Book contents
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Italian Renaissance
- Part II Sixteenth-Century France
- Part III The “Cambridge Platonists”
- Part IV German Romanticism
- Part V The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Appendix: Chronology of Editions and Translations of Plotinus1
- Index
- References
Part III - The “Cambridge Platonists”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Plotinus’ Legacy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Italian Renaissance
- Part II Sixteenth-Century France
- Part III The “Cambridge Platonists”
- Part IV German Romanticism
- Part V The Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries
- Appendix: Chronology of Editions and Translations of Plotinus1
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Plotinus' LegacyThe Transformation of Platonism from the Renaissance to the Modern Era, pp. 125 - 180Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
References
Agostini, I. (2006) “Henry More e l’olenmerismo,” Nouvelles de la république des lettres 2: 73–86.Google Scholar
Cope, J. I. (1954) “‘The Cupri-Cosmits’: Glanvill on Latitudinarian Anti-Enthusiasm,” Huntington Library Quarterly 17: 269–286.Google Scholar
Crocker, R. (2003) Henry More, 1614–1687: A Biography of the Cambridge Platonist, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cudworth, R. (1678) The True Intellectual System of the Universe: Wherein, All Reason and Philosophy of Atheism Is Confuted; and Its Impossibility Demonstrated, London.Google Scholar
[Elys, E.] (1694) Letters on Several Subjects, by the Late Pious Dr. Henry More, London.Google Scholar
Gabbey, A. (1982) “‘Philosophia Cartesiana Triumphata,’ Henry More and Descartes, 1646–71,” in Lennon, T. M., Nicholas, J. M., and Davis, J. W. (eds.) Problems in Cartesianism, Kingston, Ontario and Montreal, 171–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbey, A. (1990) “Henry More and the Limits of Mechanism,” in Hutton, S. (ed.) Henry More (1614–87): Tercentenary Studies, Dordrecht, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, D. (1998) “Soul and Mind: Life and Thought in the Seventeenth Century,” in Garber, D. and Ayers, M. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Glanvill, J. (1676) “Anti-Fanatical Religion, and Free Philosophy, in a Continuation of the New Atlantis,” in Glanvill, J., Essays on Several Important Subjects in Philosophy and Religion, London.Google Scholar
Grant, E. (1981) Much Ado about Nothing: Theories of Space and Vacuum from the Middle Ages to the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, S. (2007) “Henry More, Ficino and Plotinus: The Continuity of Renaissance Platonism,” in Simonetti, L. (ed.) Forme Del Neoplatonismo, Florence, 281–296.Google Scholar
Hutton, S. (2013) “The Cambridge Platonists and Averroes,” in Akasoy, A. and Giglioni, G. (eds.) Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Jacob, A. (1985) “Henry More’s Psychodia Platonica and Its Relationship to Marsilio Ficino’s Theologia Platonica,” Journal of the History of Ideas 46: 503–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, D. (2002) “‘Plato and Deep Plotin’: Cambridge Platonism, Platonicall Triads, and More’s Reflections on Nature,” Dionysius 20: 179–198.Google Scholar
Leech, D. (2011) “Ficino and Henry More on the Immortality of the Soul,” in Clucas, S., Forshaw, P. J., and Rees, V. (eds.) Laus Platonici Philosophi: Marsilio Ficino and His Influence, Leiden, 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, D. (2013) The Hammer of the Cartesians: Henry More’s Philosophy of Spirit and the Origins of Modern Atheism, Leuven.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. et al. (2017) “‘Origenian Platonisme’ in Interregnum Cambridge: Three Academic Texts by George Rust, 1656 and 1658,” in History of Universities 30: 43–124.Google Scholar
More, H. (1646) Democritus Platonissans, or, An Essay upon the Infinity of Worlds out of Platonick Principles, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
More, H. (1647) Philosophicall Poems. A Platonicall Song of the Soul; Treating of the Life of the Soul, Her Immortalitie, the Sleep of the Soul, the Unitie of Souls, and Memorie after Death, 2nd ed., Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
More, H. (1653) Conjectura Cabbalistica: Or, A Conjectural Essay of Interpreting the Minde of Moses According to a Threefold Cabbala, Viz., Literal, Philosophical, Mystical, or, Divinely Moral, London.Google Scholar
More, H. (1655) An Antidote against Atheisme. The Second Edition Corrected and Enlarged: With an Appendix Thereunto Annexed, London.Google Scholar
More, H. (1659) The Immortality of the Soul: So Farre Forth as It Is Demonstrable from the Knowledge of Nature and the Light of Reason, London.Google Scholar
More, H. (1668) Divine dialogues […] the Three First Dialogues Treating of the Attributes of God and His Providence at Large, London.Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. (2007) “Mind and Extension (Descartes, Hobbes, More),” in Lagerlund, H. (ed.) Forming the Mind: Essays on the Internal Senses and the Mind/Body Problem from Avicenna to the Medical Enlightenment, Dordrecht, 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. (2008) “The Spatial Presence of Spirits among the Cartesians,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 46: 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sailor, D. B. (1962) “Cudworth and Descartes,” in Journal of the History of Ideas 23: 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staudenbaur, C. A. (1968) “Galileo, Ficino and Henry More’s Psychathanasia,” Journal of the History of Ideas 29: 565–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, U. (1998) “Personal Identity,” in Garber, D. and Ayers, M. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, Cambridge, UK, 868–912.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. (2005) ‘“Creeping Spatiality”: The Location of Nous in Plotinus’ Universe,” Phronesis 50: 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Allen, M. J. B., Hankins, J., and Warden, J. (eds. and trans.) (2001–2006) Marsilio Ficino, Platonic Theology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Beierwaltes, W. (1969) “Augustins Interpretation von Sapientia 11:21,” Revue des études augustiniennes 15: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, E. (1932) Marius Victorinus und die Entwicklung der Abendländischen Willensmetaphysik, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Bergemann, L. (2012) Ralph Cudworth: System aus Transformation. Zur Naturphilosophie der Cambridge Platonists und ihrer Methode, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonifazi, C. (1978) The Soul of the World: An Account of the Inwardness of Things, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. (1932) Die platonische Renaissance in England und die Schule von Cambridge, Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Cudworth, R. (1678) The True Intellectual System of the Universe: The First Part […], London.Google Scholar
Dixon, P. (2003) Nice Hot Disputes: The Doctrine of the Trinity in the Seventeenth Century, London and New York.Google Scholar
Hutton, S. (ed.) (1996) Ralph Cudworth: A Treatise Concerning Eternal and Immutable Morality, with a Treatise on Free Will, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Israel, J. I. (2008) Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670–1752, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lähteenmäki, V. (2010) “Cudworth on Types of Consciousness”, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18: 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroux, G. (ed. and trans.) (1990) Plotin, Traité sur la liberté et la volonté de l’Un, Paris.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (2012) Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodney, J. M. (1970) A Godly Atomist in Seventeenth Century England: Ralph Cudworth, History 32: 243–249.Google Scholar
Thiel, U. (1991) “Cudworth and Seventeenth-Century Theories of Consciousness”, in Gaukroger, S. (ed.) The Uses of Antiquity, Dortrecht, 77–99.Google Scholar
Vassanya, M. (2011) Anima Mundi: The Rise of the World Soul Theory in Modern German Philosophy, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
References
Armstrong, A. H. (ed. and trans.) (1966–1988) Plotinus: Enneads, 7 vols., Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Carter, B. (2010) “Ralph Cudworth and the Theological Origins of Consciousness,” History of the Human Sciences 23: 29–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charleton, W. (1652) The Darknes of Atheism Dispelled by the Light of Nature […] London.Google Scholar
Clark, S. R. L. (2017) “Patrides, Plotinus and the Cambridge Platonists,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25: 858–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., and Murdoch, D. (eds.) (1991a) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vols. I–II, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., Murdoch, D., and Kenny, A. (eds.) (1991b) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. III: The Correspondence, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. and Plantinga, A. (2010) Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? New York.Google Scholar
