambridge Platonists”
- Part IV German Romanticism
- Part V The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Appendix: Chronology of Editions and Translations of Plotinus1
- Index
- References
Part II - Sixteenth-Century France
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Italian Renaissance
- Part II Sixteenth-Century France
- Part III The “Cambridge Platonists”
- Part IV German Romanticism
- Part V The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Appendix: Chronology of Editions and Translations of Plotinus1
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Plotinus' LegacyThe Transformation of Platonism from the Renaissance to the Modern Era, pp. 71 - 124Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Albertson, D. (2012) “Achard of St. Victor (d. 1171) and the Eclipse of the Arithmetic Model of the Trinity,” Traditio 67: 101–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertson, D. (2014) Mathematical Theologies: Nicholas of Cusa and the Legacy of Thierry of Chartres, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, M. J. B. (1994) Nuptial Arithmetic: Marsilio Ficino’s Commentary on the Fatal Number in Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B. (ed. and trans.) (2015) Marsilio Ficino, On Dionysius the Areopagite, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bocken, I. (2011) “The Pictorial Treatises of Charles de Bovelles,” Intellectual History Review 21: 341–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boisset, J. (1960) “Les ‘Hecatonomies’ de Lefèvre d’Étaples,” Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger 150: 237–240.Google Scholar
Bovelles, C. de (1511) Que hoc volumine continentur: Liber de intellectu, Liber de sensu, Liber de nichilo […]De geometricis supplementis, Paris.Google Scholar
Bricot, T. (1495) Expositio Magistri Georgii [i.e. George of Brussels] super summulas, Paris.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1927) Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance, Leipzig and Berlin [English translation by M. Domandi, 1963].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champier, S. (1519) Duellum epistolare: Galie & Etalie antiquitates summatim complectens, Lyon.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P., Normore, C. G., and Parsons, T. (eds.) (2014) Peter of Spain: Summaries of Logic, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denifle, H. and Châtelaine, E. (eds.) (1889) Chartularium universitatis Parisiensis, 4 vols., Paris.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1996) “An Ethic for the Late Antique Sage,” in Gerson, L. P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, Cambridge, UK, 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1977) “Ancient Scholastic Logic as the Source of Medieval Scholastic Logic,” in Kretzmann, N., et al. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge, UK, 101–127.Google Scholar
Emery, K. (1984) “Mysticism and the Coincidence of Opposites in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century France,” Journal for the History of Ideas 45: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faye, E. (1998a) Philosophie et perfection de l’homme: De la Renaissance à Descartes, Paris.Google Scholar
Faye, E. (1998b) “Nicolas de Cues et Charles de Bovelles dans le manuscrit ‘Exigua pluvia’ de Beatus Rhenanus,” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 1998, 415–450.Google Scholar
Ferrari, M. (2011) “Introduction to Bovelles’ Liber de Sapiente,” Intellectual History Review 21: 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, M. and Albertini, T. (eds.) (2011) Charles de Bovelles’ Liber de Sapiente, or Book of the Wise [Special issue of Intellectual History Review], London.Google Scholar
George of Brussels (1495) Expositio Magistri Georgii super summulas Petri Hispani, Paris.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. (ed. and trans.) (2017) Commentary on Plotinus, Volume 4: Ennead III, Part 1, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (2005) Arts libéraux et philosophie dans la pensée antique: contribution à l’histoire de l’éducation et de la culture dans l’Antiquité, Paris.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1990) “The Harmony of Plotinus and Aristotle According to Porphyry,” in Sorabji, R. (ed.) Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence, Ithaca, NY, 125–140.Google Scholar
Heller, H. (1972) “Nicholas of Cusa and Early French Evangelicalism,” Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte 63: 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joukovsky, F. (1979) “Thèmes plotiniens à la Renaissance: Lefèvre et Champier commentateurs de textes néo-platoniciens,” Studi di letteratura francese 5: 5–24.Google Scholar
