Rosenorn-Lanng, D. Human Factors in Healthcare, Level 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.Google Scholar

CHFG Clinical Human Factors Group. Key human factors messages when working under pressure. https://chfg.org.Google Scholar

Knight, M, Bunch, K, Tuffnell, D, et al. (eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2014–16. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, 2018.Google Scholar

Weindling, AM. The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Arch Dis Childhd. 2003;88(12):1034–7.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Each Baby Counts: 2018 Progress Report. London: RCOG; 2018.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Each Baby Counts: Themed report on anaesthetic care, including lessons identified from Each Baby Counts babies born 2015 to 2017. London: RCOG; 2018.Google Scholar

Coroyannakis, C, Chandraharan, E, Matiluko, A. Comparative analysis of the human ‘WORM’: role of human factors on adverse incidents in two adjacent obstetric units in London. BJOG. 2013;120(1):413.Google Scholar

Vosper, H, Hignett, S, Bowie, P. () Twelve tips for embedding human factors and ergonomics principles in healthcare education. Med Teacher. 2018;40(4):357–63, DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1387240.Google Scholar

Russ, AL, Fairbanks, RJ, Karsh, B-T, Militello, LG, Saleem, JJ, Wears, RL. The science of human factors: separating facts from fiction. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:802–8.Google Scholar

Jackson, K, Hayes, K, Hinshaw, K. The relevance of non-technical skills in obstetrics and gynaecology. TOG. 2013;15:269–74.Google Scholar

Endsley, M. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors. 1995;37(1):32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flin, R, O’Connor, P, Crichton, M. Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills. Burlington, VT: Ashgate; 2008.Google Scholar

Chabris, C, Simons, D. The Invisible Gorilla and Other Ways Our Intuition Deceives Us. London: HarperCollins; 2011.Google Scholar

Nzelu, O, Chandraharan, E, Pereira, S. Human factors: the dirty dozen in CTG misinterpretation. Glob J Reprod Med. 2018;6(2):GJORM.MS.ID.555683.Google Scholar

Bahl, R, Murphy, DJ, Strachan, B. Non-technical skills for obstetricians conducting forceps and vacuum deliveries: qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150(2):147–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

NICE. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth; 2014. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG190Google Scholar

Quality, Service Improvement and Redesign Tools: SBAR communication tool- situation, background, assessment, recommendation. ACT academy- Online library of Quality, Service Improvement and Redesign tools. NHS Improvement. https://improvement.nhs.uk/documents/2162/sbar-communication-tool.pdfGoogle Scholar

Francis, R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationary Office; 2013.Google Scholar

West, M, Eckert, R, Steward, K, Pasmore, B. Developing collective leadership for healthcare. King’s Fund, 2014. www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/field/field_publication_file/developing-collective-leadership-kingsfund-may14.pdfGoogle Scholar

Hasson, G. Emotional Intelligence. Chichester: Capstone; 2014.Google Scholar

Yule, S, Flin, R, Maran, N, et al. Surgeons’ non-technical skills in the operating room: reliability testing of the NOTSS behaviour rating system. World J Surg. 2008;32:548–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, S, Brackley, K, Landau, A, Hayes, K. Assessing non-technical skills on the delivery suite: a pilot study. Clin Teach. 2014;11(5):375–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Easterbrook, JA. The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychol Rev. 1959;66(3):183–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hanoch, Y, Vitouch, O. When less is more: information, emotional arousal and the ecological reframing of the Yerkes–Dodson Law. Theory Psychol. 2004;14(4): 427–52.Google Scholar

Nzelu, O, Chandraharan, E, Pereira, S. Human factors: the dirty dozen in CTG misinterpretation. Glob J Reprod Med. 2018;6(2):555683.Google Scholar