Abbott, Kenneth. International Relations Theory, International Law, and the Regime Governing Atrocities in Internal Conflicts American Journal of International Law 93, no. 2 (1999): 361–79.Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges. Wars of National Liberation and the Laws of War. Annals of International Studies, Association des Anciens Etudiants de L’Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales, 3 (1972).Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges. Wars of National Liberation and the Development of Humanitarian Law. In van Krieken, Peter J., Akkerman, Robert J and Pannenborg (eds.), Charles O., Declarations on Principles : A Quest for Universal Peace, 143–79. Leyden: Sijthoff, 1977.Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges. Wars of National Liberation in the Geneva Conventions and Protocols. In Recueil Des Cours, 165:353–445. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1979.Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges. Wars of National Liberation and the Laws of War. In Kratochwil, Friedrich V and Mendlovitz, Saul H (eds.), International Law: A Contemporary Perspective, 2:410–37. Boulder: Westview Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges. Non-International Armed Conflicts. In UNESCO International Dimensions of Humanitarian Law, 217–40. Dordecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1988.Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges. The Third World Intellectual in Praxis: Confrontation, Participation, or Operation behind Enemy Lines? Third World Quarterly 37, no. 11 (2016): 1957–71.Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Rosemary. Droit humanitaire et conflits internes – Origines et évolution de la réglementation internationale. Geneva, Paris: Institut Henry-Dunant, Editions A. Pedone, 1986.Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Rosemary. Humanitarian Law and Internal Conflicts: The Evolution of Legal Concern. In Delissen, Astrid J. M. and Tanja (eds.), Gerard J.,Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict: Challenges Ahead : Essays in Honour of Frits Kalshoven, 209–23. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1991.Google Scholar

Abplanalp, Philippe. The International Conferences of the Red Cross as a Factor for the Development of International Humanitarian Law and the Cohesion of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. International Review of the Red Cross, no. 308 (1995): 520–49.Google Scholar

Abresch, William. A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya. European Journal of International Law 16, no. 4 (2005): 741–67.Google Scholar

Abtahi, Hirad. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the ICC. Journal of International Criminal Justice 3, no. 3 (2005): 635–48.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel. Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates. In Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. 2nd edn., 112–44. London: Sage, 2013.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel, and Haas, Peter. Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program. International Organization 46, no. 1 (1992): 367–90.Google Scholar

Akande, Dapo. Classification of Armed Conflicts: Relevant Legal Concepts. In Wilmshurst, Elizabeth (ed.), International Law and the Classification of Conflicts, 32–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Albert, Mathias, Kessler, Oliver and Stetter, Stephan. On Order and Conflict: International Relations and the ‘Communicative Turn’. Review of International Studies 34, no. S1 (2008): 43–67.Google Scholar

Alderson, Kai. Making Sense of State Socialization. Review of International Studies 27, no. 3 (2001): 415–33.Google Scholar

Aldrich, George H. New Life for the Laws of War. American Journal of International Law 75, no. 4 (1981): 764–83.Google Scholar

Aldrich, George H. Some Reflections on the Origins of the 1977 Geneva Protocols. In Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et Essais Sur Le Droit International Humanitaire et Sur Les Principes de La Croix-Rouge En lhonneur de Jean Pictet = Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, 129–37. The Hague; Geneva: Martinus Nijhoff; International Committee of the Red Cross, 1984.Google Scholar

Aldrich, George H. Prospects for United States Ratification of Additional Protocol I to the 1949 Geneva Conventions. American Journal of International Law 85, no. 1 (1991): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, George H. Notes from the Vietnam Peace Negotiations. (Unpublished).Google Scholar

Alexander, Amanda. A Short History of International Humanitarian Law. European Journal of International Law 26, no. 1 (2015): 109–38.Google Scholar

Alexander, Amanda. International Humanitarian Law, Postcolonialism and the 1977 Geneva Protocol I. Melbourne Journal of International Law 17 (2016): 15.Google Scholar

Allen, Rodney G., Cherniack, Martin, and Andreopoulos, George J.. Refining War: Civil Wars and Humanitarian Controls. Human Rights Quarterly 18 (1996): 747.Google Scholar

Allison, Roy. The Soviet Union and the Strategy of Non-Alignment in the Third World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J. The Empire of International Law? American Journal of International Law 113, no. 1 (2019): 183–199.Google Scholar

Alvarez, José E. Do Liberal States Behave Better? A Critique of Slaughters Liberal Theory. European Journal of International Law 12, no. 2 (2001): 183–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, José E. What Are International Judges For? The Main Functions of International Adjudication. In Romano, Cesare P. R., Alter, Karen and Shany, Yuval (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, 158–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Amnesty International. The International Criminal Court: Making the Right Choices – Part I. Amnesty International, January 1997, available at: http://iccnow.org/documents/ALMakingRightChoises97PartI.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Anderson, Kenneth. The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-Governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society. European Journal of International Law 11 (2000): 91–120.Google Scholar

Anwar, Raja. The Terrorist Prince: The Life and Death of Murtaza Bhutto. London: Verso, 1997.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Westminster, UK: Christian Classics, 1981.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Politics: Books V and VI. Translated by David Keyt. Clarendon Aristotle Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Armitage, David. Civil Wars: A History in Ideas. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2017.Google Scholar

Arts, Bas. Non-State Actors in Global Governance. Preprints, Bonn: Max-Planck-Projektgruppe Recht Der Gemeinschaftsgueter, 2003, available at: https://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/85112/1/2003-04_online.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Australian Practice in International Law 1974–1975. Australian Year Book of International Law 13 (1975): 325.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert, Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.World Politics, Vol. 38, no. 1 (1985), 226–54.Google Scholar

Axworthy, Lloyd. Navigating a New World: Canadas Global Future. Toronto: Vintage, 2004.Google Scholar

Bacino, Leo J. Reconstructing Russia: U.S. Policy in Revolutionary Russia, 1917–1922. Kent: Kent State University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond (eds.), Power in Global Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond. Power in International Politics. International Organization 59, no. 1 (2005): 39–75.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Barrett, Joseph. Chechnyas Last Hope – Enforced Disappearances and the European Court of Human Rights. Harvard Human Rights Journal 22 (2009): 133.Google Scholar

Barsalou, Olivier. Making Humanitarian Law in the Cold: The Cold War, the United State and the Genesis of the Geneva Conventions of 1949. IILJ Emerging Scholars Papers. New York University School of Law, 2008, available at: http://iilj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Barsalou-Making-Humanitarian-Law-in-the-Cold-2008.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Bartels, Rogier. Timelines, Borderlines and Conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross 91, no. 873 (2009): 35–67.Google Scholar

Bartelson, Jens. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Bass, Gary. Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Bass, Gary. Freedom’s Battle: The Origins of Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Knopf, 2008.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif. The Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Documentary History. Ardsley: Transnational, 1998.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif. Negotiating the Treaty of Rome on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court. Cornell International Law Journal 32 (1999): 443.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif. The Legislative History of the International Criminal Court. Vol. 3. 3 vols. Ardsley: Transnational, 2005.Google Scholar

Bates, Elizabeth Stubbins. Sophisticated Constructivism in Human Rights Compliance Theory. European Journal of International Law 25, no. 4 (2014): 1169–82.Google Scholar

Baxter, Hugh. System and Life-World in Habermass Theory of Communicative Action. Theory and Society 16, no. 1 (1987): 39–86.Google Scholar

Baxter, Richard R. The First Modern Codification of the Law of War – Francis Lieber and General Orders No. 100 (II). International Review of the Red Cross 3, no. 26 (1963): 234–50.Google Scholar

Baxter, Richard R. Humanitarian Law or Humanitarian Politics – The 1974 Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law. Harvard International Law Journal 16 (1975): 1–26.Google Scholar

Baxter, Richard R. Modernizing the Law of War. Military Law Review 78 (1977): 165–183.Google Scholar

Beach, Derek. Process-Tracing Methods in Social Science. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 2017, available at https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-176 [accessed 14 September 2019].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. What Is Process-Tracing Actually Tracing? The Three Variants of Process Tracing Methods and Their Uses and Limitations, 2011, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1902082 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. How Do I Know Mechanistic Evidence When I See It? A Four-Step Procedure for Tracing Causal Mechanisms in Case Study Research, 2017, available at: https://researchgate.net/publication/320100548_How_do_I_know_mechanistic_evidence_when_I_see_it_A_four-step_procedure_for_tracing_causal_mechanisms_in_case_study_research [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. Selecting Appropriate Cases When Tracing Causal Mechanisms. Sociological Methods & Research 47, no. 4 (2018): 837–871.Google Scholar

