Cunningham, F, et al. Williams Obstetrics. 23rd Edition. McGraw Hill Professional. 2009.Google Scholar

Armson, BA. Is planned cesarean childbirth a safe alternative? CMAJ. 2007;176:475.Google Scholar

Declercq, E, Barger, M, Cabral, HJ, et al. Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:669.Google Scholar

Alexander, JM, Leveno, KJ, Rouse, DJ, et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:917.Google Scholar

Martin, TA. Hamilton, BE. Osterman Michelle. Births in the US, 2014. NCHS Data Brief No. 216 Sept. 2015.Google Scholar

Shellhaas, CS, Gilbert, S, Landon, MB, et al. The frequency and complication rates of hysterectomy accompanying cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clark, SL, Christmas, JT, Frye, DR, et al. Maternal mortality in the United States: Predictability and the impact of protocols on fatal postcesarean pulmonary embolism and hypertension-related intracranial hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:32.e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wen, SW, Rusen, ID, Walker, M, et al. Maternal Health Study Group, Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1263–1269.Google Scholar

Harper, MA, Byington, RP, Espeland, MA, et al. Pregnancy-related death and health care services. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:273–278.Google Scholar

Lydon-Rochelle, M, Holt, VL, Easterling, TR, Martin, DP. Cesarean delivery and postpartum mortality among primiparas in Washington State, 1987–1996. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:169–174.Google Scholar

Schuitemaker, N, van Roosmalen, J, Dekker, G, et al. Maternal mortality after cesarean section in The Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76:332–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kamel, H, Navi, BB, Sriram, N, et al. Risk of a thrombotic event after the 6-week postpartum period. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1307.Google Scholar

Ueland, K. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. VII. Intrapartum blood volume changes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;126:671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Larsson, C, Saltvedt, S, Wiklund, I, et al. Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:1448.Google Scholar

Hammad, IA, Chauhan, SP, Magann, EF, Abuhamad, AZ. Peripartum complications with cesarean delivery: A review of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network publications. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:463.Google Scholar

Hebert, PR, Reed, G, Entman, SS, Mitchel, EF Jr, Berg, C, Griffin, MR.Serious maternal morbidity after childbirth: Prolonged hospital stays and readmissions. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:942–947.Google ScholarPubMed

Sherman, SJ, Greenspoon, JS, Nelson, JM, Paul, RH. Obstetric hemorrhage and blood utilization. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:929–934.Google ScholarPubMed

Allen, VM, O’Connell, CM, Liston, RM, Baskett, TF. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:477–482.Google Scholar

Silver, RM, MFMU Network of NICHD. The MFMU cesarean section registry: Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:s17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaim, W, Bashiri, A, Bar-David, J, Shoham-Vardi, I, Mazor, M. Prevalence and clinical significance of postpartum endometritis and wound infection. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2000;8:77–82.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fisher, J, Astbury, J, Smith, A. Adverse psychological impact of operative obstetric interventions: A prospective longitudinal study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1997;31:728–738.Google Scholar

Duff, P. Pathophysiology and management of postcesarean endomyometritis. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:269.Google Scholar

Owen, J, Andrews, WW. Wound complications after cesarean sections. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;37:842.Google Scholar

Olsen, MA, Butler, AM, Willers, DM, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after low transverse cesarean section. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:477.Google Scholar

Selo-Ojeme, DO, Bhattacharjee, P, Izuwa-Njoku, NF, Kadir, RA. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary London hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;271:154–159. Epub 2005 Feb 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Figueroa, R, Garry, D, Maulik, D. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: Experience at a community teaching hospital. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:971–975.Google Scholar

Phipps, MG, Watabe, B, Clemons, JL, et al. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:156.Google Scholar

Thompson, JF, Roberts, CL, Currie, M, Ellwood, DA. Prevalence and persistence of health problems after childbirth: Associations with parity and method of birth. Birth. 2002;29:83–94.Google Scholar

Kacmar, J, Bhimani, L, Boyd, M, Shah-Hosseini, R, Peipert, J. Route of delivery as a risk factor for emergent peripartum hysterectomy: A case–control study. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:141–145.Google Scholar

Declercq, ER, Sakala, C, Corry, MP, Applebaum, S, Risher, P. Listening to Mothers: Report of the First National U.S. Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences. New York: Maternity Center Association, October 2002.Google Scholar

