Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech
- Part I Phonological structure in signed languages
- Part II Gesture and iconicity in sign and speech
- Part III Syntax in sign: Few or no effects of modality
- Part IV Using space and describing space: Pronouns, classifiers, and verb agreement
- 13 Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: Are grammatical categories modality-dependent?
- 14 Is verb agreement the same crossmodally?
- 15 The effects of modality on spatial language: How signers and speakers talk about space
- 16 The effects of modality on BSL development in an exceptional learner
- 17 Deictic points in the visual–gestural and tactile–gestural modalities
- Index
- References
13 - Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: Are grammatical categories modality-dependent?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech
- Part I Phonological structure in signed languages
- Part II Gesture and iconicity in sign and speech
- Part III Syntax in sign: Few or no effects of modality
- Part IV Using space and describing space: Pronouns, classifiers, and verb agreement
- 13 Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: Are grammatical categories modality-dependent?
- 14 Is verb agreement the same crossmodally?
- 15 The effects of modality on spatial language: How signers and speakers talk about space
- 16 The effects of modality on BSL development in an exceptional learner
- 17 Deictic points in the visual–gestural and tactile–gestural modalities
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Language in the visual–gestural modality presents a unique opportunity to explore fundamental structures of human language. One of the larger, more complex questions that arises when examining signed languages is the following: how, and to what degree, does the modality of a language affect the structure of that language? In this context, the term “modality” refers to the physical systems underlying the expression of a language; spoken languages are expressed in the aural-oral modality, while signed languages are expressed in the visual–gestural modality.
One apparent difference between signed languages and spoken languages relates to the linguistic expression of reference. Because they are expressed in the visual–gestural modality, signed languages are uniquely equipped to convey spatial–relational and referential relationships in a more overt manner than is possible in spoken languages. Given this apparent difference, it is not unreasonable to ask whether systems of pronominal reference in signed languages are structured according to the same principles as those governing pronominal reference in spoken languages.
Following this line of inquiry, this typological study explores the grammatical distinctions that are encoded in pronominal reference systems across spoken and signed languages. Using data from a variety of languages representing both modalities, two main questions are addressed. First, are the categories encoded within pronoun systems (e.g. person, number, gender, etc.) the same across languages in the two modalities? Second, within these categories, is the range of distinctions marked governed by similar principles?
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages , pp. 329 - 369Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
Ahlgren, Inger. 1990. Deictic pronouns in Swedish and Swedish Sign Language. In Theoretical issues in sign language research, Vol. I: Linguistics, ed. S. Fischer and P. Siple, 167–174. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
Anderson, Stephen R. and Edward L. Keenan. 1985. Deixis. In Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, ed. Timothy Shopen, 259–308. New York: Cambridge University Press
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, and Wendy Sandler. 2000. Universal and particular aspects of sign language morphology. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 10:1–33
Baker, Charlotte and Dennis Cokely. 1980. American Sign Language: A teacher's resource text on grammar and culture. Silver Spring, MD: T. J. Publishers
Bellugi, Ursula and Edward Klima. 1982. From gesture to sign: Deixis in a visual–gestural language. In Speech, place, and action, ed. Robert J. Jarvella and Wolfgang Klein, 279–313. Chichester: John Wiley
Benton, R. A. 1971. Pangasinan reference grammar. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press
Benveniste, Emile. 1971. Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press
Boas, Franz. 1947. Kwakiutl grammar. In Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, Volume 37 (3). New York: AMS Press
Chinchor, Nancy. 1979. Numeral incorporation in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
and . 1993. On the nature of phonological structure in sign language. Phonology 10:165–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy. 1998. How does modality contribute to linguistic diversity? Manuscript, University of Texas, Austin, Texas
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. Typological Studies in Language, 42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1986. The use of space with verbs in Danish Sign Language. In Signs of life: Proceedings of the 2nd European Congress of Sign Language Research. ed. Bernard Tervoort, 32–51. Amsterdam: Institute of General Linguistics of the University of Amsterdam
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum
Farnell, Brenda. 1995. Do you see what I mean? Plains Indian sign talk and the embodiment of action. Austin: University of Texas Press
Fauconnier. Giles. 1985. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
Fauconnier, Giles. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
. 1996. The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language. Lingua 98:103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Susan D. and Yutaka Osugi. 2000. Thumbs up vs. giving the finger: Indexical classifiers in NS and ASL. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Amsterdam, July
Forchheimer, Paul. 1953. The category of person in language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
. 1975. On the semantics of space, time, and person reference in the American Sign Language. Language 51:940–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 1994. Ga in Lak and the three “there”s: Deixis and markedness in Daghestan. NSL 7: Linguistic studies in the non Slavic languages of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Baltic Republics, ed. Howard I. Aronson. 79–93. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society
Ingram, David. 1978. Typology and universals of personal pronouns. In Universals of human language, Vol. 3: Word structure, ed. Joseph H. Greenberg, 213–247. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