Beck, Robert J. International Law and International Relations: The Prospects for Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Journal of International Legal Studies 1 (1995): 119–50.Google Scholar

Bederman, David J. International Law in Antiquity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Bedont, Barbara, and Matas, David. Negotiating for an International Criminal Court. Peace Magazine, Sept.–Oct. 1998: 21.Google Scholar

Behringer, Ronald M. The Human Security Agenda: How Middle Power Leadership Defied U.S. Hegemony. New York: Continuum International, 2012.Google Scholar

Bellinger, John B., III, and Haynes, William J. II. A US Government Response to the International Committee of the Red Cross Study Customary International Humanitarian Law. International Review of the Red Cross 89, no. 866 (2007): 443–71.Google Scholar

Benedetti, Fanny, Bonneau, Karine, and Washburn, John. Negotiating the International Criminal Court: New York to Rome, 1994–1998. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2013.Google Scholar

Benedetti, Fanny, and Washburn, John L.. Drafting the International Criminal Court Treaty: Two Years to Rome and an Afterword on the Rome Diplomatic Conference. Global Governance 5, no. 1 (1999): 1–37.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew. The Mother of All Isms: Causal Mechanisms and Structured Pluralism in International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (2013): 459–81.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T. (eds.), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. Process Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practice. In Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T. (eds.), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, 3–38. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew, and Elman, Colin. Case Study Methods. In Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, 499–517. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Bennett, Andrew, and George, Alexander. Process Tracing in Case Study Research, Paper Presented at the MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Case Study Methods, available at: https://uzh.ch/cmsssl/suz/dam/jcr:00000000-5103-bee3-0000-000059b16b9d/05.19.bennett_george.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, and Lustig, Doreen. Taming Democracy: Codifying the Laws of War to Restore the European Order, 1856–1874. University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 28/2017, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2985781 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Prosper M., Bernard Canada and Human Security: From the Axworthy Doctrine to Middle Power Internationalism. American Review of Canadian Studies 36, no. 2 (2006): 233–61.Google Scholar

Prosper M., Bernard Canada and the International Criminal Court: A Case for Renewed Commitment. Policy Options, April 2011.Google Scholar

Best, Geoffrey. Making the Geneva Conventions of 1949: The View from Whitehall. In Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, 5–15. The Hague; Geneva: Martinus Nijhoff ; International Committee of the Red Cross, 1984.Google Scholar

Best, Geoffrey. War and Law since 1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Beyer, Christian. Edmund Husserl. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2015. Stanford: Stanford University, 2015, available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/husserl/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Björkdahl, Annika. Swedish Norm Entrepreneurship in the UN. International Peacekeeping 14, no. 4 (2007): 538–52.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Alan. Norm Antipreneurs and Theorising Resistance to Normative Change. Review of International Studies 42, no. 2 (2016): 310–33.Google Scholar

Boehme, Franziska. We Chose Africa: South Africa and the Regional Politics of Cooperation with the International Criminal Court. International Journal of Transitional Justice 11, no. 1 (2017): 50–70.Google Scholar

Bohman, James, and Rehg, William. Jürgen Habermas. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2015. Stanford: Stanford University, 2014, available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/habermas/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Boissier, Pierre. From Solferino to Tsushima: History of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute, 1985.Google Scholar

Bonner, Michael. Jihad in Islamic History: Doctrines and Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Bordwell, Percy. The Law of War between Belligerents: A History and Commentary. Chicago: Callaghan & Co., 1908.Google Scholar

Bos, Adriaan. From the International Law Commission to the Rome Conference (1994–1998). In Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola and Jones, John R. W. D. (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 35–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Bosco, David. Rough Justice: The International Criminal Court’s Battle to Fix the World, One Prosecution at a Time. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Bosco, David. When the Blue Helmets Are to Blame. Foreign Policy, July 22, 2014.Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael. The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Additional Protocols of 1977. In Zimmermann, Andreas, Geiß, Robin and Haumer, Stefanie (eds.), Humanizing the Laws of War: The Red Cross and the Development of International Humanitarian Law, 57–80. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Bower, Adam. Norms without the Great Powers: International Law and Changing Social Standards in World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Branche, Raphaëlle. The French Army and the Geneva Conventions during the Algerian War of Independence and After. In Evangelista, Matthew and Tannenwald, Nina (eds.), Do the Geneva Conventions Matter?, New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Bratberg, Øivind. Ideas, Tradition and Norm Entrepreneurs: Retracing Guiding Principles of Foreign Policy in Blair and Chiracs Speeches on Iraq. Review of International Studies 37, no. 1 (2011): 327–48.Google Scholar

Brooks, Stephen G. Dueling Realisms. International Organization 51, no. 3 (1997): 445–77.Google Scholar

Brooks, Stephen G., and Wohlforth, William C.. World out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Brown, Bartram S. The Statute of the ICC: Past, Present and Future. In Sewall, Sarah B. and Kaysen, Carl (eds.), The United States and the International Criminal Court: National Security and International Law, 61–84. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta. Challenging International Law: What’s New? (Essay Based on Keynote Presentation at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Council on International Law in Ottawa, on November 2, 2018). Opinio Juris (blog), November 13, 2018, available at: http://opiniojuris.org/2018/11/13/challenging-international-law-whats-new/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J.. International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an Interactional Theory of International Law.Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 39 (2000): 19–74.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J.. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryant, Michael. A World History of War Crimes: From Antiquity to the Present. London ; New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.Google Scholar

Bueger, Christian, and Gadinger, Frank. The Play of International Practice. International Studies Quarterly 59, no. 3 (2015): 449–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bugnion, François. The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949: From the 1949 Diplomatic Conference to the Dawn of the New Millennium. International Affairs 76, no. 1 (2000): 41–50.Google Scholar

Bugnion, François. Jus ad Bellum, Jus in Bello and Non-International Armed Conflicts. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 6 (2003): 167–98.Google Scholar

Bugnion, François. The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Protection of War Victims. London: Macmillan Education, 2003.Google Scholar

Bugnion, François. The International Committee of the Red Cross and Nuclear Weapons: From Hiroshima to the Dawn of the 21st Century. International Review of the Red Cross 87, no. 859 (2005): 511–24.Google Scholar

Bugnion, François. Adoption of the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977: A Milestone in the Development of International Humanitarian Law. International Review of the Red Cross 99, no. 905 (2017): 785–96.Google Scholar

Byers, Michael. Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Caesar, Julius. The Civil War. Translated by J. F. Gardner. London: Penguin Books Ltd, 1967.Google Scholar

Cakmak, Cenap. Transnational Activism in World Politics and Effectiveness of a Loosely Organised Principled Global Network: The Case of the NGO Coalition for an International Criminal Court. The International Journal of Human Rights 12, no. 3 (2008): 373–93.Google Scholar

Campbell, Colm, and Aolain, Fionnuala Ni. The Paradox of Transition in Conflicted Democracies. Human Rights Quarterly 27 (2005): 172–213.Google Scholar

Capoccia, Giovanni. Critical Junctures. In Fioretos, Orfeo, Falleti, Tulia G. and Sheingate, Adam (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, 89–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Carr, David. Husserls Problematic Concept of the Life-World. American Philosophical Quarterly 7, no. 4 (1970): 331–39.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio. The Geneva Protocols of 1977 on the Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict and Customary International Law. UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal 3 (1984): 55–118.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio. Wars of National Liberation and Humanitarian Law. In Swinarski, Christophe (ed.), Etudes et Essais Sur Le Droit International Humanitaire et Sur Les Principes de La Croix-Rouge En lhonneur de Jean Pictet / Studies and Essays on International Humanitarian Law and Red Cross Principles in Honour of Jean Pictet, 313–24. The Hague; Geneva: Martinus Nijhoff ; International Committee of the Red Cross, 1984.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio. The Martens Clause: Half a Loaf or Simply Pie in the Sky? European Journal of International Law 11, no. 1 (2000): 187–216.Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. Review: The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics 50, no. 2 (1998): 324–48.Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. ‘Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change’, International Organization 55, no. 3 (2001), 553–88.Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. Theoretical Pluralism in IR: Possibilities and Limits. In Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. 2nd edn., 220–41. London: Sage, 2012.Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. Transnational Dynamics of Civil War. In Checkel, Jeffrey T. (ed.), Transnational Dynamics of Civil War, 3–30. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. Mechanisms, Process and the Study of International Institutions. In Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T. (eds.), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, 74–97. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. Methods in Constructivist Approaches. In Gheciu, Alexandra and Wohlforth, William C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Security, 152–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Childress, James F. Francis Lieber’s Interpretation of the Laws of War: General Orders No. 100 in the Context of His Life and Thought. American Journal of Jurisprudence 21 (1976): 34–70.Google Scholar

