Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-24T18:21:51.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

Foreword

Get access

Summary

A mythological component has always been present in culture, whether archaic or modern. In one way or another, mythology reveals itself in every creative process; it is the first system of thought in the history of culture. The semioticians of the Tartu-Moscow school—Yuri Lotman (1922-1993), Zara Minz (1927-1987), Boris A. Uspenski (b. 1927), Eleazar M. Meletinsky (b. 1918), and others—observed that, although a restoration of mythic thought in its totality is impossible within the framework of modern culture, certain components of that thought continue to inform artistic creativity of the modern age. Meletinsky wrote: “Beginning with the second decade of the twentieth century, re-mythification became an unstoppable process that in the end came to dominate different sectors of European culture.” Re-mythification, or “neo-mythologism,” a term coined by Meletinsky, has features that are typical of archaic mythologia—its paradigmatic nature, its use of archetypes, and its mediation of opposites. However, modern mythmaking incorporates Jungian metaphorical approaches to the unconsciousness and an ironical estrangement from a common orthodoxy. Neo-mythologism involves the search for an individual language and individual myths.

Because of the particular semiotic problems associated with the study of music, the application of myth in modern literary genres has received much fuller discussion than in music. A recent non-musicological study emphasized “the primacy of mythical archetypes even in modern literature, where the field has been cleared of the ancient gods.” Yet the mythographer Claude Lévi-Strauss considered music to be a sign system no less closely related to myth than literature: “Mythology occupies an intermediary position between two diametrically opposed types of sign systems—musical language on the one hand and articulate speech on the other.” Indeed, the primacy of mythical archetypes is palpable in many works of twentiethcentury musical repertoire and parallels that of modern literature.

The mythological features of some twentieth-century compositions are commonly mentioned in different sources, from composers’ interviews and program notes to scholarly works. However, research on the role of myth in twentieth-century music is not extensive. There has been no study devoted exclusively to the past musical century as a whole and its unique relationships with mythology.

Type
Chapter
Information
Neo-Mythologism in Music
From Scriabin and Schoenberg to Schnittke and Crumb
, pp. ix - xvi
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Foreword
  • Victoria Bowles
  • Book: Neo-Mythologism in Music
  • Online publication: 21 June 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781576472811.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Foreword
  • Victoria Bowles
  • Book: Neo-Mythologism in Music
  • Online publication: 21 June 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781576472811.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Foreword
  • Victoria Bowles
  • Book: Neo-Mythologism in Music
  • Online publication: 21 June 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781576472811.001
Available formats
×