Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:22:17.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Adorno, authenticity, critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Crystal Bartolovich
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, New York
Neil Lazarus
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Get access

Summary

For the mind (Geist) is indeed not capable of producing or grasping the totality of the real, but it may be possible to penetrate the detail, to explode in miniature the mass of merely existing reality.

(Theodor Adorno, “The Actuality of Philosophy”)

Among the many quandaries facing postcolonial studies today is the question of how to reckon with the problem of saying something substantial about colonial and imperial history, experience, and effects, while remaining true to the linguistic turn and its decapitation of the body of foundationalist ideas about reality, truth, and indeed history itself. Poststructuralist theory is supposed to have performed the kind of correction on cultural and historical analysis that disallows claims about the real on the grounds that operations of language thoroughly muddy the waters of all determination and experience. Not that linguistic mindfulness has prevented anybody from making elaborate pronouncements about the postcolonial “predicament” – by referring such a predicament to the terms of culture, identity, nationhood, discourse, subjectivity, and so on. But, qualified as readings, they enable the rhetorical flourish we have come to expect from the discourse of postcolonialism at the same time as they keep the vexations of truth at bay. What results from much hand-wringing about postcoloniality – and the ambiguities, aporia, and ambivalences therein – closely resembles the genres of criticism taken to task nearly two decades ago by Edward Said in The World, the Text, and the Critic:

Orphaned by the radical Freudian, Saussurean, and Nietzschean critique of origins, traditions, and knowledge itself, contemporary criticism has achieved its methodological independence by forfeiting an active situation in the world.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×