Book contents
- New Private Law Theory
- New Private Law Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- New Private Law Theory
- Part I Methods and Disciplines
- Part II Social Ordering, Constitutionalism and Private Law
- Part III Transactions and Risk: Private Law and the Market
- 11 Negotiation, the Function of Contract and the ‘Justice of Consensus’
- 12 Knowledge and Information
- 13 Private Power
- 14 Non-discrimination
- 15 Risk, Tort and Liability
- 16 Digital Architecture of Private Law Relations
- 17 Between Market and Hierarchy
- Part IV Persons and Organizations
- Part V Private Law (Rule-Setting) beyond the State
- Index
- References
16 - Digital Architecture of Private Law Relations
from Part III - Transactions and Risk: Private Law and the Market
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 April 2021
Book contents
- New Private Law Theory
- New Private Law Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- New Private Law Theory
- Part I Methods and Disciplines
- Part II Social Ordering, Constitutionalism and Private Law
- Part III Transactions and Risk: Private Law and the Market
- 11 Negotiation, the Function of Contract and the ‘Justice of Consensus’
- 12 Knowledge and Information
- 13 Private Power
- 14 Non-discrimination
- 15 Risk, Tort and Liability
- 16 Digital Architecture of Private Law Relations
- 17 Between Market and Hierarchy
- Part IV Persons and Organizations
- Part V Private Law (Rule-Setting) beyond the State
- Index
- References
Summary
With the emergence of the Internet, the world of private law has changed. There are new modes of governing relations which interfere in private law. Private law relations are built on the availability, the accessibility and the functionality of the Internet. Online platforms are the visible intermediaries, but behind and underneath lies the internet technology that structures private relations and social norms of communication and interaction.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- New Private Law TheoryA Pluralist Approach, pp. 298 - 314Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Lessig, L, ‘The law of the horse: what cyberlaw might teach’ (1999) 113 Harvard Law Review 501–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G, ‘Societal constitutionalism: alternatives to state-centred constitutional theory?’, in Joerges, C, Sand, I.-J. and Teubner, G (eds.), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2004), pp. 3–28Google Scholar
Brownsword, R, Law, Technology and Society: Reimaging the Regulatory Environment (London: Routledge, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. A, Barocas, S, Felton, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R, Robinson, D. G. and Yu, H, ‘Accountable algorithms’ (2017) 165 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 632Google Scholar
Scherer, M. U, ‘Regulating artificial intelligence systems: risks, challenges, competencies and strategies (2016) 29 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 353Google Scholar
De Franceschi, A and Schulze, R (eds.), Digital Revolution: New Challenges for Law (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2019)Google Scholar
Ebers, M and Navas, S (eds.), Algorithms and Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grundmann, S, Collins, H, Gómez, F, Rutgers, J and Sirena, P (eds.), European Contract Law in the Digital Age (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar