Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:16:49.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The Japanese as an Asia-Pacific Population

from Part 1 - Archaeology and Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2011

Katayama Kazumichi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University
Donald Denoon
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Mark Hudson
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Gavan McCormack
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Tessa Morris-Suzuki
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Several models have been proposed to explain the origins of the modern Japanese people. The most plausible are the gradual transformation and the Yayoi immigration theories. According to the first, prehistoric Jōmon people became the protohistoric Kofun people without any substantial admixture, and finally evolved into the modern Japanese of the greater part of the Japanese islands. In the second model, immigrant populations from the Asian continent arrived from the Korean peninsula during the Yayoi, and possibly also in the early Kofun period, and played an important role in the formation of the modern Japanese, especially in the main islands of Honshu, Kyushu and Shikoku. In recent years, the immigration model has become widely accepted among anthropologists and archaeologists. I have also come to support this model. This chapter reviews the population history of the archipelago from the viewpoint of physical anthropology, and discusses the biological relations of Japanese populations to circum-Pacific Mongoloid groups.

The First Inhabitants

Recent newspaper articles report that cultural deposits which yielded several Palaeolithic stone tools at the Takamori site in Miyagi prefecture were dated to about 500 000 years bp on palaeomagnetic, thermoluminesence and ESR evidence, corresponding in age to the early Homo erectus stage at Zhoukoudian in China Although controversy continues over such early dates, it would not be surprising if such deposits were found in Japan because raised land-bridges formed several times following sea-level changes during the mid to late Pleistocene (figure 1.1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Multicultural Japan
Palaeolithic to Postmodern
, pp. 19 - 30
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×