Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Key Dates from Roman History
- To the Reader
- Introduction: Why Rome?
- 1 Anacyclosis: No Regime Is Exceptional and Democracy Is Not Inevitable
- 2 Mighty Republics Can Fall Because of Slow Corruption Rather Than Dramatic Revolutions
- 3 A Revered Tradition of Liberty Can Be Exploited by Authoritarians
- 4 Economic Inequality Drives Civil Strife
- 5 Political Violence Can Become Normalized
- 6 Strongmen Do Not Save Republics
- 7 The Rights and Responsibilities of Citizenship Need to Be Shared and Extended
- 8 Civic Virtue Is as Important as the Constitution and Laws
- 9 A Reckoning with the Oppressed Cannot Be Denied
- 10 Elections Only Work When Everyone Is Willing to Lose
- 11 Disregard for The Civil Liberties of Some Erodes the Legal Rights of All Citizens
- 12 Military Misadventures Abroad Lead to Instability at Home
- 13 Organized, Armed Gangs Tear Apart a Political System
- 14 Institutions May Not Be Able to Save the Republic
- 15 A Tyrant Backed into a Corner Is a Danger to the Republic
- 16 The Real Problem Is Not Simply a Tyrannical Leader
- 17 Free Speech Can Disappear
- 18 The Crisis Can Be Manufactured to Continue
- 19 The Revolution Can Be Advertised as a Restoration
- 20 Freedom Lost Cannot So Easily Be Regained
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Bibliographic Note
- Index
12 - Military Misadventures Abroad Lead to Instability at Home
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2022
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Key Dates from Roman History
- To the Reader
- Introduction: Why Rome?
- 1 Anacyclosis: No Regime Is Exceptional and Democracy Is Not Inevitable
- 2 Mighty Republics Can Fall Because of Slow Corruption Rather Than Dramatic Revolutions
- 3 A Revered Tradition of Liberty Can Be Exploited by Authoritarians
- 4 Economic Inequality Drives Civil Strife
- 5 Political Violence Can Become Normalized
- 6 Strongmen Do Not Save Republics
- 7 The Rights and Responsibilities of Citizenship Need to Be Shared and Extended
- 8 Civic Virtue Is as Important as the Constitution and Laws
- 9 A Reckoning with the Oppressed Cannot Be Denied
- 10 Elections Only Work When Everyone Is Willing to Lose
- 11 Disregard for The Civil Liberties of Some Erodes the Legal Rights of All Citizens
- 12 Military Misadventures Abroad Lead to Instability at Home
- 13 Organized, Armed Gangs Tear Apart a Political System
- 14 Institutions May Not Be Able to Save the Republic
- 15 A Tyrant Backed into a Corner Is a Danger to the Republic
- 16 The Real Problem Is Not Simply a Tyrannical Leader
- 17 Free Speech Can Disappear
- 18 The Crisis Can Be Manufactured to Continue
- 19 The Revolution Can Be Advertised as a Restoration
- 20 Freedom Lost Cannot So Easily Be Regained
- Conclusion
- Notes
- Bibliographic Note
- Index
Summary
The Romans did not lose wars. In fact, the Middle and Late Republic are periods of almost continuous Roman success; yes, they lost battles, but they nearly always won the war. Despite this success, military campaigns still had the potential to be disruptive to political life at home. The resources devoted to them and the political divisiveness they caused wore away notions of the common good, political solidarity, and social trust. Thus, Sulla and Marius viewed the war against Mithridates, who had orchestrated the murder of thousands of Romans and Italians, not only as the serious threat to Rome it was, but also as an opportunity for personal aggrandizement; the consequences of their ambition and violence were devastating for Rome and thousands of its citizens who died in the resulting strife. Later conflicts had similar impacts.
In 60 BCE, Rome's three most powerful, richest, and ambitious men, Pompey, Crassus, and Caesar, decided to form a political alliance, which historians call the First Triumvirate. Pompey was the most successful militarily and the richest. He had strung together a number of unprecedented offices and military commands throughout the 70s and 60s BCE. The first elected office he ever held was the consulship, a violation of Roman custom; he also held sweeping commands against the Mediterranean pirates and concluded the protracted war against Mithridates, expanding Rome's empire into the Eastern Mediterranean. The commands, which he executed efficiently and effectively, granted him immense power; his authority against the pirates troubled senators because he did not have a colleague in the office, an unrepublican precedent. His career would later serve as a model for Augustus, Rome's first emperor.
Caesar's career was on the rise, and though he had been a successful military commander, he did not yet have a distinctive military achievement to rival Pompey; in addition, he was indebted to men like Crassus. Crassus, a wealthy slum lord, was infamous for his remark that a man was not rich unless he had the money to buy an army. Though powerful and wealthy, he barely had any military success, save suppressing the revolt of Spartacus, from the Roman perspective hardly the stuff to win a proper triumph. Crassus and Caesar were zealous for military triumphs that would give them the same distinction as Pompey and the plunder that would come with it.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- On the Fall of the Roman RepublicLessons for the American People, pp. 57 - 60Publisher: Anthem PressPrint publication year: 2022