Joukovsky, F. (1981) “Thémes plotiniens dans le De Sapiente de Charles de Bovelles,” Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 43: 141–153.Google Scholar
Joukovsky, F. (1982) Le regard intérieur: thèmes plotiniens chez quelques écrivains de la Renaissance française, Paris.Google Scholar
Kessler, E. (1999) “Introducing Aristotle to the Sixteenth Century: The Lefèvre Enterprise,” in Blackwell, C. and Kusukawa, S. (eds.) Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Conversations with Aristotle, Aldershot/Brookfield, 1–21.Google Scholar
Klinger-Dollé, A.-H. (ed.) (2016) Le De sensu de Charles de Bovelles (1511): conception philosophique des sens et figuration de la pensée, Geneva.Google Scholar
Lefèvre d’Étaples, J. (ed.) (1494) Mercurij Trismegisti Liber de potestate et sapientia dei per Marsilium Ficinum traductus ad Cosmum Medicem, Paris [republished with additions 1505].Google Scholar
Lefèvre d’Étaples, J. (1499) Theologia vivificans, cibus solidus. Dionysii Celestis hierarchia. Ecclesiastica hierarchia. Diuina nomina. Mystica theologia. Undecim epistole. Ignatii Undecim epistole. Polycarpi epistola una, Paris.Google Scholar
Lefèvre d’Étaples, J. (1506) Contenta. Politicorum libro octo. Commentarii. Economicorum duo […] Explanationis Leonardi in Oeconomica duo, trans. Bruni, L.eonardo, Paris.Google Scholar
Lefèvre d’Étaples, J. and Clichtove, J. (1502) Totius philosophiae naturalis paraphrases, adiecto commentario, Paris.Google Scholar
Lines, D. A. (2007) “Lefèvre and French Aristotelianism on the Eve of the Sixteenth Century,” in Frank, G. and Speer, A. (eds.) Der Aristotelismus in der frühen Neuzeit: Kontinuität oder Wiederangeignung, Wiesbaden, 273–290.Google Scholar
Mandosio, J.-M. (2013) “Le De magia naturali de Jacques Lefèvre d’Étaples: Magie, alchimie et cabale,” in Camos Gorris, R. (ed.) Les Muses secrètes: kabbale, alchimie et littérature à la Renaissance, Geneva, 37–79.Google Scholar
Mönch, W. (1936) Die italienische Platonrenaissance und ihre Bedeutung für Frankreichs Literatur- und Geistesgeschichte (1450–1550), Berlin.Google Scholar
Monfasani, J. (1987) “Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite in Mid-Quattrocento Rome,” in Monfasani, J., Hankins, J., and Purnell, F. (eds.) Supplementum Festivum: Studies in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, Binghamton, NY, 189–219.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. E. (2012) “The Quadrivium and the Decline of Boethian Influence,” in Kaylor, N. H. and Phillips, P. E. (eds.) A Companion to Boethius in the Middle Ages, Leiden, 479–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberman, H. A. (1983) The Harvest of Medieval Theology: Gabriel Biel and Late Medieval Nominalism, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Oosterhoff, R. J. (2015) “Jacques Lefèvre d’Étaples,” in E. N. Zalta and J. Kraye (eds.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lefevre-etaples/ (accessed 23 November 2018)Google Scholar
Oosterhoff, R. J. (2018) Making Mathematical Culture: University and Print in the Circle of Lefèvre d’Étaples, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oosterhoff, R. J. (2019) “Nicholas of Cusa and Boethian Theology in the Early French Reform,” in Burton, S., Hollmann, J., and Parker, E. (eds.) Nicholas of Cusa and Early Modern Reform, Leiden, 339–366.Google Scholar
Pantin, I. (1988) “Les ‘commentaires’ de Lefèvre d’Etaples au Corpus Hermeticum,” in Faivre, A. (ed.) Présence d’Hermès Trismégiste, Paris, 167–183.Google Scholar
Renaudet, A. (1953) Préréforme et humanisme à Paris pendant les premières guerres d’Italie, 1494–1517, 2nd ed., Paris.Google Scholar
Rice, E. F. (1970) “Humanist Aristotelianism in France: Jacques Lefèvre d’Étaples and His Circle,” in Levi, A. H. T. (ed.) Humanism in France, Manchester, UK, 132–149.Google Scholar
Rice, E. F. (ed.) (1972) The Prefatory Epistles of Jacques Lefèvre d’Étaples and Related Texts, New York.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1992) “Pseudo-Dionysius, Neoplatonism and the Weakness of the Soul,” in Westra, H. J. (ed.) From Athens to Chartres: Neoplatonism and Medieval Thought: Studies in Honour of Edouard Jeauneau, Leiden, 135–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1996) “Plotinus and Christian Philosophy,” in Gerson, L. P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, Cambridge, UK, 386–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffrey, H.-D. (1996) “Florence, 1492: The Reappearance of Plotinus,” Renaissance Quarterly 49: 488–508,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (2005) “Action and Contemplation in Plotinus,” in Smith, A. and Alt, K. (eds.) The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity: Essays in Honour of Peter Brown, Swansea, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tataretus, Petrus (s.d. [1490s?] ) Expositio in Summulas Petri Hispani, una cum textu, Paris.Google Scholar
Theunissen, M. (1996) Vorentwürfe von Moderne: Antike Melancholie und die Acedia des Mittelalters, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tigerstedt, E. N. (1974) The Decline and Fall of the Neoplatonic Interpretation of Plato: An Outline and Some Observations, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Vasoli, C. (1959) “Jacques Lefèvre d’Etaples e le origini del ‘Fabrismo’,” Renascimento 10: 204–259 [republished in C. Vasoli, La dialettica e la retorica dell’Umanesimo: “Invenzione” e “Metodo” nella cultura del XV e XVI secolo, Milan 1968].Google Scholar
Victor, J. M. (1978) Charles de Bovelles, 1479–1553: An Intellectual Biography, Geneva.Google Scholar
Walker, D. P. (1954) “The Prisca Theologia in France,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 17: 204–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Allen, M. J. B. (1992) “Summoning Plotinus: Ficino, Smoke and the Strangled Chickens”, in Di Cesare, M. A. (ed.) Reconsidering the Renaissance, Binghamton, NY, 63–88 [repr. in Allen, Plato’s Third Eye].Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B. (1995) Plato’s Third Eye: Studies in Marsilio Ficino’s Metaphysics and Its Sources, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B. (1998) Synoptic Art: Marsilio Ficino on the History of Platonic Interpretation, Florence.Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. B. and Hankins, J. (ed. and trans.) (2001–2006) Marsilio Ficino, Platonic Theology, 6 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Allut, P. (1859) Études biographique et bibliographique sur Symphorien Champier, Lyon.Google Scholar
Antonioli, R. (1974) “Un médecin lecteur du Timée, Symphorien Champier,” in L’Humanisme au XVIe siècle, Grenoble, 53–62.Google Scholar
Catana, L. (2014) “Readings of Platonic Virtue Theories from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance: The Case of Marsilio Ficino’s De Amore,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22: 680–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, S. and Storey, T. (2013) Healthy Living in Late Renaissance Italy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celenza, C. S. (2002) “Late Antiquity and Florentine Platonism: The ‘Post-Plotinian’ Ficino,” in Allen, M. J. B., Rees, V., and Davies, M. (eds.) Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy, Leiden, 71–97.Google Scholar
Champier, S. (1506) De corporum animorumque morbis eorundemque remediis opusculum in duos tractatus sive libellos partitum, Lyon.Google Scholar
Champier, S. (1508) De triplici disciplina, cuius partes sunt philosophia naturalis, medicina, theologia, moralis philosophia integrantes quadrivium, Lyon.Google Scholar
Champier, S. (1516) Symphonia Platonis cum Aristotele et Galeni cum Hippocrate, Paris.Google Scholar
Champier, S. (1517) Practica nova in medicina de omnibus morborum generibus ex traditionibus Graecorum, Latinorum, Arabum, Poenorum ac recentium autorum aurei libri quinque, Lyon.Google Scholar
Champier, S. (1528?) Symphonia Galeni ad Hippocratem, Cornelii Celsi ad Avicennam, Lyon?Google Scholar
Champier, S. (1533) Periarchon, id est de principiis utriusque philosophiae […] quae Galenus in demonstrativis sermonibus, et Aristoteles in libris naturalium disciplinarum, ac Timaeus Locrus et Plato in libris de universo scripserunt […], Lyon.Google Scholar
Chin, C. “Cento,” in Grafton, A., Most, G. W., and Settis, S. (eds.) (2010) The Classical Tradition, Cambridge, MA, 189–190.Google Scholar
Clark, S. R. L. (2016) Plotinus: Myth, Metaphor, and Philosophical Practice, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. (1988) “Humanistes et antiquaires à Lyon,” in Possenti, A. and Mastrangelo, G. (eds.) Il Rinascimento a Lione, Rome,159–174.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. (1998) “Les dernières années de Symphorien Champier,” Bulletin de l’Association d’Étude sur l’Humanisme, la Réforme et la Renaissance, 47: 25–50.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P. (1977) “Lefevre d’Etaples, Symphorien Champier, and the Secret Names of God,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 40:189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P. (1978) Symphorien Champier and the Reception of the Occultist Tradition in Renaissance France, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copenhaver, B. P. (1986) “Renaissance Magic and Neoplatonic Philosophy: Ennead 4. 3–5 in Ficino’s De vita coelitus comparanda,” in Garfagnini, G. C. (ed.) Marsilio Ficino e il ritorno di Platone: Studi e documenti, Florence, II, 351–369.Google Scholar
