Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Acknowledgements
- About the authors
- Foreword
- One Introduction and methods
- Two Developing the specialty of public health, 1972–90
- Three The multidisciplinary public health movement of the 1990s
- Four Changes for specialists I: Setting up a multidisciplinary public health senior appointments process
- Five Changes for specialists II: The new regulatory system for specialists
- Six Changes for specialists III: The establishment of multidisciplinary higher specialist training in public health
- Seven The focus on practitioners and the wider workforce
- Eight Where we are now? The new public health system in England from April 2013
- Nine Experience across the other UK countries
- Ten Conclusion
- References
- Appendix 1 Timeline
- Appendix 2 Glossary of terms
- Index
Five - Changes for specialists II: The new regulatory system for specialists
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 February 2022
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Acknowledgements
- About the authors
- Foreword
- One Introduction and methods
- Two Developing the specialty of public health, 1972–90
- Three The multidisciplinary public health movement of the 1990s
- Four Changes for specialists I: Setting up a multidisciplinary public health senior appointments process
- Five Changes for specialists II: The new regulatory system for specialists
- Six Changes for specialists III: The establishment of multidisciplinary higher specialist training in public health
- Seven The focus on practitioners and the wider workforce
- Eight Where we are now? The new public health system in England from April 2013
- Nine Experience across the other UK countries
- Ten Conclusion
- References
- Appendix 1 Timeline
- Appendix 2 Glossary of terms
- Index
Summary
Introduction
For doctors, at the end of the 1990s, the standard, statutory process for achieving inclusion in the Specialist Register of the General Medical Council (GMC) and thereby becoming eligible to apply for NHS consultant posts was via satisfactory completion of specialist training in public health medicine. A similar process was introduced by the General Dental Council (GDC) for dentists becoming consultants in dental public health. This process was in line with the training requirements for all medical specialties, with each Royal College or Faculty setting its curriculum to be approved by the GMC. With recognition of public health specialists from backgrounds other than medicine it became clear that an equivalent regulatory system for assuring quality and protecting the public would be required for all those specialists who were not regulated by the GMC or the GDC.
This chapter:
• describes the identification of the need for professional regulation of the new cohort of non-medically or dentally qualified public health specialists;
• outlines the establishment of the new regulatory processes and registration for non-medical public health specialists;
• describes the creation and role of the UK Voluntary Register for Public Health Specialists (UKPHR); and
• explains the emergence of defined specialists among the multidisciplinary specialist workforce.
Setting up the regulatory processes
It was recognised within the Department of Health (DH) that the creation of Director of Public Health (DPH) posts that could be occupied, from 2002, by suitably competent individuals from a wide range of professional backgrounds carried with it new risks. These included the absence of professional accreditation or recognition for non-medically qualified specialists, and, in particular, the absence of any regulatory framework.
Until then, professional regulation under the jurisdiction of the DH had been restricted to health professionals who had contact with individual patients, whose actions could be interpreted as assault if conducted ineptly or inappropriately. Specialist public health practice was distinctly different as its proponents rarely had dealings with individual patients or clients and it took some time to gain consensus on the notion that a public health specialist's impaired fitness to practise could adversely affect the health or well-being of whole communities, rather than simply named individuals.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Multidisciplinary Public HealthUnderstanding the Development of the Modern Workforce, pp. 79 - 88Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2014