. 1991. Spatial syntax and spatial semantics in the inflection of signs for the marking of person and location in Auslan. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 2:29–62Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor. 1998. Signs of Australia: A new dictionary of Auslan. North Rocks, NSW: North Rocks Press
Klima, Edward and Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Lane, Harlan. 1984. When the mind hears: A history of the Deaf. New York: Random House
Last, Marco. In preparation. Expressions of numerosity: A cognitive approach to crosslinguistic variation in grammatical number marking and numeral systems. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam
Laycock, Donald C. 1965. The Ndu language family. Canberra: Australian National University
Liddell, Scott. 1994. Tokens and surrogates. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the 5thInternational Symposium on Sign Language Research, Vol. I, ed. I. Ahlgren, B. Bergman, and M. Brennan, 105–119. Durham, England: The International Sign Linguistics Association
Liddell, Scott. 1995. Real, surrogate, and token space: Grammatical consequences in ASL. In Sign, gesture, and space, ed. Karen Emmorey and Judy Reilly, 19–41. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
. 1996. Numeral incorporating roots and nonincorporating prefixes in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 92:201–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott. 2000a. Indicating verbs and pronouns: Pointing away from agreement. In The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima. ed. Harlan Lane and Karen Emmorey, 303–320. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Liddell, Scott. 2000b. Blended spaces and deixis in sign language discourse. In Language and gesture: Window into thought and action, ed. David McNeill, 331–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
and . 1989. American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 64:195–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1986. Parameter setting: Evidence from use, acquisition, and breakdown in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego, CA
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1995. The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Language, gesture, and space, ed. Karen Emmorey and Judy Reilly, 155–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Lillo-Martin, Diane and Edward S. Klima. 1990. Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. I: Linguistics, ed. S. Fischer and P. Siple, 191–210. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
Meier, Richard P. 1990. Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. I: Linguistics. ed. S. Fischer and P. Siple, 175–190. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63:81–97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mühlhäusler, Peter and Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Nagaraja, K. S. 1985. Khasi: A descriptive analysis. Pune, India: Deccan College
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan, and Robert G. Lee. 2000. The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
Padden, Carol. 1988. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland
Pederson, Eric and Jan Nuyts. 1997. On the relationship between language and conceptualization. In Language and conceptualization, ed. Jan Nuyts and Eric Pederson, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
and . 1990. Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13:707–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzuto, Elena. 1986. The verb system of Italian Sign Language (LIS). In Signs of life: Proceedings of the Second European Congress of Sign Language Research, ed. Bernard Tervoort, 17–31. Amsterdam: Institute of General Linguistics of the University of Amsterdam
Pizzuto, Elena, Enza Giurana, and Giuseppe Gambino. 1990. Manual and nonmanual morphology in Italian Sign Language: Grammatical constraints and discourse processes. In Sign language research: Theoretical issues, ed. Ceil Lucas, 83–102. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press
Rabel, L. 1961. Khasi: A language of Assam. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press
Ray, Sidney Herbert. 1926. A comparative study of the Melanesian Island languages. London: Cambridge University Press
Reed, Judy and David L. Payne. 1986. Asheninca (Campa) pronominals. In Pronominal systems, ed. Ursula Wiesmann, 323–331. Tübingen: Narr
Siple, Patricia. 1982. Signed language and linguistic theory. In Exceptional language and linguistics, ed. Loraine K. Obler and Lise Menn, 313–338. New York: Academic Press
Smith, Wayne. 1990. Evidence for auxiliaries in Taiwan Sign Language. In Theoretical issues in sign language research, Vol. I: Linguistics, ed. Susan Fischer and Patricia Siple, 211–228. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
Supalla, Samuel J. 1991. Manually Coded English: The modality question in sign language development. In Theoretical issues in sign language research, Vol. II: Psychology, ed. Patricia Siple and Susan Fischer, 85–110. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Supalla, Ted. 1982. Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego, CA
Supalla, Ted. 1986. The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Noun classes and categorization, ed. Colette Craig, 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Supalla, Ted and Yutaka Osugi. Unpublished. Gender handshapes in JSL (Japanese Sign Language). Course lecture notes, University of Rochester
., , and . 1978. Sign language in India: Regional variation within the deaf population. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics 4:66–74Google Scholar
Weber, David J. 1986. Huallaga Quechua pronouns. In Pronominal systems, ed. Ursula Wiesmann, 333–349. Tübingen: Narr
Winston, Elizabeth A. 1995. Spatial mapping in comparative discourse frames. In Language, gesture, and space, ed. Karen Emmorey and Judy Reilly, 87–114. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Woodward, James C. 1978a. Historical basis of American Sign Language. In Understanding language through sign language research, ed. P. Siple, 333–348. New York: Academic Press
. 1978b. All in the family: Kinship lexicalization across sign languages. Sign Language Studies 19:121–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike. 1998. Functions of the index in IPSL. Manuscript, University of Cologne, Germany
Zeshan, Ulrike. 1999. Indo-Pakistani Sign Language. Manuscript, Canberra, Australian National University, Research Centre for Linguistic Typology
- 72
- Cited by