Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:09:30.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Abortion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Charles C. Camosy
Affiliation:
Fordham University, New York
Get access

Summary

A week-old baby is not a rational and self-aware being, and there are many nonhuman animals whose rationality, self-awareness, capacity to feel and so on, exceed that of a human baby a week or a month old. If . . . the fetus does not have the same claim to life as a person, it appears that the newborn baby does not either. If these conclusions are too shocking to take seriously, it may be worth remembering that our present absolute protection of the lives of infants is a distinctively Christian attitude rather than a universal ethical value.

Peter Singer, Practical Ethics

For God, the Lord of life, has conferred on [humanity] the surpassing ministry of safeguarding life in a manner which is worthy of man. Therefore from the moment of its conception life must be guarded with the greatest care while abortion and infanticide are unspeakable crimes.

Bishops of Vatican Council ii , Gaudium et Spes

INTRODUCTION

If one is after productive exchange between Peter Singer and Christian ethics, it might seem that abortion is an odd place to begin. In his important and comprehensive work Practical Ethics, Singer suggests that

we accord the fetus no higher moral status than we give to a nonhuman animal at a similar level of rationality, self-consciousness, awareness, capacity to feel and so on. Because no fetus is a person, no fetus has the same claim to life as a person.

He believes that the overwhelming majority of abortions are justified because a woman's preferences will almost always outweigh the (at best) rudimentary preferences of a fetus. And as we will soon see, Singer notoriously goes further and argues that the right to an abortion also implies a right to infanticide, because a newborn infant, like a fetus, has few valuable preferences. Contrast this point of view with Pope John Paul ii in Evangelium Vitae:

I declare that direct abortion, that is, abortion willed as an end or as a means, always constitutes a grave moral disorder, since it is the deliberate killing of an innocent human being.

Type
Chapter
Information
Peter Singer and Christian Ethics
Beyond Polarization
, pp. 11 - 40
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Renihartz, Adele“Philo on Infanticide,”Studia Philonica Annual 4 1992Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Abortion
  • Charles C. Camosy, Fordham University, New York
  • Book: Peter Singer and Christian Ethics
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139043304.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Abortion
  • Charles C. Camosy, Fordham University, New York
  • Book: Peter Singer and Christian Ethics
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139043304.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Abortion
  • Charles C. Camosy, Fordham University, New York
  • Book: Peter Singer and Christian Ethics
  • Online publication: 05 August 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139043304.002
Available formats
×