Chitalkar, Poorvi, and Malone, David M.. India and Global Governance. In Malone, David M., Mohan, C. Raja and Raghavan, Srinath (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Indian Foreign Policy, 581–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon. The Social Foundations of World Trade: Norms, Community, and Constitution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Cicero, Marcus Tullius. Pro Milone. Translated by N. H. Watts. 5th edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Cicero, Marcus Tullius. The Philippics. Edited and translated by Shackleton-Bailey, David R.. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Ciobanu, Dan. The Attitude of the Socialist Countries. In Cassese, Antonio (ed.), The New Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, 399–444. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 1979.Google Scholar

Cisse, Catherine. The International Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda: Some Elements of Comparison. Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 7 (1997): 103–118.Google Scholar

Clark, Cal. Political Science Research Methods: Exploring America at a Crossroads. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2013.Google Scholar

Clarkson, Stephen, and Mildenberger, Matto. Dependent America? How Canada and Mexico Construct US Power. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Collier, David, Brady, Henry, and Seawright, Jason. Introduction to the Second Edition: A Sea Change in Political Methodology. In Brady, Henry and Collier, David (eds.), Rethinking Social Enquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. 2nd edn., 1–10. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010.Google Scholar

Combs, Nancy Amoury. Profile: Judge George H. Aldrich. International Law Forum 7 (2005): 47–53, available at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/35/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Conway-Lanz, Sahr. The Struggle to Fight a Humane War: The United States, the Korean War, and the 1949 Geneva Conventions. In Evangelista, Matthew and Tannenwald, Nina (eds.), Do the Geneva Conventions Matter?, 69–104. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Copeland, Dale. A Realist Critique of the English School. Review of International Studies 29, no. 3 (2003): 427–41.Google Scholar

Cornut, Jérémie. Analytic Eclecticism in Practice: A Method for Combining International Relations Theories. International Studies Perspectives 16, no. 1 (2015): 50–66.Google Scholar

Cox, Michaelene, and Shawki, Noha. Negotiating Sovereignty and Human Rights: Actors and Issues in Contemporary Human Rights Politics. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar

Creveld, Martin Van. The Transformation of War. New York: Free Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Crossland, James. Britain and the International Committee of the Red Cross, 1939–1945. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar

Crowe, David. War Crimes, Genocide, and Justice: A Global History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2014.Google Scholar

Cryer, Robert, Friman, Håkan, Robinson, Darryl, and Wilmshurst, Elizabeth. An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Cullen, Anthony. The Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Dancy, Geoff. Searching for Deterrence at the International Criminal Court. International Criminal Law Review 17, no. 4 (2017): 625–55.Google Scholar

Dancy, Geoff, and Montal, Florencia. From Law versus Politics to Law in Politics: A Pragmatist Assessment of the ICCs Impact. American University International Law Review 32, 3 (2017): 645–706.Google Scholar

Dancy, Geoff, and Eric, Wiebelhaus-Brahm. The Impact of Criminal Prosecutions during Intrastate Conflict. Journal of Peace Research 55, no. 1 (2018): 47–61.Google Scholar

Danner, Allison Marston. When Courts Make Law: How the International Criminal Tribunals Recast the Laws of War. Vanderbilt Law Review 59 (2006): 1–65.Google Scholar

Davenport, David. The New Diplomacy. Policy Review, no. 116 (December 2002): 17–30.Google Scholar

Davis, George, B. Doctor Francis Lieber’s Instructions for the Government of Armies in the Field. American Journal of International Law, 1, no. 1 (1907), 13–25.Google Scholar

Dawson, Doyne, and Dawson, James D.. The Origins of Western Warfare: Militarism and Morality in the Ancient World. Boulder: Westview Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Deighton, Anne. Britain and the Cold War, 1945–1955. In Leffler, Melvyn P. and Westad, Odd Arne (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Cold War: Volume 1: Origins, 112–32. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole. The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case. International Organization 63, no. 1 (2009): 33–65.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Harald, Müller. Theoretical Paradise – Empirically Lost? Arguing with Habermas. Review of International Studies 31, no. 1 (2005): 167–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Detter De Lupis, Ingrid. The Law of War. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013.Google Scholar

Devetak, Richard, and True, Jacqui. Diplomatic Divergence in the Antipodes: Globalisation, Foreign Policy and State Identity in Australia and New Zealand. Australian Journal of Political Science 41, no. 2 (2006): 241–56.Google Scholar

Dijk, Boyd van. Human Rights in War: On the Entangled Foundations of the 1949 Geneva Conventions. American Journal of International Law 112, no. 4 (2018): 553–82.Google Scholar

Dijk, Cornelis W. A. J. van. The American Political Intervention in the Conflict in the Dutch East Indies 1945–1949. U.S. Army Command and General Staff College (Masters thesis), 2009, available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a502059.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Dill, Janina. Legitimate Targets?: Social Construction, International Law and US Bombing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Dinstein, Yoram. Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doyle, Michael W. Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy & Public Affairs 12, no. 3 (1983): 205–35.Google Scholar

Doyle, Michael W. Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. American Political Science Review 99, no. 3 (2005): 463–66.Google Scholar

Draper, Gerald I. A. D. Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. Acta Juridica 1979 (1979): 193–206.Google Scholar

Draper, Gerald I. A. D. The Implementation and Enforcement of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and of the Two Additional Protocols of 1978. In Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (1979–III), 164: 1–54. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1980.Google Scholar

Droege, Cordula. The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict. Israel Law Review 40 (2007): 310–355.Google Scholar

Drohan, Brian. Brutality in an Age of Human Rights: Activism and Counterinsurgency at the End of the British Empire. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey, and Pollack, Mark. IL/IR Book Discussion: Beyond the ‘Isms War’? Opinio Juris (blog), September 16, 2013, available at: http://opiniojuris.org/2013/09/16/ilir-book-discussion-beyond-isms-war/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey, and Pollack, Mark A.. International Law and International Relations: Introducing an Interdisciplinary Dialogue. In Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, 3–32. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey, and Trachtman, Joel. The Law and Economics of Humanitarian Law Violations in Internal Conflict. American Journal of International Law 93, no. 2 (1999): 394–409.Google Scholar

Durand, André. From Sarajevo to Hiroshima: History of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute, 1984.Google Scholar

Durand, André. Gustave Moynier and the Peace Societies. International Review of the Red Cross 36, no. 314 (1996): 532–50.Google Scholar

Edwards, Jill. The British Government and the Spanish Civil War, 1936–1939. London: Macmillan, 1979.Google Scholar

Efrat, Asif. Professional Socialization and International Norms: Physicians against Organ Trafficking. European Journal of International Relations 21, no. 3 (2015): 647–71.Google Scholar

Eide, Asbjörn. The New Humanitarian Law in Non-International Armed Conflict. In Cassese, Antonio (ed.), The New Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, 277–309. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 1979.Google Scholar

Einsiedel, Sebastian von. Civil War Trends and the Changing Nature of Armed Conflict. United Nations University Centre for Policy Research, March 2017, available at: https://i.unu.edu/media/cpr.unu.edu/attachment/2534/OC_10-CivilWarTrendsandChangingNatureofArmedConflict-05-2017.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Elder, David A. The Historical Background of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention of 1949. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 11 (1979): 37–69.Google Scholar

Elman, Colin. Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Studies of International Politics. International Organization 59, no. 2 (2005): 293–326.Google Scholar

Elman, Colin. Explanatory Typologies in Qualitative Analysis. In Byrne, David and Ragin, Charles (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Case-Based Methods, 121–31. London: Sage, 2009.Google Scholar

Elman, Colin, Owen, John M., Mahoney, James, Tannenwald, Nina, Bennett, Andrew, and Waldner, David. Symposium on Process Tracing. Security Studies 248, no. 2 (2015): 199–250.Google Scholar

Eriksen, Tore Linné (ed.), Norway and National Liberation in Southern Africa. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute, 2000.Google Scholar

Evangelista, Matthew, and Tannenwald, Nina (eds.), Do the Geneva Conventions Matter? New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Fadl, Khaled Abou, El. Ahkam Al-Bughat: Irregular Warfare and the Law of Rebellion in Islam. In Johnson, James Turner and Kelsay, John (eds.), Cross, Crescent, and Sword: The Justification and Limitation of War in Western and Islamic Tradition, 149–76. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Fadl, Khaled Abou, El. Rebellion and Violence in Islamic Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Faizullaev, Alisher. Diplomatic Interactions and Negotiations. Negotiation Journal 30, no. 3 (July 2014): 275–99.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A. Introduction. In Falk, Richard A. (ed.), The International Law of Civil War, 1–29. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard, A. (ed.), The International Law of Civil War. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Farina, Niccolo. The Attitudes of the Peoples Republic of China. In Cassese, Antonio (ed.),The New Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, 445–457. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 1979.Google Scholar

Fearon, James D. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization 52, no. 2 (1998): 269–305.Google Scholar

Fearon, James, and Laitin, David. Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War. American Political Science Review 97, no. 1 (2003): 75–90.Google Scholar

Fearon, James, and Wendt, Alexander. Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. In Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, 52–72. London: Sage, 2002.Google Scholar

Feaver, Peter, Hellmann, Gunther, Schweller, Randall, Taliaferro, Jeffrey, Wohlforth, William C., Legro, Jeffrey, and Moravcsik, Andrew. Brother, Can You Spare a Paradigm? (Or Was Anybody Ever a Realist?) International Security 25, no. 1 (2000): 165–93.Google Scholar

Fehl, Caroline. Explaining the International Criminal Court: A ‘Practice Test’ for Rationalist and Constructivist Approaches. European Journal of International Relations 10, no. 3 (2004): 357–94.Google Scholar

Fehl, Caroline. Living with a Reluctant Hegemon: Explaining European Responses to US Unilateralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Feldbrugge, Ferdinand Joseph Maria, Van den Berg, Gerard Pieter, and Simons, William Bradford. Encyclopedia of Soviet Law. Leiden: Brill, 1985.Google Scholar

Ferencz, Benjamin B. An International Criminal Court, a Step toward World Peace: A Documentary History and Analysis. Vol. 1. 2 vols. Dobbs Ferry: Oceana, 1980.Google Scholar

Ferencz, Benjamin B. International Criminal Courts: The Legacy of Nuremberg. Pace International Law Review 10 (1998): 203–35.Google Scholar

Ferraro, Tristan. The ICRCs Legal Position on the Notion of Armed Conflict Involving Foreign Intervention and on Determining the IHL Applicable to This Type of Conflict. International Review of the Red Cross 97, no. 900 (2015): 1227–52.Google Scholar

Festinger, Leon. An Analysis of Compliant Behavior. In Muzafer Sherif, Milbourne Otto Wilson (eds.), Group Relations at the Crossroads, 232–56. New York: Harper, 1953.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha. Are Legal Norms Distinctive? New York University Journal of International Law and Politcs 32 (2000): 699–706.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs about the Use of Force. Cornell Studies in Security Affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 887–917.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 4, no. 1 (2001): 391–416.Google Scholar

Fleck, Dieter. The Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts. In Fleck (ed.), Dieter, The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law. 2nd edn., 605–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Forsythe, David P. The 1974 Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law: Some Observations. American Journal of International Law 69 (1975): 77–91.Google Scholar

Forsythe, David P. Humanitarian Politics: The International Committee of the Red Cross. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Forsythe, David P. Three Sessions of Legislating Humanitarian Law: Forward March, Retreat, or Parade Rest. International Lawyer 11, no. 1 (1977): 131–142.Google Scholar

Forsythe, David P. Legal Management of Internal War: The 1977 Protocol on Non-International Armed Conflicts. American Journal of International Law 72, no. 2 (1978): 272–295.Google Scholar

Forsythe, David P. The Humanitarians: The International Committee of the Red Cross. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Forsythe, David P. Human Rights in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Forsythe, David P., and Magat, Richard. Updating the Rules of War; The Third World Wins Some Symbolic Victories. Washington Post, February 12, 1978, C–3, Col. 1.Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Friedlander, Robert A. Great Power Politics and Spains Civil War: The First Phase. Historian 28, no. 1 (1965): 72–92.Google Scholar

Friedner Parrat, Charlotta. Bridging the Divide: What the English School Does, and Why. BISA Annual Conference: Research Paper, Bath, 2018. (Author papers).Google Scholar

Friedrichs, Jörg, and Kratochwil, Friedrich. On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology. International Organization 63, no. 4 (2009): 701–31.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History? The National Interest, no. 16 (Summer, 1989): 3–18.Google Scholar

Gaiduk, Ilya V. Divided Together: The United States and the Soviet Union in the United Nations, 1945–1965. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Alan. Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Garraway, Charles. Written Evidence. House of Commons Defence Select Committee, October 2013, available at: http://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmdfence/931/931we05.htm [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Gentili, Alberico. Three Books on the Law of War. In Scott, J. B. (ed.), Classics of International Law. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1933.Google Scholar

George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar

La Pradelle, Paul de. La conférence diplomatique et les nouvelles Conventions de Genève du 12 août 1949. Paris: Les Éditions Internationales, 1951.Google Scholar

Giladi, Rotem. Humanity in the Service of Order: Intellectual Roots of the Occupation Category, 2011. Unpublished. (Author papers).Google Scholar

Giladi, Rotem. The Enactment of Irony: Reflections on the Origins of the Martens Clause. European Journal of International Law 25, no. 3 (2014): 847–69.Google Scholar

Glasius, Marlies. Expertise in the Cause of Justice: Global Civil Society Influence on the Statute for an International Criminal Court. In Glasius, Marlies, Kaldor, Mary and Anheier, Helmut (eds.), Global Civil Society 2002, 137–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Glasius, Marlies. The International Criminal Court: A Global Civil Society Achievement. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Goddard, Stacie E. Brokering Change: Networks and Entrepreneurs in International Politics. International Theory 1, no. 2 (2009): 249–81.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack, and Posner, Eric. The Limits of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack, Eric Posner, John K. Setear, James D. Morrow, Julie Roin, Downs, George W., Jones, Michael A., et al. Rational Choice and International Law (Volume Supplement). The Journal of Legal Studies 31, no. S1 (2002).Google Scholar

Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (eds.), Legalization and World Politics. International Organization Readers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Greenwood, Christopher. International Humanitarian Law and the Tadic Case Symposium: The International Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia Comes to Age. European Journal of International Law 7 (1996): 265–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwood, Christopher. A Critique of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions. In Durham, Helen and McCormack, Timothy L. H. (eds.), The Changing Face of Conflict and the Efficacy of International Humanitarian Law, 3–22. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999.Google Scholar

Greig, J. Michael, and Meernik, James D.. To Prosecute or Not to Prosecute: Civil War Mediation and International Criminal Justice. International Negotiation 19, no. 2 (2014): 257–84.Google Scholar

Grieco, Joseph M. The Schools of Thought Problem in International Relations. International Studies Review 21, no. 3 (2019): 424–46.Google Scholar

Groenleer, Martijn L. P., and Van Schaik, Louise G.. United We Stand? The European Unions International Actorness in the Cases of the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Common Market Studies 45, no. 5 (2007): 969–98.Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace: Including the Law of Nature and of Nations. Translated by Archibald Colin Campbell. London: M. Walter Dunne, 1979.Google Scholar

Guan, Jing. The ICCs Jurisdiction over War Crimes in Internal Armed Conflicts: An Insurmountable Obstacle for Chinas Accession. Penn State International Law Review 28 (2010): 703–754.Google Scholar

Gutteridge, Joyce A. C. The Geneva Conventions of 1949. British Year Book of International Law 26 (1949): 294–326.Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew. A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law. California Law Review 90, no. 6 (2002): 1823–87.Google Scholar

Haas, Peter. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46, no. 1 (1992): 1–35.Google Scholar

Haas, Peter, Bennett, Andrew, Ba, Alice, Paul, T. V., Sil, Rudra, and Katzenstein, Peter. Symposium: Beyond Paradigms and Research Programs. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 8, no. 2 (Fall 2012): 5–24.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jurgen. The Divided West. Edited and translated by Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. Making Human Rights a Reality. 1st edn. Princeton: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Hakimi, Monica. Customs Method and Process: Lessons from Humanitarian Law. In Bradley, Curtis A. (ed.), Customs Future: International Law in a Changing World, 148–71. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Hall, Christopher Keith. The First Proposal for a Permanent International Criminal Court. International Review of the Red Cross 38, no. 322 (1998): 57–74.Google Scholar

Hall, Christopher Keith. The Third and Fourth Sessions of the UN Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court. American Journal of International Law 92, no. 1 (1998): 124–133.Google Scholar

Halleck, Henry Wager. International Law: Or, Rules Regulating the Intercourse of States in Peace and War. New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1861.Google Scholar

Halleck, Henry Wager. Elements of International Law and Laws of War. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co., 1866.Google Scholar

Halleck, Henry Wager, and Baker, George Sherston. Hallecks International Law: Or, Rules Regulating the Intercourse of States in Peace and War. 3rd edn. Vol. II. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co, 1893.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Scott. A Genealogy of Metatheory in IR: How Ontology Emerged from the Inter-Paradigm Debate. International Theory 9, no. 1 (2017): 136–70.Google Scholar

Hannikainen, Lauri, Hanski, Raija, and Rosas, Allan. Implementing Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts: The Case of Finland. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1992.Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona. Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? Yale Law Journal 111 (2001): 1935–2042.Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona. The Cost of Commitment. Stanford Law Review 55, no. 5 (2003): 1821–62.Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona. Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties? Journal of Conflict Resolution 51, no. 4 (2007): 588–621.Google Scholar

Hayes, Jarrod and James, Patrick, Systemism, Analytic Eclecticism, and the Democratic Peace. In Annette Freyberg-Inan, Ewan Harrison and Patrick James (eds.), Evaluating Progress in International Relations, 109–25. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

H-Diplo, . Roundtable 6–6 on Reconstructing the Cold War: The Early Years, 1945–1958. ISSF, February 7, 2014, available at: https://issforum.org/roundtables/6-6-reconstructing-cold-war [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Hebel, Herman von, and Robinson, Darryl. Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the Court. In Lee, Roy S. K. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations and Results, 79–126. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999.Google Scholar

Heinsch, Robert. The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Geneva Conventions of 1949. In Zimmermann, Andreas, Geiß, Robin and Haumer, Stefanie (eds.), Humanizing the Laws of War: The Red Cross and the Development of International Humanitarian Law, 27–56. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolf. Blockade. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, 2015, available at: https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e252 [accessed 23 December 2019].Google Scholar

Heller, Kevin Jon. The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Heller, Regina, Kahl, Martin, and Pisoiu, Daniela. The Dark’ Side of Normative Argumentation – The Case of Counterterrorism Policy. Global Constitutionalism 1, no. 2 (2012): 278–312.Google Scholar

Hellmann, Gunther, Rytövuori-Apunen, Helena, Friedrichs, Jörg, Sil, Rudra, Kornprobst, Markus, and Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. Pragmatism and International Relations. International Studies Review 11, no. 3 (2009): 638–62.Google Scholar

Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, and Doswald-Beck, Louise (eds.), Customary International Humanitarian Law: Volume I – Rules. 2 vols. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, and Doswald-Beck, Louise (eds.), Customary International Humanitarian Law: Volume II – Practice. 2 vols. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis. The United Nations and Human Rights. International Organization 19, no. 3 (1965): 504–17.Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. 2nd edn. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, Columbia University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Herodotus. The Histories, Revised. Edited by Marincola, John. Translated by Aubery de Selincourt. London: Penguin Classics, 2003.Google Scholar

Higgins, Noelle. The Approach of International Law to Wars of National Liberation. Moscow: Martin Institute, University of Idaho, 2004, available at: http://doras.dcu.ie/2268/1/monograph.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn. International Law and Civil Conflict. In Luard, Evan (ed.), The International Regulation of Civil Wars. London: Thames and Hudson, 1972.Google Scholar

Hill, Gina E. A Case of NGO Participation: International Criminal Court Negotiations. In Walker, James W. St G. and Thompson, Andrew S. (eds.), Critical Mass: The Emergence of Global Civil Society, 129–52. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Hillebrecht, Courtney. Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Hillebrecht, Courtney. The Deterrent Effects of the International Criminal Court: Evidence from Libya. International Interactions 42, no. 4 (2016): 616–43.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Moshe, and Lang, Andrew (eds.), Research Handbook on the Sociology of International Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, William I. France Restored: Cold War Diplomacy and the Quest for Leadership in Europe, 1944–1954. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, William I. Human Rights and the Laws of War: The Geneva Conventions of 1949. In Iriye, Akira, Goedde, Petra and Hitchcock, William I. (eds.), The Human Rights Revolution: An International History, 93–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Hollyer, James, and Rosendorff, Bryan. Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention against Torture? Signaling, Domestic Politics and Non-Compliance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6, nos. 3–4 (2011): 275–327.Google Scholar

Hopf, Ted. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security 23, no. 1 (1998): 171–200.Google Scholar

Hopf, Ted. Reconstructing the Cold War: The Early Years, 1945–1958. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Horovitz, Sigall, Shany, Yuval, and Noam, Gilad. The International Criminal Court. In Shany, Yuval (ed.), Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts, 223–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Huber, Max. The Principles of the Red Cross. Foreign Affairs 26, no. 4 (1948): 723–27.Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch. HRW Disappointed at India’s Position on International Court. 17 June 1998, available at: http://hrw.org/news/1998/06/16/hrw-disappointed-indias-position-international-court [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch. Human Rights Watch Praises German Stand on International Court. 17 June 1998, available at. http://hrw.org/news/1998/06/16/human-rights-watch-praises-german-stand-international-court [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch. Human Rights Watch Welcomes New Japanese Position on International Court. 27 June 1998, available at: http://hrw.org/news/1998/06/26/human-rights-watch-welcomes-new-japanese-position-international-court [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch. French Stand on International Court ‘Mixed’, Says Rights Group. 9 July 1998, available at: http://hrw.org/news/1998/07/09/french-stand-international-court-mixed-says-rights-group [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch. Human Rights Watch Condemns United States Threat to Sabotage International Criminal Court. 9 July 1998, available at: https://hrw.org/news/1998/07/09/human-rights-watch-condemns-united-states-threat-sabotage-international-criminal [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch. Human Rights Watch Disappointed by U.K. Stand on International Court. 9 July 1998, available at: http://hrw.org/fr/news/1998/07/09/human-rights-watch-disappointed-uk-stand-international-court [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Humphreys, Adam R. C. The Heuristic Explanation of Explanatory Theories in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 17, no. 2 (2011): 257–77Google Scholar

Hurd, Ian. Constructivism. In Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Relations, 298–313. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. Die Lebenswelt: Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, John. Champions of Charity: War and the Rise of the Red Cross. Boulder: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

Ingebritsen, Christine. Norm Entrepreneurs: Scandinavias Role in World Politics. Cooperation and Conflict 37, no. 1 (2002): 11–23.Google Scholar

Inter-Press Service (IPS). Clamour Rises for Court to Step into Internal Conflicts. Terraviva Daily Newspaper, June 19, 1998, available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20081203175209/www.ips.org/icc/tv190601.htm/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Inter-Press Service (IPS). Yes, Size Does Matter. Terraviva Daily Newspaper, June 25, 1998, available at: https://web.archive.org/web/19980624224028/http:/www.ips.org/icc/tv250602.htm [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Inter-Press Service (IPS). Take It or Leave It. Terraviva Daily Newspaper, July 14, 1998, available at: https://web.archive.org/web/19990504085041/http://ips.org/icc/tv140701.htm [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Iqbal, Nasir. Judge Harboured Bias against Bhutto, SC Told. Dawn, May 3, 2011, available at: https://dawn.com/news/625920 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Israel CDDH delegation member. Interview, March 2018. (Author papers).Google Scholar

Jackson, Gabriel. Spanish Republic and the Civil War, 1931–1939. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. London: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. Review. H-Diplo Roundtable 6-6 on Reconstructing the Cold War: The Early Years, 1945–1958. 2014, available at: https://issforum.org/roundtables/6-6-reconstructing-cold-war [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Jacobs, Alan M., Beach, Peter Derek, Runhardt, Rosa W., Waldner, David, and Bennett, Andrew. Symposium: Causal Mechanisms and Process Tracing. Qualitative and Multi-Method Research 14, no. 1/2 (Spring/Fall 2016): 13–39.Google Scholar

Jia, Bing Bing. China and the International Criminal Court: The Current Situation. Singapore Year Book of International Law 10 (2006): 87–97.Google Scholar

Jianping, Lu, and Zhixiang, Wang. Chinas Attitude towards the ICC. Journal of International Criminal Justice 3, no. 3 (2005): 608–20.Google Scholar

Hyeran, Jo. Compliant Rebels: Rebel Groups and International Law in World Politics. 1st edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Hyeran, Jo, and Simmons, Beth A.. Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity? International Organization 70, no. 3 (2016): 443–75.Google Scholar

Johnston, Alastair Iain. Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Jose, Betcy. Not Completely the New Normal: How Human Rights Watch Tried to Suppress the Targeted Killing Norm. Contemporary Security Policy 38, no. 2 (2017): 237–59.Google Scholar

Junod, Dominique-D. The Imperiled Red Cross and the Palestine–Eretz-Yisrael Conflict, 1945–1952: The Influence of Institutional Concerns on a Humanitarian Operation. London: Kegan Paul International, Limited, 1996.Google Scholar

Junod, Sylvie. Additional Protocol II: History and Scope. American University Law Review 33, no. 1 (1983): 29–40.Google Scholar

Kalshoven, Frits. Protocol II, the CDDH and Colombia. In Frits Kalshoven, Reflections on the Law of War: Collected Essays, 861–92. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007.Google Scholar

Kalshoven, Frits. The Undertaking to Respect and Ensure Respect in All Circumstances: From Tiny Seed to Ripening Fruit. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2 (1999): 3–61Google Scholar

Kalshoven, Frits. The Diplomatic Conference on Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva, 1974–1977. In Frits Kalshoven, Reflections on the Law of War: Collected Essays, 181–274. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J. Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security. In Katzenstein, Peter (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, 1–32. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter, and Okawara, Nobuo. Japan, Asian-Pacific Security, and the Case for Analytical Eclecticism. International Security 26, no. 3 (2002): 153–85.Google Scholar

Kay, David A. The New Nations in the United Nations, 1960–1967. New York: Columbia University, 1970.Google Scholar

Kay, Hugh. Salazar and Modern Portugal. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode, 1970.Google Scholar

Kaye, David. Some Thoughts on Russia and the International Criminal Court. November 2012, available at: http://councilandcourt.org/files/2012/11/Russia-and-ICC.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. Activists beyond Borders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Keith, Linda Camp. Human Rights Instruments. In Cane, Peter and Kritzer, Herbert M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, 353–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David. Of War and Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Kennedy, David M., and Bailey, Thomas. The American Spirit: United States History as Seen by Contemporaries. 12th edn. Vol. 1. 2 vols. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2009.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly 32, no. 4 (1988): 379–96.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert. Observations on the Promise and Pitfalls of Historical Institutionalism in International Relations. In Fioretos, Orfeo (ed.),International Politics and Institutions in Time, 321–336. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert, and Martin, Lisa. Institutional Theory as a Research Program. In Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius (eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, 71–108. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert, and Milner, Helen. Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Khalaf, Roula. Autocrats of the World Benefit from Donald Trumps Win. Financial Times, November 9, 2016.Google Scholar

Kincaid, Harold. Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Kindleberger, Charles P. The World in Depression, 1929–1939 (Revised). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Kirsch, Philippe. The Development of the Rome Statute. In Lee, Roy S. K. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations and Results, 451–62. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999.Google Scholar

Kirsch, Philippe, and Holmes, John T.. The Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court: The Negotiating Process. American Journal of International Law 93, no. 1 (1999): 2–12.Google Scholar

Kirsch, Philippe, and Robinson, Darryl. Reaching Agreement at the Rome Conference. In Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola and Jones, John R. W. D. (eds.),The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, 67–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Kitchen, Veronica. From Rhetoric to Reality: Canada, the United States, and the Ottawa Process to Ban Landmines. International Journal 57, no. 1 (Winter/2001–2002): 37–55.Google Scholar

Kittel, Bernhard, Kuehn, David, Blatter, Joachim, Beach, Derek, Rohlfing, Ingo, Hall, Peter A., Leuffen, Dirk, et al. Symposium: Reassessing the Methodology of Process Tracing. European Political Science 12, no. 1 (March 2013): 1–85.Google Scholar

Klose, Fabian. Human Rights in the Shadow of Colonial Violence: The Wars of Independence in Kenya and Algeria. Translated by Dona Geyer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Klotz, Audie. Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and US Sanctions against South Africa. International Organization 49, no. 3 (1995): 451–78.Google Scholar

Knight, W. Andy. Soft Power, Moral Suasion, and Establishing the International Criminal Court: Canadian Contributions. In Irwin, Rosalind (ed.), Ethics and Security in Canadian Foreign Policy, 113–37. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Knox, John. The Right of Revolution in Scotland. In Marrin, Albert (ed.), War and the Christian Conscience: From Augustine to Martin Luther King, Jr., 108–11. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, 1971.Google Scholar

Knox, John. The Debate at the General Assembly, June 1564. In Mason, Roger A. (ed.), On Rebellion, 182–209. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju. The 1998 Frankel Lecture: Bringing International Law Home. Houston Law Review 35 (1998): 623–81.Google Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju. Internalization through Socialization. Duke Law Journal 54 (2004): 975–82.Google Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara. The Continent of International Law: Explaining Agreement Design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan. The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization 55, no. 4 (2001): 761–99.Google Scholar

Korey, William. NGOs and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Curious Grapevine. New York: St. Martins Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. (Reissue) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. State Power and the Structure of International Trade. World Politics 28, no. 3 (1976): 317–47.Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. International Organization 36, no. 2 (1982): 185–205.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich. The Monologue of ‘Science’. International Studies Review 5, no. 1 (2003): 124–28.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich, and Ruggie, John. International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State. International Organization 40, no. 4 (1986): 753–75.Google Scholar

Krauthammer, Charles. The Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs 70, no. 1 (1990): 23–33.Google Scholar

Krebs, Ronald R., and Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations 13, no. 1 (2007): 35–66.Google Scholar

Kreβ, Claus, and Mégret, Frédéric. The Regulation of Non-International Armed Conflicts: Can a Privilege of Belligerency Be Envisioned in the Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts? International Review of the Red Cross 96, no. 893 (2014): 29–66.Google Scholar

Krieger, Heike. A Conflict of Norms: The Relationship between Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in the ICRC Customary Law Study. Journal of Conflict and Security Law 11, no. 2 (Summer 2006): 265–91.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico. International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of the International Legal Order. European Journal of International Law 16, no. 3 (2005): 369–408.Google Scholar

Kristensen, Peter Marcus. International Relations at the End: A Sociological Autopsy. International Studies Quarterly 62, no. 2 (2018): 245–59.Google Scholar

La Haye, Eve. War Crimes in Internal Armed Conflicts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Lahiri, Dilip. Should India Continue to Stay out of ICC? ORF (blog), 24 November 2010, available at: https://orfonline.org/research/should-india-continue-to-stay-out-of-icc/ [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Lake, David A. Why ‘Isms’ Are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress. International Studies Quarterly 55, no. 2 (2011): 465–80.Google Scholar

Lake, David A. Theory Is Dead, Long Live Theory: The End of the Great Debates and the Rise of Eclecticism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (2013): 567–87.Google Scholar

Lantis, Jeffrey S., and Wunderlich, Carmen. Resiliency Dynamics of Norm Clusters: Norm Contestation and International Cooperation. Review of International Studies 44, no. 3 (2018): 570–93.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch. Recognition in International Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1947.Google Scholar

Leach, Philip. The Chechen Conflict: Analysing the Oversight of the European Court of Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review, no. 6 (2008): 732–61.Google Scholar

Lebow, Richard Ned. The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism. International Organization 48, no. 2 (1994): 249–77.Google Scholar

Lee, Roy S. K. Introduction. In Lee, Roy S. K. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations and Results, 1–39. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999.Google Scholar

Legro, Jeffrey. Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the ‘Failure’ of Internationalism. International Organization 51, no. 1 (1997): 31–63.Google Scholar

Legro, Jeffrey, and Moravcsik, Andrew. Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security 24, no. 2 (1999): 5–55.Google Scholar

Leitenberg, M. Deaths in Wars and Conflicts between 1945 and 2000, Cornell University Peace Studies Program. Occasional Paper 29 (2006).Google Scholar

Levine, Daniel J., and McCourt, David M.. Why Does Pluralism Matter When We Study Politics? A View from Contemporary International Relations. Perspectives on Politics 16, no. 1 (2018): 92–109.Google Scholar

Linton, Suzannah. India and China before, at, and after Rome. Journal of International Criminal Justice 16, no. 2 (2018): 265–94.Google Scholar

Lippman, Matthew. Prosecutions of Nazi War Criminals before Post-World War II Domestic Tribunals. University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review 8, no. 1 (2000): 1–114.Google Scholar

Li-Sun, Zhu. Traditional Asian Approaches – The Chinese View. Australian Year Book of International Law 9 (1980): 143–50.Google Scholar

Little, Daniel. Exogenous Variable. In Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Bryman, Alan and Liao, Tim Futing (eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, 1: 347. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2004.Google Scholar

Lobell, Steven E., Ripsman, Norrin M., and Taliaferro, Jeffrey W.. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Lowe, Kimberly A. Humanitarianism and National Sovereignty: Red Cross Intervention on Behalf of Political Prisoners in Soviet Russia, 1921–3. Journal of Contemporary History 49, no. 4 (2014): 652–74.Google Scholar

Luard, Evan (ed.), The International Regulation of Civil Wars. London: Thames and Hudson, 1972.Google Scholar

Lubell, Noam. Parallel Application of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law: An Examination of the Debate. Israel Law Review 40, no. 2 (2007): 648–60.Google Scholar

Lui, Andrew. Why Canada Cares: Human Rights and Foreign Policy in Theory and Practice. Kingston: McGill-Queens Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Luther, Martin. An Open Letter on the Harsh Book against the Peasants. In Marrin, Albert (ed.), War and the Christian Conscience: From Augustine to Martin Luther King, Jr., 101–7. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, 1971.Google Scholar

Lüthi, Lorenz M. The Non-Aligned Movement and the Cold War, 1961–1973. Journal of Cold War Studies 18, no. 4 (2017): 98–147.Google Scholar

Lyall, Jason. Process Tracing, Causal Inference, and Civil War. In Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T. (eds.), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, 186–207. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Lysaght, Charles. The Attitude of Western Countries. In Cassese, Antonio (ed.), The New Humanitarian Law of Armed Conflict, 350–385. Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 1979.Google Scholar

Mack, Michelle, and Pejic, Jelena. Increasing Respect for International Humanitarian Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 2008.Google Scholar

Magnarella, Paul J. Expanding the Frontiers of Humanitarian Law: The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Florida Journal of International Law 9 (1994): 421–441.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James. The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences. Sociological Methods & Research 41, no. 4 (2012): 570–97.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Qualitative Research. American Political Science Review 98, no. 4 (2004): 653–70.Google Scholar

Makinda, Samuel. Terrorism in International Society: An Eclectic Perspective. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs 3, no. 1 (2016): 90–101.Google Scholar

Mamlyuk, Boris N. Decolonization as a Cold War Imperative. In Eslava, Luis, Fakhri, Michael and Nesiah, Vasuki (eds.), Bandung, Global History, and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures, 196–214. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Mansingh, Surjit. Indira Gandhis Foreign Policy: Hard Realism? In Malone, David M., Raja Mohan, C and Raghavan, Srinath (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Indian Foreign Policy, 104–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Mantilla, Giovanni. Under (Social) Pressure: The Historical Regulation of Internal Armed Conflicts through International Law (PhD dissertation). University of Minnesota, 2013, available at: https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/175520 [accessed 19 September 2019].Google Scholar

Mantilla, Giovanni. Conforming Instrumentalists: Why the USA and the United Kingdom Joined the 1949 Geneva Conventions. European Journal of International Law 28, no. 2 (2017): 483–511.Google Scholar

Mantilla, Giovanni. The Origins and Evolution of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and the 1977 Additional Protocols. In Evangelista, Matthew and Tannenwald, Nina (eds.), Do the Geneva Conventions Matter?, 35–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Mantilla, Giovanni. Forum Isolation: Social Opprobrium and the Origins of the International Law of Internal Conflict. International Organization 72, no. 2 (2018): 317–49.Google Scholar

Mantilla, Giovanni. The Protagonism of the USSR and Socialist States in the Revision of International Humanitarian Law. Journal of the History of International Law 21 (2019): 181–211.Google Scholar

Maqungo, Sivu. The Establishment of the International Criminal Court: SADCs Participation in the Negotiations. African Security Review 9, no. 1 (2000): 42–53.Google Scholar

March, James, and Olsen, Johan. The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 943–69.Google Scholar

March, James, and Olsen, Johan. The Logic of Appropriateness. In Goodin, Robert E. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, 478–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Marsh, David, Ercan, Selen A., and Furlong, Paul. A Skin Not a Sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science. In Lowndes, Vivien, Marsh, David and Stoker, Gerry (eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science. 4th edn., 177–98. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2017.Google Scholar

Martin, Lisa. An Institutionalist View: International Institutions and State Strategies. In Paul, T. V. and Hall, John A. (eds.), International Order and the Future of World Politics, 78–98. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Martin, Lisa. The President and International Commitments: Treaties as Signaling Devices. Presidential Studies Quarterly 35, no. 3 (2005): 440–65.Google Scholar

McAllister, Jacqueline, and Meernik, James. Casting a Shadow over War Zones: The International Criminal Courts Impact on Rebel and Government Forces Use of Violence against Civilians. Ljubljana, 2016, available at: http://web.isanet.org/Web/Conferences/CEEISA-ISA-LBJ2016/Archive/a7a5720e-fe27-48a6-8144-b816c183957d.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

McCourt, David M. Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism. International Studies Quarterly 60, no. 3 (2016): 475–85.Google Scholar

McGoldrick, Dominic. Political and Legal Responses to the ICC. In McGoldrick, Dominic, Rowe, Peter J. and Donnelly, Eric (eds.), The Permanent International Criminal Court: Legal and Policy Issues, 389–449. Oxford; Portland: Hart Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar

McGoldrick, Dominic, Rowe, Peter J., and Donnelly, Eric (eds.), The Permanent International Criminal Court: Legal and Policy Issues. Oxford; Portland: Hart, 2004.Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19, no. 3 (1994): 5–49.Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: WW Norton & Company, 2003.Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, John. Structural Realism. In Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve (eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 51–67. 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Meernik, James. The International Criminal Court and the Deterrence of Human Rights Atrocities. Civil Wars 17, no. 3 (2015): 318–39.Google Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric. From ‘Savages’ to ‘Unlawful Combatants’: A Postcolonial Look at International Humanitarian Laws ‘Other’. In Orford, Anne (ed.), International Law and Its Others, 265–317. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Melander, Erik, Pettersson, Therése and Themnér, Lotta. Organized Violence, 1989–2015. Journal of Peace Research 53, no. 5 (2016): 727–42.Google Scholar

Meron, Theodor. International Criminalization of Internal Atrocities. American Journal of International Law 89, no. 3 (1995): 554–77.Google Scholar

Meron, Theodor. The Martens Clause, Principles of Humanity, and Dictates of Public Conscience. American Journal of International Law 94, no. 1 (2000): 78–89.Google Scholar

Mills, Kurt, and Bloomfield, Alan. African Resistance to the International Criminal Court: Halting the Advance of the Anti-Impunity Norm. Review of International Studies 44, no. 1 (2018): 101–27.Google Scholar

Moir, Lindsay. The Historical Development of the Application of Humanitarian Law in Non-International Armed Conflicts to 1949. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 47, no. 2 (1998): 337–61.Google Scholar

Moir, Lindsay. The Law of Internal Armed Conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Montbrial, Thierry de. For a New World Economic Order. Foreign Affairs 54, no. 1 (1975): 61–78.Google Scholar

Moorehead, Caroline. Dunants Dream: War, Switzerland and the History of the Red Cross. New York: Carroll & Graf, 1999.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. Liberal International Relations Theory: A Scientific Assessment. In Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius (eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, 159–204. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. Liberalism and International Relations Theory. Center for International Affairs, Harvard University, Working Paper No. 92–6, 1992.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51, no. 4 (1997): 513–53.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. The New Liberalism. In Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, 234–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54, no. 2 (2000): 217–52.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. Theory Synthesis in International Relations: Real Not Metaphysical. International Studies Review 5, no. 1 (2003): 131–36.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J. Another ‘Great Debate’: The National Interest of the United States. The American Political Science Review 46, no. 4 (1952): 961–88.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans J. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 4th edn. New York: Knopf, 1967.Google Scholar

Morrow, James D. Order within Anarchy: The Laws of War as an International Institution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Morrow, James D. The Laws of War, Common Conjectures, and Legal Systems in International Politics. The Journal of Legal Studies 31, no. S1 (2002): S41–60.Google Scholar

Müller, Harald. Arguing, Bargaining and All That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 10, no. 3 (2004): 395–435.Google Scholar

Müller, Harald, and Wunderlich, Carmen. Not Lost in Contestation: How Norm Entrepreneurs Frame Norm Development in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. Contemporary Security Policy 39, no. 3 (2018): 341–66.Google Scholar

Murray, Daragh. Practitioners Guide to Human Rights Law in Armed Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Nabulsi, Karma. Traditions of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Neack, Laura (ed.), Forum: Pluralism in IR Theory. International Studies Perspectives 16, no. 1 (2015).Google Scholar

Neff, Stephen C. Justice in Blue and Gray: A Legal History of the Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Neff, Stephen C. War and the Law of Nations: A General History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Neuberg, Paul. Sadat to Meet Tito as Soviet Anger Rises. The Guardian, March 27, 1974.Google Scholar

Neuerbourg, Hanns. Ninety-Seven Nations and Three Liberation Movements Signed a Document Friday Completing Four Years of Work on How to Improve Humanitarian Rules of Welfare. Associated Press, June 10, 1977.Google Scholar

Nexon, Daniel, Hopf, Ted, Goddard, Stacie, Montgomery, Alexander, Kessler, Oliver, Bueger, Christian, Lynch, Cecelia, Solomon, Ty, Srivastava, Swati, and McCourt., David M. Seizing Constructivist Ground? Practice and Relational Theories: Symposium. 3 April 2017, available at: https://isanet.org/Publications/ISQ/Posts/ID/5473/Seizing-Constructivist-Ground-Practice-and-Relational-Theories [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004.Google Scholar

Öberg, Marko Divac. The Absorption of Grave Breaches into War Crimes Law. International Review of the Red Cross 91, no. 873 (2009): 163–83.Google Scholar

Oberleitner, Gerd. Human Rights in Armed Conflict: Law, Practice, Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Oeter, Stefan. Civil War, Humanitarian Law and the United Nations. In Frowein, Jochen and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 1: 195–229. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997.Google Scholar

Oglesby, Roscoe Ralph. Internal War and the Search for Normative Order. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971.Google Scholar

O’Keefe, Roger. The Grave Breaches Regime and Universal Jurisdiction. Journal of International Criminal Justice 7, no. 4 (2009): 811–31.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa. International Law: A Treatise. Vol. II. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1906.Google Scholar

O’Rourke, Vernon A. Recognition of Belligerency and the Spanish War. American Journal of International Law 31, no. 3 (1937): 398–413.Google Scholar

Osakwe, C. O. The Participation of the Soviet Union in Universal International Organizations: A Political and Legal Analysis of Soviet Strategies and Aspirations Inside ILO, Unesco and WHO. Leiden: Brill, 1972.Google Scholar

Owen, John M. How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace. International Security 19, no. 2 (1994): 87–125.Google Scholar

Pace, William R., and Schense, Jennifer. The Coalition for the International Criminal Court at the Preparatory Commission. In Lee, Roy S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, 705–34. Ardsley: Transnational, 2001.Google Scholar

Pace, William R., and Thieroff, Mark. Participation of Non-Governmental Organizations. In Lee, Roy S. K. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute: Issues, Negotiations and Results, 391–8. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999.Google Scholar

Parsons, Craig. Before Eclecticism: Competing Alternatives in Constructivist Research. International Theory 7, no. 3 (2015): 501–38.Google Scholar

Parsons, Craig. How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Paul, T. V., Larson, Deborah Welch, and Wohlforth, William C. (eds.), Status in World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Pearson, Zoe. Non-Governmental Organizations and the International Criminal Court: Changing Landscapes of International Law. Cornell International Law Journal 39, no. 2 (2006): 243–84.Google Scholar

Peevers, Charlotte. Altering International Law: Nasser, Bandung, and the Suez Crisis. In Eslava, Luis, Fakhri, Makhri and Nesiah, Vasuki (eds.), Bandung, Global History and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures, 574–94. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Perna, Laura. The Formation of the Treaty Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006.Google Scholar

Petrova, Margarita H. Rhetorical Entrapment and Normative Enticement: How the United Kingdom Turned from Spoiler into Champion of the Cluster Munition Ban. International Studies Quarterly 60, no. 3 (2016): 387–99.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Pike, David W. France Divided: The French and the Civil War in Spain. London: Sussex Academic Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Plummer, Joni J. France and Portugal in the Spanish Civil War – Domestic and International Policies (MA thesis). Indiana University at Bloomington, 1988, available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a203120.pdf [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Pohl, Benjamin, and van Willigen, Niels. Analytic Eclecticism and EU Foreign Policy (In)Action. Global Society 29, no. 2 (2015): 175–98.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent. Diplomats as Permanent Representatives: The Practical Logics of the Multilateral Pecking Order. International Journal 66, no. 3 (2011): 543–61.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent. International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO–Russia Diplomacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent, and Cornut, Jérémie. Practice Theory and the Study of Diplomacy: A Research Agenda. Cooperation and Conflict 50, no. 3 (2015): 297–315.Google Scholar

Pratt, Simon Frankel. Pragmatism as Ontology, Not (Just) Epistemology: Exploring the Full Horizon of Pragmatism as an Approach to IR Theory. International Studies Review 18, no. 3 (2016): 508–27.Google Scholar

Price, Jonathan J. Thucydides and Internal War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Price, Richard. Emerging Customary Norms and Anti-Personnel Landmines. In Reus-Smit, Christian (ed.), The Politics of International Law, 106–30. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Price, Richard. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization 52, no. 3 (1998): 613–44.Google Scholar

Price, Richard, and Christian, Reus-Smit. Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations 4, no. 3 (1998): 259–94.Google Scholar

Prorok, Alyssa K. The (In)Compatibility of Peace and Justice? The International Criminal Court and Civil Conflict Termination International Organization 71, no. 2 (2017): 213–43.Google Scholar

Quénivet, Noëlle. Commentary on the Law of the International Criminal Court: Article 8(2)(c). Edited by Mark Klamberg, 23 March 2017, available at: https://casematrixnetwork.org/cmn-knowledge-hub/icc-commentary-clicc/commentary-rome-statute/commentary-rome-statute-part-2-articles-5-10/#c1938 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Quénivet, Noëlle. Commentary on the Law of the International Criminal Court: Article 8(2)(e). Edited by Mark Klamberg, 23 March 2016, available at: https://casematrixnetwork.org/cmn-knowledge-hub/icc-commentary-clicc/commentary-rome-statute/commentary-rome-statute-part-2-articles-5-10/#c1947 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Quénivet, Noëlle. Commentary on the Law of the International Criminal Court: Article 8(2)(f). Edited by Mark Klamberg, 23 March 2017, available at: https://casematrixnetwork.org/cmn-knowledge-hub/icc-commentary-clicc/commentary-rome-statute/commentary-rome-statute-part-2-articles-5-10/#c1967 [accessed 14 September 2019].Google Scholar

Rajkovic, Nikolas. The Politics of International Law and Compliance: Serbia, Croatia and The Hague Tribunal. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Ramanathan, Usha. India and the ICC. Journal of International Criminal Justice 3, no. 3 (2005): 627–34.Google Scholar

Rao, Raza Mumtaz. Nasim Hasan Shah: A Controversial Judge. Daily Capital. February 4, 2015.Google Scholar

Ratcliffe, Susan (ed.), Concise Oxford Dictionary of Quotations. 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Raymond, Gregory. Problems and Prospects in the Study of International Norms. Mershon International Studies Review 41, no. 2 (1997): 205–45.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian. Beyond Metatheory? European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 3 (2013): 589–608.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian. Constructivism. In Burchill, Scott, Linklater, Andrew, Devetak, Richard, Donnelly, Jack, Paterson, Matthew, Reus-Smit, Christian and True, Jacqui (eds.), Theories of International Relations. 3rd edn., 188–212. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian. Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 4, no. 3 (2002): 487–509.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian. Society, Power and Ethics. In Reus-Smit, Christian (ed.), The Politics of International Law, 272–90. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar