Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: The Myths of Masculinity in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde
- 1 “Beautiful as Troilus”: Richard II, Chaucer's Troilus, and Figures of (Un)Masculinity
- 2 The State of Exception and Sovereign Masculinity in Troilus and Criseyde
- 3 Revisiting Troilus's Faint
- 4 What Makes a Man? Troilus, Hector, and the Masculinities of Courtly love
- 5 Masculinity and Its Hydraulic Semiotics in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde
- 6 Masochism, Masculinity, and the Pleasures of Troilus
- 7 “The Dreams in Which I'm Dying”: Sublimation and Unstable Masculinities in Troilus and Criseyde
- 8 “A Mannes Game”: Criseyde's Masculinity in Troilus and Criseyde
- 9 Troilus's Gaze and the Collapse of Masculinity in Romance
- 10 Sutured Looks and Homoeroticism: Reading Troilus and Pandarus Cinematically
- 11 Being a Man in Piers Plowman and Troilus and Criseyde
- 12 “The Monstruosity in Love”: Sexual Division in Chaucer and Shakespeare
- Index
- CHAUCER STUDIES
12 - “The Monstruosity in Love”: Sexual Division in Chaucer and Shakespeare
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 September 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: The Myths of Masculinity in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde
- 1 “Beautiful as Troilus”: Richard II, Chaucer's Troilus, and Figures of (Un)Masculinity
- 2 The State of Exception and Sovereign Masculinity in Troilus and Criseyde
- 3 Revisiting Troilus's Faint
- 4 What Makes a Man? Troilus, Hector, and the Masculinities of Courtly love
- 5 Masculinity and Its Hydraulic Semiotics in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde
- 6 Masochism, Masculinity, and the Pleasures of Troilus
- 7 “The Dreams in Which I'm Dying”: Sublimation and Unstable Masculinities in Troilus and Criseyde
- 8 “A Mannes Game”: Criseyde's Masculinity in Troilus and Criseyde
- 9 Troilus's Gaze and the Collapse of Masculinity in Romance
- 10 Sutured Looks and Homoeroticism: Reading Troilus and Pandarus Cinematically
- 11 Being a Man in Piers Plowman and Troilus and Criseyde
- 12 “The Monstruosity in Love”: Sexual Division in Chaucer and Shakespeare
- Index
- CHAUCER STUDIES
Summary
This will not have been an historicizing essay.
But it will be historical. It is mired in history. It is min(e)d in history. It recognizes that unity is a delusion – this is why there is history, history is always two or more. Where there is history, there is no unity.
Separation is the psychogenetic crisis most particular to human males. In over a century of heroic thinking (often opposed by unspeakable, inexcusable petty-mindedness), psychoanalysis (and the artists who have followed it) have demonstrated in many ways that the male's separation from the mother, from the different body that is hers and yet that is also the source of his nature and nurture, leaves indelible artifacts of angst and hostility in his unconscious mind. The Oedipus is but one such artifact. Its resolution is only one step. In my dreams since my boyhood, I have met many monsters more horrible than the Sphinx. Even if I lived in a body without organs, if my libido were not subject to organization, I imagine I would meet monsters ineffable but insistent still that I let them speak.
And I acknowledge, unapologetically, that I believe Chaucer and Shakespeare encountered their own monsters of sexual division as well.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Men and Masculinities in Chaucer's 'Troilus and Criseyde' , pp. 183 - 194Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2008