Corrias, A. (2013) “From Daemonic Reason to Daemonic Imagination: Plotinus and Marsilio Ficino on the Soul’s Tutelary Spirit,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21: 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, J. M. (1996) “An Ethic for the Late Antique Sage,” in Gerson, L. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, Cambridge, UK, 315–335,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
du Cange, C. (1883–1887) Glossarium mediae et infimae latinitatis, ed. Favre, L., 8 vols., Niort.Google Scholar
Eliasson, E. (2015) “The Late Ancient Development of a Notion of Heroic Virtue,” in Rota, S. F. and Hellerstedt, A. (eds.) Shaping the Heroic Virtue: Studies in the Art and Politics of Supereminence in Europe and Scandinavia, Leiden:19–40.Google Scholar
Ficino, M. (1576) Marsilii Ficini Florentini […] opera et quae hactenus extitere et quae in lucem nunc primum prodiere omnia […], Basel. (Photographic reprint Turin 1959, and later Lucca 2011).Google Scholar
Garin, E. (1974) “Plotino nel Rinascimento,” in Plotino e il Neoplatonismo in Oriente e in Occidente, Rome, 537–553 [repr. in Garin, Rinascite e rivoluzioni].Google Scholar
Garin, E. (1975) Rinascite e rivoluzioni: Movimenti culturali dal XIV al XVIII secolo, Bari.Google Scholar
Gersh, S. (2017) “Analytical Study of the Commentary on Ennead III,” in Gersh, S. (ed.) Marsilio Ficino, Commentary on Plotinus, Cambridge, MA, xi–ccxxxi.Google Scholar
Hankins, J. (2016) “Iamblichus, Ficino and Schleiermacher on the Sources of Religious Knowledge,” Erudition and the Republic of Letters, 1: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunkeler, T. (2007) “Symphorien Champier: Logique(s) du compilateur,” in Carlino, A. and Wenger, A. (eds.) Littérature et médicine: Approches et perspectives (XVIe-XIXe siècles), Geneva, 49–63.Google Scholar
Jodogne, P. (1972) “La correspondance de Symphorien Champier avec Jérôme de Pavie dans le ‘Duellum epistolare’ 1519,” in Verbeke, G. and Ijsewijn, J. (eds.) The Late Middle Ages and the Dawn of Humanism Outside of Italy, Leuven and The Hague, 45–56.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, G. (2013) “Numenius”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/numenius/ (accessed 16 November 2018).Google Scholar
Kaske, C. V. and Clark, J. R. (eds.) (1989) Marsilio Ficino, Three Books on Life, Binghamton, NY.Google Scholar
Kessler, E. (2011) Alexander of Aphrodisias and His Doctrine of the Soul: 1400 Years of Lasting Significance, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langseth, J. L. (2013) Knowing God: A Study of the Argument of Numenius of Apameia’s On the Good. Dissertation. University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (1973) “Le rôle de l’imprimerie lyonnaise dans le premier humanisme français,” in L’Humanisme français au début de la Renaissance: Colloque international de Tours, Paris, 81–91.Google Scholar
Muccillo, M. (1996) Platonismo, ermetismo e ‘prisca theologia’: Ricerche di storiografia filosofica rinascimentale, Florence.Google Scholar
Renaudet, A. (1916) Préréforme et humanisme à Paris pendant les premières guerres d’Italie (1494–1511), Paris.Google Scholar
Robichaud, D. J.-J. (2016) “Platonic Questions: Ficino’s Latin and Schleiermacher’s German,” Historia Philosophica: An International Journal, 14: 159–174.Google Scholar
Robichaud, D. J.-J. (2018) Plato’s Persona: Marsilio Ficino, Renaissance Humanism, and Platonic Traditions, Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roger, J. (1973) “L’humanisme médical de Symphorien Champier,” in L’Humanisme français au début de la Renaissance: Colloque de Tours, Paris, 261–272.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H.-D. (1996) “Florence 1492: The Reappearance of Plotinus,” Renaissance Quarterly, 49: 488–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saulnier, V. I. (1958) “Lyon et la médicine aux temps de la Renaissance,” La Revue Lyonnaise de Médicine 7: 73–83.Google Scholar
Schniewind, A. (2003) L’Éthique du sage chez Plotin: Le paradigme du spoudaios, Paris.Google Scholar
Silver, I. (1993) “Plato and Ficino in the Work of Symphorien Champier,” Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance, 55: 271–280.Google Scholar
Siraisi, N. G. (2007) History, Medicine, and the Traditions of Renaissance Learning, Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasoli, C. (1960) “Temi e fonti della tradizione ermetica in uno scritto di Symphorien Champier,” in Castelli, E. (ed.) Umanesimo e esoterismo, Padua, 235–247.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, J. B. (1962) Lyons 1473–1503: The Beginnings of Cosmopolitanism, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Walker, D. P. (1954) “The Prisca Theologia in France,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 17: 204–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar