Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:13:46.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Steps toward the Europeanization of US securities regulation, with thoughts on the evolution and design of a multinational securities regulator

from PART 2 - Perspectives in financial regulation, SECTION 2: Transatlantic perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Michel Tison
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Hans De Wulf
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Christoph Van der Elst
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Reinhard Steennot
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The United States currently faces a set of regulatory issues that are profoundly important to the future of its form of securities regulation and hence its place in the global capital marketplace. Calls for extensive reform have come from a well-publicized set of studies that question the ability of the US to be competitive worldwide because of excessive regulation and an overdeveloped litigation culture.

One of the principal moves being considered takes the form of mutual recognition. The likely first stage of this would be the invitation to foreign stock exchanges and securities firms to have a presence in the US without registration with the SEC as a domestic exchange or broker-dealer firm, upon the determination that adequate home country regulation exists and can be relied upon as a substitute for direct SEC oversight. As part of this, however, would be some attention to a bigger project: the potential for mutual recognition of issuer disclosure and governance rules. Foreign trading screens and foreign broker-dealer presence in the US is meaningful largely as a means of making foreign securities more readily available to US investors, and the potential for increased competition and lower costs will hardly follow if making such securities available means intense US regulation of the issuers of those securities. Some mutual recognition of issuer disclosure standards is thus inevitable if the project is to succeed, and the SEC has already taken steps in this direction with the recent determination that foreign issuers do not have to reconcile their financial reporting to US generally accepted accounting principles.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Pan, E., ‘The New Internationalization of US Securities Regulation: Improving the Prospects for an Trans-Atlantic Marketplace’, European Company Law, 5 (2008), 1Google Scholar
Tafara, E. and Peterson, R., ‘A Blueprint for Cross-Border Access to US Investors: A New International Framework’, Harvard International Law Journal, 48 (2007), 31–68.Google Scholar
Ferran, E., Building an EU Securities Market (Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moloney, N., ‘Building a Retail Investment Culture Through Law: The 2004 Markets in Financial Instruments Directive’, European Business Organization Law Review, 6 (2005), 341–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langevoort, D., ‘The Social Construction of Sarbanes-Oxley’, Michigan Law Review, 105 (2007), 1817–55.Google Scholar
Choi, S. and Guzman, A., ‘Portable Reciprocity: Rethinking the International Reach of Securities Regulation’, Southern California Law Review, 71 (1998), 903–52.Google Scholar
Moloney, N., ‘Innovation and Risk in EC Financial Market Regulation: New Instruments of Financial Market Intervention and the Committee of European Securities Regulators’, European Law Review, 32 (2007), 627–63.Google Scholar
Langevoort, D., ‘Structuring Securities Regulation in the European Union: Lessons from the US Experience’, in Ferrarini, and Wymeersch, (eds.), Investor Protection in Europe: Corporate Law Making, the MiFID and Beyond (Oxford University Press, 2006), 485–506.Google Scholar
Brummer, C., ‘Stock Exchanges and the New Market for Securities Law’, University of Chicago Law Review 75 (2008), 1435.Google Scholar
Langevoort, D., ‘The Social Construction of Sarbanes–Oxley’, Michigan Law Review, 105 (2007), 1828–9.Google Scholar
Coffee, J., ‘Reforming the Securities Class Action: An Essay on Deterrence and its Implementation’, Columbia Law Review, 106 (2006), 1534.Google Scholar
Baker, T. and Griffith, S., ‘The Missing Monitor in Corporate Governance: The Director and Officer's Liability Insurer’, Georgetown Law Journal, 95 (2007), 795–845.Google Scholar
Langevoort, D., ‘On Leaving Corporate Executives “Naked, Homeless and Without Wheels”: Corporate Fraud, Equitable Remedies, and the Debate Over Entity Versus Individual Liability’, Wake Forest Law Review, 42 (2007), 627–61.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×