Dewhurst, K. (1963) John Locke (1632–1704) Physician and Philosopher: A Medical Biography, London.Google Scholar
Diehl, H. (ed.) (1903–1906) Proclus: In Platonis Timaeum Commentarii, 3 vols., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Digby, K. (1644) Two Treatises in the one of which the Nature of Bodies, in the other, the Nature of Mans Soule is looked into in way of Discovery of the Immortality of Reasonable Soules, Paris.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E. K. (1988) Plotinus on Sense-Perception: A Philosophical Study, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleet, B. (ed.) (2016) Plotinus: Ennead IV.7: On the Immortality of the Soul, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
Forstrom, K. J. S. (2010) John Locke and Personal Identity: Immortality and Bodily Resurrection in 17th-Century Philosophy, London.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. and Wood, A. (eds.) (1998) Immanuel Kant: Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Jacob, A. (1987) “Introduction,” in Jacob, A. (ed.) Henry More, The Immortality of the Soul, Dordrecht, i–ciii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, P. (1884) The Life and Letters of John Locke, with Extracts from his Journals and Common-place Books, London.Google Scholar
Leech, D. (2013) The Hammer of the Cartesians: Henry More’s Philosophy of Spirit and the Origins of Modern Atheism, Leuven.Google Scholar
Lennon, T. M. (2008) “Cudworth and Boyle: An Odd Couple?,” in Lennon, T. M. and Stainton, R. J. (eds.) Achilles of Rationalist Psychology, Dordrecht, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitin, D. (2015) Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LoLordo, A. (2011) “Epicureanism and Early Modern Naturalism,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19: 647–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenna, S. (trans.) (1992) Plotinus: The Enneads, Burdett, NY [Originally published 1917–1930].Google Scholar
Michaud, D. A. (2017) Reason Turned into Sense: John Smith on Spiritual Sensation, Leuven.Google Scholar
More, H. (1653) An Antidote Against Atheisme, Or an Appeal to the Natural Faculties of Man, whether there be not a God, London.Google Scholar
Morel, P.-M. (2016) “Plotinus, Epicurus and the Problem of Intellectual Evidence: Tr. 32 (Enn. V 5) I,” in Longo, A. and Taormina, D. P. (eds.) Plotinus and Epicurus: Matter, Perception, Pleasure, New York, 96–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nidditch, P. (ed.) (1975) John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Oxford.Google Scholar
Purinton, J. S. (1999) “Epicurus on ‘Free Volition’ and the Atomic Swerve,” Phronesis 44: 253–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. John, J. A. (ed.) (1906) John Locke, An Examination of Pere Malebranche’s Opinion of Seeing All Things in God, in The Philosophical Works of John Locke, London.Google Scholar
Schachter, J.-P. (2008) “Locke and the Achilles Argument,” in Lennon, T. M. and Stainton, R. J. (eds.) The Achilles of Rationalist Psychology, Dordrecht, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, K. (2015) Anti-Atheism in Early Modern England 1580–1720: ‘The Atheist Answered and His Error Confuted,’ Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. (1660b) “Discourse of the Immortality of the Soul,” in Select Discourses, London, 59–120.Google Scholar
Smith, J. (1660c) “The Excellency and Nobleness of True Religion,” in Select Discourses, London, 377–451.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. G. (2011) “Marsilio Ficino’s Critique of the Lucretian Alternative,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 72: 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern-Gillet, S. (2016) “Plotinus and the Problem of Consciousness,” in Leach, S. and Tartaglia, J. (eds.) Consciousness and the Great Philosophers: What Would They Have Said about Our Mind-Body Problem?, New York, 19–27.Google Scholar
Taormina, D. P. (2016) “‘What is known through Sense Perception is an Image’: Plotinus’ tr. 32 (Enn. V 5) I. 12–19: An Anti-Epicurean Argument?,” in Longo, A. and Taormina, D. P. (eds.) Plotinus and Epicurus, New York, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthington, J. (1660) “To the Reader,” in Smith, J., Select Discourses, London, iii–xxxi.Google Scholar