Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:55:00.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Risk assessment in control of reservoir systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

A. Kozlowski
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
A. Lodziński
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz
Affiliation:
World Meteorological Organization, Geneva
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT Decision making in the process of control of water storage reservoirs is always combined with risk, whose evaluation is of utmost practical importance. Define the risk as the probability of failure within an operational control process, in the sense of water deficit or water surplus. The control is the sequence of interventions (releases) on future intervals. The risk is estimated on the basis of probability distributions of the total inflows within the horizon of an intervention. The stochastic process of total inflow is conceptualized as a non-stationary Markov chain of first or second order, under discrete time. The methodology is illustrated at the example of the water supply system of a cascade of reservoirs on the river Sola.

INTRODUCTION

In a real decision making problem a decision is made under the conditions of uncertainty, i.e. the decision maker does not have complete information about all elements that influence his decision.

In the water resources management the estimation of the quality of control is carried out a posteriori as a result of analysis of water management system performance within a long period of time, usually several years. A probabilistic estimation of failure in the control process is conducted through the determination of the periods of assurance of various desirable outflows. Recently some specific performance indices of water resources system, such as reliability, vulnerability, resilience and robustness have been considered (cf. Cohen, 1982; Haimes et al., 1984; Hashimoto et al., 1982a, b).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×