Lydon-Rochelle, MT, Holt, VL, Martin, DP. Delivery method and self-reported postpartum general health status among primiparous women. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15:232–240.Google Scholar

Almeida, EC, Nogueira, AA, Candido dos Reis, FJ, Rosa e Silva, JC. Cesarean section as a cause of chronic pelvic pain. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;79:101–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DiMatteo, MR, Morton, SC, Lepper, HS, et al. Cesarean childbirth and psychological outcomes: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 1996;15:303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnstone, SJ, Boyce, PM, Hickey, AR, Morris-Yatees, AD, Harris, MG. Obstetric risk factors for postnatal depression in urban and rural community samples. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2001;35:69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

LaRosa, JA, Saywell, RM Jr, Zollinger, TW, et al. The incidence of adynamic ileus in postcesarean patients. Patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular analgesia. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:293.Google ScholarPubMed

DiMatteo, MR, Morton, SC, Lepper, HS, et al. Cesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 1996;15:303.Google Scholar

Clement, S. Psychological aspects of caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;15:109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levine, EM, Ghai, V, Barton, JJ, Strom, CM. Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dunnihoo, DR, Gallaspy, JW, Wise, RB, Otterson, WN. Postpartum Ovarian Vein Thrombophlebitis: A review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1991;46:415–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bodelon, C, Bernabe-Ortiz, A, Schiff, MA, Reed, SD. Factors associated with peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:115.Google Scholar

Rossi, AC, Lee, RH, Chmait, RH. Emergency postpartum hysterectomy for uncontrolled postpartum bleeding: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:637.Google Scholar

Flood, KM, Said, S, Geary, M, et al. Changing trends in peripartum hysterectomy over the last 4 decades. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:632.e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shellhaas, CS, Gilbert, S, Landon, MB, et al. The frequency and complication rates of hysterectomy accompanying cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:224.Google Scholar

Bager, P, Melbye, M, Rostgaard, K, Benn, CS, Westergaard, T. Mode of delivery and risk of allergic rhinitis and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111:51–56.Google Scholar

Alexander, JM, Leveno, KJ, Hauth, J, et al. Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Towner, D, Castro, MA, Eby-Wilkens, E, Gilbert, WM. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1709–1714.Google Scholar

Lydon-Rochelle, M, Holt, VL, Martin, DP, Easterling, TR. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA. 2000;283:2411–2416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marshall, NE, Fu, R, Guise, JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:262.e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tulandi, T, Agdi, M, Zarei, A, et al. Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:56.e1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Eijsink, JJ, van der Leeuw-Harmsen, L, van der Linden, PJ. Pregnancy after Caesarean section: Fewer or later? Hum Reprod. 2008;23:543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moraitis, AA, Oliver-Williams, C, Wood, AM, et al. Previous caesarean delivery and the risk of unexplained stillbirth: Retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2015;122:1467.Google Scholar

Andolf, E, Thorsell, M, Kallen, K. Caesarean section and risk for endoemtriosis: A prospective cohort stud of Swedish registries. BJOG. 2013;120:1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gunes, M, Kayikcioglu, F, Ozturkoglu, E, Haberal, A. Incisional endometriosis after cesarean section, episiotomy and other gynecologic procedures. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005;31:471.Google Scholar

Blanco, RG, Parithivel, VS, Shah, AK, et al. Abdominal wall endometriomas. Am J Surg. 2003;185:596.Google Scholar

Bij de Vaate, AJ, van der Voet, LF, Naji, O, et al. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: Systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:372.Google Scholar

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: Vaginal birth after cesarean: New insights. March 8–10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:1279.Google Scholar

Landon, MB, Hauth, JC, Leveno, KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Guise, J-M, Eden, K, Emeis, C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: New insights. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No.191. (Prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I). AHRQ Publication No. 10-E003. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD 2010. www.ahrq.gov/clinic/tp/cesarreqtp.htm#Report (Accessed on May 21, 2012).Google Scholar

Landon, MB, Lynch, CD. Optimal timing and mode of delivery after cesarean with previous classical incision or myomectomy: A review of the data. Semin Perinatol. 2011;35:257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Glaze, S, Ekwalanga, P, Roberts, G, et al. Peripartum hysterectomy: 1999 to 2006. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed